Communicating Adverse Drug Reaction Insights Through Patient Organizations: Experiences from a Pilot Study in the Netherlands

Promoting Collaboration of Regulators and Patients in Improving Drug Safety and Regulatory Decision Making

Pharmacovigilance involves a continuous process of evaluating, monitoring and communicating the safety profile of a medicine throughout its life cycle. This process involves a range of stakeholders, including national regulatory authorities, industry, health organisations, healthcare providers and patients. Although patients are the end users of medicines and experts in their medical conditions, patient involvement is still nascent in the Asia-Pacific region. While there are positive examples and encouraging trends, several key challenges currently hinder systemic patient involvement in drug safety and regulatory decision making. Systemic issues such as a lack of formalised frameworks or platforms, underdeveloped communication and information exchange channels, and paternalistic health systems constrain greater patient involvement and collaborative regulator-patient activities. Addressing these challenges will greatly advance collaboration among regulators, patients, and patient advocates to enhance drug safety and regulatory decision making.

Pharmacovigilance regulatory actions by national pharmacovigilance centers in Arab countries following COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) activities were affected by COVID-19. Therefore, several health authorities around the world have issued guidelines and practices to ensure that PV activities are maintained and continued during the pandemic. This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the preparedness and performance of national PV systems in 14 Arab countries.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that was conducted between July and October 2020. National PV centers in 18 Arab countries were invited to participate in this study. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize and present the results of this study.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 14 (77.8%) countries. Adverse events reporting was the main PV activity that was covered by PV guidelines and practices. National guidelines and practices covered other PV activities in 8 (57.14%) of the participating countries. Performance and practices of national PV centers vary considerably among participating countries during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the differences in preparedness and performance of different national PV centers in participating Arab countries. Improving digital infrastructure among participating countries could serve as a useful tool to minimize the impact of the pandemic on PV activities.

Factors Contributing to Best Practices for Patient Involvement in Pharmacovigilance in Europe: A Stakeholder Analysis

Introduction

Involving patients in decision making adds value in the context of pharmacovigilance (PV). This added value goes beyond participation in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. However, there is a gap between allowing patients to report and actual patient involvement. Views regarding best practices from regulators, patient organizations and pharmaceutical companies could help increase and improve patient involvement in PV.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors contributing to best practices for patient involvement in PV and to develop a definition of patient involvement based on a qualitative multistakeholder study across Europe.

Methods

A literature review was conducted to map the field of study and obtain insights for the elaboration of an interview guide. Subsequently, patient representatives, members of the pharmaceutical industry and regulators were invited to participate in interviews. These interviews were analyzed using NVIVO^® software and employing reflective thematic analysis.

Results

A total of 20 interviews were conducted with representatives at both the national and European levels. The best practices identified were engagement from the start, face-to-face communication, a full circle of feedback, same-level partners, structured involvement and guidelines, establishing common goals, patient education and empowerment, and developing trust and balance. These activities can be implemented via deep collaboration among stakeholders. A definition of patient involvement was constructed in accordance with the input of all stakeholder groups, which reflects the involvement of all types of patients at all levels of the decision-making process.

Conclusion

In this study, we developed a definition for patient involvement based on qualitative interviews. The factors contributing to best practices for patient involvement were mentioned across stakeholder groups and aimed to stimulate patient involvement in PV. Patients are eager to become equal partners and to engage effortlessly in the same manner as other stakeholders.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-022-01222-y.