Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: A Review in Complicated Intra-Abdominal and Urinary Tract Infections

Multi-resistant organisms in burn patients: an end or a new beginning

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients, and the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has made it more challenging to manage and prevent infections. This review examines the available treatment options for MDROs in burn patients and anticipates the future challenges posed by their increasing prevalence. The review covers new antibiotics, such as Eravacycline and Plazomicin, as well as non-antibiotic therapies, such as bacteriophages and nanoparticles. Future research should focus on examining the long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and in vivo efficacy of different treatment modalities. The potential of alternative therapies, such as probiotics and low-frequency magnetic fields, should also be explored. Accurate and rapid diagnostic and monitoring tools for detecting MDROs in burn patients should be developed. The emergence of MDROs in burn care is a challenge and a new beginning in infection innovation and novel treatments.

In-vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) between 2016 and 2019 in China

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (an antipseudomonal cephalosporin) in combination with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor has not been approved to date in clinical practice in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns. P. aeruginosa (n=2178) specimens were collected from multiple sources in seven geographic regions of China between 2016 and 2019. All isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and minimum inhibitory concentrations of various antimicrobial agents (ceftolozane/tazobactam, amikacin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, cefepime, colistin, levofloxacin, aztreonam, meropenem, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) were determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's broth microdilution method. P. aeruginosa demonstrated considerably high rates of multi-drug resistance (MDR, 57.3%), extensive drug resistance (XDR, 43.5%) and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR, 16.8%). The overall susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ceftolozane/tazobactam was 81.9%, and ceftolozane/tazobactam showed diverse activity against the three resistant subsets, ranging from 28.5% against DTR P. aeruginosa to 68.9% against MDR P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa derived from the East (Jiangzhe area) region maintained significantly lower susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa from other regions. The susceptibility rates of P. aeruginosa isolated from diverse sources to ceftolozane/tazobactam were similar to isolates from bloodstream infections, with the highest being 88.6%. Compared with other antimicrobial agents, ceftolozane/tazobactam was more active than the β-lactams tested but was slightly less active than amikacin. Amikacin demonstrated the best activity against P. aeruginosa and the three resistant subsets. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated considerable in-vitro activity against P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa, indicating that it could be an optional therapeutic agent against P. aeruginosa.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Treatment of Hypervirulent Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Neutropenic Patients

The effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients caused by hypervirulent multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been previously reported. We identified seven cases of MDR P. aeruginosa infection in neutropenic patients over a four-month period within the same hematology ward. Four cases were associated with rapid progression despite piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem therapy, and three patients developed sepsis or extensive skin/soft tissue necrosis. In three of the four cases, patients were empirically switched from meropenem to ceftolozane/avibactam before carbapenem susceptibility test results were available, and all four patients underwent extensive surgical debridement or amputation of affected tissues and survived. Further investigation revealed a common bathroom source of MDR P. aeruginosa clonal subtypes ST175 and ST235 that harbored genes for type III secretion system expression and elaboration of ExoU or ExoS exotoxin. We conclude that ceftolozane/tazobactam plus early source control was critical for control of rapidly progressing skin and soft infection in these neutropenic patients caused by highly virulent ST175 and ST235 clones of MDR P. aeruginosa.

In-hospital management of acute complicated urinary tract infections

Upper tract urinary tract infections that require hospitalization have been the focus of national recommendations in 2018 by the French society of infectious diseases (Spilf). We here propose to discuss several complex-challenging situations: severe infection with sepsis, pyelonephritis in the pregnant woman, management of infections involving multiresistant bacteria and infection in polycystic kidney disease.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: current perspectives and place in therapy

The current prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms is a global threat, and thus, the development of new antimicrobial agents with activity against these pathogens is a healthcare priority. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a new combination of a cephalosporin with a β-lactamase inhibitor that shows excellent in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL) strains and MDR or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa. In phase III randomized clinical trials, C/T demonstrated similar efficacy to meropenem for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and superior efficacy to levofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. The drug is generally safe and well tolerated and its PK/PD profile is very favorable. Observational studies with C/T have revealed good efficacy for the treatment of different types of infection caused by MDR or XDR P. aeruginosa, including some that originated from the digestive or urinary tracts. The place of C/T in therapy is not well defined, but its use could be recommended in a carbapenem-sparing approach for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing strains or for the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa if there are no other more favorable therapeutic options. Further clinical experience is needed to position this new antimicrobial drug for the empirical treatment of cIAIs or cUTIs.

Use of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in a Case of Septic Shock by Puerperal Sepsis

Multiresistant bacteria infections cause widespread morbidity and mortality and lead to an increase in expenses for hospital stays and complications. We describe the case of a 27-year-old patient with puerperal sepsis after cesarean section due to Escherichia coli complicated by multiresistant Klebsiella ESBL-producing superinfection with septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, successfully treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus antimicrobial non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates including MDR and XDR isolates obtained from across Canada as part of the CANWARD study, 2008-16

Objectives

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of activity that includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and relevant comparators versus a large collection of antimicrobial non-susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical isolates recovered from patients across Canada (CANWARD, 2008-16).

Methods

Susceptibility testing was performed on P. aeruginosa clinical isolates obtained from sentinel hospitals across Canada between January 2008 and December 2016 using broth microdilution, as described by the CLSI. MDR P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial from ≥3 classes. XDR P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial from ≥5 classes.

Results

In total, 3229 P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained as a part of CANWARD. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active antimicrobial evaluated, with 98.3% of isolates testing susceptible. The percentage of antimicrobial non-susceptible isolates that remained susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam ranged from 85.3% (amikacin non-susceptible subset) to 95.0% (ciprofloxacin non-susceptible subset). Four-hundred and sixty-two P. aeruginosa isolates were MDR (14.3% of all isolates tested) and 84 were XDR (2.6% of all isolates tested). Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated excellent in vitro activity versus the MDR and XDR isolates, with 90.5% and 78.6% remaining susceptible, respectively.

Conclusions

Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against antimicrobial non-susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including MDR and XDR subsets. It may prove useful in the treatment of infections caused by these organisms.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: report of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy/Healthcare Infection Society/British Infection Association Joint Working Party

The Working Party makes more than 100 tabulated recommendations in antimicrobial prescribing for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and suggest further research, and algorithms for hospital and community antimicrobial usage in urinary infection. The international definition of MDR is complex, unsatisfactory and hinders the setting and monitoring of improvement programmes. We give a new definition of multiresistance. The background information on the mechanisms, global spread and UK prevalence of antibiotic prescribing and resistance has been systematically reviewed. The treatment options available in hospitals using intravenous antibiotics and in primary care using oral agents have been reviewed, ending with a consideration of antibiotic stewardship and recommendations. The guidance has been derived from current peer-reviewed publications and expert opinion with open consultation. Methods for systematic review were NICE compliant and in accordance with the SIGN 50 Handbook; critical appraisal was applied using AGREE II. Published guidelines were used as part of the evidence base and to support expert consensus. The guidance includes recommendations for stakeholders (including prescribers) and antibiotic-specific recommendations. The clinical efficacy of different agents is critically reviewed. We found there are very few good-quality comparative randomized clinical trials to support treatment regimens, particularly for licensed older agents. Susceptibility testing of MDR GNB causing infection to guide treatment needs critical enhancements. Meropenem- or imipenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae should have their carbapenem MICs tested urgently, and any carbapenemase class should be identified: mandatory reporting of these isolates from all anatomical sites and specimens would improve risk assessments. Broth microdilution methods should be adopted for colistin susceptibility testing. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes should be instituted in all care settings, based on resistance rates and audit of compliance with guidelines, but should be augmented by improved surveillance of outcome in Gram-negative bacteraemia, and feedback to prescribers. Local and national surveillance of antibiotic use, resistance and outcomes should be supported and antibiotic prescribing guidelines should be informed by these data. The diagnosis and treatment of both presumptive and confirmed cases of infection by GNB should be improved. This guidance, with infection control to arrest increases in MDR, should be used to improve the outcome of infections with such strains. Anticipated users include medical, scientific, nursing, antimicrobial pharmacy and paramedical staff where they can be adapted for local use.

New antimicrobial options for the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Optimal management of cIAI requires early source control in combination with adequate antimicrobial treatment and aggressive fluid resuscitation. cIAIs are mainly caused by Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes. Broad-spectrum single-agent or combination drug regimens against these microorganisms are the mainstay of therapy. However, development of antimicrobial resistance has become an increasingly large concern: multidrug-resistant organisms are associated with a higher rate of inadequate antimicrobial therapy, which in turn is associated with higher mortality rate, longer hospital stay, and increased cost compared to adequate antimicrobial therapy. In this mini-review, we discuss the effectiveness of several new antimicrobial agents, recently approved or in advanced phases of clinical development, for the treatment of cIAIs, including the new beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, aztreonam/avibactam), siderophore cephalosporins (cefiderocol), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), and tetracyclines (eravacycline).

β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: an update

Antibiotic resistance caused by β-lactamase production continues to present a growing challenge to the efficacy of β-lactams and their role as the most important class of clinically used antibiotics. In response to this threat however, only a handful of β-lactamase inhibitors have been introduced to the market over the past thirty years. The first-generation β-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanic acid, sulbactam and tazobactam) are all β-lactam derivatives and work primarily by inactivating class A and some class C serine β-lactamases. The newer generations of β-lactamase inhibitors including avibactam and vaborbactam are based on non-β-lactam structures and their spectrum of inhibition is extended to KPC as an important class A carbapenemase. Despite these advances several class D and virtually all important class B β-lactamases are resistant to existing inhibitors. The present review provides an overview of recent FDA-approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as an update on research efforts aimed at the discovery and development of novel β-lactamase inhibitors.

Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLs) infections: what have we learned until now?

The spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) has dramatically increased worldwide, and this “evolving crisis” is currently regarded as one of the most important public health threats. The growing problem of ESBL-PE antimicrobial resistance seems to have a dual face between “Scylla and Charybdis”: on one hand the potential for rapid spread and dissemination of resistance mechanisms and on the other hand the injudicious overuse of antimicrobial agents and the inadequate infection control measures, especially in the health-care setting. Given the World Health Organization’s warning against a “post antibiotic era”, health-care providers are at a critical standpoint to find a “balance” between safe and effective ESBL-PE treatment and avoidance of inducing further resistance mechanisms. The aim of the review is to summarize the updated published knowledge in an attempt to answer basic everyday clinical questions on how to proceed to effective and the best ESBL-PE treatment options based on the existing published data.

Where Did They Come from-Multi-Drug Resistant Pathogenic Escherichia coli in a Cemetery Environment?

Human burial in cemeteries facilitates the decomposition of corpses without posing a public health danger. However, the role of cemeteries as potential environmental reservoirs of drug-resistant pathogens has not been studied. Thus, we investigated cemeteries as potential environmental reservoirs of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogenic Escherichia coli. E. coli isolates were obtained from water samples (collected from surface water bodies and boreholes in three cemeteries) after isolation using the Colilert^® 18 system. Pathogenic potentials of the isolates were investigated using real-time polymerase chain reactions targeting seven virulence genes (VGs) pertaining to six E. coli pathotypes. The resistance of isolates to eight antibiotics was tested using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. The mean E. coli concentrations varied from <1 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL to 2419.6 MPN/100 mL with 48% of 100 isolates being positive for at least one of the VGs tested. Furthermore, 87% of the isolates were resistant to at least one of the antibiotics tested, while 72% of the isolates displayed multi-drug resistance. Half of the MDR isolates harboured a VG. These results suggest that cemeteries are potential reservoirs of MDR pathogenic E. coli, originating from surrounding informal settlements, which could contaminate groundwater if the cemeteries are in areas with shallow aquifers.

Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Escherichia coli isolates from U.S. veterans (2011) in relation to co-resistance and sequence type 131 (ST131) H30 and H30Rx status

Background

Escherichia coli sequence type 131 (ST131), with its multidrug-resistance-associated H30R1 and H30Rx clonal subsets, causes most antimicrobial-resistant E. coli infections in the U.S., especially among veterans. The activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), a new beta-lactamase inhibitor agent, against ST131 strains, and E. coli isolates from veterans, is undefined.

Methods

We determined broth microdilution MICs for C/T and five comparators–piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) levofloxacin (LVX), gentamicin (GEN), ceftazidime (CAZ), and meropenem (MEM)–for 595 clinical E. coli isolates, collected in 2011 from 24 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers across the U.S. Categorical resistance and MICs were compared statistically with resistance category (fluoroquinolone-susceptible, fluoroquinolone-resistant, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL]-producing) and with PCR-defined ST131, H30R1, and H30Rx status.

Results

Resistance prevalence was ≤ 6% for C/T (6%) and MEM (0%), vs. from 8.0% (TZP) to 59% (LVX) for the other comparators. MICs generally increased by resistance category, from fluoroquinolone-susceptible through fluoroquinolone-resistant to ESBL, and by clonal subgroup, from non-ST131-H30 through H30R1 to H30Rx. For each comparator agent except MEM, although a significantly greater fraction of resistant than susceptible isolates were C/T-resistant, only a minority of comparator-resistant isolates were C/T-resistant (i.e., 9% if LEV-resistant, 12% if GEN-resistant, 21% if CAZ-resistant, 38% if TZP-resistant).

Conclusions

C/T was broadly active against E. coli clinical isolates from veterans, notwithstanding significant variation by resistance category and ST131-H30R1/H30Rx status, outperforming all non-carbapenem comparators. C/T should prove useful as a carbapenem-sparing therapy for multidrug-resistant E. coli ST131 infections, including in veterans.

Management of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: current evidence and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

The spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae has become a major public health threat worldwide. Area covered: A thorough systematic literature review describing the current evidence and future prospects of therapeutic options for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Expert commentary: The methods of detecting ESBLs have been evolving. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing lowered the MIC breakpoints of cephalosporins against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in 2010. Phenotypic testing for ESBLs is no longer recommended. Instead, the selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents largely depends on the report of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). To date, therapeutic options for these multidrug-resistant organisms remain limited. The clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime on in vitro-susceptible ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae remains a concern. Many studies found an in vitro-in vivo discordance based on current breakpoints. Carbapenems are the most reliable antibiotics for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. However, their overuse has led to a serious problem of increasing drug resistance. Recently, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam have been approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The introduction of these new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations offers new carbapenem-sparing options for the treatment of ESBL infections.

Are there any reasons to change our behavior in necrotizing fasciitis with the advent of new antibiotics?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of necrotizing fasciitis requires a multifaceted approach, consisting of surgical source control with immediate surgical debridement along with life support, clinical monitoring, and antimicrobial therapy. Many drugs are now available for the treatment of this life-threatening infectious disease, and the purpose of this review is to provide the reader with an updated overview of the newest therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because most necrotizing soft tissue infections are polymicrobial, broad-spectrum coverage is advisable. Acceptable monotherapy regimens include piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem. However, drugs such as ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam in association with an antianaerobic agent (metronidazole or clindamycin) are currently available as valuable alternatives. The new cephalosporins active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ceftaroline, and ceftobiprole share similar antibacterial activity against Gram-positive cocci, and they might be considered as an alternative to nonbetalactam anti-MRSA agents for necrotizing fasciitis management. Two new long-acting lypoglycopeptides - oritavancin and dalbavancin - share the indications for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and had similar activity against Gram-positive cocci including MRSA and streptococci.

SUMMARY

Carbapenem-sparing agents are particularly suitable for antimicrobial stewardship strategy. The new long-acting lypoglycopeptides are very effective in treating necrotizing fasciitis and are uttermost attractive for patients requiring short hospital stays and early discharge.

An update on β-lactamase inhibitor discovery and development

Antibiotic resistance, and the emergence of pan-resistant clinical isolates, seriously threatens our capability to treat bacterial diseases, including potentially deadly hospital-acquired infections. This growing issue certainly requires multiple adequate responses, including the improvement of both diagnosis methods and use of antibacterial agents, and obviously the development of novel antibacterial drugs, especially active against Gram-negative pathogens, which represent an urgent medical need. Considering the clinical relevance of both β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase-mediated resistance, the discovery and development of combinations including a β-lactamase inhibitor seems to be particularly attractive, despite being extremely challenging due to the enormous diversity, both structurally and mechanistically, of the potential β-lactamase targets. This review will cover the evolution of currently available β-lactamase inhibitors along with the most recent research leading to new β-lactamase inhibitors of potential clinical interest or already in the stage of clinical development.

Management of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are especially at risk of developing infections by multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), as they are frequently exposed to antibiotics and the healthcare setting, and are regulary subject to invasive procedures. Nevertheless, no recommendations concerning prevention and treatment are available. A panel of experts revised the available evidence; this document summarizes their recommendations: (1) it is important to characterize the isolate's phenotypic and genotypic resistance profile; (2) overall, donor colonization should not constitute a contraindication to transplantation, although active infected kidney and lung grafts should be avoided; (3) recipient colonization is associated with an increased risk of infection, but is not a contraindication to transplantation; (4) different surgical prophylaxis regimens are not recommended for patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant GNB; (5) timely detection of carriers, contact isolation precautions, hand hygiene compliance and antibiotic control policies are important preventive measures; (6) there is not sufficient data to recommend intestinal decolonization; (7) colonized lung transplant recipients could benefit from prophylactic inhaled antibiotics, specially for Pseudomonas aeruginosa; (8) colonized SOT recipients should receive an empirical treatment which includes active antibiotics, and directed therapy should be adjusted according to susceptibility study results and the severity of the infection.

Analysis of the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin use for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria in hospital settings

OBJECTIVE

The aims of our study were to assess the prevalence and distribution of Gram-negative (G-) bacteria in hospital isolates, their sensitivity to the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (c3 and c4), therapeutic use of c3 and c4 in the treatment of G- infections and drug utilisation data.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study collected medical records data from the General Hospital "Gornji Milanovac" (GM) and the University Medical Center "Bezanijska kosa" (BK). The time frame of the study was 12 months. Microbiological and clinical parameters, and c3/c4 drug utilisation were analysed.

RESULTS

Escherichia coli were the most predominant pathogen in GM and BK, accounting for 43% and 28% of all G- isolates, respectively (GM), 884 G- isolates obtained from 606 patients; BK, 1766 isolates obtained from 1045 patients). Nearly half of the isolates (55% and 43%) were obtained from urine samples collected from the surgical ward (GM), and the internal medicine wards and intensive care unit (BK). On average, the resistance rate of G- strains against c3 and c4 reached 40% and 70%, respectively (lowest in E. coli, 8%-25%; highest in Acinetobacer baumannii, 67%-100%). Resistance rate of Pseudomonas spp. to cefepime and ceftazidime was low/moderate (0%-30% and 19%-47%). In BK, the adult patients were older than in GM (75 vs 66 years), with longer hospital stay (19 vs 10 days) and bacteria were isolated later during hospitalisation (10 vs 2 days). C3 and c4 were more often used in empirical therapy (83% vs 64%) in BK. Ceftazidime and cefepime were used more often in BK than in GM (2.036 vs 69 DDD/y and 586 vs. 126 DDD/y, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of c3 and c4 in the treatment of G- infections in both hospitals should be re-evaluated in accordance with current guidelines and local resistance.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of ceftolozane + tazobactam in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common nosocomially acquired infections, responsible for approximately 21% of healthcare-associated pyelonephritis and 10.5% of urosepsis. Worldwide trends of increasing resistance resulted in the urgent need for novel antimicrobials that would be active against bacterial resistance mechanisms as an alternative to carbapenems, which are considered last resort antibiotics.

AREAS COVERED

The current review is based on a Medline search of published English language literature and contains summary information regarding the evaluation of pharmacologic properties, efficacy, safety and activity of ceftolozane+tazobactam against common bacterial resistance mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

In vivo and vitro studies demonstrated high activity of ceftolozane+tazobactam in the combination of 2:1 against a variety of uropathogens, including ESBL-producers. Phase II and Phase III studies performed in patients with complicated UTIs showed good tolerability and safety of ceftolozane+tazobactam when prescribed intravenously 1.5 g every 8 h for 7 days and at least non-inferiority to a high dose (750 mg) of levofloxacin. The pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane+tazobactam makes it a worthy alternative to carbapenems in cases of complicated UTIs, also caused by multidrug resistant uropathogens.