Costimulation Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Treatment of a MyD88 inhibitor alleviates rejection and inflammation in xenotransplantation by inhibiting dendritic cells activation and trained immunity in macrophages

BACKGROUND

Acute vascular rejection (AVR) and systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients (SIXR) negatively impact the xenografts survival, and novel immunosuppressants are required to improve survival outcomes. We previously reported that TJ-M2010-5, a myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) inhibitor, exerts excellent anti-rejection effects in allogeneic transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of TJ-M2010-5 in preventing AVR and SIXR and to investigate whether combined treatment of TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody (MR1) could prolong xenograft survival furthermore.

METHODS

A model involving heart transplantation from Sprague-Dawley rats to BALB/c mice was established in vivo, and the xenografts developed typical AVR. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and macrophages were cultured to study the underlying mechanisms induced by rat cardiomyocyte lysate stimulation in vitro.

RESULTS

TJ-M2010-5 monotherapy prolonged xenograft survival, although combination treatment with MR1 further enhanced the anti-AVR and anti-SIXR effects with about 21 days graft survival, compared to monotherapy. TJ-M2010-5 reduced dendritic cell and macrophage activation induced by xenotransplantation, downregulated CD80/CD86 expression, suppressed B-cell activation and anti-donor antibody generation, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and tissue factor expression, and attenuated epigenetic modifications underlying interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α production in macrophages by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B nuclear translocation.

CONCLUSIONS

TJ-M2010-5 attenuated AVR and SIXR and contributed to xenograft survival by inhibiting dendritic cell and macrophage activation. A dual-system inhibition strategy combining TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody achieved better results in xenotransplantation.

Initial exploration of a novel fusion protein, IL-4/IL-34/IL-10, which promotes cardiac allograft survival mice through alloregulation

Immune mediated graft loss still represents a major risk to transplant recipients. Creative approaches to immunosuppression that exploit the recipient's own alloregulatory mechanisms could reduce the need for pharmacologic immunosuppression and potentially induce immune tolerance. In the process of studying recipient derived myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), we identified key alloregulatory MDSC mechanisms, mediated by isolatable proteins IL-4, IL-34, and IL-10. We sought to purify these proteins and fuse them for subsequent infusion into transplant recipients as a means of inducing an alloregulatory response. In this introductory investigation, we leveraged molecular engineering technology to create a fusion protein (FP) of three cytokine coding sequences of IL-4, IL-34, and IL-10 and demonstrated their expressions by Western Blot analysis. Following purification, we tested whether FP IL-4/IL-34/IL-10 (FP1) can protect heart transplant allografts. Injection of FP1 significantly prolonged allogeneic cardiac graft survival in a dose-dependent fashion and the increase of graft survival time exceeded survival attributable to IL-34 alone. In vitro, MDSCs cells were expanded by FP1 treatment. However, FP1 did not directly inhibit T cell proliferation in vitro. In conclusion, newly developed FP1 improves the graft survival in cardiac transplantation mouse model. Significant additional work to optimize FP1 or include other novel proteins could supplement current treatment options for transplant patients.

Increased CMV disease and "severe" BK viremia with belatacept vs. sirolimus three-drug maintenance immunosuppression

OBJECTIVES

Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B0) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B1). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months.

RESULTS

Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B0:0.36 vs. B1:0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B0:6.1% vs. B1:26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B0:1.2% vs. B1:5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B0:0.41% vs. B1:4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:9.4% vs. B1:13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:29.7% vs. B1:31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B0:2.4% vs. B1:1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B0:13.0% vs. B1:21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B0:1.24 mg/dL vs. B1:1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B0:1.2% vs. B1:2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B0:1.2% vs. B1:0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up.

Monomethyl fumarate prevents alloimmune rejection in mouse heart transplantation by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are important targets for eliciting allograft rejection after transplantation. Previous studies have demonstrated that metabolic reprogramming of DCs can transform their immune functions and induce their differentiation into tolerogenic DCs. In this study, we aim to investigate the protective effects and mechanisms of monomethyl fumarate (MMF), a bioactive metabolite of fumaric acid esters, in a mouse model of allogeneic heart transplantation. Bone marrow-derived DCs are harvested and treated with MMF to determine the impact of MMF on the phenotype and immunosuppressive function of DCs by flow cytometry and T-cell proliferation assays. RNA sequencing and Seahorse analyses are performed for mature DCs and MMF-treated DCs (MMF-DCs) to investigate the underlying mechanism. Our results show that MMF prolongs the survival time of heart grafts and inhibits the activation of DCs in vivo. MMF-DCs exhibit a tolerogenic phenotype and function in vitro. RNA sequencing and Seahorse analyses reveal that MMF activates the Nrf2 pathway and mediates metabolic reprogramming. Additionally, MMF-DC infusion prolongs cardiac allograft survival, induces regulatory T cells, and inhibits T-cell activation. MMF prevents allograft rejection in mouse heart transplantation by inducing tolerogenic DCs.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

The use of non-transplant biologics in solid organ transplant recipients: A practical review for the frontline clinician

Biologics have become the forefront of medicine for management of autoimmune conditions, leading to improved quality of life. Many autoimmune conditions occur in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and persist following transplant. However, the use of biologics in this patient population is not well studied, and questions arise related to risk of infection and adjustments to induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Guidelines have been published highlighting management strategies of biologics around the time of elective surgical procedures, but this is not always feasible in urgent situations, especially with deceased donor transplantation. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature regarding the use of these agents in solid organ transplant recipients, and specifically address induction and maintenance immunosuppression, as well as the need for alternative infective prevention strategies to create a practical reference for the frontline clinician, when faced with this complex clinical scenario.

Updated Pathways in Cardiorenal Continuum after Kidney Transplantation

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains one of the leading causes for increased morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment option for CKD G5. Improved perioperative and postoperative care, personalized immunosuppressive regimes, and refined matching procedures of kidney transplants improves cardiovascular health in the early posttransplant period. However, the long-term burden of CVD is considerable. Previously underrecognized, the role of the complement system alongside innate immunity, inflammaging, structural changes in the glomerular filtration barrier and early vascular ageing also seem to play an important role in the posttransplant management. This review provides up-to-date knowledge on these pathways that may influence the cardiovascular and renal continuum and identifies potential targets for future therapies. Arterial destiffening strategies and the applicability of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and their role in cardiovascular health after kidney transplantation are also addressed.

Innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: A challenge for unmet needs

Due to the optimal results obtained in kidney transplantation and to the lack of interest of the industries, new innovative drugs in kidney transplantation are difficult to be encountered. The best strategy to find the new drugs recently developed or under development is to search in the sections of kidney transplantation still not completely covered by the drugs on the market. These unmet needs are the prevention of delayed graft function (DGF), the protection of the graft over the long time and the desensitization of preformed anti human leukocyte antigen antibodies and the treatment of the acute antibody-mediated rejection. These needs are particularly relevant due to the expansion of some kind of kidney transplantation as transplantation from non-heart beating donor and in the case of antibody-incompatible grafts. The first are particularly exposed to DGF, the latter need a safe desensitization and a safe treatments of the antibody mediated rejections that often occur. Particular caution is needed in treating these drugs. First, they are described in very recent studies and the follow-up of their effect is of course rather short. Second, some of these drugs are still in an early phase of study, even if in well-conducted randomized controlled trials. Particular caution and a careful check need to be used in trials launched 2 or 3 years ago. Indeed, is always necessary to verify whether the study is still going on or whether and why the study itself was abandoned.

Lessons from transmissible cancers for immunotherapy and transplant

The emergence of horizontal transmission of cancer between vertebrates is an issue that interests scientists and medical society. Transmission requires: (i) a mechanism by which cancer cells can transfer to another organism and (ii) a repressed immune response on the part of the recipient. Transmissible tumors are unique models to comprehend the responses and mechanisms mediated by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), which can be transposed for transplant biology. Here, we discuss the mechanisms involved in immune-mediated tissue rejection, making a parallel with transmissible cancers. We also discuss cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in cancer immunotherapy and anti-rejection therapies.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy After Kidney Transplantation: An Underdiagnosed and Potentially Reversible Entity

Thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare but serious complication that affects kidney transplant recipients. It appears in 0.8–14% of transplanted patients and negatively affects graft and patient survival. It can appear in a systemic form, with hemolytic microangiopathic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure, or in a localized form, with progressive renal failure, proteinuria, or arterial hypertension. Post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy is classified as recurrent atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome or de novo thrombotic microangiopathy. De novo thrombotic microangiopathy accounts for the majority of cases. Distinguishing between the 2 conditions can be difficult, given there is an overlap between them. Complement overactivation is the cornerstone of all post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathies, and has been demonstrated in the context of organ procurement, ischemia-reperfusion phenomena, immunosuppressive drugs, antibody-mediated rejection, viral infections, and post-transplant relapse of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Although treatment of the causative agents is usually the first line of treatment, this approach might not be sufficient. Plasma exchange typically resolves hematologic abnormalities but does not improve renal function. Complement blockade with eculizumab has been shown to be an effective therapy in post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy, but it is necessary to define which patients can benefit from this therapy and when and how eculizumab should be used.

CD40/CD40L Signaling as a Promising Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Renal Disease

The cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40) is activated by the CD40 ligand (CD40L) in a variety of diverse cells types and regulates important processes associated with kidney disease. The CD40/CD40L signaling cascade has been comprehensively studied for its roles in immune functions, whereas the signaling axis involved in local kidney injury has only drawn attention in recent years. Clinical studies have revealed that circulating levels of soluble CD40L (sCD40L) are associated with renal function in the setting of kidney disease. Levels of the circulating CD40 receptor (sCD40), sCD40L, and local CD40 expression are tightly related to renal injury in different types of kidney disease. Additionally, various kidney cell types have been identified as non-professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that express CD40 on the cell membrane, which contributes to the interactions between immune cells and local kidney cells during the development of kidney injury. Although the potential for adverse CD40 signaling in kidney cells has been reported in several studies, a summary of those studies focusing on the role of CD40 signaling in the development of kidney disease is lacking. In this review, we describe the outcomes of recent studies and summarize the potential therapeutic methods for kidney disease which target CD40.

Immunosuppressive Agents and Infectious Risk in Transplantation: Managing the "Net State of Immunosuppression"

Successful solid organ transplantation reflects meticulous attention to the details of immunosuppression, balancing risks for graft rejection against risks for infection. The 'net state of immune suppression' is a conceptual framework of all factors contributing to infectious risk. Assays which measure immune function in the immunosuppressed transplant recipient relative to infectious risk and allograft function are lacking. The best measures of integrated immune function may be quantitative viral loads to assess the individual's ability to control latent viral infections. Few studies address adjustment of immunosuppression during active infections. Thus, confronted with infection in solid organ recipients, the management of immunosuppression is based largely on clinical experience. This review examines known measures of immune function and the immunologic effects of common immunosuppressive drugs and available studies reporting modification of drug regimens for specific infections. These data provide a conceptual framework for the management of immunosuppression during infection in organ recipients.