The measure of impact: Proposal of quality metrics for solid organ transplant pharmacy practice

As healthcare continues its transition toward value-based care, it is increasingly important for transplant pharmacists to demonstrate their impact on patient care, health-related outcomes, and healthcare costs. Evidence-based quality and performance metrics are recognized as crucial tools for measuring the value of service. Yet, there is a lack of well-developed and agreed-upon specific metrics for many clinical pharmacy specialties, including solid organ transplantation. To address this need, a panel of transplant pharmacy specialists conducted a detailed literature review and engaged in several panel discussions to identify quality metrics to be considered for assessing the value of clinical pharmacy services provided to solid organ transplant recipients and living donors. The proposed metrics are based on the Donabedian model and are categorized to coincide with the typical phases of transplant care. The measures focus on key issues that arise in transplant recipients related to medication therapy, including adverse drug events, nonadherence, and clinical outcomes attributable to medication therapy management. This article proposes a comprehensive set of measures, any number of which transplant pharmacists can adopt and measure over time to objectively gauge the value of services they are providing to transplant recipients, the transplant center, and the overall healthcare system.

The expanded role of the transplant pharmacist: A 10-year follow-up

The role of the transplant pharmacist is recognized by transplant programs, governmental groups, and professional organizations as an essential part of the transplant multidisciplinary team. This role has evolved drastically over the last decade with the advent of major advances in the science of transplantation and the growth of the field, which necessitate expanded pharmacy services to meet the needs of patients. Data now exist within all realms of the phases of care for a transplant recipient regarding the utility and benefit of a solid organ transplant (SOT) pharmacist. Furthermore, governing bodies now have the opportunity to use Board Certification in Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacotherapy as a mechanism to identify and recognize specialty knowledge and expertise within the field of SOT pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching review of the current and future state of SOT pharmacy while also identifying major changes to the profession, forthcoming challenges, and expected areas of growth.

Sweet and simple as syrup: A review and guidance for use of novel antihyperglycemic agents for post-transplant diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) increase morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. Conventional strategies for diabetes management in this population include metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides and insulin. Limitations with these agents, as well as promising new antihyperglycemic agents, create a need and opportunity to explore additional options for transplant diabetes pharmacotherapy. Novel agents including sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i) demonstrate great promise for T2DM management in the non-transplant population. Moreover, many of these agents possess renoprotective, cardiovascular, and/or weight loss benefits in addition to improved glucose control while having reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with certain other conventional agents. This comprehensive review examines available literature evaluating the use of novel antihyperglycemic agents in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with T2DM or PTDM. Formal grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system recommendations are provided to guide incorporation of these agents into post-transplant care. Available literature was evaluated to address the clinical questions of which agents provide greatest short- and long-term benefits, timing of novel antihyperglycemic therapy initiation after transplant, monitoring parameters for these antihyperglycemic agents, and concomitant antihyperglycemic agent and immunosuppression regimen management. Current experience with novel antihyperglycemic agents is primarily limited to single-center retrospective studies and case series. With ongoing use and increasing comfort, further and more robust research promises greater understanding of the role of these agents and place in therapy for kidney transplant recipients.

The use of non-transplant biologics in solid organ transplant recipients: A practical review for the frontline clinician

Biologics have become the forefront of medicine for management of autoimmune conditions, leading to improved quality of life. Many autoimmune conditions occur in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and persist following transplant. However, the use of biologics in this patient population is not well studied, and questions arise related to risk of infection and adjustments to induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Guidelines have been published highlighting management strategies of biologics around the time of elective surgical procedures, but this is not always feasible in urgent situations, especially with deceased donor transplantation. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature regarding the use of these agents in solid organ transplant recipients, and specifically address induction and maintenance immunosuppression, as well as the need for alternative infective prevention strategies to create a practical reference for the frontline clinician, when faced with this complex clinical scenario.

Effect of Jejunal Administration on Tacrolimus Trough Concentrations in a Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient

Maintenance immunosuppression regimens containing calcineurin inhibitors, specifically tacrolimus, are standard of care for rejection prevention in pediatric liver transplantation. Challenges with tacrolimus administration are common with pediatric patients, and guidance for non-oral, enteral administration of tacrolimus is limited. We report the case of an 11-year-old male orthotopic liver transplant recipient with a history of malnutrition requiring a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) for enteral nutrition and medication administration post-transplantation. Tacrolimus was initially given orally, and then transitioned to J-tube administration for 10 days. Tacrolimus trough concentrations declined significantly following conversion to J-tube administration and remained subtherapeutic despite a 3-fold dose increase. Once transitioned back to the oral route, trough concentrations became supratherapeutic requiring dose reductions until goal concentrations were achieved. This case demonstrates reduced bioavailability and need for increased dosing, when tacrolimus is administered through a J-tube.

Impact of once-daily ER-Tac on trough concentration variability in a stable AYA renal transplant recipient cohort

BACKGROUND

Successful renal transplantation requires complex medication regimens that rely on strict adherence to be effective. Variability in immunosuppression exposure, specifically tacrolimus, is associated with poor allograft outcomes. Wide intra-patient variability of tacrolimus trough concentrations (Vtac) is likely, in part, attributable to regimen complexity and poor medication adherence. Once-daily tacrolimus formulations create opportunity to simplify therapeutic regimens, and this study aims to evaluate their impact on Vtac and ultimately transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated stable (AYA) renal transplant recipients converted from (IR-Tac) to (ER-Tac). Subjects served as their own controls. Vtac was assessed by measuring the (SD) of serial tacrolimus trough concentrations prior to and at four time points post-conversion to ER-Tac over 24-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included graft function, infection rates, and effect on modifiable treatment-related factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight AYA subjects were converted from IR-Tac to ER-Tac. Vtac significantly improved following conversion and was sustained for 24 months (Vtac₀ 2.32 vs. Vtac₂₄ 1.11, p .017). Renal function remained stable, and (BPAR) rates were modest (14%). Mean pill burden was reduced by 15%, and 42.9% of subjects achieved a once-daily medication regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from IR-Tac to ER-Tac in this AYA population significantly improved Vtac with sustained effect over 2 years. This effect is likely attributable in part to simplification of the medication regimen and presumably improved medication adherence. Such conversion does not appear to compromise graft function for at least 2 years post-conversion.

Entrustable professional activities for pharmacy students: A primer for solid organ transplant preceptors

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles , AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

The role of a solid organ transplant pharmacist is multifaceted and translates to diverse experiential and elective learning experiences that can be provided to pharmacy learners. Here we provide a guide to integrating pharmacy students into patient care and other pharmacist activities in solid organ transplantation.

SUMMARY

Thoughtful incorporation of learners into clinical practice and clinical research creates a positive learning environment for pharmacy students that can foster the development of core skills necessary for students to become "practice-ready" and "team-ready" pharmacy graduates and can equip them with valuable skills to incorporate into the specialty practice areas and careers they pursue. To help develop these educational experiences, attention to the list of core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) established by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy can help create a rich environment of learning with carefully cultivated tasks. Furthermore, learners can serve as transplant pharmacist extenders to assist in overall patient care and multidisciplinary involvement on the transplant team. This article serves as a "how-to" guide for applying the EPA framework to integrating pharmacy students in patient care and other pharmacist activities in solid organ transplantation and other specialty practice areas.

CONCLUSION

As pharmacy preceptors design and operationalize their teaching to incorporate EPAs, they can benefit from recommendations tailored to specialty practice areas such as solid organ transplantation. Students may start and finish these experiences at different EPA levels, but continuance of training will allow them to achieve the final EPA level across the 6 EPA domains.

Considerations and controversies of pharmacologic management of the pediatric kidney transplant recipient

Pediatric kidney transplantation has experienced considerable growth and improvement in patient and allograft outcomes over the past 20 years, in part due to advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and management. Despite this progress, care for this unique population can be challenging due to limited pediatric transplant data and trials, intricacies related to differences in children and adolescents compared with their adult counterparts, and limitations to long-term survival facing all solid organ transplant populations. Immunosuppression and infection prevention practices vary from one pediatric transplant center to another and clinical controversies exist surrounding treatment and dosing. This review aims to summarize key aspects of pharmacologic management in this population and present pertinent data that describe the influence of practice to serve as a resource for practitioners caring for this unique specialty patient population. Additionally, this review highlights select controversies that exist within pediatric kidney transplantation.