A Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled Phase III Study of Centhaquine (Lyfaquin®) as a Resuscitative Agent in Hypovolemic Shock Patients

Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock

Introduction: Centhaquine is a resuscitative agent that acts on α2B adrenergic receptors. Its effect on cardiac output in hypovolemic shock patients has not been reported. Methods: This pilot study was conducted in 12 hypovolemic shock patients treated with centhaquine who participated in an open-label phase IV study (NCT05956418). Echocardiography was utilized to measure stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) and diameter (LVOTd), heart rate (HR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (LVFS), and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter before (0 min) and 60, 120, and 300 min after centhaquine (0.01 mg/kg) iv infusion for 60 min. Results: SV was significantly increased after 60, 120, and 300 min. CO increased significantly after 120 and 300 min despite a decrease in HR. IVC diameter and LVOT-VTI at these time points significantly increased, indicating the increased venous return. LVEF and LVFS did not change, while the mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg) increased after 120 and 300 min. Positive correlations between IVC diameter and SV (R2 = 0.9556) and between IVC diameter and MAP (R2 = 0.8928) were observed, which indicated the effects of an increase in venous return on SV, CO, and MAP. Conclusions: Centhaquine-mediated increase in venous return is critical in enhancing SV, CO, and MAP in patients with hypovolemic shock; these changes could be pivotal for reducing shock-mediated circulatory failure, promoting tissue perfusion, and improving patient outcomes. Trial Registration: CTRI/2021/01/030263 and NCT05956418.

Review of COVID-19 Therapeutics by Mechanism: From Discovery to Approval

The global research and pharmaceutical community rapidly mobilized to develop treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Existing treatments have been repurposed and new drugs have emerged. Here we summarize mechanisms and clinical trials of COVID-19 therapeutics approved or in development. Two reviewers, working independently, reviewed published data for approved COVID-19 vaccines and drugs, as well as developmental pipelines, using databases from the following organizations: United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Japanese Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and ClinicalTrials.gov. In all, 387 drugs were found for initial review. After removing unrelated trials and drugs, 66 drugs were selected, including 17 approved drugs and 49 drugs under development. These drugs were classified into six categories: 1) drugs targeting the viral life cycle 2) Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Monoclonal Antibodies, 3) immunomodulators, 4) anti-coagulants, 5) COVID-19-induced neuropathy drugs, and 6) other therapeutics. Among the 49 drugs under development are the following: 6 drugs targeting the viral life cycle, 12 immunosuppression drugs, 2 immunostimulants, 2 HIF-PHD targeting drugs, 3 GM-CSF targeting drugs, 5 anti-coagulants, 2 COVID-19-induced neuropathy drugs, and 17 others. This review provides insight into mechanisms of action, properties, and indications for COVID-19 medications.

Catalyst-free anti-Markovnikov hydroamination and hydrothiolation of vinyl heteroarenes in aqueous medium: an improved process towards centhaquine

Catalyst-free hydroamination and hydrothiolation of alkenes have been achieved in an aqueous medium. The anti-Markovnikov addition works efficiently in suspended water at room temperature and allows straightforward access to centhaquine, a drug used for the management of hypovolemic shocks in critically ill patients, and its derivatives. Various primary and secondary amines, thiols, and hydrazides were successfully reacted with a number of heteroaryl/aryl-alkenes. The scalability of the process has been demonstrated by synthesizing centhaquine at a 19.65 g scale. A comparative analysis of the present process with previous approaches has been provided on the basis of green chemistry metrics.

Evolutionary Unmasking Resuscitative Therapeutics Potential of Centhaquin Citrate in Hypovolemic Shock

Hypovolemic shock (HS), a clinical condition of insufficient blood perfusion and oxygenation in body tissues, is associated with immense morbidity and mortality. Treatment approaches include fluid replacement and surgical repair of reversible causes of hemorrhage; however, they cause irreversible blood perfusion loss, systemic inflammation, multiple organ failure, and death. Centhaquin citrate (CC) is an innovative centrally acting cardiovascular active agent that is initially intended as an antihypertensive drug. However, due to its positive ionotropic effect, Centhaquin citrate is being tested clinically as a resuscitative agent for the management of hypovolemic shock It acts at the α2B-adrenergic receptor to produce venous constriction followed by an increase in venous return to the heart. These actions are assumed to be capable of resuscitative activity observed by centhaquin citrate, through an increase in cardiac output and tissue perfusion. Pharmacokinetics investigations in animals and humans have shown that centhaquin citrate is well tolerated and has insignificant side effects. Therefore, centhaquin citrate seems to be a promising entity and gaining the interest of researchers to develop it as a resuscitative agent in HS. The review gives insight into the development of centhaquin citrate as a resuscitative agent and provides insight into the associated mechanism of action and molecular signalling to foster future research on CC for its clinical use in HS.

Controls of Central and Peripheral Blood Pressure and Hemorrhagic/Hypovolemic Shock

The pressure exerted on the heart and blood vessels because of blood flow is considered an essential parameter for cardiovascular function. It determines sufficient blood perfusion, and transportation of nutrition, oxygen, and other essential factors to every organ. Pressure in the primary arteries near the heart and the brain is known as central blood pressure (CBP), while that in the peripheral arteries is known as peripheral blood pressure (PBP). Usually, CBP and PBP are correlated; however, various types of shocks and cardiovascular disorders interfere with their regulation and differently affect the blood flow in vital and accessory organs. Therefore, understanding blood pressure in normal and disease conditions is essential for managing shock-related cardiovascular implications and improving treatment outcomes. In this review, we have described the control systems (neural, hormonal, osmotic, and cellular) of blood pressure and their regulation in hemorrhagic/hypovolemic shock using centhaquine (Lyfaquin^®) as a resuscitative agent.

Role of adrenergic receptors in shock

Shock is a severe, life-threatening medical condition with a high mortality rate worldwide. All four major categories of shock (along with their various subtypes)-hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive, involve a dramatic mismatch between oxygen supply and demand, and share standard features of decreased cardiac output, reduced blood pressure, and overall hypoperfusion. Immediate and appropriate intervention is required regardless of shock type, as a delay can result in cellular dysfunction, irreversible multiple organ failure, and death. Studies have shown that dysfunction and downregulation of adrenergic receptors (ARs) are often implicated in these shock conditions; for example, their density is shown to be decreased in hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock, while their reduced signaling in the brain and vasculature decrease blood perfusion and oxygen supply. There are two main categories of ARs, α, and β, each with its subtypes and distributions. Our group has demonstrated that a dose of .02 mg/kg body wt of centhaquine (CQ) specifically activates α2B ARs on venous circulation along with the central α2A ARs after hypovolemic/hemorrhagic shock. Activating these receptors by CQ increases cardiac output (CO) and reduces systemic vascular resistance (SVR), with a net increase in blood pressure and tissue perfusion. The clinical trials of CQ conducted by Pharmazz Inc. in India have demonstrated significantly improved survival in shock patients. CQ improved blood pressure and shock index, indicating better blood circulation, and reduced lactate levels in the blood compared to in-use standard resuscitative agents. After successful clinical trials, CQ is being marketed as a drug (Lyfaquin^®) for hypovolemic/hemorrhagic shock in India, and United States FDA has approved the phase III IND application. It is anticipated that the phase III trial in the United States will begin in 2023. Thus, we have demonstrated that α2 ARs could be suitable targets for treating or managing hypovolemic/hemorrhagic shock. Further understanding of ARs in shock would help find new potential pharmacological targets.

Pathophysiology of Hemorrhage as It Relates to the Warfighter

Saving lives of wounded military Warfighters often depends on the ability to resolve or mitigate the pathophysiology of hemorrhage, specifically diminished oxygen delivery to vital organs that leads to multi-organ failure and death. However, caring for hemorrhaging patients on the battlefield presents unique challenges that extend beyond applying a tourniquet and giving a blood transfusion, especially when battlefield care must be provided for a prolonged period. This review will describe these challenges and potential strategies for treating hemorrhage on the battlefield in a prolonged casualty care situation.