Concizumab: First Approval

Targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor with concizumab to improve hemostasis in patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia: an in vitro study

BACKGROUND

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is caused by an inherited defect of platelet αIIbβ3 integrin. Concizumab, a monoclonal antibody specific for tissue factor pathway inhibitor, abolishes its anticoagulant effect.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro ability of concizumab to improve hemostasis in GT.

METHODS

The effects of concizumab were evaluated in whole blood or platelet-rich plasma from GT patients (n = 5-9) using a thrombin generation assay, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a global fibrinolytic capacity assay, and a flow chamber assay (Total Thrombus formation Analysis System). Washed platelets (WPs) and 20 nM recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) were included for comparison.

RESULTS

The lag time in the thrombin generation assay was significantly longer (+85%; P < .0001) in GT patients than in controls. WPs, rFVIIa, and concizumab each significantly improved thrombin generation profiles. The ROTEM clotting time (CT) was significantly longer in GT patients than in controls (677 seconds vs 523 seconds; P = .03). However, CT improved after adding WPs, rFVIIa, or concizumab. Under flow, occlusive thrombi were present in all healthy controls after 10 minutes, whereas platelet-fibrin depositions were not seen in GT patients. Subocclusive or occlusive thrombi formed when GT blood was mixed with WPs, rFVIIa, or concizumab. Clots in GT platelet-rich plasma were more susceptible to fibrinolysis and were improved by WPs, rFVIIa, or concizumab.

CONCLUSION

Concizumab enhanced thrombin generation, decreased the ROTEM CT, improved thrombus formation under flow, and reduced clot lysis. Our results demonstrate the potential of concizumab for subcutaneous prophylaxis in GT patients.

Joint health and pain in the changing hemophilia treatment landscape

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder. Bleeding, and in particular joint hemorrhage results in chronic arthropathy and disability. Acute and chronic pain are frequent and limit activity and participation and result in decreased health-related quality of life. Remarkable progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia but bleeding continues to prove recalcitrant to currently available treatments and joint disease remains problematic. Physiotherapy and pain management are mainstays of current multidisciplinary integrated care of people with hemophilia (PWH). The focus of this review is on preservation of joint health in the era of new and innovative therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A search of the PubMed Central was conducted on 1 February 2024 using the MeSH Major Topic terms identified as keywords for the manuscript. This review will highlight what is known and unknown about joint bleeding and arthropathy, including insights on pain as a related complication.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting healthy joints in PWH will be discussed, including both the pharmacological treatment landscape and related strategies to promote joint health.

Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives

One of the well-known X-linked genetic disorders is hemophilia, which could be hemophilia A as a result of a mutation in the F8 (factor VIII) gene or hemophilia B as a result of a mutation in the F9 (factor IX) gene, leading to insufficient levels of the proteins essential for blood coagulation cascade. In patients with severe hemophilia, factor VIII or factor IX activities in the blood plasma are considerably low, estimated to be less than 1%. This is responsible for spontaneous or post-traumatic bleeding episodes, or both, leading to disease complications and death. Current treatment of hemophilia relies on the prevention of bleeding, which consists of expensive lifelong replacement infusion therapy of blood plasma clotting factors, their recombinant versions, or therapy with recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Recently emerged gene therapy approaches may be a potential game changer that could reshape the therapeutic outcomes of hemophilia A or B using a one-off vector in vivo delivery and aim to achieve long-term endogenous expression of factor VIII or IX. This review examines both traditional approaches to the treatment of hemophilia and modern methods, primarily focusing on gene therapy, to update knowledge in this area. Recent technological advances and gene therapeutics in the pipeline are critically reviewed and summarized. We consider gene therapy to be the most promising method as it may overcome the problems associated with more traditional treatments, such as the need for constant and expensive infusions and the presence of an immune response to the antibody drugs used to treat hemophilia.

Evaluating Factor VIII Concentrates Using Clot Waveform Analysis

Background/Objectives: FVIII reagent activity varies across different assays, as well as activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents. The hemostatic ability of various FVIII reagents was examined via clot waveform analysis (CWA). Methods: APTT was measured using 12 APTT reagents, a small amount of tissue factor-induced FIX activation (sTF/FIXa) and a small amount of thrombin time (sTT) in order to examine 10 FVIII reagents and reference plasma (RP) using CWA. FVIII activity was measured using CWA-APTT, a chromogenic assay, or CWA-sTT. Results: Although the peak time (PT) and peak height (PH) of the CWA-APTT were markedly different in different FVIII reagents using several APTT reagents, the PTs of CWA-APTT were generally normal or shortened and the PHs of CWA-APTT were generally lower than those of RP. The FVIII activity varied, as evaluated using APTT, and was higher when using the CWA-sTT method than the APTT or chromogenic methods. CWA-sTT showed an elevated second peak of first DPH in all FVIII reagents, and both CWA-sTF/FIXa and CWA-sTT were enhanced using APTT reagents. Conclusions: Our evaluation of the hemostatic ability of FVIII reagents varied among APTT reagents. CWA-sTT can be used to further evaluate the hemostatic ability of an FVIII concentrate based on thrombin burst.

Exploring nonreplacement therapies' impact on hemophilia and other rare bleeding disorders

The management of hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), and rare coagulation disorders traditionally relied on replacement therapies, such as factor concentrates, to address clotting factor deficiencies. However, in recent years, the emergence of nonreplacement therapies has shown promise as an adjunctive approach, especially in hemophilia, and also for patients with VWD and rare bleeding disorders. This review article offers an overview of nonreplacement therapies, such as FVIII-mimicking agents and drugs aimed at rebalancing hemostasis by inhibiting natural anticoagulants, particularly in the management of hemophilia. The utilization of nonreplacement therapies in VWD and rare bleeding disorders has recently attracted attention, as evidenced by presentations at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2023 Congress. Nonreplacement therapies provide alternative methods for preventing bleeding episodes and enhancing patients' quality of life, as many of them are administered subcutaneously and allow longer infusion intervals, resulting in improved quality of life and comfort for patients.

Rare bleeding disorders: Advances in management

Inherited factor coagulation deficiencies and vascular bleeding disorders, associated with bleeding of various severity, are often classified as rare bleeding disorders (RBDs). These include inherited fibrinogen disorders, inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD) and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). In the last decades, there have been large increases in knowledge on the epidemiology, genetics, physiopathology, clinical features, and diagnosis of RBDs, but improvements in management have been more limited and remain challenging. The treatment mainstay of RBDs is based only on replacement of a few available coagulation factor concentrates or cryoprecipitates. There is growing interest in therapeutic agents that enhance coagulation or inhibiting anticoagulant pathways in RBDs. In severe IPFD, the optimal platelet transfusion strategy is not yet established. Moreover, data is scarce on the effectiveness and safety of desmopressin and/or antifibrinolytic drugs often used for milder IPFD treatment. The best fibrinogen replacement strategy (prophylaxis vs. on demand) in afibrinogenemia is still debated. Similarly, the optimal trough fibrinogen target level for treatment of acute bleeding, and the role of fibrinogen replacement during pregnancy in mild hypofibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia, have not been properly evaluated. The therapeutic arsenal in HHT includes antifibrinolytics and a series of antiangiogenic agents whose potential efficacy has been tested in small studies or are under investigation for treatment of bleeding. However, there is need to address several issues, including the optimal dosing strategies, the potential emergent toxicity of longer-term use, and the impact of systemic antiangiogenic treatment on visceral arteriovenous malformations.

Haemophilia in the era of novel therapies: Where do inhibitors feature in the new landscape?

INTRODUCTION

The advent of therapeutic recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) protein infusions revolutionized the care of persons with haemophilia in the 1990s. It kicked off an era with the increasing use of prophylactic factor infusions for patients and transformed conversations around the ideal trough activity levels as well as the ultimate goals in tailored, individualized care. Our knowledge surrounding the immunologic basis of inhibitor development and treatment derives from a time when patients were receiving frequent factor infusions and focused on immune tolerance induction following inhibitor development.

DISCUSSION

More recently, care was revolutionized again in haemophilia A with the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII function, to prevent bleeding. The use of emicizumab prophylaxis has resulted in a significantly slower accumulation of factor exposure days and continued effective prophylaxis in the case of inhibitor development. While emicizumab is effective at reducing the frequency of bleeding events in patients with haemophilia A, management of breakthrough bleeds, trauma, and surgeries still requires additional treatment. Ensuring that FVIII is a therapeutic option, particularly for life-threatening bleeding events and major surgeries is critical to optimizing the care of persons with haemophilia A. Other novel non-factor concentrate therapies, including rebalancing agents, will dramatically change the landscape for persons with haemophilia B with inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses the changing landscape regarding the timing of inhibitor development and management strategies after inhibitor development, stressing the importance of education across the community to continue to vigilantly monitor for inhibitors and be prepared to treat persons with inhibitors.

Antibodies to watch in 2024

The 'Antibodies to Watch' article series provides an annual summary of commercially sponsored monoclonal antibody therapeutics currently in late-stage clinical development, regulatory review, and those recently granted a first approval in any country. In this installment, we discuss key details for 16 antibody therapeutics granted a first approval in 2023, as of November 17 (lecanemab (Leqembi), rozanolixizumab (RYSTIGGO), pozelimab (VEOPOZ), mirikizumab (Omvoh), talquetamab (Talvey), elranatamab (Elrexfio), epcoritamab (EPKINLY), glofitamab (COLUMVI), retifanlimab (Zynyz), concizumab (Alhemo), lebrikizumab (EBGLYSS), tafolecimab (SINTBILO), narlumosbart (Jinlitai), zuberitamab (Enrexib), adebrelimab (Arelili), and divozilimab (Ivlizi)). We briefly review 26 product candidates for which marketing applications are under consideration in at least one country or region, and 23 investigational antibody therapeutics that are forecast to enter regulatory review by the end of 2024 based on company disclosures. These nearly 50 product candidates include numerous innovative bispecific antibodies, such as odronextamab, ivonescimab, linvoseltamab, zenocutuzumab, and erfonrilimab, and antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab botidotin, patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan, and MRG002, as well as a mixture of two immunocytokines (bifikafusp alfa and onfekafusp alfa). We also discuss clinical phase transition and overall approval success rates for antibody therapeutics, which are crucial to the biopharmaceutical industry because these rates inform decisions about resource allocation. Our analyses indicate that these molecules have approval success rates in the range of 14-32%, with higher rates associated with antibodies developed for non-cancer indications. Overall, our data suggest that antibody therapeutic development efforts by the biopharmaceutical industry are robust and increasingly successful.

The role of intraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid in joint pain relief in hemophilic arthropathy

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain in hemophilic patients is due to joint degeneration associated with hemophilic arthropathy. In addition to appropriate hematological treatment (primary prophylaxis), pharmacologic management and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation should be indicated. When such measures are not sufficient, intraarticular injections (IAIs) of hyaluronic acid (HyA) may be considered.

AREAS COVERED

In order to determine whether IAIs of HyA are effective in terms of pain relief in individuals with painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy, a PubMed and Cochrane Library search using 'hemophilia hyaluronic acid' as keywords was performed on 18 July 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

In a study of individuals with hemophilic arthropathy (elbows, knees and ankles), 91% of them improved pain after a mean follow-up of 6 years. In another study of individuals with knee arthropathy, after a 7-year follow-up 82% reported an improvement in pain. As for hemophilic ankle arthropathy, in a study 67% of patients showed relief of joint pain at 6-month follow-up. Although the literature on the subject is very heterogeneous and difficult to interpret, it appears that IAIs of HyA can relieve the joint pain of painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy for months. Moreover, the IAIs can be repeated every 6-12 months.