Effectiveness of Non-Budesonide Therapies in Management of Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Update on the Epidemiology and Management of Microscopic Colitis

Microscopic colitis is an inflammatory bowel disease that commonly presents with debilitating chronic watery diarrhea. Recent epidemiologic studies and randomized trials of therapeutics have improved the understanding of the disease. Medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, proton pump inhibitors, and antidepressants, have traditionally been considered as the main risk factors for microscopic colitis. However, recent studies have challenged this observation. Additionally, several epidemiologic studies have identified other risk factors for the disease including older age, female sex, smoking, alcohol use, immune-mediated diseases, and select gastrointestinal infections. The diagnosis of microscopic colitis requires histologic assessment of colon biopsies with findings including increased in intraepithelial lymphocytes with or without expansion of the subepithelial collagen band. The pathophysiology is poorly understood but is thought to be related to an aberrant immune response to the luminal microenvironment in genetically susceptible individuals. Antidiarrheal medications, such as loperamide or bismuth subsalicylate, may be sufficient in patients with mild symptoms. In patients with more severe symptoms, treatment with budesonide is recommended. Maintenance therapy is often necessary and several potential treatment strategies are available. Biologic and small molecule treatments seem to be effective in patients who have failed budesonide. There is an unmet need to further define the pathophysiology of microscopic colitis. Additionally, trials with novel therapies, particularly in patients with budesonide-refractory disease, are needed.

Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Microscopic Colitis in Geriatric Care

Microscopic colitis, a diagnosis under the umbrella term of inflammatory bowel disease, is a prevalent cause of watery diarrhea, often with symptoms of urgency and bloating, typically observed in older adults aged ≥ 60 years. Its incidence has been reported to exceed those of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in some geographical areas. Although nonpathognomonic endoscopic abnormalities, including changes of the vascular mucosal pattern; mucosal erythema; edema; nodularity; or mucosal defects, e.g., "cat scratches" have been reported, a colonoscopy is typically macroscopically normal. As reliable biomarkers are unavailable, colonoscopy using random biopsies from various parts of the colon is compulsory. Based on the histological examination under a microscope, the disease is divided into collagenous (with a thickened subepithelial collagenous band) and lymphocytic (with intraepithelial lymphocytosis) colitis, although incomplete forms exist. In routine clinical settings, the disease has a high risk of being misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome or even overlooked. Therefore, healthcare providers should be familiar with clinical features and rational management strategies. A 6-8-week oral budesonide treatment course (9 mg/day) is considered the first-line therapy, but patients often experience relapse when discontinued, or might become intolerant, dependent, or even fail to respond. Consequently, other therapeutic options (e.g., bismuth subsalicylate, biologics, loperamide, bile acid sequestrants, and thiopurines) recommended by available guidelines may be prescribed. Herein, clinically meaningful data is provided based on the latest evidence that may aid in reaching a diagnosis and establishing rational therapy in geriatric care to control symptoms and enhance the quality of life for those affected.

The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease: Critical Insights to Better Understand Clinical Outcomes

The gluten-free diet (GFD) remains a complex paradigm in managing celiac disease (CeD) in children and adults, and there are many reasons why GFD adherence should be strict to improve outcomes. However, this is a challenging task for patients, since they need to have access to quality healthcare resources that facilitate optimal GFD adherence. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the GFD, tackling coexisting nutritional deficiencies, and dealing with complex situations, such as seronegative CeD or non-responsive CeD, all require the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The short- and long-term follow-up of CeD patients should preferably be performed by a combined Gastroenterology and Nutrition service with well-defined quality standards and the multidisciplinary involvement of physicians, nurses, dietitians, and psychologists. Nutritional advice and counseling by an experienced dietitian can reduce the costs associated with long-term follow-up of CeD patients. Likewise, psychological interventions may be essential in specific scenarios where implementing and sustaining a lifelong GFD can cause a significant psychological burden for patients. This manuscript aims to provide guidelines to improve clinical practice in the follow-up and monitoring of CeD patients and provide information on the nutritional risks of an ill-advised GFD. Clinicians, biochemists, food technologists, dietitians, and psychologists with a global view of the disease have been involved in its writing.