Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Combination Therapies for Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in Elderly Patients: Results from the German Hepatitis C Registry

Effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in the therapy of HCV-infected elderly people

BACKGROUND

The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with their effectiveness and safety has revolutionized the approach to treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Nevertheless, elderly patients have often been excluded from clinical trials, so the results of real-world studies are particularly important in the context of the geriatric population. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of antiviral DAA treatment in HCV-infected patients over the age of 65, with notable inclusion of those over the age of 85.

METHODS

The analyzed patients were divided by age into three groups: group A (65-74 years), group B (75-84 years) and group C (85 years or older). Patients started DAA based therapy at 22 hepatology centers between July 2015 and December 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 3505 elderly patients were included in the analysis, and this group consisted of 2501 patients in group A, 893 in group B, and 111 in group C. The study population, regardless of age, was dominated by women. Patients had a high prevalence of comorbidities (84.9%, 92.2%, and 93.7%, respectively) as well as a high rate of concomitant medications. The sustained virological response was 97.9% in groups A and B and 100% in group C. The therapy was well-tolerated, with a comparable safety profile observed in all analyzed groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA-based therapies are highly effective and well tolerated by the elderly patients, including those over 85. Age should not be a barrier to treatment, but careful management is necessary.

Real-world experience for the outcomes and costs of treating hepatitis C patients: Results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

With long-term consequences like the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a significant health burden. Information on HCV treatment outcomes and costs in routine care is still rare, especially for subgroups. The aim of this study was to analyse the treatment outcomes and costs of subgroups in routine care and to compare them over time with previous analyses.

METHODS

Data were derived from a noninterventional study including a subset of 10298 patients receiving DAAs with genotypes 1 and 3. Sociodemographic, clinical parameters and costs were collected using a web-based data recording system. The total sample was subdivided according to treatment regimen, cirrhosis status as well as present HIV infection and opioid substitution treatment (OST).

RESULTS

95% of all patients achieved SVR. Currently used DAA showed higher SVR-rates and less adverse events (AE) compared to former treatments. Concerning subgroups, cirrhotic patients, HIV-coinfected patients and OST patients showed lower but still high SVR-rates. In comparison, cirrhotic had considerably longer treatment duration and more frequent (serious) AE. Overall, average treatment costs were €48470 and costs per SVR were €51129; for currently used DAAs costs amounted to €30330 and costs per SVR to €31692. After the end of treatment, physical health is similar to the general population in all patients except cirrhotic. Mental health remains far behind in all subgroups, even for currently used DAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Over time, some relevant factors developed positively (SVR-rates, costs, treatment duration, adverse events, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Further research on HRQoL, especially on mental health, is necessary to evaluate the differences between subgroups and HRQoL over time and to identify influencing factors.

Progress of Hepatitis C elimination in Viennese people living with HIV after two decades of increasing cure rates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Interferon(IFN)-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy has been replaced by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We assessed temporal trends in patient characteristics, transmission risks, treatment initiation, and cure rates in eras of IFN, restricted DAA-access, and unrestricted DAA-access in Viennese HCV/HIV-coinfected patients (HIV/HCV).

METHODS

Consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients starting HCV treatment at the Vienna General Hospital between 2002 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

Of all N = 508 HIV/HCV, 78% (398/508) were male and the mean age was 41.8 ± 9.5 years. 'People-who-inject-drugs' (PWID) accounted for 61% (311/508), while 31% (156/508) were 'men who have sex with men' (MSM). In the IFN-era, restricted DAA-era and unrestricted DAA-era, N = 152, N = 129, and N = 227 HCV treatments were started and 49% (74/152), 95% (122/129), and 88% (200/227) achieved sustained virologic response, respectively. Treatment during the IFN-era was a strong predictor for virologic non-response (aOR 12.69; 6.93-23.24) and loss-to-follow-up (aOR 6.12; 2.99-12.54), while virologic non-response was less common in 'MSM' (aOR 0.28; 0.13-0.62). Ninety three percent (50/54) of the observed HCV reinfections occurred in the unrestricted DAA-era. A substantial increase in 'MSM' transmission was observed since 2010 with 66% (107/161) in the DAA-era versus 15% (49/330) prior to the DAA-era.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV cure rates in Viennese HIV patients increased from 49% in the IFN-era to 88-95% in the DAA-era. MSM-related risk behaviour and reinfections became the key challenges towards HCV elimination in HIV-coinfected patients.

Circulating Genotypes of Hepatitis C Virus in Italian Patients before and after the Application of Wider Access Criteria to HCV Treatment

Aims:

The aims of this study were to report a description of the HCV genotype distribution in adult Italians and non-Italians subjects tested in the Microbiology and Virology Unit of the Padova University Hospital from January 2016 (after about one year from the availability of DAAs) to December 2018 and to compare genotype frequencies in the 12-month period before and after the application of the wider access criteria to HCV treatment.

Background:

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem, but the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has dramatically changed HCV disease natural history because these drugs have excellent tolerability and they can eliminate the virus in almost all treated patients.

Objective:

The objective was to describe the circulating HCV genotypes in high-income countries in order to help health authorities in the future organization of DAAs treatment strategies; this aspect is not limited to drug prescription, but it also includes the identification of infected individuals who are undiagnosed, which is the limiting step to achieve the HCV elimination goal.

Methods:

Adult patients who had HCV genotype performed from 01/01/16 to 31/12/18 in the Microbiology and Virology Unit of the Padova University Hospital were included in the study: the two 12-month periods were April 2016-March 2017 (before period, BEF) and April 2017-March 2018 (after period, AFT).

Results:

Italians were 2168 (91.2%) and non-Italians were 208 (8.8%). Italians median age was 55 years, and females were older. Italians had a lower genotype 1 (p=0.0012) and higher genotype 2 frequencies (p<0.0001) with respect to non-Italians. Most patients aged 38-67 years: Italians were more represented in class age 48-57 years (p=0.0138), 68-77 years (p=0.001) and ≥78 years (p<0.0001); subjects with genotype 3 were the youngest and those with genotype 2 the oldest. Italian patients typed in the AFT and BEF were comparable; only a lower frequency of genotype 1 males and younger age in genotype 3 were found in AFT.

Conclusion:

Italians were older with respect to non-Italians, which implies that a different age based screening program could be applied. Italian genotype 3 subjects represent a cohort to focus on for the risk of therapeutic failure. Patients tested after the extended criteria for HCV treatment were very similar to those tested before, suggesting that HCV burden in Italians is higher than expected.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus in elderly patients (≥65 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Direct-acting agents (DAAs) have launched a new era of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. As aged individuals comprise a large percentage of HCV-infected patients, the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in the elderly have come under scrutiny. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAAs in elderly patients. After a systematic search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, OVID MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and other databases, two investigators reviewed relevant abstracts and selected manuscripts for examination. The sustained virologic response (SVR) and adverse event (AE) rates were calculated with a random-effects model. Ninety studies evaluating SVR rates of elderly patients (≥65 years old) receiving DAAs were selected. DAAs in elderly patients exhibited a notable SVR rate of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95%-97%), accompanied by comparable rates in subgroup analyses. The comparison of SVR rates in elderly and non-elderly patients indicated no significant discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01). The overall event rate of AEs was 45% (95% CI: 31%-60%), though AE rates varied by subgroups. Furthermore, AEs were comparatively more frequent (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28) in the elderly than non-elderly, especially in subgroups such as SAE (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.52-2.36) and dose reduction in ribavirin (OR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.53-2.36). However, in the ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the elderly and non-elderly groups. DAAs have high efficacy in elderly patients. Considering the possibility of AE, the RBV-free regimen should be given prior consideration for the treatment of elderly patients with HCV.

Effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral drugs against hepatitis C virus: predictive factors of response to the treatment

Background/Aims. Despite the high efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus shown in clinical trials, treatment failures continue to occur. Our aim was to establish the effectiveness of these drugs in routine clinical practice, as well as to determine factors that could influence the response to the treatment.Matherials/methods. Single-center, observational, retrospective study. Clinical, virological and pharmacotherapeutic variables were registered at baseline. Adverse drug reactions that occurred were recorded until week 24 of follow-up. Achievement of sustained virologic response was also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to determine factors of response.Results. A total of 333 treatment regimens corresponding to 330 different patients were evaluated. Sustained virologic response rate was 94.6% [95%CI: 91.6-96.6%]. 67.9% of the patients experienced adverse drugs reactions (92.2% were grade 1). The univariate analysis identified a higher baseline of platelets, albumin and total cholesterol as predictive factors of sustained virologic response (p < 0.05). Presence of diabetes and complications related to liver disease (splenomegaly, portal hypertension, portal hypertensive gastropathy), body mass index ≥30, greater liver fibrosis, receiving simeprevir and higher baseline levels of glucose, aspartate-aminotransferase, alanine-aminotransferase and alkaline-phosphatase, have been identified as predictive factors of non-response (p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis detected the following independent factors of non-response: body mass index ≥30 and presence of complications related to liver disease.Conclusion. The effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus have been maintained in routine clinical practice. Further research on predictive factors of response is required in order to develop more reliable and reproducible predictive models.

Global adverse events reported for direct-acting antiviral therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C: an analysis of the World Health Organization VigiBase

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have transformed the treatment of hepatitis C infection (HCV) globally. Exploratory studies to identify potential rare adverse drug events associated with DAAs to optimize their use are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the most common serious DAA-associated adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports overall and by DAA regimen.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of post-market ADRs associated with DAA therapy using VigiBase, the global database of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring. Reports occurring between 2013 and 2020 in which an eligible DAA brand or regimen was reported as the suspect drug were included and described. Reports of concomitant ribavirin or interferon use were excluded. The top 25 events for all reports where the outcome was indicated as 'serious' or 'life-threatening' were described overall and by drug regimen.

RESULTS

We identified 56 636 global ADR reports [45% women, 38% ledipasvir/sofosbuvir use, 67% from USA/Canada, average patient age 57 (SD 13) years]. Overall, 3.8% of reports described a life-threatening event or death. Unexpected ADRs included major pulmonary (dyspnea, pneumonia, and respiratory failure) and cardiac (myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest) events.

COMMENT

When examining all serious ADRs for DAAs globally, unexpected pulmonary and cardiac events were identified and may be of interest for further research on DAA safety. Future studies must examine population-level risk of ADRs for DAA therapies while accounting for confounding by indication, comorbidities, and stage of HCV disease.

Direct-acting antiviral treatments display excellent outcomes even in older HCV-infected patients at increased risk of fibrosis

Background

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of available direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens between individuals aged 60 years and older and younger patients in a real-life setting. Specifically, we aimed to provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of DAAs in the treatment of older adults in Tianjin, China.

Methods

In this retrospective observational cohort study, patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) were enrolled between April 2018 and December 2019 at 2 tertiary hospitals in Tianjin, China. We assessed the sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks (SVR12) after DAA treatment, and adverse events in two groups using age stratification by comparing older adults (≥60 years) and younger adults (<60 years). Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the risk factors associated with the SVR12.

Results

Of 1,106 patients, 440 (39.8%) were ≥60 years of age. The overall SVR12 rate was 97.8% in the entire cohort. In the older adult group, the SVR12 rate was 98.0% (431/440) compared to 97.7% (651/666) in the younger adult group. A multivariate analysis showed that (I) age was not predictive of SVR; and (II) the variables of treatment-experience [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =27.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) =3.35–226.08; P=0.002] and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (aOR =1.02; 95% CI =1.01–1.04; P=0.027) were independently associated with the SVR12 in the older adult group. All of the available DAA regimens were well-tolerated in older adult group.

Conclusions

Chinese older adults with chronic HCV infection showed a significantly higher percentage of fibrosis; however, the available different DAA regimens were safe, well-tolerated, and achieved high rates of SVR in all age subgroups. Our observations suggest that DAA treatment should not be withheld even from older patients suffering from chronic HCV.

Excellent Safety and Sustained Virologic Response to Direct-Acting Antivirals Treatment in HCV-Infected Geriatric Patients: A Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are current standard of HCV treatment (Rx). However, data remain lacking on real-world safety, patterns of biochemical, virologic responses, and sustained virologic response (SVR12) rate in geriatric patients.

AIMS

The present study assessed clinical presentation, safety, SVR12 rate, dynamic changes in HCV RNA, ALT, and AFP in geriatric patients (age ≥ 65 year old, G1) versus non-geriatric patients (G2) with chronic hepatitis C and received DAA treatment.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study on 183 patients with DAA Rx and 12-week post-Rx follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patterns of biochemical and virologic responses between the two groups. Undetectable HCV RNA rates were 67.2% versus 75.7% (p = 0.22) and 77.3% versus 84.3% (p = 0.24) at Rx week 2 and Rx week 4, respectively. The SVR12 rate was comparable in 2 groups, 94.1% (G1) versus 95.7% (G2, p = 0.64). ALT normalization rates were 91.2% versus 91.3% (p = 0.98), 92.6% versus 93.9% (p = 0.74), and 97.1% versus 97.4% (p = 0.89) at Rx week 2, post-Rx week12, and post-Rx week 24, respectively. AFP normalization was lower in G1 with 89.7% versus 95.7% (p = 0.12), 77.9% versus 87.8% (p = 0.08), and 79.4% versus 92.2% (p = 0.01), at Rx week 2, and post-Rx week 12, and post-Rx week 24, respectively. Both groups showed similar side effects profile including fatigue 11.8% versus 12.2% (p = 0.93) and headache 11.8% versus 13.9% (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Based on our real-world data, geriatric patients had excellent and comparable treatment outcomes with non-geriatric patients in safety and SVR12 rates to different DAA regimens.

Hepatitis C direct-acting antiviral outcomes in patients 75 years and older

Background and Aim

Elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have worse interferon‐based treatment outcomes than young patients. Direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have enabled the treatment of previously difficult‐to‐cure populations. There are few studies that specifically assess DAA treatment outcomes in patients over 75 years of age.

Methods

Design: This was a cohort study. Setting: The setting was three Canadian HCV specialty sites. Participants: Patients aged 75 years and older and treated with DAA without interferon were enrolled. Measurements: Patient demographics, liver fibrosis by transient elastography, treatment regimen, and treatment outcome data were collected.

Results

The mean age of 78 patients in our analysis was 78.6 years (SD 3.5; range: 75–88 years). The most common genotype was 1b (35%). The most frequently utilized regimens included sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir (33%) and ledipasvir‐sofosbuvir (32%). Ribavirin was included for 17% of recipients. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 94% of patients (69% of those receiving ribavirin and 98% of patients on ribavirin‐free regimens). Ribavirin toxicity contributed to the lower SVR rates in ribavirin‐exposed patients. Ribavirin dosage was decreased in three patients and ultimately discontinued in two of these patients. All treatment was discontinued in another two patients.

Conclusion

Ribavirin‐free DAA therapy is safe and achieves SVR rates in older adults comparable to those described in the general population. RBV inclusion frequently results in complications, often leads to treatment modification or interruption, and does not improve SVR rates in those with advanced age.

Hepatitis C virus-microelimination program and patient trajectories after hepatitis C virus cure in an outpatient HIV clinical unit

OBJECTIVE

Treatment recommendations for hepatitis C now make no distinction between HIV/HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. The largest challenge remained lack of effective models to eliminate HCV in people living with HIV. We report the results of a microelimination program evaluating the possibility of eradicating HCV in an HIV-outpatient clinical unit within 12 months.

METHODS

This HCV-microelimination program began in February 2016 in an unit following approximately 1000 HIV-infected patients and combined screening and therapeutic components according to the French guideline. A nested cohort study evaluating the impact of HCV cure on different health outcomes was conducted through self-administered questionnaires and using generalized mixed models.

RESULTS

Among 601 patients eligible for HCV serological testing, 445 were evaluated, and two HCV acute infections were diagnosed. Among the 151 patients eligible for HCV RNA quantification, 119 were evaluated, and one reinfection with HCV was diagnosed. Among the 110 patients eligible for direct-acting antiviral treatment, 51 (46.4%) initiated treatment within the 12 months program, and 35 (31.8%) after. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 96.1%, and two treatments failed. At least one self-reported symptom was declared by 72.5% (n = 29) of patients. Positive impact of HCV cure was observed on various markers of physical and mental health as well as on health habits.

CONCLUSION

Our program should be considered as a proof of concept, which confirmed the feasibility of a HCV-microelimination program at the scale of an HIV clinical unit. However, 12 months were not sufficient to achieve our objective despite the specific organization.

English hepatitis C registry data show high response rates to directly acting anti-virals, even if treatment is not completed

BACKGROUND

In England, choice of hepatitis C therapy is determined by national contracts that change with time, facilitating comparisons between different regimens. England has a diverse population with hepatitis C including large proportions of uncommon viral genotypes.

AIM

To evaluate efficacy of directly acting anti-viral treatments for hepatitis C in England using real-world data from the national treatment registry.

METHODS

Sustained virological response (SVR) rates 12 weeks after treatment completion for patients treated between 2014 and August 2018 who attended for SVR tests were analysed in univariate subgroups using Chi-squared tests. Multivariate models were constructed with clinically relevant variables to determine predictors of SVR and evaluate the impact of treatment regimens.

RESULTS

SVR data were available on 14,603 treated patients. The overall SVR rate was 95.59% [95% CI 95.25%-95.91%]. Multivariable regression modelling in patients with genotype 1 infection showed that the odds of SVR with elbasvir/grazoprevir were higher than for those treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (OR 1.891, 95% CI 1.072-3.336, P = 0.028). For genotype 3, we found no significant difference between any of the treatment regimens. Patients who completed at least one third of the planned treatment duration achieved SVR rates in excess of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the currently licensed hepatitis C direct-acting anti-viral regimens had similar efficacy (>95%) in an unselected population. Noncompletion of planned treatment duration still resulted in over 80% SVR rates provided that more than one third of treatment was completed.

Factors influencing hepatitis C cure in the era of direct-acting antivirals

Direct-acting antiviral agents are highly potent drugs with a strong genetic barrier. Consequently, the factors influencing hepatitis C cure have been reduced and have progressively lost importance. Host factors, such as the presence of cirrhosis, race, and treatment adherence, influence sustained viral response. Adherence, together with treatment errors and drug interactions, are also important, especially in older patients. Viral factors, such as viral load, genotype, and the presence of baseline resistances affect the response rate but their influence can be minimised by using pan-genotypic regimens. Treatment simplification and the high efficacy of new antiviral treatments will allow treatment universalisation and will hopefully enable elimination of the infection in the next few decades. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "The value of simplicity in hepatitis C treatment", which is sponsored by Gilead. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Importance of adherence to treatment with direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C

The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and the implementation of the National Strategic Plan has extended the spectrum of patients suitable for treatment to include practically all affected individuals. There has been a change in patient profile. Most patients are previously untreated, with lesser awareness of the disease, and taking polymedication, and are often under treatment with opioid replacement therapy, are active drug users or have psychiatric comorbidities. This article reviews the most important factors determining the degree of treatment adherence, in particular, drug therapy complexity, the adverse effects of DAA, demographic factors (age, ethnic group, sex, educational level, marital status) and psychosocial factors (beliefs, motivation to take therapy and negative attitude to therapy), as well as the doctor-patient relationship, knowledge/awareness of the disease, and finally comorbidities and drug abuse or abuse of other substances such as alcohol. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "The value of simplicity in hepatitis C treatment", which is sponsored by Gilead. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.