Perceptions Towards HCV Treatment with Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs): A Qualitative Analysis with Persons with HIV/HCV Co-infection Who Delay or Refuse Treatment

In the United States, approximately 25% of people with HIV (PWH) are co-infected with hepatitis C (HCV). Since 2014, highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized HCV treatment. Uptake of DAAs by people with HIV/HCV co-infection has improved but remains suboptimal due to system, provider, and patient-level barriers. To explore patient-level issues by better understanding their attitudes towards DAA treatment, we conducted qualitative interviews with 21 persons with HIV/HCV co-infection who did not consent to DAA treatment or delayed treatment for at least 1 year after diagnosis. We found PWH perceived DAA treatment barriers and facilitators on multiple levels of the social-ecological environment: the individual (HCV disease and treatment literacy), interpersonal (peer influence), institutional (media and healthcare provider relationship), and structural levels (treatment cost and adherence support). Recommendations to improve DAA treatment uptake include HCV-treatment adherence support, HCV disease and treatment literacy training (particularly for substance use and DAA treatment interactions), and encouraging PWH who have successfully completed DAA treatment to speak with their peers.

Tumor characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C: Comparative analysis with antiviral therapy-naive patients

BACKGROUND

Insufficient and contradictory data are available about the relation between direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV).

AIM

To analyze differences in basic clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics in addition to tumor behavior upon HCC diagnosis between patients with and without a previous history of DAAs exposure.

METHODS

This multicenter case-control study included 497 patients with chronic HCV-related HCC, allocated into one of two groups according to their history of antiviral treatment for their HCV.

RESULTS

Group I included 151 HCC patients with a history of DAAs, while 346 patients who had never been treated with DAAs were assigned to group II. A significant difference was observed between both groups regarding basic assessment scores (Child, MELD, and BCLC), which tended to have more advanced liver disease and HCC stage upon diagnosis in group I. However, serum albumin was significantly affected, and serum α-fetoprotein was significantly higher in group II (P < 0.001). In addition, group I showed significant HCC multicentricity than group II, while the incidence of portal vein thrombosis was significantly higher in group I (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The basic clinical scores and laboratory characteristics of HCC patients are advanced in patients who are naïve to DAAs treatment; however, HCC behavior is more aggressive in DAA-treated patients.

Excellent Safety and Sustained Virologic Response to Direct-Acting Antivirals Treatment in HCV-Infected Geriatric Patients: A Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are current standard of HCV treatment (Rx). However, data remain lacking on real-world safety, patterns of biochemical, virologic responses, and sustained virologic response (SVR12) rate in geriatric patients.

AIMS

The present study assessed clinical presentation, safety, SVR12 rate, dynamic changes in HCV RNA, ALT, and AFP in geriatric patients (age ≥ 65 year old, G1) versus non-geriatric patients (G2) with chronic hepatitis C and received DAA treatment.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study on 183 patients with DAA Rx and 12-week post-Rx follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patterns of biochemical and virologic responses between the two groups. Undetectable HCV RNA rates were 67.2% versus 75.7% (p = 0.22) and 77.3% versus 84.3% (p = 0.24) at Rx week 2 and Rx week 4, respectively. The SVR12 rate was comparable in 2 groups, 94.1% (G1) versus 95.7% (G2, p = 0.64). ALT normalization rates were 91.2% versus 91.3% (p = 0.98), 92.6% versus 93.9% (p = 0.74), and 97.1% versus 97.4% (p = 0.89) at Rx week 2, post-Rx week12, and post-Rx week 24, respectively. AFP normalization was lower in G1 with 89.7% versus 95.7% (p = 0.12), 77.9% versus 87.8% (p = 0.08), and 79.4% versus 92.2% (p = 0.01), at Rx week 2, and post-Rx week 12, and post-Rx week 24, respectively. Both groups showed similar side effects profile including fatigue 11.8% versus 12.2% (p = 0.93) and headache 11.8% versus 13.9% (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Based on our real-world data, geriatric patients had excellent and comparable treatment outcomes with non-geriatric patients in safety and SVR12 rates to different DAA regimens.

Direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hepatitis C Virus in geriatric patients: a real-world retrospective comparison between early and late elderly patients

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates are high in the geriatric population considering that interferon-based therapy is usually intolerable. With the introduction of oral antiviral therapy for HCV, increased treatment tolerability and good treatment responses have been observed. However, treatment data regarding the geriatric population have been limited. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV in the geriatric population.

Materials and Methods

The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after treatment completion, whereas the secondary end points were treatment-related side effects and short-term survival rate following treatment.

Results

In total, 492 patients (median age, 73 years; 43.9% males), including 278 early elderly patients, were enrolled. Among the included patients, 45% had cirrhosis. HCV genotypes 1 (72.4%) and 2 (25.4%) were the most common. The overall SVR rate was 96.7%, with no difference in SVR rates observed between early and late elderly groups (96.8% vs. 96.7%; p = 0.983). Both groups showed similar side effects, including dizziness (11.4%), and fatigue (8.7%), with three patients discontinuing therapy owing to side effects. Both groups had a similar 3-year survival rate. Significant factors associated with post-treatment survival included cirrhosis, albumin, and creatinine level.

Conclusions

Our real-world data showed that both early and late elderly patients could undergo direct-acting antiviral treatment for HCV with excellent treatment outcomes.

A platform in the use of medicines to treat chronic hepatitis C (PLATINUM C): protocol for a prospective treatment registry of real-world outcomes for hepatitis C

Background

Safe, highly curative, short course, direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies are now available to treat chronic hepatitis C. DAA therapy is freely available to all adults chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Australia. If left untreated, hepatitis C may lead to progressive hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Australia is committed to eliminating hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030 set by the World Health Organization. However, since the introduction of funded DAA treatment, uptake has been suboptimal. Australia needs improved strategies for testing, treatment uptake and treatment completion to address the persisting hepatitis C public health problem. PLATINUM C is a HCV treatment registry and research platform for assessing the comparative effectiveness of alternative interventions for achieving virological cure.

Methods

PLATINUM C will prospectively enrol people with active HCV infection confirmed by recent detection of HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) in blood. Those enrolled will agree to allow standardised collection of demographic, lifestyle, treatment, virological outcome and other relevant clinical data to better inform the future management of HCV infection. The primary outcome is virological cure evidenced by sustained virological response (SVR), which is defined as a negative HCV PCR result 6 to 18 months after initial prescription of DAA therapy and no less than 12 weeks after the completion of treatment. Study participants will be invited to opt-in to medication adherence monitoring and quality of life assessments using validated self-reported instruments (EQ-5D-5L).

Discussion

PLATINUM C is a treatment registry and platform for nesting pragmatic trials. Data collected will inform the design, development and implementation of pragmatic trials. The digital infrastructure, study procedures and governing systems established by the registry will allow PLATINUM C to support a wider research platform in the management of hepatitis C in primary care.

Trial registration

The trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ACTRN12619000023156). Date of registration: 10/01/2019.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12879-020-05531-4.

Peer to peer communication about hepatitis C treatment amongst people who inject drugs: A longitudinal qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how information on direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C circulates through peer networks of people who inject drugs. In this study we aimed to explore what and how treatment-related information is shared between people undergoing treatment and their peers.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from two general practice clinics and the community-based hepatitis C Treatment and Prevention Study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with each participant (N = 20) before, during and following treatment. Interviews explored hepatitis C treatment experiences, key sources of DAA information and the impact of receiving and sharing knowledge. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Time sequential matrices were generated to understand thematic change over time.

RESULTS

Fifty-four interviews were conducted with 20 participants across seven field-sites in Melbourne, Australia. Key themes were: 'peers as a source treatment information', 'do it together' and 'becoming a treatment advocate'. Peers were a crucial trusted source of information. Positive treatment anecdotes were important for building confidence in and motivation to initiate treatment. Many participants adopted a 'treatment advocate' role in their close peer networks, which was described as empowering. Some participants described benefits of undertaking treatment alongside members of their close network.

CONCLUSION

Findings illustrate the importance of close peers in shaping treatment perceptions and engagement. This will be important in designing health promotion messaging and interventions to increase treatment uptake.

Access to Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Among Veterans With Serious Mental Illness

OBJECTIVE

This study examined whether serious mental illness is associated with initiating and with completing sofosbuvir-based treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) among veterans who started treatment after the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) received expanded funding for HCV care.

METHODS

Administrative health care data from fiscal years 2016-2017 revealed 4,288 treatment-naïve patients with HCV, of whom 1,311 had initiated sofosbuvir-based treatment. Dependent variables were initiation and completion of ≥8 weeks of sofosbuvir treatment. Associations with serious mental illness were estimated with adjusted odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of veterans with and veterans without serious mental illness who initiated (p=0.628) or completed ≥8 weeks (p=0.301) of sofosbuvir treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Veterans with and without serious mental illness initiated and completed sofosbuvir treatment at similar rates. The VA should continue to provide equitable access to HCV treatments and support medication adherence.

Rapidly growing hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C

We report on a 62-year-old man with chronic hepatitis C who developed rapidly growing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after achieving sustained virological response at post-treatment week 24 (SVR 24) by direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. In 2008, he failed interferon therapy at 56 years of age. He received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for 24 weeks after confirmation of no liver tumor by abdominal ultrasonography. He had no advanced liver fibrosis. Three months after initiation of DAA treatment, a liver tumor measuring 6 mm in diameter was detected by ultrasonography and confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. After achieving SVR 24, the tumor increased in size to 16 mm. Two months later, a tumor biopsy was performed, and histology revealed moderately to poorly differentiated HCC. The patient's alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was within the normal range, but the Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP level was elevated. The diameter of the tumor increased to 32 mm at 2 months after diagnosis. Lymph node metastasis in porta hepatis was found by positron emission tomography at 4 months after diagnosis. The patient received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but died later. Careful monitoring is required during and after DAA treatment because HCC can grow fast even in patients with normal AFP and no advanced liver fibrosis.