Blockade of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease: Results of a Single-Center, Observational Cohort Study

Use and Benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent syndrome in elderly subjects. Currently, multiple drugs have shown clinical benefits in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, evidence is scarce in elderly patients (beyond 75 years old), even more so for the latest drugs, such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs). This study aims to evaluate the use and benefits of ARNIs in elderly patients with HFrEF. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was designed. Patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (defined by left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < 40%) and age ≥ 75 years from January 2016 to December 2020 were prospectively included. Patients with an indication for ARNIs at inclusion or throughout follow-up were selected. Clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables were collected. Results: A total of 616 patients were included, 34.4% of them female, with a mean age of 83.3 years, mean LVEF of 28.5% and ischemic etiology in 53.9% of patients. Only 14.3% of patients were taking ARNIs. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, 50.2% of patients died, and 62.2% had a cardiac event (total mortality or hospital admission due to HF). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the use of ARNIs was independently and significantly associated with lower rates of mortality [HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.21-0.61)], with similar results in relation to all-cause mortality in a propensity-score-matched analysis [HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.19-0.57)]. Conclusions: We observed an important underuse of ARNIs in a cohort of elderly HFrEF patients, in which treatment with ARNIs was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Greater implementation of clinical practice guidelines in this group of patients could improve their prognosis.

Older patients are less prone to fast decline of renal function: a propensity-matched study

PURPOSE

Despite CKD is common among older patients, and although factors associated with CKD progression have been explored over decades, little is known about the decline of renal function specifically in older individuals.

METHODS

We included adult patients with CKD on conservative management in a propensity-score matched study 1:1 older (> 65 year) and young (≤ 65 yr). Factors associated with the slope of the decline of eGFR such as proteinuria, initial eGFR, diabetes, sex, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor block (ACEI/ARB) were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were at least two consultations in the service and an initial eGFR lower than 45 ml/min/m2, in the period between January 2012 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Crude analysis of eGFR decline shows a slower progression of older patients when compared to younger patients in both absolute change [- 2.0 (- 4.5, - 1.0) vs. -3.0 (- 7.0, - 1.0) ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001] and slope of eGFR reduction [- 2.2 (- 4.4, - 1.0) vs. 3.1 (- 6.7, - 1.2)) ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001]. Patients considered fast progressors (> 5 ml/min/1.73 m2/year decline in eGFR) were less likely to be older (35.2% young vs. 22.0% older, p < 0.001). Adjusted logistic multivariate regression confirmed that older patients had less odds ratio of eGFR decline, independently of the presence of proteinuria, diabetes, ACEI/ARB use, sex, baseline eGFR, baseline phosphate and baseline 25(OH) vitamin D.

CONCLUSION

Older patients present slower CKD progression even after multiple adjustments. This information should be taken into consideration while treating these patients on conservative management and should be kept in mind while planning dialysis start.

Real-world evidence for steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were shown to delay chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with hypertension and/or heart failure (HF) and proteinuria.

Objective

We conducted a systematic literature review on real-world evidence to identify the literature gaps related to the efficacy and safety outcomes of MRAs administered to CKD patients.

Results

A total of 751 records were identified of which, 23 studies (26 publications) were analyzed. Studies included heterogeneous populations, including the overall CKD, CKD and diabetes, CKD and HF, and CKD and a history of cardiovascular disease. Most of the studies were small and non-rigorous, resulting in a notable lack of evidence in these populations. In the overall CKD population, steroidal MRAs resulted in a significant or sustained eGFR reduction but no efficacy in delaying progression to end-stage kidney disease. No cardiovascular protection was found. Results for all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF were inconsistent; however, the longest follow-up studies indicate similar or lower incidence for spironolactone non-users. Most results consistently reported a higher incidence of hyperkalemia among patients on steroidal MRAs in all CKD stages, and side effects led to high discontinuation rates in the real-world setting.

Conclusions

Despite the limited availability of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of steroidal MRAs in CKD patients and subgroups with diabetes, HF or history of cardiovascular disease, MRAs were shown to have a limited effect on renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Gaps in the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of MRAs are particularly relevant in diabetic CKD patients; therefore, further research is warranted.

Use of angiotensin receptor blocker is associated with improved 1 year mortality in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction

AIMS

Current evidence about the effect of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on the outcome of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is lacking. We aim to assess the association between use of ARB and 1 year all-cause mortality after hospitalization for HFmrEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the data of patients with ejection fraction of 40-49% in China Patient-centred Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Prospective Heart Failure Study; 4907 patients hospitalized for heart failure from 52 Chinese hospitals were enrolled from August 2016 to May 2018. Use of ARB was determined by prescriptions at discharge. Patients who died during hospitalization or were using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge were excluded. The association between the use of ARB and outcome was assessed using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. A total of 701 patients with HFmrEF were included for analysis. The mean age was 66.4 ± 12.8 years, and 267 (38.1%) were female. Of them, 244 were treated (34.8%) with ARB. During the 1 year follow-up period, patients treated with ARB had lower all-cause mortality compared with untreated patients (11.5% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.0005). Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that use of ARB was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.69, P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients hospitalized for HFmrEF, the use of ARB was associated with lower 1 year mortality after discharge.

Beta-blocker therapy in elderly patients with renal dysfunction and heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of beta-blockers (BB) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) aged ≥ 75 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2008 to July 2014, we included 390 consecutive patients ≥ 75 years of age with ejection fraction ≤ 35% and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m². We analyzed the relationship between treatment with BB and mortality or cardiovascular events. The mean age of our population was 82.6 ± 4.1 years. Mean ejection fraction was 27.9% ± 6.5%. GFR was 60-45 mL/min per 1.73 m² in 50.3% of patients, 45-30 mL/min per 1.73 m² in 37.4%, and < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m ² in 12.3%. At the conclusion of follow-up, 67.4% of patients were receiving BB. The median follow-up was 28.04 (IR: 19.41-36.67) months. During the study period, 211 patients (54.1%) died and 257 (65.9%) had a major cardiovascular event (death or hospitalization for heart failure). BB use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.74;P < 0.001). Patients receiving BB consistently showed a reduced risk of death across the different stages of CKD: stage IIIa (GFR = 30-45 mL/min per 1.73 m ²; HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.86,P < 0.0001), stage IIIb (GFR 30-45 mL/min per 1.73 m ²; HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.26-1.06,P = 0.007), and stages IV and V (GFR < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m ²; HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.76;P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BB in elderly patients with HFrEF and renal impairment was associated with a better prognosis. Use of BB should be encouraged when possible.

Role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in heart failure and chronic kidney disease

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are the key medications for patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated their benefits in an outpatient setting for the treatment of chronic heart failure. Additional advantages in acute heart failure treatment during inpatient hospitalization are less clear but a small number of non-randomized studies have favored their use. Conditions that result in stoppage of RAAS inhibitors during inpatient stay are an increase in serum creatinine, hyperkalemia, and hemodynamic instability such as hypotension. The role of RAAS inhibitors in chronic kidney disease has also been documented in multiple randomized controlled trials, with their use in hypertension and proteinuria being unambiguous. This narrative review summarizes the role of RAAS inhibitors in acute and chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Agreement Between Administrative Database and Medical Chart Review for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease G category

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health issue and cardiovascular risk factor. Validity assessment of administrative data for the detection of CKD in research for drug benefit and risk using real-world data is important. Existing algorithms have limitations and we need to develop new algorithms using administrative data, giving the importance of drug benefit/risk ratio in real world.

Objective

The aim of this study was to validate a predictive algorithm for CKD GFR category 4-5 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² but not receiving dialysis or CKD G4-5ND) using the administrative databases of the province of Quebec relative to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a reference standard.

Design

This is a retrospective cohort study using chart collection and administrative databases.

Setting

The study was conducted in a community outpatient medical clinic and pre-dialysis outpatient clinic in downtown Montreal and rural area.

Patients

Patient medical files with at least 2 serum creatinine measures (up to 1 year apart) between September 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015, were reviewed consecutively (going back in time from the day we started the study). We excluded patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. The study was started in September 2013.

Measurement

Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the CKD Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) from each patient's file. Several algorithms were developed using 3 administrative databases with different combinations of physician claims (diagnostics and number of visits) and hospital discharge data in the 5 years prior to the cohort entry, as well as specific drug use and medical intervention in preparation for dialysis in the 2 years prior to the cohort entry.

Methods

Chart data were used to assess eGFR. The validity of various algorithms for detection of CKD groups was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

A total of 434 medical files were reviewed; mean age of patients was 74.2 ± 10.6 years, and 83% were older than 65 years. Sensitivity of algorithm #3 (diagnosis within 2-5 years and/or specific drug use within 2 years and nephrologist visit ≥4 within 2-5 years) in identification of CKD G4-5ND ranged from 82.5% to 89.0%, specificity from 97.1% to 98.9% with PPV and NPV ranging from 94.5% to 97.7% and 91.1% to 94.2%, respectively. The subsequent subgroup analysis (diabetes, hypertension, and <65 and ≥65 years) and also the comparisons of predicted prevalence in a cohort of older adults relative to published data emphasized the accuracy of our algorithm for patients with severe CKD (CKD G4-5ND).

Limitations

Our cohort comprised mostly older adults, and results may not be generalizable to all adults. Participants with CKD without 2 serum creatinine measurements up to 1 year apart were excluded.

Conclusions

The case definition of severe CKD G4-5ND derived from an algorithm using diagnosis code, drug use, and nephrologist visits from administrative databases is a valid algorithm compared with medical chart reviews in older adults.