1
|
Klein Haneveld MJ, Hieltjes IJ, Langendam MW, Cornel MC, Gaasterland CMW, van Eeghen AM. Improving care for rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines using AGREE II. Genet Med 2024; 26:101071. [PMID: 38224026 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability require lifelong multidisciplinary care. Clinical practice guidelines may support healthcare professionals in their daily practice, but guideline development for rare conditions can be challenging. In this systematic review, the characteristics and methodological quality of internationally published recommendations for this population are described to provide an overview of current guidelines and inform future efforts of European Reference Network ITHACA (Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism, and Congenital Anomalies). METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Orphanet were systematically searched to identify guidelines for conditions classified as "rare genetic intellectual disability" (ORPHA:183757). Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II tool. RESULTS Seventy internationally published guidelines, addressing the diagnosis and/or management of 28 conditions, were included. The methodological rigor of development was highly variable with limited reporting of literature searches and consensus methods. Stakeholder involvement and editorial independence varied as well. Implementation was rarely addressed. CONCLUSION Comprehensive, high-quality guidelines are lacking for many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Use and transparent reporting of sound development methodologies, active involvement of affected individuals and families, robust conflict of interest procedures, and attention to implementation are vital for enhancing the impact of clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirthe J Klein Haneveld
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iméze J Hieltjes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte M W Gaasterland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnies M van Eeghen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Advisium, 's Heeren Loo Zorggroep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical experience. Paper 2: consumer engagement in living guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 155:97-107. [PMID: 36592876 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe and reflect on the consumer engagement approaches used in five living guidelines from the perspectives of consumers (i.e., patients, carers, the public, and their representatives) and guideline developers. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In a descriptive report, we used a template to capture engagement approaches and the experiences of consumers and guideline developers in living guidelines in Australia and the United Kingdom. Responses were summarized using descriptive synthesis. RESULTS One guideline used a Consumer Panel, three included two to three consumers in the guideline development group, and one did both. Much of our experience was common to all guidelines (e.g., consumers felt welcomed but that their role initially lacked clarity). We identified six challenges and opportunities specific to living guidelines: managing the flow of work; managing engagement in online environments; managing membership of the panel; facilitating more flexibility, variety and depth in engagement; recruiting for specific skills-although these can be built over time; developing living processes to improve; and adapting consumer engagement together. CONCLUSION Consumer engagement in living guidelines should follow established principles of consumer engagement in guidelines. Conceiving the engagement as living, underpinned by a living process evaluation, allows the approach to be developed with consumers over time.
Collapse
|