1
|
Beerda DCE, Greidanus MA, de Rijk AE, de Wind A, Tamminga SJ, Schaafsma FG. The SME tool supporting employers of small- and medium-sized enterprises during the return to work of employees on long-term sick leave: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and for a process evaluation. Trials 2024; 25:541. [PMID: 39152487 PMCID: PMC11328497 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08383-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Returning to work after long-term sick leave can be challenging, particularly in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) where support may be limited. Recognizing the responsibilities and challenges of SME employers, a web-based intervention (hereafter the SME tool) has been developed. The SME tool aims to enhance the employer's intention and ability to support the sick-listed employee. Based on the Self-Determination Theory, it is hypothesized that this intention is enhanced by intervening in the employer's autonomy, competences, and relatedness targeted at, e.g., communication with sick-listed employee, involvement of other stakeholders, and practical support. This is achieved by means of providing templates, communication videos, and information on legislation. This article describes the design of an effect and process evaluation of the SME tool. METHODS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted with a parallel-group design with two arms: an intervention group and a control group. Sick-listed employees (≤ 8 weeks) of SMEs (≤ 250 employees) at risk of long-term sick leave and their employers will be recruited and randomly allocated as a dyad (1:1). Employers randomized to the intervention group receive unlimited access to the SME tool, while those in the control group will receive care as usual. The primary outcome is the satisfaction of the employee with the return to work (RTW) support provided by their employer. Secondary outcomes include social support, work performance, and quality of work life at the employee level and self-efficacy in providing RTW support at the employer level. Outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Process evaluation measures include, e.g., recruitment and use of and perceived usefulness of the SME tool. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with employers, employees, and occupational physicians will explore the interpretation of the RCT results and strategies for the national implementation of the SME tool. DISCUSSION The SME tool is hypothesized to be valuable in addition to usual care helping employers to effectively support the RTW of their long-term sick-listed employees, by improving the employers' intention and ability to support. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06330415. Registered on February 14, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna C E Beerda
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Michiel A Greidanus
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Angelique E de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institute Primary Care and Public Health (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid de Wind
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sietske J Tamminga
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation & Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo YJ, Xue P, Gu WW, Su XQ, Li JM, Kuai BX, Xu JS, Xie HW, Han PP. Development and validation of Adaptability to Return-to-Work Scale (ARTWS) for cancer patients. Front Psychol 2024; 14:1275331. [PMID: 38741785 PMCID: PMC11090167 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The research on cancer patients returning to work in China is still in its infancy, and there is no research and discussion on the adaptability to return-to-work for cancer patients. It is critical to develop the Adaptability to Return-to-Work Scale (ARTWS) for cancer patients and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods The items of the initial scale were compiled based on the theoretical model and literature review results. Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation (N = 15) and a pilot survey (N = 40), the initial scale was further checked and revised. Conduct a large sample survey (N = 376) and the construct validity and reliability of the ARTWS were assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results The final ARTWS consisted of 24 items. "Focusing on rehabilitation," "Rebuilding Self-efficiency," and "Adjusting plans" as common factors in determining adaptability to return to work for cancer patients, and the cumulative variance contribution rate for these three factors was 66.6%. The S-CVI of the total scale was 0.979. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.937 and the 2-week test-retest reliability was 0.814. Discussion ARTWS has good correlation validity and can be used as a tool to measure the adaptability of cancer patients' return to work. The presentation of the manuscript in Research Square (https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2323264/v1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jie Guo
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Xue
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Office of Joint Medicine, Taizhou Second People’s Hospital, Jiangyan District, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wen-wen Gu
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rudong People’s Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiao-qin Su
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jia-mei Li
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ben-xin Kuai
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jia-shuo Xu
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hui-wen Xie
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping-ping Han
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong university, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu W, Hu D, Chen H, Li N, Feng X, Hu M, Cao F, Jin B, Zhang C. Quality of working life and adaptability of returning to work in nurse cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:226. [PMID: 38478116 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08409-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between quality of working life (QWL) and adaptability of returning to work (RTW) among nurse cancer survivors (NCSs). METHOD We conducted a cross-sectional study on nurses previously diagnosed with cancer. QWL was quantified using the Quality of Working Life Scale (QWL7-32), and the level of RTW adaptability was assessed using the Adaptability of Returning to Work for Cancer Survivors (ARTW-CS) scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to control for confounding factors, and a simple effect analysis was performed on the interaction term. RESULTS After controlling for sociodemographic, work-related, and health-related factors, the findings indicated a significant correlation between "adaptation and planning" and QWL score (p < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that "RTW gradualness" and "support seeking" had an interaction effect (p = 0.021). The simple effect analysis demonstrated that when the "RTW gradualness" score was ≥ 16 points, nurses with a high "support seeking" score (≥ 7 points) exhibited a significantly better QWL than those with a low "support seeking" score (< 7 points) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The interaction between "RTW gradualness" and "support seeking" in the ARTW-CS scale significantly impacted the QWL of the NCSs, underscoring the importance of implementing a gradual career plan and seeking support to enhance QWL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Xu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Danhong Hu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Na Li
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao Feng
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Miaoye Hu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fuxiao Cao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bixia Jin
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chunmei Zhang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yildirim H, Widdershoven CV, Aarts MJ, Bex A, Bloemendal HJ, Bochove-Overgaauw DM, Hamberg P, Herbschleb KH, van der Hulle T, Lagerveld BW, van Oijen MG, Oosting SF, van Thienen JV, van der Veldt AA, Westgeest HM, Zeijdner EE, Aben KK, van den Hurk C, Zondervan PJ, Bins AD. The PRO-RCC study: a long-term PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort in the Netherlands, providing an infrastructure for 'Trial within Cohorts' study designs. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:648. [PMID: 37434119 PMCID: PMC10337109 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11094-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ongoing research in the field of both localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma has resulted in the availability of multiple treatment options. Hence, many questions are still unanswered and await further research. A nationwide collaborative registry allows to collect corresponding data. For this purpose, the Dutch PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort (PRO-RCC) has been founded, for the prospective collection of long-term clinical data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs). METHODS PRO-RCC is designed as a multicenter cohort for all Dutch patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recruitment will start in the Netherlands in 2023. Importantly, participants may also consent to participation in a 'Trial within cohorts' studies (TwiCs). The TwiCs design provides a method to perform (randomized) interventional studies within the registry. The clinical data collection is embedded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Next to the standardly available data on RCC, additional clinical data will be collected. PROMS entail Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), symptom monitoring with optional ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of pain and fatigue, and optional return to work- and/or nutrition questionnaires. PREMS entail satisfaction with care. Both PROMS and PREMS are collected through the PROFILES registry and are accessible for the patient and the treating physician. TRIAL REGISTRATION Ethical board approval has been obtained (2021_218) and the study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05326620). DISCUSSION PRO-RCC is a nationwide long-term cohort for the collection of real-world clinical data, PROMS and PREMS. By facilitating an infrastructure for the collection of prospective data on RCC, PRO-RCC will contribute to observational research in a real-world study population and prove effectiveness in daily clinical practice. The infrastructure of this cohort also enables that interventional studies can be conducted with the TwiCs design, without the disadvantages of classic RCTs such as slow patient accrual and risk of dropping out after randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilin Yildirim
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Maureen Jb Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK
| | - Haiko J Bloemendal
- Department of Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Hamberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam/Schiedam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin H Herbschleb
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn Gh van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes V van Thienen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Am van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans M Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Katja Kh Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Corina van den Hurk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia J Zondervan
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ibikunle PO, Rhoda A, Smith MR, Useh U. Applying the ICF codes, flag model and C-OAR-SE in the development of return-to-work assessment scale for stroke survivors. Work 2023; 75:1427-1437. [PMID: 36710708 DOI: 10.3233/wor-220120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Return-to-Work Assessment Scale (RAS) was developed in 2021 by Ibikunle et al. to assess return-to-work among post-stroke survivors. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe how the conceptual (flag model and ICF) and theoretical framework (C-OAR-SE) were used in developing the RAS. METHOD The development of the RAS consisted of three phases: (i) Initial item generation (ii) Face and content validity (iii) Psychometric testing. With each phase embracing the flag model, international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) and the C-OAR-SE an acronym for the six aspects of the theory: 'C' [construct definition], 'OAR' [object representation, attribute classification, and rater entity identification], and 'SE' [selection of item type and answer scale, as well as, enumeration]. RESULTS A triangulated approach drawn on three separate theories and models. Phase one was developed by using the flag model which provided the semi-structured open ended questions that materialized into the draft instrument while phases two and three were developed using the ICF and the C-OAR-SE. The scale consists of two sections, A and B. Section A comprises general information about post-stroke survivors, which would not be scored, while section B includes three parts that are important to consider when deciding to return-to-work. CONCLUSION An instrument called RAS was developed, an excellent, internally consistent, as well as reliable tool that has demonstrated good group and structural validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter O Ibikunle
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nnewi, Nigeria
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
- Lifestyle Diseases Research Entity, Faculty of Health Sciences, North West University, Mahikeng, Republic of South Africa
| | - Anthea Rhoda
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
| | - Mario R Smith
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
| | - Ushotanefe Useh
- Lifestyle Diseases Research Entity, Faculty of Health Sciences, North West University, Mahikeng, Republic of South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kobayashi M, Sezai I, Ishikawa T, Masujima M. Psychological and educational support for cancer patients who return to work: A scoping review. Work 2022; 73:291-300. [DOI: 10.3233/wor-205326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients with cancer experience challenges when they return to work (RTW) following cancer diagnosis and treatment. Psycho-educational support is important to facilitate the RTW process. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review examined published reports on psycho-educational support for patients with cancer who RTW. METHODS: We followed the preferred reported items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement and the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database, PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), and ICHUSHI and performed manual searches. RESULTS: We retrieved 1,586 articles and retained 48 for analysis (published January 2000 to December 2020). Physicians, occupational physicians, nurses, social workers, and psychologists provide considerable support in hospitals. Delivery modes included individual, face-to-face, and workbook. Psychological support included emotional, stress coping, counseling, and knowledge. Educational support included information or advice provision, communication skills, problem discussion, and work planning. Employment status was typically the primary outcome. We included 50 measurement scales across quality of life, cognitive functioning and illness, self-efficacy, psychological distress, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This review elucidated psycho-educational support for patients with cancer who RTW, and measurement tools for related effects. Based on the characteristics of the psycho-educational support revealed in this study, future studies should examine the development, intervention, and implementation of support programs for patients’ RTW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamitsu Kobayashi
- Faculty of Nursing, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
- Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Izumi Sezai
- Faculty of Nursing, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takako Ishikawa
- Graduate School Health Care Scienses, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Rijk A, Carrasco-Negüe K, Houkes I. The Cross-Country Comparison Model for Labor Participation (CCC Model for LP) of Persons with Chronic Diseases. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2022; 32:225-240. [PMID: 35723804 PMCID: PMC9232459 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10041-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To design a model based on the three pillars of new institutional theory (NIT), that facilitates cross-country comparison of labor participation (LP) of people with chronic diseases. This model should support getting a comprehensive overview of factors representing country differences, understanding these differences and should support estimating cross-country transferability of policies and interventions in the context of Work Disability Prevention. Methods Based on NIT, a draft model was designed by means of (1) a literature review of empirical studies; (2) theoretical books and articles; (3) a focus group with six expert researchers. This draft model was (4) adapted in the context of academic education. Literature was searched on Web of Science and EBSCO host. Feedback on (use of) the model was received from the focus group, four different academic courses at 28 occasions and two international conferences. Results The cross-country comparison model for labor participation (CCC model for LP) of persons with chronic diseases is proposed consisting of five factors: (1) Legislation; (2) Norms & values in practice; (3) Culture; (4) Organization of WDP in practice; (5) Labor market characteristics. Within these factors and based on (in)direct empirical evidence, subfactors are distinguished. The feedback received led to renaming (sub) factors, improved visual representation and a tool for estimating transferability. Conclusions The CCC model for LP of persons with chronic diseases allows for a comprehensive understanding of country differences and cross-country transferability of policies and interventions. The CCC model can be used for other populations when population-specific subfactors are included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, the Netherlands.
| | - Karina Carrasco-Negüe
- Department of Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Inge Houkes
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Porro B, Campone M, Moreau P, Roquelaure Y. Supporting the Return to Work of Breast Cancer Survivors: From a Theoretical to a Clinical Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19095124. [PMID: 35564514 PMCID: PMC9105271 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Promoting the return to work of breast cancer survivors is of major interest to patients, healthcare and occupational health professionals, companies, governments, and researchers worldwide. We previously conducted a French consensus study resulting in a model describing the multifactorial process of the return to work of breast cancer survivors (the REWORK-BC model). Other work has identified the transtheoretical model as a relevant theoretical framework for interventions to promote the return to work of cancer survivors. In this opinion paper, we provide a theoretically-based clinical framework describing how to support breast cancer survivors at each stage of the return-to-work process. This clinical framework considers several essential aspects of supportive care for breast cancer survivors returning to work, such as: (i) helping the patient actively self-manage, by considering her to be the main decision-maker; (ii) respecting and adapting to the patient’s choice of professional project; (iii) respecting the temporality of the patient’s choices; (iv) proposing tailored interventions; (v) implementing simple tools to promote the return to work, shared representation between the patient and a multidisciplinary team, and improvement of working conditions and the knowledge of health and occupational professionals, and managers or employers; and (vi) maintaining certain flexibility aimed at proposing, but never imposing, changes in practices. This clinical framework, specific to breast cancer survivors, could be extrapolated to other tumor types, offering a practical guide for healthcare and occupational health professionals to better understand the return-to-work process of cancer survivors. This clinical framework aims to be a usable tool for any hospital or cancer care center wishing to implement a patient-centered intervention that promotes returning to work, regardless of the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Porro
- Univ. Angers, Univ. Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)—UMR_S 1085, SFR ICAT, F-49000 Angers, France;
- Correspondence:
| | - Mario Campone
- Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, F-44805 Saint-Herblain, France;
- Center for Research in Cancerology and Immunology Nantes-Angers, Inserm UMR 1232, Univ. Nantes and Univ. Angers, F-44307 Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Moreau
- University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, 44000 Nantes, France;
- University of Nantes, 44035 Nantes, France
| | - Yves Roquelaure
- Univ. Angers, Univ. Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)—UMR_S 1085, SFR ICAT, F-49000 Angers, France;
- Univ. Angers, CHU Angers, Univ. Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)—UMR_S 1085, SFR ICAT, F-49000 Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kobayashi M, Kako J, Kajiwara K, Ogata A. Response to "Occupational rehabilitation of male breast cancer patients: Return patterns, motives, experiences, and implications-A qualitative study". Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13445. [PMID: 34263975 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jun Kako
- College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
| | - Kohei Kajiwara
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan
| | - Ayako Ogata
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Greidanus MA, de Rijk AE, de Boer AGEM, Bos MEMM, Plaisier PW, Smeenk RM, Frings-Dresen MHW, Tamminga SJ. A randomised feasibility trial of an employer-based intervention for enhancing successful return to work of cancer survivors (MiLES intervention). BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1433. [PMID: 34289828 PMCID: PMC8293550 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11357-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Employers express a need for support during sickness absence and return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. Therefore, a web-based intervention (MiLES) targeted at employers with the objective of enhancing cancer survivors' successful RTW has been developed. This study aimed to assess feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention. Also preliminary results on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention were obtained. METHODS A randomised feasibility trial of 6 months was undertaken with cancer survivors aged 18-63 years, diagnosed with cancer < 2 years earlier, currently in paid employment, and sick-listed < 1 year. Participants were randomised to an intervention group, with their employer receiving the MiLES intervention, or to a waiting-list control group (2:1). Feasibility of a future definitive RCT was determined on the basis of predefined criteria related to method and protocol-related uncertainties (e.g. reach, retention, appropriateness). The primary effect measure (i.e. successful RTW) and secondary effect measures (e.g. quality of working life) were assessed at baseline and 3 and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS Thirty-five cancer survivors were included via medical specialists (4% of the initially invited group) and open invitations, and thereafter randomised to the intervention (n = 24) or control group (n = 11). Most participants were female (97%) with breast cancer (80%) and a permanent employment contract (94%). All predefined criteria for feasibility of a future definitive RCT were achieved, except that concerning the study's reach (90 participants). After 6 months, 92% of the intervention group and 100% of the control group returned to work (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.03); no difference were found with regard to secondary effect measures. CONCLUSIONS With the current design a future definitive RCT on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention on successful RTW of cancer survivors is not feasible, since recruitment of survivors fell short of the predefined minimum for feasibility. There was selection bias towards survivors at low risk of adverse work outcomes, which reduced generalisability of the outcomes. An alternative study design is needed to study effectiveness of the MiLES intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register ( NL6758/NTR7627 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Greidanus
- Department Public and Occupational Health/ Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - A E de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A G E M de Boer
- Department Public and Occupational Health/ Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E M M Bos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P W Plaisier
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Smeenk
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M H W Frings-Dresen
- Department Public and Occupational Health/ Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S J Tamminga
- Department Public and Occupational Health/ Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kobayashi M, Kako J, Kajiwara K, Ogata A. Regarding: Humayra Rashid et al. (2020) Returning to work in lung cancer survivors-a multi-center cross-sectional study in Germany. Supp Care Cancer; Published 19 November 2020. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4183-4184. [PMID: 33533987 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masamitsu Kobayashi
- Faculty of Nursing, National Defense Medical College, 3-2, Namiki, Tokorozawa-shi, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.
| | - Jun Kako
- College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
| | - Kohei Kajiwara
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan
| | - Ayako Ogata
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Greidanus MA, de Boer AGEM, de Rijk AE, Frings-Dresen MHW, Tamminga SJ. Response to Comment on "The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility". PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 14:141-143. [PMID: 33073338 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00472-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel A Greidanus
- Department Public and Occupational Health/Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Angela G E M de Boer
- Department Public and Occupational Health/Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique E de Rijk
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institute Primary Care and Public Health (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique H W Frings-Dresen
- Department Public and Occupational Health/Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sietske J Tamminga
- Department Public and Occupational Health/Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kobayashi M, Kako J, Kajiwara K, Ogata A. Letter to the Editor in response to Greidanus et al., June 2020, "The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility". THE PATIENT 2020; 14:139-140. [PMID: 33073337 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00470-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masamitsu Kobayashi
- Faculty of Nursing, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa-shi, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.
| | - Jun Kako
- Division of Nursing Science, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553, Japan
| | - Kohei Kajiwara
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, 1-1 Asty Munakata, Fukuoka, 811-4157, Japan
| | - Ayako Ogata
- Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, 1-1 Asty Munakata, Fukuoka, 811-4157, Japan
| |
Collapse
|