1
|
Håkansson AS, Andersson AC, Abrahamsson J, Stenmarker M. Early phase clinical trials in pediatric oncology: Swedish pediatric oncologists' experiences of balancing hope and expectations in life-threatening illnesses. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1395841. [PMID: 39220655 PMCID: PMC11361959 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim To study Swedish pediatric oncologists' practical and emotional experiences of referring, including and/or treating children in early-phase clinical trials. Methods A nationwide study was conducted using a mixed-method approach. Structured interviews based on a study-specific questionnaire and participants' personal reflections were utilized. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while participants' comments were analyzed using thematic analysis. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results In total, 29 physicians with 4 to 32 years of experience in pediatric oncology participated, with 19 (66%) having > 10 years of experience. Three themes appeared: 1) Optimization-based approach focused on finding the most suitable treatment and care for every child with a refractory/relapsed cancer eligible for an early-phase clinical trial; 2) Team-based approach aimed at establishing local and national consensus in decision-making for treatment options, including early-phase clinical trials and palliative care; 3) Family-based approach in which the physicians provided families with actionable information, listened to their desires, and endeavored to maintain hope in challenging circumstances. Several participants (40% with ≤ 10 years of experience and 58% with > 10 years of experience) viewed the early-phase clinical trial as a potential "chance of cure". A majority (80%) of physicians with ≤ 10 years of experience, reported that they often or always felt personally and emotionally affected by communication regarding early-phase clinical trials. Delivering difficult news in cases of uncertain prognosis was identified as the major challenge. None of the study participants felt adequately prepared in terms of sufficient knowledge and experience regarding early-phase clinical trials. The physicians expressed a need for guidance and training in communication to address these challenges. Conclusions Working with early-phase clinical trials highlight a field where physicians cannot solely rely on their expertise or past experiences, and where they are likely to be deeply emotionally involved. Physicians who care for children eligible for such studies require targeted educational initiatives and supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schröder Håkansson
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatrics, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann-Christine Andersson
- Jönköping Academy, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
- Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Abrahamsson
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Pediatrics, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Margaretha Stenmarker
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden
- Department of Pediatrics, Ryhov Hospital Jönköping, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koonrungsesomboon N, Charoenkwan P, Natesirinilkul R, Fanhchaksai K, Sakuludomkan W, Morakote N. What information and the extent of information to be provided in an informed assent/consent form of pediatric drug trials. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:113. [DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00856-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to determine the elements and the extent of information that child participants and their parents would like to read in an informed assent form (IAF)/informed consent form (ICF) of a pediatric drug trial.
Methods
A descriptive survey was conducted to determine the perceived importance of each element of the ICF content from child participants and their parents who underwent informed assent/consent of a multi-center pediatric drug trial. The respondents were asked to indicate the level of importance of each item in a questionnaire, by giving a rating scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important).
Results
A total of 22 families, 17 child participants with the diagnosis of hematology or oncology diseases and 27 parents, were enrolled. Among 30 items, risk–benefit aspects (i.e., direct health benefit [mean: 4.71 for child respondents, 4.89 for parent respondents], indirect/societal benefit [mean: 4.65, 4.85], major foreseeable risk [mean: 4.47, 4.78], post-trial benefit/provision [mean: 4.59, 4.74], and all adverse effects of the drug including uncommon adverse effects [mean: 4.53, 4.74]) were perceived to be of most concerning items from both child participants’ and parents’ viewpoint. None of the items were considered ‘slightly important’ or lower by more than 20% of the respondents.
Conclusions
For pediatric drug trials, risk–benefit information (including direct health benefit, indirect/societal benefit, and post-trial benefit/provision, as well as major foreseeable risk and adverse effects of the drug) should be made a salient feature of an IAF/ICF. This empirical data could help related stakeholders arrange essential information in order of importance and tailor an IAF/ICF to better suit child participants’ and parents’ needs, particularly for pediatric drug trials involving children with the diagnosis of hematology or oncology diseases.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamimed M, Leblond P, Dumont A, Gattacceca F, Tresch-Bruneel E, Probst A, Chastagner P, Pagnier A, De Carli E, Entz-Werlé N, Grill J, Aerts I, Frappaz D, Bertozzi-Salamon AI, Solas C, André N, Ciccolini J. Impact of pharmacogenetics on variability in exposure to oral vinorelbine among pediatric patients: a model-based population pharmacokinetic analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2022; 90:29-44. [PMID: 35751658 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-022-04446-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Better understanding of pharmacokinetics of oral vinorelbine (VNR) in children would help predicting drug exposure and, beyond, clinical outcome. Here, we have characterized the population pharmacokinetics of oral VNR and studied the factors likely to explain the variability observed in VNR exposure among young patients. DESIGN/METHODS We collected blood samples from 36 patients (mean age 11.6 years) of the OVIMA multicentric phase II study in children with recurrent/progressive low-grade glioma. Patients received 60 mg/m2 of oral VNR on days 1, 8, and 15 during the first 28-day treatment cycle and 80 mg/m2, unless contraindicated, from cycle 2-12. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling within the Monolix® software. Fifty SNPs of pharmacokinetic-related genes were genotyped. The influence of demographic, biological, and pharmacogenetic covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters was investigated using a stepwise multivariate procedure. RESULTS A three-compartment model, with a delayed double zero-order absorption and a first-order elimination, best described VNR pharmacokinetics in children. Typical population estimates for the apparent central volume of distribution (Vc/F) and elimination rate constant were 803 L and 0.60 h-1, respectively. Following covariate analysis, BSA, leukocytes count, and drug transport ABCB1-rs2032582 SNP showed a dramatic impact on Vc/F. Conversely, age and sex had no significant effect on VNR pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION Beyond canonical BSA and leukocytes, ABCB1-rs2032582 polymorphism showed a meaningful impact on VNR systemic exposure. Simulations showed that the identified covariates could have an impact on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Thus, a personalized dosing strategy, using those covariates, could help to optimize the efficacy/toxicity balance of VNR in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mourad Hamimed
- SMARTc Unit, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France. .,Inria-Inserm COMPO Team, Centre Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, Marseille, France.
| | - Pierre Leblond
- Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology IHOPe, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Aurélie Dumont
- Unité d'Oncologie Moléculaire Humaine, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Florence Gattacceca
- SMARTc Unit, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France.,Inria-Inserm COMPO Team, Centre Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, Marseille, France
| | | | - Alicia Probst
- Département de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, Lille, France
| | - Pascal Chastagner
- Service d'Hémato-Oncologie Pédiatrique, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Anne Pagnier
- Service d'Hémato-Oncologie Pédiatrique, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Emilie De Carli
- Service d'Hémato-Oncologie Pédiatrique, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Natacha Entz-Werlé
- Pédiatrie Onco-Hématologie Université de Strasbourg, CHRU Hautepierre, UMR CNRS 7021, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jacques Grill
- Département de Cancérologie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent et UMR CNRS 8203 Université Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Isabelle Aerts
- SIREDO Centre (Care, Innovation and Research in Paediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology), Institut Curie-Oncology Center, Paris, France
| | - Didier Frappaz
- Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology IHOPe, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | | - Caroline Solas
- Unité des Virus Émergents (UVE), Aix-Marseille Univ-IRD 190-Inserm 1207, Marseille, France.,Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology Laboratory, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas André
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Joseph Ciccolini
- SMARTc Unit, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France.,Inria-Inserm COMPO Team, Centre Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Inserm U1068-CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University U105, Marseille, France.,Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology Laboratory, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mackley MP, Fernandez NR, Fletcher B, Woolcott CG, Fernandez CV. Revisiting Risk and Benefit in Early Oncology Trials in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase I Trials of Targeted Single-Agent Anticancer Therapies. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:17-26. [PMID: 34994588 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Phase I trials are a crucial step in the evaluation of new cancer therapies. Historically, low rates of response (5%) and comparably high rates of death from toxicities (0.5%) have contributed to debates on the ethics and orientation of these trials. With the introduction of novel targeted therapies, a contemporary estimate is needed. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for reports of phase I oncology trials of single-agent targeted immunomodulators, molecularly targeted therapies, and antiangiogenic agents, published between January 2015 and July 2018. Adult and pediatric trials of solid and hematological malignancies were eligible. Treatment-related adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5) and response rates (objective, complete, and partial) were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-eight trial reports, covering 6,707 patients, were included. The rate of treatment-related deaths was 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1), while 13.2% of patients (9.5 to 17.3) experienced a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity. The combined objective response rate was 6.4% (4.6 to 8.5). Among trials using tumor biomarkers as eligibility criteria, the objective response rate was higher (12.0% [7.3 to 17.6] compared to 4.9% [2.5 to 5.7], P value < .01). The same was true of trials focusing on a single tumor type (13.4% [8.2 to 19.4]) compared to multiple tumor types (3.8% [2.5 to 5.3], P value < .01). CONCLUSION Reduced grade 5 risk and improved benefit appears to exist in modern phase I oncology trials, particularly in trials that target single tumor types and integrate biomarkers as eligibility criteria. These findings provide information to support informed consent discussions, highlight the need for improved reporting of phase I oncology trials, and provide direction for optimizing their design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas R Fernandez
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, Canada
| | - Benjamin Fletcher
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research (IAHR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Christy G Woolcott
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Conrad V Fernandez
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reeve BB, McFatrich M, Mack JW, Maurer SH, Jacobs SS, Freyer DR, Withycombe JS, Baker JN, Castellino SM, Lin L, Lucas NR, Hinds PS. Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 112:1143-1152. [PMID: 31999349 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements linked to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading may improve symptom adverse event (AE) reporting in pediatric oncology trials. We evaluated construct validity, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the Ped-PRO-CTCAE measurement system for children and adolescents undergoing cancer care. METHODS A total of 482 children and adolescents (7-18 years, 41.5% not non-Hispanic white) newly diagnosed with cancer and their caregivers participated from nine pediatric oncology hospitals. Surveys were completed at 72 hours preceding treatment initiation (T1) and at follow-up (T2) approximately 7-17 days later for chemotherapy, and 4+ weeks for radiation. Psychometric analyses examined the relationship of Ped-PRO-CTCAE items (assessing 62 symptom AEs) with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Lansky Play-Performance Scale, and medication use. A separate test-retest study included 46 children. RESULTS Ped-PRO-CTCAE and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale were strongly correlated across age groups at T2: 7-12 years (r = 0.62-0.80), 13-15 years (r = 0.44-0.94), and 16-18 years (r = 0.65-0.98); and over time. The Ped-PRO-CTCAE was strongly correlated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric measures at T2; for example, pain interference (r = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.76), fatigue severity (r = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69), and depression severity (r = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.81). Ped-PRO-CTCAE items differentiated children by Lansky Play-Performance Scale and by medication use. Test-retest agreement ranged from 54.3% to 93.5%. CONCLUSIONS This longitudinal study provided evidence for the construct validity and reliability of the core Ped-PRO-CTCAE symptom AE items relative to several established measures. Additional responsiveness data with clinical anchors are recommended. Incorporation of Ped-PRO-CTCAE in trials may lead to a better understanding of the cancer treatment experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Suite 230, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Molly McFatrich
- Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Suite 230, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana 1104, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Scott H Maurer
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Ave, 5th Floor Plaza Bldg, Suite 506, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Shana S Jacobs
- Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Mail Stop 54, Los Angeles, CA 90027-6016, USA
| | - Janice S Withycombe
- Clemson University School of Nursing, 508 Edwards, Clemson, SC 29634 [Formerly, Emory University, Atlanta, GA], USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 N Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, 2015 Uppergate Drive, ECC 436, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Li Lin
- Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Suite 230, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Nicole R Lucas
- Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Suite 230, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Pamela S Hinds
- Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hasan F, Widger K, Sung L, Wheaton L. End-of-Life Childhood Cancer Research: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-003780. [PMID: 33597286 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-003780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Children with incurable cancer may participate in research studies at the end of life (EOL). These studies create knowledge that can improve the care of future patients. OBJECTIVE To describe stakeholder perspectives regarding research studies involving children with cancer at the EOL by conduct of a systematic review. DATA SOURCES We used the following data sources: Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest (inception until August 2020). STUDY SELECTION We selected 24 articles published in English that examined perceptions or experiences of research participation for children with cancer at the EOL from the perspectives of children, parents, and health professionals (HPs). DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted data, assessed study quality, and performed thematic analysis and synthesis. RESULTS Eight themes were identified: (1) seeking control; (2) faith, hope, and uncertainty; (3) being a good parent; (4) helping others; (5) barriers and facilitators; (6) information and understanding; (7) the role of HPs in consent and beyond; and (8) involvement of the child in decision-making. LIMITATIONS Study designs were heterogeneous. Only one study discussed palliative care research. CONCLUSIONS Some families participate in EOL research seeking to gain control and sustain hope, despite uncertainty. Other families choose against research, prioritizing quality of life. Parents may perceive research participation as the role of a "good parent" and hope to help others. HPs have positive views of EOL research but fear that parents lack understanding of the purpose of studies and the likelihood of benefit. We identified barriers to research participation and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fyeza Hasan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada;
| | - Kimberley Widger
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Germovsek E, Barker CIS, Sharland M, Standing JF. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development, and the Importance of Standardized Scaling of Clearance. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 58:39-52. [PMID: 29675639 PMCID: PMC6325987 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0659-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling is important in the design and conduct of clinical pharmacology research in children. During drug development, PKPD modeling and simulation should underpin rational trial design and facilitate extrapolation to investigate efficacy and safety. The application of PKPD modeling to optimize dosing recommendations and therapeutic drug monitoring is also increasing, and PKPD model-based dose individualization will become a core feature of personalized medicine. Following extensive progress on pediatric PK modeling, a greater emphasis now needs to be placed on PD modeling to understand age-related changes in drug effects. This paper discusses the principles of PKPD modeling in the context of pediatric drug development, summarizing how important PK parameters, such as clearance (CL), are scaled with size and age, and highlights a standardized method for CL scaling in children. One standard scaling method would facilitate comparison of PK parameters across multiple studies, thus increasing the utility of existing PK models and facilitating optimal design of new studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Germovsek
- Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Heath, University College London, London, UK. .,Pharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, PO Box 591, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Charlotte I S Barker
- Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Heath, University College London, London, UK.,Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Heath, University College London, London, UK.,Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McGill BC, Wakefield CE, Hetherington K, Munro LJ, Warby M, Lau L, Tyrrell V, Ziegler DS, O’Brien TA, Marshall GM, Malkin D, Hansford JR, Tucker KM, Vetsch J. "Balancing Expectations with Actual Realities": Conversations with Clinicians and Scientists in the First Year of a High-Risk Childhood Cancer Precision Medicine Trial. J Pers Med 2020; 10:E9. [PMID: 32075154 PMCID: PMC7151613 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine is changing cancer care and placing new demands on oncology professionals. Precision medicine trials for high-risk childhood cancer exemplify these complexities. We assessed clinicians' (n = 39) and scientists' (n = 15) experiences in the first year of the PRecISion Medicine for Children with Cancer (PRISM) trial for children and adolescents with high-risk cancers, through an in-depth semi-structured interview. We thematically analysed participants' responses regarding their professional challenges, and measured oncologists' knowledge of genetics and confidence with somatic and germline molecular test results. Both groups described positive early experiences with PRISM but were cognisant of managing parents' expectations. Key challenges for clinicians included understanding and communicating genomic results, balancing biopsy risks, and drug access. Most oncologists rated 'good' knowledge of genetics, but a minority were 'very confident' in interpreting (25%), explaining (34.4%) and making treatment recommendations (18.8%) based on somatic genetic test results. Challenges for scientists included greater emotional impact of their work and balancing translational outputs with academic productivity. Continued tracking of these challenges across the course of the trial, while assessing the perspectives of a wider range of stakeholders, is critical to drive the ongoing development of a workforce equipped to manage the demands of paediatric precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany C. McGill
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
| | - Lachlan J. Munro
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
| | - Meera Warby
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia; (M.W.); (K.M.T.)
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Loretta Lau
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia;
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington 2750, Australia;
| | - Vanessa Tyrrell
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington 2750, Australia;
| | - David S. Ziegler
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia;
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington 2750, Australia;
| | - Tracey A. O’Brien
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia;
| | - Glenn M. Marshall
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia;
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Kensington 2750, Australia;
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada;
| | - Jordan R. Hansford
- Children’s Cancer Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Division of Cancer, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia; (M.W.); (K.M.T.)
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Janine Vetsch
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia; (C.E.W.); (K.H.); (L.J.M.); (L.L.); (D.S.Z.); (T.A.O.); (J.V.)
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vetsch J, Wakefield CE, Duve E, McGill BC, Warby M, Tucker KM, Malkin D, Lau L, Ziegler DS. Parents', Health Care Professionals', and Scientists' Experiences of a Precision Medicine Pilot Trial for Patients With High-Risk Childhood Cancer: A Qualitative Study. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; 3:1-11. [PMID: 35100729 DOI: 10.1200/po.19.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Children with high-risk cancers have low survival rates because current treatment options are limited. Precision medicine trials are designed to offer patients individualized treatment recommendations, potentially improving their clinical outcomes. However, parents' understanding is often limited, and expectations of benefit to their own child can be high. Health care professionals (HCPs) are often not familiar with precision medicine and might find managing families' expectations challenging. Scientists find themselves working with high expectations among different stakeholders to rapidly translate their identification of actionable targets in real time. Therefore, we wanted to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences of all stakeholders involved in a new precision medicine pilot trial called TARGET, including parents, their child's HCPs, and the scientists who conducted the laboratory research and generated the data used to make treatment recommendations. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with all participants and analyzed the interviews thematically. RESULTS We interviewed 15 parents (9 mothers; 66.7% bereaved), 17 HCPs, and 16 scientists. We identified the following themes in parents' interviews: minimal understanding and need for more information, hope as a driver of participation, challenges around biopsies, timing, and drug access, and few regrets. HCP and scientist interviews revealed themes such as embracing new technologies and collaborations and challenges managing families' expectations, timing of testing and test results, and drug access. CONCLUSION Educating families, HCPs, and scientists to better understand the benefits and limitations of precision medicine trials may improve the transparency of the translation of discovery genomics to novel therapies, increase satisfaction with the child's care, and ameliorate the additional long-term psychosocial burden for families already affected by high-risk childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Vetsch
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Duve
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brittany C McGill
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meera Warby
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Malkin
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loretta Lau
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David S Ziegler
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Béranger A, Bouazza N, de Haut de Sigy A, Foubert-Wenc AC, Davous D, Aerts I, Geoerger B, Auvrignon A, Brethon B, Leblond P, Corradini N, André N, Martinez H, Dupont JCK, Doz F, Chappuy H. Parents' and children's comprehension and decision in a paediatric early phase oncology trial: a prospective study. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:947-952. [PMID: 30472665 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse parents' and children's understanding of consent information and assess their decision-making process in paediatric oncology. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTINGS Eleven French paediatric oncology units. PATIENTS Parents and children who have been asked to give consent for participation in an early phase trial. INTERVENTIONS Thirty-seven children and 119 parents were questioned using an audio-recorded semistructured interview. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The participants' understanding of nine elements of the informed consent was assessed by comparing their answers with the informed consent leaflet. Their decision-making process was also evaluated. RESULTS Most parents and children had an excellent understanding regarding their participation in a clinical trial (respectively 88.2% and 48.6%), the right to withdraw (76.5% and 43.2%) and the prospects of collective benefits (74.8% and 48.6%). By contrast, less than half of the parents and few of the children correctly understood the alternatives (respectively 47.5% and 27%), the risks related to participation (44.5% and 10.8%), the prospects of individual benefits (33.6% and 10.8%) and the purpose of the clinical trial (12.6% and 2.7%). Twenty-six (70.3%) children participated in the decision-making process. Most parents and children felt they had no choice but to participate in the trial to have access to a new anticancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS What might appear to be a poor understanding of the research protocol may actually correspond to the families' interpretation of the situation as a coping mechanism. All children (except infants) should get age-tailored information in order for them to have a meaningful involvement in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Béranger
- Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Cochin-Necker, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Naïm Bouazza
- Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Cochin-Necker, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Amélie de Haut de Sigy
- Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Cochin-Necker, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Anne-Charlotte Foubert-Wenc
- Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Cochin-Necker, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Dominique Davous
- CHU Saint Louis, Espace éthique région Ile-de-France, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Aerts
- Centre Oncologie SIREDO (Soins, Innovation et Recherche pour enfants, adolescents et jeunes adultes atteints de cancer), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Birgit Geoerger
- Département d'oncologie pédiatrique et pour adolescents, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Auvrignon
- Hémato-Immuno-Oncologie Pédiatrique, hôpital Armand Trousseau, AP-HP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Benoît Brethon
- Hématologie immunologie pédiatrique, hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Leblond
- Oncologie pédiatrique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer, Lille, France
| | - Nadège Corradini
- Service d'hématologie et oncologie pédiatrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, Nantes, France.,Institut d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique (IHOPe), Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas André
- Hématologie et oncologie pédiatrique, hôpital de la Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.,INSERM UMR 911, Centre de recherche en oncologie biologique et en oncopharmacologie, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Hélène Martinez
- Institut d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique (IHOPe), Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Claude K Dupont
- Hospinnomics, Paris School of Economics, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - François Doz
- Centre Oncologie SIREDO (Soins, Innovation et Recherche pour enfants, adolescents et jeunes adultes atteints de cancer), Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Chappuy
- Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Cochin-Necker, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France.,Urgences pédiatriques, hôpital Armand Trousseau, AP-HP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Joseph PD, Craig JC, Tong A, Caldwell PHY. Researchers', Regulators', and Sponsors' Views on Pediatric Clinical Trials: A Multinational Study. Pediatrics 2016; 138:peds.2016-1171. [PMID: 27940891 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The last decade has seen dramatic changes in the regulatory landscape to support more trials involving children, but child-specific challenges and inequitable conduct across income regions persist. The goal of this study was to describe the attitudes and opinions of stakeholders toward trials in children, to inform additional strategies to promote more high-quality, relevant pediatric trials across the globe. METHODS Key informant semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders (researchers, regulators, and sponsors) who were purposively sampled from low- to middle-income countries and high-income countries. The transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-five stakeholders from 10 countries were interviewed. Five major themes were identified: addressing pervasive inequities (paucity of safety and efficacy data, knowledge disparities, volatile environment, double standards, contextual relevance, market-driven forces, industry sponsorship bias and prohibitive costs); contending with infrastructural barriers (resource constraints, dearth of pediatric trial expertise, and logistical complexities); navigating complex ethical and regulatory frameworks ("draconian" oversight, ambiguous requirements, exploitation, excessive paternalism and precariousness of coercion versus volunteerism); respecting uniqueness of children (pediatric research paradigms, child-appropriate approaches, and family-centered empowerment); and driving evidence-based child health (advocacy, opportunities, treatment access, best practices, and research prioritization). CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders acknowledge that changes in the regulatory environment have encouraged more trials in children, but they contend that inequities and political, regulatory, and resource barriers continue to exist. Embedding trials as part of routine clinical care, addressing the unique needs of children, and streamlining regulatory approvals were suggested. Stakeholders recommended increasing international collaboration, establishing centralized trials infrastructure, and aligning research to child health priorities to encourage trials that address global child health care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pathma D Joseph
- Centre for Kidney Research and .,The Pharmacy Department, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; and.,Discipline of Adolescent and Child Health and
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research and.,School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research and.,School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
|