Medical Options for the Adjuvant Treatment and Management of Pediatric Melanoma

Pediatric model-based dose optimization using a pooled exposure-response safety analysis for nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in melanoma

An exposure-response (E-R) safety analysis was conducted across adult and pediatric (<18 years) studies to evaluate the potential impact of higher nivolumab and/or ipilimumab exposures in adolescents (≥12 to <18 years) versus adults with melanoma using the approved adult dosing regimens for nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab. Data from 3507 patients across 15 studies were used to examine the relationship between nivolumab-ipilimumab daily average exposure and time to grade 2+ immune-mediated adverse events (gr2+ IMAEs). Results from the E-R safety model showed ipilimumab, but not nivolumab, exposure to be a statistically significant predictor of gr2+ IMAEs. Significant covariates included sex (41% higher risk for women than men), line of therapy (19% higher for first-line than later-line), and treatment setting (26% lower for adjuvant than advanced melanoma). Younger age and lower body weight (BW) were each associated with a lower risk of gr2+ IMAEs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.830 for 15-year-olds versus 60-year-olds and 0.84 for BW 52 kg versus 75 kg). For adolescents with melanoma treated with nivolumab in the advanced or adjuvant settings, these results are supportive of nivolumab flat dosing regimens for adolescents greater than or equal to 40 kg and BW-based dosing for adolescents less than 40 kg. These results also support adult weight-based dosing regimens for nivolumab plus ipilimumab in adolescents with advanced melanoma. This analysis suggests that although higher exposures are predicted in adolescents with lower weight compared with adults, there is no predicted immune-mediated safety risk when treated with the approved adult dosing of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab.

Pediatric Melanoma-Diagnosis, Management, and Anticipated Outcomes

Melanoma is the most common skin cancer in children, often presenting in an atypical fashion. The incidence of melanoma in children has been declining. The mainstay of therapy is surgical resection. Sentinel lymph node biopsy often is indicated to guide therapy and determine prognosis. Completion lymph node dissection is recommended in selective cases after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Those with advanced disease receive adjuvant systemic treatment. Because children are excluded from melanoma clinical trials, management is based on pediatric retrospective data and adult clinical trials. This review focuses on epidemiology, presentation, surgical management, adjuvant therapy, and outcomes of pediatric melanoma.

Trends in pediatric skin cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To inform pediatric providers of the clinical characteristics, underlying genetic drivers, and therapeutic options for skin cancer arising in childhood and adolescence.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of melanoma in pediatric patients has been declining in the past decades. Pediatric-specific diagnostic criteria should be utilized when assessing lesions concerning for melanoma to better account for the different presentations seen in pediatric disease compared with adults, such as an increased prevalence of amelanotic melanoma or frequent mimic of benign pediatric lesions. Pediatric melanoma often presents with a higher histopathologic stage and a higher Breslow depth as compared with adult melanoma. Pediatric nonmelanoma skin cancer including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are associated with genetic conditions and immunosuppression, both iatrogenic and inherited.

SUMMARY

Melanoma in pediatric patients often presents differently from conventional adult melanoma, including Spitz melanoma and melanoma associated with congenital melanocytic nevi. Pediatric patients with nonmelanoma skin cancers should be evaluated for predisposing risk factors. More research on therapeutic options for pediatric skin cancer is vital to understanding the tolerance and response of our pediatric patients to therapies that are more frequently utilized in adult disease.

National Burden of Hospitalization Due to Cutaneous Melanoma in Adolescents and Young Adults

OBJECTIVES

Although adolescents and young adults (AYA) suffer disproportionately from cutaneous melanoma (CM), little is known regarding the burden of CM leading to hospitalization in AYA. The objective of this study was to elucidate sociodemographic/hospitalization characteristics of AYA CM inpatients, determine which factors lead to the greater length of stay (LOS) and cost of care for AYA CM inpatients, and evaluate trends in the prevalence, LOS, and cost of care for AYA CM hospitalizations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of nationally representative data from the 2009 to 2015 National Inpatient Sample. Multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to determine sociodemographic factors associated with AYA CM hospitalization. Multivariable survey-weighted linear regression models were used to determine characteristics associated with the greater cost of care and LOS in AYA CM inpatients.

RESULTS

A total of 8986 AYA CM inpatients were included in this study. The prevalence of AYA CM hospitalizations is decreasing over time while the cost of care is increasing. On average, AYA CM hospitalizations were 3.3 days long and cost $38,018.40. Controlling for all covariates, male sex, older age, non-Hispanic white race, higher income, private insurance, and elective admissions were associated with AYA hospitalization due to CM (P<0.0001). Male sex was associated with longer LOS (P=0.007) and cost of care (P=0.01) among AYA hospitalized for CM.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a decreasing prevalence of CM hospitalizations in AYA inpatients, the economic burden of these hospitalizations is increasing. Substantial sex-based differences exist in the inpatient burden of AYA CM. Further research is required to elucidate the causes of these differences and prevent AYA hospitalization due to CM.