1
|
Hamada T, Oyama H, Igarashi A, Kawaguchi Y, Lee M, Matsui H, Michihata N, Nakai Y, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H, Fujishiro M. Optimal age to discontinue long-term surveillance of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: comparative cost-effectiveness of surveillance by age. Gut 2024; 73:955-965. [PMID: 38286589 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current guidelines recommend long-term image-based surveillance for patients with low-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). This simulation study aimed to examine the comparative cost-effectiveness of continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages and define the optimal age to stop surveillance. DESIGN We constructed a Markov model with a lifetime horizon to simulate the clinical course of patients with IPMNs receiving imaging-based surveillance. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages to stop surveillance, stratified by sex and IPMN types (branch-duct vs mixed-type). We determined the optimal age to stop surveillance as the lowest age at which the ICER exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year. To estimate model parameters, we used a clinical cohort of 3000 patients with IPMNs and a national database including 40 166 patients with pancreatic cancer receiving pancreatectomy as well as published data. RESULTS In male patients, the optimal age to stop surveillance was 76-78 years irrespective of the IPMN types, compared with 70, 73, 81, and 84 years for female patients with branch-duct IPMNs <20 mm, =20-29 mm, ≥30 mm and mixed-type IPMNs, respectively. The suggested ages became younger according to an increasing level of comorbidities. In cases with high comorbidity burden, the ICERs were above the willingness-to-pay threshold irrespective of sex and the size of branch-duct IPMNs. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of long-term IPMN surveillance depended on sex, IPMN types, and comorbidity levels, suggesting the potential to personalise patient management from the health economic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Oyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ataru Igarashi
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
- Unit of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihye Lee
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mehra T, Lupatsch JE, Kössler T, Dedes K, Siebenhüner AR, von Moos R, Wicki A, Schwenkglenks ME. Olaparib not cost-effective as maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2 germline-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0301271. [PMID: 38573891 PMCID: PMC10994352 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of olaparib as a maintenance therapy in platinum-responsive, metastatic pancreatic cancer patients harboring a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, using the Swiss context as a model. METHODS Based on data from the POLO trial, published literature and local cost data, we developed a partitioned survival model of olaparib maintenance including full costs for BRCA1/2 germline testing compared to FOLFIRI maintenance chemotherapy and watch-and-wait. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the base case and several scenario analyses and estimated 5-year budget impact. RESULTS Comparing olaparib with watch-and wait and maintenance chemotherapy resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of CHF 2,711,716 and CHF 2,217,083 per QALY gained, respectively. The 5-year costs for the olaparib strategy in Switzerland would be CHF 22.4 million, of which CHF 11.4 million would be accounted for by germline BRCA1/2 screening of the potentially eligible population. This would amount to a budget impact of CHF 15.4 million (USD 16.9 million) versus watch-and-wait. CONCLUSIONS Olaparib is not a cost-effective maintenance treatment option. Companion diagnostics are an equally important cost driver as the drug itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarun Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Judith E. Lupatsch
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM) and Health Economics Facility, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Kössler
- Service d’oncologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Roger von Moos
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Wicki
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias E. Schwenkglenks
- Department of Public Health and Head of Research, Health Economics Facility, Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tafazzoli A, Ramsey SD, Shaul A, Chavan A, Ye W, Kansal AR, Ofman J, Fendrick AM. The Potential Value-Based Price of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection Genomic Blood Test to Complement Current Single Cancer Screening in the USA. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:1107-1117. [PMID: 36038710 PMCID: PMC9550746 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing could increase detection of cancer at early stages, when survival outcomes are better and treatment costs are lower, but is expected to increase screening costs. This study modeled an MCED test for 19 solid cancers in a US population and estimated the potential value-based price (the maximum price to meet a given willingness to pay) of the MCED test plus current single cancer screening (usual care) compared to usual care alone from a third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. METHODS A hybrid cohort-level state-transition and decision-tree model was developed to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes of annual MCED testing between age 50 and 79 years. The impact on time and stage of diagnosis was computed using an interception modeling approach, with the consequences of cancer modeled based on stage at diagnosis. The model parameters were mainly sourced from the literature, including a published case-control study to inform MCED test performance. All costs were inflated to 2021 US dollars. RESULTS Multi-cancer early detection testing shifted cancer diagnoses to earlier stages, with a 53% reduction in stage IV cancer diagnoses, resulting in longer overall survival compared with usual care. Addition of MCED decreased per cancer treatment costs by $5421 and resulted in a gain of 0.13 and 0.38 quality-adjusted life-years across all individuals in the screening program and those diagnosed with cancer, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the potential value-based price of an MCED test was estimated at $1196. The projected survival of individuals diagnosed with cancer and the number of cancers detected at an earlier stage by MCED had the greatest impact on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS An MCED test with high specificity would potentially improve long-term health outcomes and reduce cancer treatment costs, resulting in a value-based price of $1196 at a $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year willingness-to-pay threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Tafazzoli
- GRAIL LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., 1525 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc. (at time of study), Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alissa Shaul
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ameya Chavan
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Weicheng Ye
- Evidence Synthesis, Modeling & Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anuraag R Kansal
- GRAIL LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., 1525 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - Josh Ofman
- GRAIL LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., 1525 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - A Mark Fendrick
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Value-Based Insurance Design, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raphael MJ, Raskin W, Habbous S, Tai X, Beca J, Dai WF, Arias J, Forbes L, Gavura S, Biagi JJ, Earle CC, Chan KKW. The Association of Drug-Funding Reimbursement With Survival Outcomes and Use of New Systemic Therapies Among Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133388. [PMID: 34779846 PMCID: PMC8593760 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) both improve survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer when compared with single-agent gemcitabine in clinical trials. Objective To describe changes in the survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer associated with sequential drug-funding approvals and to determine if there exist distinct patient populations for whom GEMNAB and FOLFIRINOX are associated with survival benefit. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based, retrospective cohort study examined all incident cases of advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada (2008-2018) that were identified from the Cancer Care Ontario (Ontario Health) New Drug Funding Program database. Statistical analysis was performed from October 2020 to January 2021. Exposures First-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were the proportion of patients treated with each chemotherapy regimen over time and overall survival for each regimen. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival between treatment regimens after adjustment for confounding variables, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and matching. Results From 2008 to 2018, 5465 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with first-line chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada. The median (range) age of patients was 66.9 (27.8-93.4) years; 2447 (45%) were female; 878 (16%) had prior pancreatic resection, and 328 (6%) had prior adjuvant gemcitabine. During the time period when only gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX were funded (2011-2015), 49% (929 of 1887) received FOLFIRINOX. When GEMNAB was subsequently funded (2015-2018), 9% (206 of 2347) received gemcitabine, 44% (1034 of 2347) received FOLFIRINOX, and 47% (1107 of 2347) received GEMNAB. The median overall survival increased from 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.1-6.0 months) in 2008 to 2011 to 6.9 months (95% CI, 6.5-7.4 months) in 2011 to 2015 to 7.6 months (95% CI, 7.1-8.0 months) in 2015 to 2018. Patients receiving FOLFIRINOX were younger and healthier than patients receiving GEMNAB. After adjustment and weighting, FOLFIRINOX was associated with better overall survival than GEMNAB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69-0.81]). In analyses comparing patients treated with GEMNAB and gemcitabine, GEMNAB was associated with better overall survival (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy within a universal health care system found that drug funding decisions were associated with increased uptake of new treatment options over time and improved survival. Both FOLFIRINOX and GEMNAB were associated with survival benefits in distinct patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Raphael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Raskin
- Department of Oncology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Habbous
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xiaochen Tai
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaclyn Beca
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei F. Dai
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Arias
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leta Forbes
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Gavura
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James J. Biagi
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig C. Earle
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin K. W. Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi BM, Abraham RB, Halawah H, Calamia M, Obeng-Kusi M, Alrawashdh N, Arku D, Abraham I. Comparing jurisdiction-specific pharmaco-economic evaluations using medical purchasing power parities. J Med Econ 2021; 24:34-41. [PMID: 34866529 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2007705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate how medical purchasing power parities (mPPP) may harmonize economic evaluations from different jurisdictions and enable comparisons across jurisdictions. METHODS We describe the use of mPPPs and illustrate this with an example of economic evaluations of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (Nab-P + Gem) versus gemcitabine monotherapy in the setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Following a literature search, we extracted data from cost-effectiveness studies on these treatments performed in various countries. mPPPs from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development were used to convert reported costs in the jurisdiction of origins to US dollars for the most current year using two possible pathways: (1) reported costs first adjusted by mPPP then adjusted by exchange index; and (2) reported costs first adjusted by exchange index then adjusted by mPPP. RESULTS Despite many of the pharmaco-economic evaluations sharing similar assumptions and inputs, even after mPPP conversion, residual heterogeneity was attributable to perspectives, discount rate, outcomes, and costs, among others; including in studies conducted in the same jurisdiction. CONCLUSION Despite the methodological challenges and heterogeneity within and across jurisdictions, we demonstrated that mPPP offers a way to compare economic evaluations across jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana M Choi
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Rachel B Abraham
- Department of Community, Environment and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Hala Halawah
- Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Matthias Calamia
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mavis Obeng-Kusi
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Neda Alrawashdh
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel Arku
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kharat AA, Nelson R, Au T, Biskupiak J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic cancer in the United States based on PRODIGE-24 and APACT trials. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2021; 27:1367-1375. [PMID: 34595948 PMCID: PMC10391115 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is associated with low median overall survival. Combination chemotherapy regimens FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) are the new adjuvant treatment standards for resectable pancreatic cancer. PRODIGE-24 and APACT trials demonstrated superior clinical outcomes with FOLFIRINOX and GemNab, each vs gemcitabine monotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX vs GemNab for resectable pancreatic cancer in adults from the U.S. payer perspective, in order to inform decision makers about which of these treatments is optimal. METHODS: A Markov model with 3 disease states (relapse free, progressive disease, and death) was developed. Cycle length was 1 month, and time horizon was 10 years. Transition probabilities were derived from PRODIGE-24 and APACT survival data. All cost and utility input parameters were obtained from published literature. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to obtain total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. The effect of uncertainty on model parameters was assessed with 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS: Our analysis estimated that the cost for FOLFIRINOX was $40,831 higher than GemNab ($99,669 vs. $58,837). Despite increased toxicity, FOLFIRINOX was associated with additional 0.18 QALYs and 0.25 LYs compared with GemNab (QALY: 1.65 vs. 1.47; LY: 2.09 vs. 1.84). The ICER for FOLFIRINOX vs GemNab was $226,841 per QALY and $163,325 per LY. FOLFIRINOX was not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200,000 per QALY, and this was confirmed by the PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Total monthly cost for FOLFIRINOX was approximately 1.7 times higher than GemNab. If the WTP threshold increases to or above $250,000 per QALY, FOLFIRINOX then becomes a cost-effective treatment option. DISCLOSURES: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi A Kharat
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Richard Nelson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Trang Au
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Joseph Biskupiak
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu P, Wang X, Li T, Li L, Wu H, Tu J, Zhang R, Zhang L, Guo Z, Chen Q. Bioinspired Microenvironment Responsive Nanoprodrug as an Efficient Hydrophobic Drug Self-Delivery System for Cancer Therapy. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2021; 13:33926-33936. [PMID: 34254767 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c09612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Artemisinin compounds have shown satisfactory safety records in anti-malarial clinical practice over decades and have revealed value as inexpensive anti-tumor adjuvant chemotherapeutic drugs. However, the rational design and precise preparation of nanomedicines based on the artemisinin drugs are still limited due to their non-aromatic and fragile chemical structure. Herein, a bioinspired coordination-driven self-assembly strategy was developed to manufacture the artemisinin-based nanoprodrug with a significantly increased drug loading efficacy (∼70 wt %) and decreased preparation complexity compared to conventional nanodrugs. The nanoprodrug has suitable size distribution and robust colloidal stability for cancer targeting in vivo. The nanoprodrug was able to quickly disassemble in the tumor microenvironment with weak acidity and a high glutathione concentration, which guarantees a better tumor inhibitory effect than direct administration and fewer side effects on normal tissues in vivo. This work highlights a new strategy to harness a robust, simplified, organic solvent-free, and highly repeatable route for nanoprodrug manufacturing, which may offer opportunities to develop cost-effective, safe, and clinically available nanomedicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengping Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
| | - Xueying Wang
- Anhui Key Laboratory for Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
| | - Tuanwei Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
| | - Lingli Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
| | - Huihui Wu
- Anhui Key Laboratory for Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
| | - Jinwei Tu
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
| | - Ruoyang Zhang
- Changzhou Senior High School of Jiangsu Province, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
| | - Zhen Guo
- Anhui Key Laboratory for Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
| | - Qianwang Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at Microscale and Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li N, Zheng H, Huang Y, Zheng B, Cai H, Liu M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Olaparib Maintenance Treatment for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:632818. [PMID: 33959007 PMCID: PMC8096350 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.632818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The PARP inhibitor olaparib has been shown to have clinical efficacy in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and ovarian or breast cancer. However, the high treatment cost associated with this drug limits its viability as a clinical treatment option. This work aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of olaparib as a maintenance treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer from the perspective of the United States and China healthcare systems and provides valuable suggestions for clinical decision making. Method: A three-state Markov model (progression-free, progressed disease, death) was constructed using TreeAge Pro 2020 software to evaluate the economic value of olaparib vs. placebo maintenance treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer based on the clinical data derived from phase III randomized controlled trial (POLO, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02184195). Total costs, quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were used as economic indicators for this analysis. A 5-years horizon and 5%/year discount rates were used. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to assess the model uncertainty. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the use of olaparib vs. placebo in China and the United States were $6,694/QALY and $13327/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were far below the thresholds of $30829 in China and $50000 in the United States. Sensitivity analysis confirmed a stable economic advantage in the use of olaparib vs. placebo as maintenance therapy in China and the United States. Conclusion: Olaparib was estimated to be more cost effective than placebo for the maintenance therapy of patients with a germline BRCA mutation and pancreatic cancer in China and the United States at thresholds of $30829 and $50000 per QALY, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Huanrui Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yanlei Huang
- School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bin Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hongfu Cai
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Maobai Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu B, Shi L. Cost-Effectiveness of Maintenance Olaparib for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1528-1536. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has been shown to be effective. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance olaparib for MPC from the US payer perspective. Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model was adopted to project the disease course of MPC. Efficacy and toxicity data were gathered from the Pancreas Cancer Olaparib Ongoing (POLO) trial. Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in each POLO group. Cost and health preference data were derived from the literature. The incremental cost-utility ratio, incremental net-health benefit, and incremental monetary benefit were measured. Subgroup analysis, one-way analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to explore the model uncertainties. Results: Maintenance olaparib had an incremental cost-utility ratio of $191,596 per additional progression-free survival (PFS) quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, with a high cost of $132,287 and 0.691 PFS QALY gained, compared with results for a placebo. Subgroup analysis indicated that maintenance olaparib achieved at least a 16.8% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $200,000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were sensitive to the hazard ratio of PFS and the cost of olaparib. When overall survival was considered, maintenance olaparib had an incremental cost-utility ratio of $265,290 per additional QALY gained, with a high cost of $128,266 and 0.483 QALY gained, compared with results for a placebo. Conclusions: Maintenance olaparib is potentially cost-effective compared with placebo for patients with a germline BRCA mutation and MPC. Economic outcomes could be improved by tailoring treatment based on individual patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Wu
- 1Medical Decision and Economic Group, Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, South Campus, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China; and
| | - Lizheng Shi
- 2Department of Global Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|