Cost-of-Illness Progression Before and After Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study in Sweden of People Newly Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and a Population-Based Matched Reference Group

Excess costs of multiple sclerosis: a register-based study in Sweden

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Population-based estimates of the socioeconomic burden of multiple sclerosis (MS) are limited, especially regarding primary healthcare. This study aimed to estimate the excess costs of people with MS that could be attributed to their MS, including primary healthcare.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted of the 2806 working-aged people with MS in Stockholm, Sweden and 28,060 propensity score matched references without MS. Register-based resource use was quantified for 2018. Annual healthcare costs (primary, specialised outpatient, and inpatient healthcare visits along with prescribed drugs) and productivity losses (operationalised by sickness absence and disability pension days) were quantified using bottom-up costing. The costs of people with MS were compared with those of the references using independent t-tests with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to isolate the excess costs of MS from the mean difference.

RESULTS

The mean annual excess costs of MS for healthcare were €7381 (95% CI 6991-7816) per person with MS with disease-modifying therapies as the largest component (€4262, 95% CI 4026-4497). There was a mean annual excess cost for primary healthcare of €695 (95% CI 585-832) per person with MS, comprising 9.4% of the excess healthcare costs of MS. The mean annual excess costs of MS for productivity losses were €13,173 (95% CI 12,325-14,019) per person with MS, predominately from disability pension (79.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The socioeconomic burden of MS in Sweden from healthcare consumption and productivity losses was quantified, updating knowledge on the cost structure of the substantial excess costs of MS.

Societal economic burden of multiple sclerosis and cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies

Background

In an era of scarce resources, policy makers, neurologists and other stakeholders need to be aware of the economic burden of multiple sclerosis and the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies. The aim of this article is to provide a mini-review of these health economic facets of multiple sclerosis.

Methods

An umbrella review was conducted by searching PubMed and Google Scholar from 2002 until June 2022 for peer-reviewed systematic and narrative literature reviews.

Results

An extensive body of evidence corroborates that multiple sclerosis is associated with a substantial economic burden within and outside the health care sector, that costs of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis exceed those of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, that costs increase with disease severity and are influenced by the occurrence of relapses and therapy adherence. However, cost estimates and their breakdown into various components vary between countries. Economic evaluations show that disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are generally not cost-effective, but these results depend on the local setting. Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies improves when a societal perspective is taken and efficacy does not wane over a lifetime horizon, when oral administration forms or dosing strategies requiring less maintenance are introduced, and when generic versions enter the market. Reimbursement recommendations related to disease-modifying therapies also differ between countries.

Conclusion

The local context matters when calculating the societal economic burden of multiple sclerosis and the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies.

Burden of illness the first year after diagnosed bladder dysfunction among people with spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis - a Danish register study

BACKGROUND

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS) are often living with some degree of bladder and/or bowel dysfunction due to acquired neurogenic damage. The objective was to estimate the burden of illness of SCI and MS the first year after diagnosed bladder dysfunction.

METHODS

Data were extracted from registers covering all Danish citizens. People with SCI or MS were indexed at diagnosis of bladder dysfunction. Inclusion period was 2002-2015 and cases and matched controls were followed for one year.

RESULTS

A total of 2,132 subjects with SCI and 1,887 subjects with MS were identified. Healthcare utilization and societal costs per patient-year were significantly higher for cases compared to controls driven primarily by inpatient care. Cases with urinary tract infection had significantly higher inpatient costs per patient-year compared to controls (SCI: 544 EUR vs 23, p < 0.05; MS: 497 EUR vs 6, p< 0.05) and medication for constipation was significantly more costly per patient-year (SCI: 178 EUR vs 3, p < 0.05; MS: 78 vs 1, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates heavy societal and personal costs in the first year after bladder dysfunction in people with SCI or MS. This emphasizes the need for medical and social interventions to reduce the burden of illness.

Measuring productivity loss in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults with major consequences for their autonomy and capacity to maintain employment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact on work productivity in early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤ 3 years, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 were included. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and unpaid work loss due to RRMS were measured using the Valuation of Lost Productivity (VOLP) questionnaire. The EDSS, SymptoMScreen, 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire were used to gather information on disability, patients' perception of symptom severity, fatigue, mood/anxiety, cognition, and problems in the workplace, respectively. Associations between the VOLP and clinical and work outcomes were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlations.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included. Mean age (SD) was 36.1 ± 9.4 years and 71.4% were female. Mean disease duration was 1.2 ± 0.8 years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (IQR 0, 2.0). One hundred thirty patients (68.8%) were working for pay or self-employed. Fifty-three patients (40.8%) reported absence from work in the past 3 months with an average of 14.3 absent workdays. Their health problems resulted in the loss of 3.4% of their actual work time in the past 7 days. Thirty patients got help (11.8 h) with their unpaid work activities in the past 7 days. Absenteeism was significantly correlated with anxiety and depression (rho=0.298 and 0.291, p<0.001), fatigue (rho=0.214, p = 0.014), and symptom severity (rho=0.213, p = 0.015). Presenteeism was significantly correlated with fatigue (rho=0.375, p<0.001), symptom severity (rho=0.373, p<0.001), depression (rho=0.263, p = 0.008), and disability (rho=0.215, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Productivity loss even in a RRMS population with short disease duration stresses the need for more efficient treatment control of disease activity from earlier stages.