1
|
Ma J, Yang Q, Ye X, Xu W, Chang Y, Chen R, Wang Y, Luo M, Lou Y, Yang X, Li D, Xu Y, He W, Cai M, Cao W, Ju G, Yin L, Wang J, Ren J, Ma Z, Zuo C, Ren S. Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:4017-4037. [PMID: 37981590 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10436-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages. RESULTS We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18). CONCLUSION PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging. KEY POINTS • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianglei Ma
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Qinqin Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Xiaofei Ye
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Weidong Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yifan Chang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Ye Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Mengting Luo
- College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Yihaoyun Lou
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xuming Yang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Central Hospital, Hengyang, 421001, Hu'nan, China
| | - Duocai Li
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yusi Xu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Wei He
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Minglei Cai
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Wanli Cao
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Guanqun Ju
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Lei Yin
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Junkai Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Jizhong Ren
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Zifang Ma
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Central Hospital, Hengyang, 421001, Hu'nan, China.
| | - Changjing Zuo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Shancheng Ren
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bettati P, Dormer JD, Shahedi M, Fei B. An Augmented Reality-Assisted Visualization System for Potential Applications in Prostate Biopsy. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2022; 12034:120342G. [PMID: 36793657 PMCID: PMC9928501 DOI: 10.1117/12.2611590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided biopsy is widely used for disease detection and diagnosis. We plan to register preoperative imaging, such as positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with real-time intraoperative ultrasound imaging for improved localization of suspicious lesions that may not be seen on ultrasound but visible on other imaging modalities. Once the image registration is completed, we will combine the images from two or more imaging modalities and use Microsoft HoloLens 2 augmented reality (AR) headset to display three-dimensional (3D) segmented lesions and organs from previously acquired images and real-time ultrasound images. In this work, we are developing a multi-modal, 3D augmented reality system for the potential use in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of combining images from multiple modalities into an AR-guided system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patric Bettati
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
- Center for Imaging and Surgical Innovation, University of Texas at Dallas, TX
| | - James D. Dormer
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
- Center for Imaging and Surgical Innovation, University of Texas at Dallas, TX
| | - Maysam Shahedi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
- Center for Imaging and Surgical Innovation, University of Texas at Dallas, TX
| | - Baowei Fei
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX
- Center for Imaging and Surgical Innovation, University of Texas at Dallas, TX
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Galgano SJ, West JT, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221105018. [PMID: 35755177 PMCID: PMC9218890 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT J779, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Janelle T West
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tao L, Ma L, Xie M, Liu X, Tian Z, Fei B. Automatic Segmentation of the Prostate on MR Images based on Anatomy and Deep Learning. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2021; 11598:115981N. [PMID: 35755404 PMCID: PMC9232192 DOI: 10.1117/12.2581893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of the prostate has many applications in the detection, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Automatic segmentation can be a challenging task because of the inhomogeneous intensity distributions on MR images. In this paper, we propose an automatic segmentation method for the prostate on MR images based on anatomy. We use the 3D U-Net guided by anatomy knowledge, including the location and shape prior knowledge of the prostate on MR images, to constrain the segmentation of the gland. The proposed method has been evaluated on the public dataset PROMISE2012. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 91.6% as compared to the manual segmentation. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method based on anatomy knowledge can achieve satisfactory segmentation performance for prostate MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Tao
- College of Software, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ling Ma
- College of Software, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Corresponding author:
| | - Maoqiang Xie
- College of Software, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiabi Liu
- School of Computer Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Tian
- School of Software Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Baowei Fei
- Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy: a prospective randomized single-centre study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:483-492. [PMID: 32734457 PMCID: PMC7835307 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04863-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is valuable for detecting primary and recurrent prostatic lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT as a triage tool for prostate biopsy (PSMA-TB) and compare with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods This single-centre study randomly allocated 120 patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (> 4 ng/ml) to PSMA-PET or TRUS group. Patients with PSMA-avid lesions (SUVmax ≥ 8.0) underwent PSMA-TB via a single-puncture percutaneous transgluteal approach (n = 25), whilst patients with negative PSMA-PET underwent systematic TRUS-GB (n = 35). All patients in the TRUS group underwent TRUS-GB directly (n = 60). Results PCa and csPCa were detected in 26/60 (43.3%) and 24/60 (40.0%) patients in the PSMA-PET group and 19/60 (31.6%) and 15/60 (25.0%) in the TRUS group, respectively. In the PSMA-PET group, the detection rate of PCa and csPCa were significantly higher in PSMA-PET-positive than negative patients (PCa, 23/25 (92.0%) vs 3/35 (8.6%), P < 0.01; csPCa, 22/25 (88.0%) vs 2/35 (5.7%), P < 0.01). PSMA-TB detected significantly more PCa and csPCa than TRUS-GB in the TRUS controls (PCa, 21/25 (84.0%) vs 19/60 (31.6%), P < 0.01; csPCa, 20/25 (80.0%) vs 15/60 (25.0%), P < 0.01). PSMA-PET detected significantly more cases of csPCa amongst patients with PSA 4.0–20.0 ng/ml than TRUS (27.02% vs 8.82%, P < 0.05). No haematuria, urinary retention or pelvic infection was observed after PSMA-TB compare with TRUS-GB. Conclusions 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is a feasible imaging technique that may serve as a triage tool for prostate biopsy, and may improve the detection rate of csPCa compared with TRUS-GB, especially in patients with serum PSA 4.0–20.0 ng/ml.
Collapse
|
6
|
Feasibility and Initial Results: Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Recurrent Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2019; 202:413-421. [PMID: 30817240 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the feasibility and cancer detection rate of fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy vs standard template biopsy in the same patient with biochemical failure after nonsurgical therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 21 patients with a mean ± SD prostate specific antigen of 7.4 ± 6.8 ng/ml and biochemical failure after nonoperative prostate cancer treatment underwent fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (mean 364.1 ± 37.7 MBq) and planning transrectal prostate ultrasound with 3-dimensional image reconstruction. Focal prostatic activity on positron emission tomography was delineated and co-registered with planning ultrasound. During the subsequent biopsy session computer generated 12-core template biopsies were performed and then fluciclovine defined targets were revealed and biopsied. Histological analysis of template and targeted cores were completed. RESULTS Template biopsy was positive for malignancy in 6 of 21 patients (28.6%), including 10 of 124 regions and 11 of 246 cores, vs targeted biopsy in 10 of 21 (47.6%), including 17 of 50 regions and 40 of 125 cores. Five of 21 patients had positive findings on targeted biopsy only and 1 of 21 had positive findings on template biopsy only. An additional case was upgraded from Grade Group 2 to 3 on targeted biopsy. Extraprostatic disease was detected in 8 of 21 men (38.1%) with histological confirmation in all 3 who underwent lesion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Fluciclovine positron emission tomography real-time ultrasound fusion guidance for biopsy is feasible in patients with biochemical failure after nonsurgical therapy for prostate cancer. It identifies more recurrent prostate cancer using fewer cores compared with template biopsy in the same patient. Further study is required to determine in what manner targeted biopsy may augment template biopsy of recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sultana S, Song DY, Lee J. Deformable registration of PET/CT and ultrasound for disease-targeted focal prostate brachytherapy. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2019; 6:035003. [PMID: 31528661 PMCID: PMC6739636 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.6.3.035003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We propose a deformable registration algorithm for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion. Accurate registration of PSMA PET to intraoperative TRUS will allow physicians to customize dose planning based on the regions involved. The inputs to the registration algorithm are the PET/CT and TRUS volumes as well as the prostate segmentations. PET/CT and TRUS volumes are first rigidly registered by maximizing the overlap between the segmented prostate binary masks. Three-dimensional anatomical landmarks are then automatically extracted from the boundary as well as within the prostate. Then, a deformable registration is performed using a regularized thin plate spline where the landmark localization error is optimized between the extracted landmarks that are in correspondence. The proposed algorithm was evaluated on 25 prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. We registered the postimplant CT to TRUS using the proposed algorithm and computed target registration errors (TREs) by comparing implanted seed locations. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with significantly lower ( mean ± standard deviation ) TRE of 1.96 ± 1.29 mm while being computationally efficient (mean computation time of 38 s). The proposed landmark-based PET/CT-TRUS deformable registration algorithm is simple, computationally efficient, and capable of producing quality registration of the prostate boundary as well as the internal gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharmin Sultana
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Daniel Y. Song
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Junghoon Lee
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abiodun-Ojo OA, Akintayo AA, Akin-Akintayo OO, Tade FI, Nieh PT, Master VA, Alemozaffar M, Osunkoya AO, Goodman MM, Fei B, Schuster DM. 18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1531-1536. [PMID: 30954940 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated 18F-fluciclovine uptake parameters that correlate with true positivity for local recurrence in non-prostatectomy-treated patients. Methods: Twenty-one patients (prostate-specific antigen level, 7.4 ± 6.8 ng/mL) with biochemical recurrence after nonprostatectomy local therapy (radiotherapy and cryotherapy) underwent dual-time-point 18F-fluciclovine (364.1 ± 37.7 MBq) PET/CT from pelvis to diaphragm. Prostatic uptake over background was delineated and coregistered to a prostate-biopsy-planning ultrasound. Transrectal biopsies of 18F-fluciclovine-defined targets were completed using a 3-dimensional visualization and navigation platform. Histologic analyses of lesions were completed. Lesion characteristics including SUVmax, target-to-background ratio (TBR), uptake pattern, and subjective reader's suspicion level were compared between true-positive (malignant) and false-positive (benign) lesions. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between PET and histologic findings. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were plotted to determine discriminatory cutoffs for TBR. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05. Results: Fifty lesions were identified in 21 patients on PET. Seventeen of 50 (34.0%) targeted lesions in 10 of 21 patients were positive for malignancy. True-positive lesions had a significantly higher SUVmax (6.62 ± 1.70 vs. 4.92 ± 1.27), marrow TBR (2.57 ± 0.81 vs. 1.69 ± 0.51), and blood-pool TBR (4.10 ± 1.17 vs. 2.99 ± 1.01) than false-positive lesions at the early time point (P < 0.01) and remained significant at the delayed time point, except for blood-pool TBR. Focal uptake (odds ratio, 12.07; 95% confidence interval, 2.98-48.80; P < 0.01) and subjective highest suspicion level (odds ratio, 10.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-99.69; P = 0.03) correlated with true positivity. Using the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, optimal cutoffs for marrow TBR were 1.9 (area under the curve, 0.82) and 1.8 (area under the curve, 0.85) at early and delayed imaging, respectively. With these cutoffs, 15 of 17 malignant lesions were identified at both time points; however, fewer false-positive lesions were detected at the delayed time point (5/33) than at the early time point (11/33). Conclusion: True positivity of 18F-fluciclovine-targeted prostate biopsy in non-prostatectomy-treated patients correlates with focal uptake, TBR (blood pool and marrow), and subjective highest suspicion level. A marrow TBR of 1.9 at the early time point and 1.8 at the delayed time point had optimal discriminating capabilities. Despite the relatively low intraprostate positive predictive value (34.0%) with 18F-fluciclovine, application of these parameters to interpretative criteria may improve true positivity in the treated prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Akinyemi A Akintayo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Funmilayo I Tade
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Peter T Nieh
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mehrdad Alemozaffar
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark M Goodman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Emory University Center for Systems Imaging, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Baowei Fei
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Bioengineering, Erick Josson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas; and.,Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David M Schuster
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
68Ga-PSMA-PET: added value and future applications in comparison to the current use of choline-PET and mpMRI in the workup of prostate cancer. Radiol Med 2018; 123:952-965. [PMID: 30116970 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0929-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) has been commonly and successfully used, in combination with computed tomography (CT) and more recently magnetic resonance (MRI), in the workup of intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Nowadays, new specific receptor targeted PET tracers in prostate cancer imaging have been introduced; one of the most used is 68Ga-PSMA, that evaluates the expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). This tracer has been rapidly taken into account for its better sensitivity and specificity compared to lipid metabolism tracers, such as 11C/18F labelled fluorocholine. Besides, in the era of theranostics, this tracer is having a useful application not only for imaging but also for therapeutic purposes. The aim of this review article is, in the first part, to give an overview of the main indications and future development of 68Ga-PSMA imaging, using PET/CT or PET/MRI, according to the clinical course of the disease and in view of the current use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and choline PET in the management of PCa. In the second part, a brief overview of the promising 18F-labelled PSMA tracers and the current use of PSMA radionuclide therapy will be provided.
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Q, Xiang F, Lin X, Grajo JR, Yang L, Xu Y, Duan Y, Vyas U, Harisinghani M, Mahmood U, Samir AE. The Role of Imaging in Prostate Cancer Care Pathway: Novel Approaches to Urologic Management Challenges Along 10 Imaging Touch Points. Urology 2018; 119:23-31. [PMID: 29730256 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
We map out a typical prostate cancer care pathway through discussion of updates on modern imaging. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive and specific imaging tool for diagnosis and local staging, but transrectal ultrasound remains the most widely used technique for prostate biopsy guidance. Computed tomography and bone scan are useful in initial staging and recurrence detection. Novel imaging techniques in ultrasound elastography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging allow for increased lesion detection sensitivity and have the potential to enhance biopsy, while the development of new positron emission tomography radiotracers has great promise for improved detection of local and metastatic disease in patients with biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Li
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Feixiang Xiang
- Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xueying Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Joseph R Grajo
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Long Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, Henan Province People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Xu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Duan
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Urvi Vyas
- Product Management, BK Ultrasound, Peabody, MA
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony E Samir
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jadvar H. Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer. Clin Transl Imaging 2017; 5:199-208. [PMID: 28713796 DOI: 10.1007/s40336-017-0228-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing interest in focal therapy (male lumpectomy) of localized low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Focal therapy is typically associated with low morbidity and provides the possibility of retreatment. Imaging is pivotal in stratification of men with localized prostate cancer for active surveillance, focal therapy or radical intervention. This article provides a concise review of focal therapy and the evolving role of imaging in this clinical setting. METHODS We performed a narrative and critical literature review by searching PubMed/Medline database from January 1997 to January 2017 for articles in the English language and the use of search keywords "focal therapy", "prostate cancer", and "imaging". RESULTS Most imaging studies are based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Transrectal ultrasound is inadequate independently but multiparametric ultrasound may provide new prospects. Positron emission tomography with radiotracers targeted to various underlying tumor biological features may provide unprecedented new opportunities. Multimodal Imaging appears most useful in localization of intraprostatic dominant index lesions amenable to focal therapy, in early assessment of therapeutic efficacy and potential need for additional focal treatments or transition to whole-gland therapy, and in predicting short-term and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION Multimodal imaging is anticipated to play an increasing role in the focal therapy planning and assessment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer and thereby moving this form of treatment option forward in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this review is to summarize the applications of PET molecular imaging-directed biopsy of a variety of organs in the management of various diseases with a focus on cancers. CONCLUSION PET can yield metabolic information at the cellular and molecular levels, and PET-directed biopsy is playing an increasing role in the diagnosis and staging of diseases.
Collapse
|