Early Detection of Psychosis: Recent Updates from Clinical High-Risk Research

Neurocognition in help-seeking individuals at risk for psychosis: Prediction of outcome after 24 months

An important aim in schizophrenia research is to optimize the prediction of psychosis and to improve strategies for early intervention. The objectives of this study were to explore neurocognitive performance in individuals at risk for psychosis and to optimize predictions through a combination of neurocognitive and psychopathological variables. Information on clinical outcomes after 24 months was available from 118 subjects who had completed an extensive assessment at baseline. Subjects who had converted to psychosis were compared with subjects who had not. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine which baseline measure best predicted a conversion to psychosis. The premorbid IQ and the neurocognitive domains of processing speed, learning/memory, working memory and verbal fluency significantly discriminated between converters and non-converters. When entered into multivariate regression analyses, the combination of PANSS positive/negative symptom severity and IQ best predicted the clinical outcomes. Our results confirm previous evidence suggesting moderate premorbid cognitive deficits in individuals developing full-blown psychosis. Overall, clinical symptoms appeared to be a more sensitive predictor than cognitive performance. Nevertheless, the two might serve as complementary predictors when assessing the risk for psychosis.

Progress and Future Directions in Research on the Psychosis Prodrome: A Review for Clinicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:

ABSTRACT

The psychosis prodrome, or period of clinical and functional decline leading up to acute psychosis, offers a unique opportunity for identifying mechanisms of psychosis onset and for testing early-intervention strategies. We summarize major findings and emerging directions in prodromal research and provide recommendations for clinicians working with individuals suspected to be at high risk for psychosis. The past two decades of research have led to three major advances. First, tools and criteria have been developed that can reliably identify imminent risk for a psychotic disorder. Second, longitudinal clinical and psychobiological data from large multisite studies are strengthening individual risk assessment and offering insights into potential mechanisms of illness onset. Third, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions are demonstrating promise for delaying or preventing the onset of psychosis in help-seeking, high-risk individuals. The dynamic psychobiological processes implicated in both risk and onset of psychosis, including altered gene expression, cognitive dysfunction, inflammation, gray and white matter brain changes, and vulnerability-stress interactions suggest a wide range of potential treatment targets and strategies. The expansion of resources devoted to early intervention and prodromal research worldwide raises hope for investigating them. Future directions include identifying psychosis-specific risk and resilience factors in children, adolescents, and non-help-seeking community samples, improving study designs to test hypothesized mechanisms of change, and intervening with strategies that, in order to improve functional outcomes, better engage youth, address their environmental contexts, and focus on evidence-based neurodevelopmental targets. Prospective research on putatively prodromal samples has the potential to substantially reshape our understanding of mental illness and our efforts to combat it.