Ultrasonographic reference values for the deep branch of the radial nerve at the arcade of Frohse

Anatomy of the nerves, vessels, and muscular compartments of the forearm, as revealed by high-resolution ultrasound. Part 1: overall structure and forearm compartments

In recent decades, high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has revolutionized the morphological and structural evaluation of peripheral nerves and muscles, revealing details of the internal structure of the neural fascicles and muscle architecture. Applications range from diagnostics to interventional procedures. The anatomy of the forearm region is complex, with several muscles and an extensive network of vessels and nerves. To guarantee the success of the evaluation by HRUS, knowledge of the normal anatomy of the region is essential. The aim of these two companion articles is to present the normal anatomy of the nerves and compartments of the forearm, as revealed by HRUS, as well as the relationships between the main vessels and nerves of the region. Part 1 aims to review the overall structure of nerves, muscles and tendons, as seen on HRUS, and that of the forearm compartments. We present a practical approach, with general guidelines and tips on how best to perform the study. Part 2 is a pictorial essay about compartment vascularization and cutaneous innervation. Knowledge of the normal anatomy of the forearm improves the technical quality of the examinations, contributing to better diagnoses, as well as improving the performance and safety of interventional procedures.

The Efficacy of Ultrasound for Visualizing Radial Nerve Lesions with Coexistent Plate Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound has been commonly employed for depicting the morphology of the lesions in patients with radial nerve neuropathy, including entrapment, tumor, trauma, and iatrogenic injury. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound for visualizing radial nerve lesions with coexistent plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures. This study aimed to address this special clinical issue.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the efficacy of ultrasound for visualizing radial nerve lesions with coexistent plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures based on intraoperative findings in patients who were treated in our hospital from January 2007 to June 2019.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included, and there was a 100% concordance between the ultrasound and intraoperative findings on radial nerve lesions. Ultrasonography revealed four types of lesions: radial nerve in continuity in thirty-one patients, neuroma in continuity in four patients, radial nerve stuck under the plate in three patients, and radial nerve transection in eight patients. The lesion radial nerve in continuity comprised two situations according to intraoperative electrodiagnostic test results, which could not be differentiated by ultrasonography, radial nerve in continuity treated with neurolysis in twenty-five patients and radial nerve in continuity treated with nerve graft in six patients.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography can accurately depict radial nerve lesions with coexistent plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures. It provides a basis for determining the extent of nerve damage in all patients except those with the lesion radial nerve in continuity, which is conducive to making treatment decisions as early as possible.