A Phase 1, Open-Label Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Absolute Bioavailability of AG-221 by a Microtracer Approach

Deciphering the multifaceted roles and clinical implications of 2-hydroxyglutarate in cancer

Increasing evidence indicates that 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) is an oncometabolite that drives tumour formation and progression. Due to mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and the dysregulation of other enzymes, 2HG accumulates significantly in tumour cells. Due to its structural similarity to α-ketoglutarate (αKG), accumulated 2HG leads to the competitive inhibition of αKG-dependent dioxygenases (αKGDs), such as KDMs, TETs, and EGLNs. This inhibition results in epigenetic alterations in both tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment. This review comprehensively discusses the metabolic pathways of 2HG and the subsequent pathways influenced by elevated 2HG levels. We will delve into the molecular mechanisms by which 2HG exerts its oncogenic effects, particularly focusing on epigenetic modifications. This review will also explore the various methods available for the detection of 2HG, emphasising both current techniques and emerging technologies. Furthermore, 2HG shows promise as a biomarker for clinical diagnosis and treatment. By integrating these perspectives, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of 2HG in cancer biology, highlight the importance of ongoing research, and discuss future directions for translating these findings into clinical applications.

Absolute and Relative Bioavailability of Oral Solid Dosage Formulations of Deucravacitinib in Humans

Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective, allosteric inhibitor of tyrosine kinase 2, an intracellular signaling kinase involved in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The absolute and relative bioavailability (BA) were evaluated in phase 1, open-label studies in healthy adults to assess (1) the absolute BA of the deucravacitinib tablet formulation following single oral administration of a 12-mg tablet and an intravenous microdose infusion of 0.1-mg carbon-13 and nitrogen-15-labeled deucravacitinib ([13 C2 , 15 N3 ] deucravacitinib) solution in 8 subjects, and (2) the relative oral BA of deucravacitinib tablet and capsule formulations at the 3- and 12-mg dose levels in 20 subjects. The absolute oral availability of deucravacitinib in the tablet formulation was near complete at approximately 99%. The total clearance (254 mL/min) was low relative to hepatic blood flow, and volume of distribution (∼140 L) was greater than total body water, indicating extravascular distribution. Deucravacitinib systemic exposure (maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma drug concentration curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable nonzero concentration, and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity) after administration of the tablet formulation were similar to the capsule at the tested 3- and 12-mg doses. In both studies, deucravacitinib was safe with no clinically relevant changes in laboratory values, electrocardiogram parameters, or vital signs.

A Phase 1 Study to Assess Mass Balance and Absolute Bioavailability of Zimlovisertib in Healthy Male Participants Using a 14 C-Microtracer Approach

Zimlovisertib (PF‐06650833) is a selective, reversible inhibitor of interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) with anti‐inflammatory effects. This phase 1, open‐label, fixed‐sequence, two‐period, single‐dose study aimed to evaluate the mass balance and excretion rate of zimlovisertib in healthy male participants using a ¹⁴C‐microtracer approach. All six participants received 300 mg ¹⁴C‐zimlovisertib with lower radioactivity per mass unit orally in Period A, then unlabeled zimlovisertib 300 mg orally and ¹⁴C‐zimlovisertib 135 μg intravenously (IV) in Period B. Study objectives included extent and rate of excretion of ¹⁴C‐zimlovisertib, pharmacokinetics, and safety and tolerability of oral and IV zimlovisertib. Total radioactivity recovered in urine and feces was 82.4% ± 6.8% (urine 23.1% ± 12.3%, feces 59.3% ± 9.7%) in Period A. Zimlovisertib was absorbed rapidly following oral administration, with the fraction absorbed estimated to be 44%. Absolute oral bioavailability of the 300‐mg dose was 17.4% (90% confidence interval 14.1%, 21.5%) using the dose‐normalized area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity. There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), severe AEs, discontinuations or dose reductions due to AEs, and no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. These results demonstrate that zimlovisertib had low absolute oral bioavailability and low absorption (<50%).

Assessment of Transporter-Mediated Drug Interactions for Enasidenib Based on a Cocktail Study in Patients With Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

As a first-in-class, selective, potent inhibitor of the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with an isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 mutation. An in vitro study showed that enasidenib at clinically relevant concentrations has effects on multiple drug metabolic enzymes and transporters, including inhibition of P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporter (OAT) P1B1, and OATP1B3 transporters. Therefore, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted to assess the impact of enasidenib at steady state on the pharmacokinetics of several probe compounds in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, including the probes herein described in this article, digoxin and rosuvastatin. Results from 8 patients (all Asian) with a mean age of 67.1 years showed that following coadministration of enasidenib (100 mg, 28-day once-daily schedule) for 28 days (at steady state), digoxin's (0.25 mg) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 30 days was 1.2-fold (90% confidence interval, 0.9-1.6), compared with digoxin alone. Following coadministration of enasidenib (100 mg, 28-day once-daily schedule) for 28 days (at steady state), rosuvastatin's (10 mg) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity was 3.4-fold (90% confidence interval, 2.6-4.5) compared with rosuvastatin alone. These results should serve as the basis for dose recommendations for drugs that are substrates of P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 transporters, when used concomitantly with enasidenib.