Shifts in Asthma Evaluation and Management During COVID-19

Clinical reasoning amongst paramedics using nebulised β₂ agonists to treat acute asthma exacerbations: a qualitative study

The heterogeneous nature of asthma results in a wide range of presentations during exacerbation. Despite UK pre-hospital management guidelines focusing on β₂ agonists, variables such as cause, severity, underlying health, comorbidities, and drug side effects can often make emergency treatment optimisation difficult. This article examines paramedics' methods of observing, perceiving, interpreting, and treating asthma with β₂ agonists, often acting on limited information in rapidly evolving situations. We recruited paramedics from a single UK National Health Service ambulance Trust for qualitative semi-structured interviews. Responses underwent framework analysis to identify data similarities and differences. Fifteen qualitative interviews with paramedics revealed three main themes affecting patient management: clinician experience of presentation, adaptation of patient management approaches, and severity of side effects. Paramedics felt their ability to manage various asthma presentations was enhanced through guideline adaptation based on their own clinical experience and understanding of β₂ agonist side effects, allowing tailored responses based on a set of reinforcing factors. Inductive analysis revealed additional complexities within these themes, such as anxiety and diabetes, which may influence β₂ agonist administration and result in multiple care pathways being initiated during exacerbation. Paramedic care mirrors asthma's complexity, accounting for a range of characteristics. A dynamic, critically thought approach enables patient management to be based on the presenting conditions rather than strict adherence to a single algorithm. Comprehending the complexities and variables in treatment can be crucial to how paramedics rationalise their treatment and optimise the care provided.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Analysis of United States Commercial Insurance Data

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Given limited information on health care and treatment utilization for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) during the pandemic, we studied JIA-related health care and treatment utilization in a commercially insured retrospective US cohort.

METHODS

We studied rates of outpatient visits, new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) initiations, intra-articular glucocorticoid injections (iaGC), dispensed oral glucocorticoids and opioids, DMARD adherence, and DMARD discontinuation by quarter in March 2018-February 2021 (Q1 started in March). Incident rate ratios (IRR, pandemic vs prepandemic) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable Poisson or Quasi-Poisson models stratified by diagnosis recency (incident JIA, <12 months ago; prevalent JIA, ≥12 months ago).

RESULTS

Among 1294 children diagnosed with JIA, total and in-person outpatient visits for JIA declined during the pandemic (IRR, 0.88-0.90), most markedly in Q1 2020. Telemedicine visits, while higher during the pandemic, declined from 21% (Q1) to 13% (Q4) in 2020 to 2021. During the pandemic, children with prevalent JIA, but not incident JIA, had lower usage of iaGC (IRR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.34-1.07), oral glucocorticoids (IRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67), and opioids (IRR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75). Adherence to and discontinuation of DMARDs was similar before and during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first year of the pandemic, visits for JIA dropped by 10% to 12% in commercially insured children in the United States, declines partly mitigated by use of telemedicine. Pandemic-related declines in intra-articular glucocorticoids, oral glucocorticoids, and opioids were observed for children with prevalent, but not incident, JIA. These changes may have important implications for disease control and quality of life.