Exploring Associations between Stressors and Burnout in Trainee Doctors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK

COVID-19 in Workplace Settings: Lessons Learned for Occupational Medicine in the UK

This paper addresses lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic from a UK Occupational Medicine perspective to permit comparison with other national accounts. In spite of good prior research and statute, the necessary resources to protect workers' health were seriously lacking when the pandemic struck. Weak public health guidance, which did not recognise dominant airborne transmission, was applied to workplaces, leaving workers and others unprotected, especially in respect to Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE). The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) as regulator was lacking, for example, in not producing guidance to protect HealthCare Workers (HCW) who were amongst the most at risk. The UK COVID-19 Public Inquiry should address shortcomings such as these, but recommendations must be accompanied by robust means to ensure appropriate implementation. These should range from substantial measures to improve indoor air quality, to a permanent pandemic management organization with adequate resources. The enforcing authority has to be obliged to publish more specific workplace guidance than the public health authorities. Occupational medicine as a discipline needs to be better prepared, and hence to assert its responsibility towards high standards of workers' health protection. Future research has to include investigating the best means of mitigation against airborne infection and the management of post-acute covid sequelae.

The Benefits of Promoting Junior Trainees in Vascular Surgery

Introduction United Kingdom surgical training consists of a two-year core surgical training (CST) followed by a six-year higher speciality training (ST). There is a significant step up in responsibility and operative skills when transitioning from core to higher training. One-way trainees can bridge this gap is to "act up" to registrar level "CST-R." The CST "steps up" to the role of ST typically in the latter part of their core training and gains exposure at being the "reg of the week," primary assistant in theatre, managing MDTs, and taking speciality referrals. This can be an excellent training opportunity. This study aims to demonstrate a quantitative improvement in trainee operation as a result of stepping up. Methods This study compares the operative experience of one vascular surgery-themed trainee during six months as a CST and six months acting up as a CST-R. The trainee's eLogbook was searched for all operations between August 3, 2022, and January 31, 2023, and between February 1, 2023, and August 1, 2023. The number of cases performed and the role played in each were analyzed. The number of low complexity cases conducted in each block was used as a baseline to ensure the progression seen was because of increasingly complex ST operating rather than the increase in CST level operating expected throughout CST. An abscess incision and drainage were used as the reference low-complexity case. Results The number of cases the trainee performed independently increased from 13% to 25%, while the number where they were simply assisting decreased from 43% to 35%. The number of cases where the trainer remained scrubbed decreased nonsignificantly from 43% to 39%. The number of low-complexity cases performed remained unchanged for each six-month block. Conclusion As a CST-R, the trainee played a more prominent operative role in a greater number of cases. The CST-R does require a supportive department and consultant body. It also enables other STs to gain more surgical exposure because of their reduced frequency of being the "reg of the week." If a trainee can remain in a post for two six-month blocks, then there is much to be gained from a formalised acting-up program, and consideration should be given to formally incorporating this into core surgical programs.