Papillary thyroid carcinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Associated Endocrinopathies in Slovenia from 1995 to 2021

Background: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare endocrine tumour that is sporadic in 75% of cases and occurs as a part of inherited cancer syndromes in approximately 25% of cases. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and type of RET pathogenic variants (PVs) in the Slovenian MTC patient population diagnosed between 1995 and 2021 and to elucidate the full range of associated endocrinopathies. Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records of 266 MTC patients and their relatives seen in a tertiary centre between 1995 and 2021 was performed. Sequence analysis of exons 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of the RET gene was analysed in most patients using Sanger sequencing. From 2017, the entire sequence of RET gene was analysed in most patients using targeted next-generation sequencing. Results: Germline PVs in the RET proto-oncogene were identified in 21.6% probands from 21 different MTC families. Of their tested relatives, 65% (67/103) were RET-positive and 35% (36/103) were RET-negative. PVs were detected in codon 618 and codon 634 in 28.6%, and in codon 790 in 23.8%. The RET-positive group consisted of 52 MTC patients, 13 patients with C cell hyperplasia and 2 individuals with neither. Associated endocrinopathies were diagnosed in 8/21 families: primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in six families and pheochromocytoma (PHEO) in five families. In 62% of RET-positive families (13/21), no associated endocrinopathies were diagnosed. PHEO was most commonly associated with C634R (6/13) and PHPT with C634R (4/7). Hirschsprung’s disease appeared in one patient with RET PV in codon 618. Based on data from the Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia, only individual cases of common cancers with well understood environmental risk factors were discovered; lung cancer in 2/21 of families, papillary thyroid cancer in 3/21 of families, cutaneous melanoma in 2/21 of families, cervical cancer in 1/21 families, and lymphoma in 1/21 families. Conclusions: Analysis of prospectively collected MTC cases during a 27-year period revealed that 21.6% of Slovenian patients are RET PV carriers. Sixty-two percent of families had none of the associated endocrinopathies, confirming the thesis that FMTC is the most common presentation. This could suggest using risk-stratified management approaches when screening for PHEO and PHPT in RET PV carriers. However, more studies are needed to evaluate potential genetic risk modifiers as well as safety, improved quality of life, and medical cost reduction in the case of a patient-oriented approach.

Controversy on the management of patients carrying RET p.V804M mutation

CONTEXT

RET p.V804M is classified as a moderate risk mutation for familial medullary thyroid cancer (FMTC). There is a significant controversy on the management of patients carrying this mutation. We describe a family incidentally discovered to have this mutation and review the literature on RET p.V804M mutation.

RESULTS

The proband was born to first-degree relative parents. He was noticed to have hypertrophy of some parts of the body and vascular skin changes. Whole-exome sequencing of DNA extracted from a skin biopsy showed a mutation in the PIK3CA (c.3132T>G, p.ASN1044LYS). This variant was not found in DNA extracted from blood. This confirmed the diagnosis of CLOVES syndrome (Congenital Lipomatous Overgrowth, Vascular malformations, Epidermal nevi and Scoliosis, skeletal or spinal anomalies). Another incidentally found mutation in the skin biopsy and blood sample was RET p.V804M. Although there was no family history of MTC or MEN 2 syndromes, family screening revealed RET p.V804M mutation and FMTC in the proband's father, paternal grandmother, one sister, and one aunt. There was significant interfamilial heterogeneity in the age of presentation and pathology. A review of literature showed that RET p.V804M mutation is a moderate risk mutation associated with late-onset FMTC, usually at middle to old age.

CONCLUSION

Despite the controversy and the heterogeneous presentation of patients with RET p.V804M mutation, our study and review of the literature suggest that this seemingly "low" risk mutation is associated with late-onset but potentially aggressive MTC. This indicates the need for follow-up and timely intervention based on calcitonin level elevation.

Occurrence of paratesticular ganglioneuroma 18 years after concurrent adrenal ganglioneuroma and papillary thyroid carcinoma - a case report

BACKGROUND

Ganglioneuromas (GNs) are composed of mature ganglion cells and Schwann cells with a fibrous stroma; GNs are most often observed in children and young adults. The majority of non-cranial GNs are located in the retroperitoneum and posterior mediastinum. Other reported rare sites include the adrenal gland, small intestine, colon and urinary bladder. However, para-testicular GNs are even more rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we report the case of a patient with concurrent adrenal GN and thyroid papillary carcinoma who developed paratesticular GN eighteen years later.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is an association among papillary thyroid carcinoma, GN and MEN2 syndromes. This case report may provide important information for the proposed association. However, further studies are required.

Classical point mutations of RET, BRAF and RAS oncogenes are not shared in papillary and medullary thyroid cancer occurring simultaneously in the same gland

BACKGROUND

Papillary (PTC) and medullary (MTC) thyroid carcinomas represent two distinct entities, but quite frequently, they may occur simultaneously.

AIM

To provide genetic analysis of PTC and MTC occurring in the same patient (PTC/MTC) to elucidate their origin.

METHODS

Sequencing analysis of RAS, BRAF and RET oncogenes hot spots mutations in tumoral and normal tissues of 24 PTC/MTC patients.

RESULTS

Two of 24 patients (8.3 %) were affected by familial MTC (FMTC) harboring RET germline mutations in all tissues. Eight of 22 (36.4 %) sporadic cases did not show any somatic mutation in the three tissue components. Considering the MTC component, 10/22 (45.4 %) patients did not show any somatic mutation, 7 of 22 (31.8 %) harbored the M918T RET somatic mutation and 4/22 (18.2 %) presented mutations in the H-RAS gene. In an additional case (1/22, 4.6 %), H-RAS and RET mutations were simultaneously present. Considering the PTC component, 1 of 24 (4.2 %) patients harbored the V600E BRAF mutation, 1 of 24 (4.2 %) the T58A H-RAS mutation and 1 of 24 (4.2 %) the M1T K-RAS mutation, while the remaining PTC cases did not show any somatic mutation. In one case, the MTC harbored a RET mutation and the PTC a BRAF mutation. None of the mutations found were present in both tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing a possible involvement of RET, BRAF and RAS oncogene mutations in PTC/MTC. These data clearly suggest that the classical activating mutations of the oncogenes commonly involved in the pathogenesis of PTC and MTC may not be responsible for their simultaneous occurrence.