Efficacy and safety of oral insulin compared to subcutaneous insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Revolutionizing type 1 diabetes management: Exploring oral insulin and adjunctive treatments

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune condition that affects millions of people worldwide. Insulin pumps or injections are the standard treatment options for this condition. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the several type 1 diabetes treatment options, focusing on oral insulin. The article is divided into parts that include immune-focused treatments, antigen vaccination, cell-directed interventions, cytokine-directed interventions, and non-immunomodulatory adjuvant therapy. Under the section on non-immunomodulatory adjunctive treatment, the benefits and drawbacks of medications such as metformin, amylin, sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 Ras), and verapamil are discussed. The article also discusses the advantages of oral insulin, including increased patient compliance and more dependable and regular blood sugar control. However, several variables, including the enzymatic and physical barriers of the digestive system, impair the administration of insulin via the mouth. Researchers have looked at a few ways to get over these challenges, such as changing the structure of the insulin molecule, improving absorption with the use of absorption enhancers or nanoparticles, and taking oral insulin together with other medications. Even with great advancements in the use of these treatment strategies, T1D still needs improvement in the therapeutic difficulties. Future studies in these areas should focus on creating tailored immunological treatments, looking into combination medications, and refining oral insulin formulations in an attempt to better control Type 1 Diabetes. The ultimate objective is to create accurate, customized strategies that will enhance glycemic management and the quality of life for individuals with the condition.

Recent advances in oral insulin delivery technologies

With the rise in diabetes mellitus cases worldwide, oral delivery of insulin is preferred over subcutaneous insulin administration due to its good patient compliance and non-invasiveness, simplicity, and versatility. However, oral insulin delivery is hampered by various gastrointestinal barriers that result in low drug bioavailability and insufficient therapeutic efficiency. Numerous strategies have been developed to overcome these barriers and increase the bioavailability of oral insulin. Yet, no commercial oral insulin product is available to address all clinical hurdles because of various substantial obstacles related to the structural organization and physiological function of the gastrointestinal tract. Herein, we discussed the significant physiological barriers (including chemical, enzymatic, and physical barriers) that hinder the transportation and absorption of orally delivered insulin. Then, we showcased recent significant and innovative advances in oral insulin delivery technologies. Finally, we concluded the review with remarks on future perspectives on oral insulin delivery technologies and potential challenges for forthcoming clinical translation of oral insulin delivery technologies.

Synthesis of an insulin intercalated graphene oxide nanogel composite: evaluation of its release profile and stability for oral delivery of insulin

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disorder of glucose regulation produced due to insufficient availability of insulin. Generally, insulin is given to diabetes patients via subcutaneous injection which is a painful method to deliver this drug. In this work we have made an attempt to develop an oral drug delivery system that can efficiently deliver insulin to the small intestine. An insulin intercalated GO based nanogel composite (In@GO NgC) was fabricated for oral delivery of insulin. The in vitro release of insulin from In@GO NgC was studied in artificial gastric (pH 1.2) and intestinal (pH 7.5) fluids. The In@GO NgC produced better release in artificial intestinal fluid as compared to gastric fluid. The enzymatic degradation of released insulin was also examined and the results revealed that even after 6 h of incubation, the gel remained stable and the un-degraded insulin seemed to be sufficient for the physiological processes. The efficacy of In@GO NgC was also confirmed by comparing its release profile with non-intercalated GO NgC and nanogel (Ng) without GO. The prepared nanogels were thoroughly characterized using FTIR, SEM, EDS, DSC and DLS. The better release profile and enzymatic stability of In@GO NgC suggests that it can be utilized for oral drug delivery of insulin.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Insulin Administration in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 1 Trial

Oral delivery is an ideal method of insulin administration and is currently a promising research field. Here, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic characteristics of oral administration of an insulin capsule (ORMD-0801) with 2 different sources of recombinant human insulin. This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase 1 trial. Single dosing of the oral insulin capsule was administered in 70 healthy Chinese subjects. In stage 1, four dose groups (8, 16, 32, and 48 mg) for capsules containing Sanofi insulin and in stage 2, three dose groups (8, 32, and 48 mg) containing Hefei Tianmai insulin were evaluated consequently. The results showed that the oral insulin formulations with either source in the dose range 8 to 48 mg were safe, and no serious adverse events were observed. After a standard breakfast 45 minutes after dosing, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to time t and AUC from time 0 to infinity for insulin in the 8-mg and 48-mg dose groups in stage 1 and for 8- to 48-mg groups in stage 2 were slightly increased compared with placebo, but no significant dose-related changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed for either stage. The peak-valley difference and the change in value of the AUC for glucose from baseline showed a dose-related increase in the dose range from 8 to 48 mg in both stages. Together, this study indicated that in healthy Chinese subjects, this oral capsule containing 2 different insulin formulations was safe and well tolerated after a single-dose administration.

Proteomic Changes to the Updated Discovery of Engineered Insulin and Its Analogs: Pros and Cons

The destruction of β-cells of the pancreas leads to either insulin shortage or the complete absence of insulin, which in turn causes diabetes Mellitus. For treating diabetes, many trials have been conducted since the 19th century until now. In ancient times, insulin from an animal's extract was taken to treat human beings. However, this resulted in some serious allergic reactions. Therefore, scientists and researchers have tried their best to find alternative ways for managing diabetes with progressive advancements in biotechnology. However, a lot of research trials have been conducted, and they discovered more progressed strategies and approaches to treat type I and II diabetes with satisfaction. Still, investigators are finding more appropriate ways to treat diabetes accurately. They formulated insulin analogs that mimic the naturally produced human insulin through recombinant DNA technology and devised many methods for appropriate delivery of insulin. This review will address the following questions: What is insulin preparation? How were these devised and what are the impacts (both positive and negative) of such insulin analogs against TIDM (type-I diabetes mellitus) and TIIDM (type-II diabetes mellitus)? This review article will also demonstrate approaches for the delivery of insulin analogs into the human body and some future directions for further improvement of insulin treatment.

Oral insulin delivery: utopia, currently possible or a near reality?

Diabetes is still one of the main diseases worldwide due to its high incidence, prevalence and, unfortunately, very high mortality. Type 1 diabetes (and in some other types) is generally controlled by exogenous insulin. Several attempts of oral insulin administration to humans have been done so far. Some of them achieved interesting results, but it seems to exist a barrier to transpose these studies into clinical trials. A broad perspective about the oral insulin and approaches will be addressed. Representative (not all) examples of innovation are herein described, and they should represent a step forward to achieve the main goal: to orally deliver insulin and improve the life quality of millions of patients.

Insulin Therapy in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: a Narrative Review

Here, we review insulin management options and strategies in nonpregnant adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Most patients with T1DM should follow a regimen of multiple daily injections of basal/bolus insulin, but those not meeting individual glycemic targets or those with frequent or severe hypoglycemia or pronounced dawn phenomenon should consider continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The latter treatment modality could also be an alternative based on patient preferences and availability of reimbursement. Continuous glucose monitoring may improve glycemic control irrespective of treatment regimen. A glycemic target of glycated hemoglobin < 7% (53 mmol/mol) is appropriate for most nonpregnant adults. Basal insulin analogues with a reduced peak profile and an extended duration of action with lower intraindividual variability relative to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin are preferred. The clinical advantages of basal analogues compared with older basal insulins include reduced injection burden, better efficacy, lower risk of hypoglycemic episodes (especially nocturnal), and reduced weight gain. For prandial glycemic control, any rapid-acting prandial analogue (aspart, glulisine, lispro) is preferred over regular human insulin. Faster-acting insulin aspart is a relatively new option with the advantage of better postprandial glucose coverage. Frequent blood glucose measurements along with patient education on insulin dosing based on carbohydrate counting, premeal blood glucose, and anticipated physical activity is paramount, as is education on the management of blood glucose under different circumstances.Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary is available for this article.

Efficacy and safety of oral basal insulin versus subcutaneous insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Oral insulin 338 (I338) is a long-acting, basal insulin analogue formulated in a tablet with the absorption-enhancer sodium caprate. We investigated the efficacy and safety of I338 versus subcutaneous insulin glargine (IGlar) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a phase 2, 8-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel trial completed at two research institutes in Germany. Insulin-naive adult patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy or combined with other oral antidiabetic drugs (HbA_1c 7·0-10·0%; BMI 25·0-40·0 kg/m²), were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily I338 plus subcutaneous placebo (I338 group) or once-daily IGlar plus oral placebo (IGlar group). Randomisation occurred by interactive web response system stratified by baseline treatment with oral antidiabetic drugs. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Weekly insulin dose titration aimed to achieve a self-measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration of 4·4-7·0 mmol/L. The recommended daily starting doses were 2700 nmol I338 or 10 U IGlar, and maximum allowed doses throughout the trial were 16 200 nmol I338 or 60 U IGlar. The primary endpoint was treatment difference in FPG concentration at 8 weeks for all randomly assigned patients receiving at least one dose of trial product (ie, the full analysis set). The trial has been completed and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02470039.

FINDINGS

Between June 1, 2015, and Oct 19, 2015, 82 patients were screened for eligibility and 50 patients were randomly assigned to the I338 group (n=25) or the IGlar group (n=25). Mean FPG concentration at baseline was 9·7 (SD 2·8) in the I338 group and 9·1 (1·7) in the IGlar group. Least square mean FPG concentration at 8 weeks was 7·1 mmol/L (95% CI 6·4-7·8) in the I338 group and 6·8 mmol/L (6·5-7·1) in the IGlar group, with no significant treatment difference (0·3 mmol/L [-0·5 to 1·1]; p=0·46). I338 and IGlar were well tolerated by patients. Adverse events were reported in 15 (60%) patients in the I338 group and 17 (68%) patients in the IGlar group. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (three [12%] patients in each group) and nasopharyngitis (five [20%] in the I338 group and two [8%] in the IGlar group). Most adverse events were graded mild (47 of 68 events), and no severe adverse events were reported. One patient in the IGlar group had a treatment-emergent serious adverse event (urogenital haemorrhage of moderate intensity, assessed by the investigator as unlikely to be related to treatment; the patient recovered). Incidence of hypoglycaemia was low in both groups (n=7 events in the I338 group; n=11 in the IGlar group), with no severe episodes.

INTERPRETATION

I338 can safely improve glycaemic control in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes with no evidence of a difference compared with insulin glargine, a widely used subcutaneously administered basal insulin. Further development of this particular oral insulin project was discontinued because I338 doses were high and, therefore, production of the required quantities of I338 for wide public use was deemed not commercially viable. Improvement of technologies involved in the product's development is the focus of ongoing research.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk.

Using probiotics for type 2 diabetes mellitus intervention: Advances, questions, and potential

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become one of the most prevalent diseases on earth and several treatments have been developed. However, the current intervention approaches have not been as effective as expected. One promising supplementary strategy is the use of probiotics through direct or indirect approaches. Probiotics are microbial food cultures conferring health-promoting properties. In this review, we summarized the current theories and mechanisms of T2DM intervention using probiotics and hypothesize that probiotics intervene T2DM during its onsetting, developing, and complicating. For the first time, we comprehensively analyzed T2DM intervention in animal models using both wide-type probiotics in different forms and using recombinant probiotics. Then, probiotic intervention in T2DM patients was reviewed and the main results were compared with that obtained from animal studies. Finally yet importantly, remaining questions that are important such as in which form and in which state, as well as the future potential of probiotic intervention in T2DM were discussed from a perspective of food microbiologists. In conclusion, probiotic intervention in T2DM is promising but there are still many important issues unsolved yet. Critical review of the advances, questions, and potential of probiotic intervention in T2DM promotes the development of this approach for further application in humans.

Controlling insulin release from reverse hexagonal (HII) liquid crystalline mesophase by enzymatic lipolysis

In the present study we aimed to control insulin release from the reverse hexagonal (H_II) mesophase using Thermomyces lanuginosa lipase (TLL) in the environment (outer TLL) or within the H_II cylinders (inner TLL). Two insulin-loaded systems differing by the presence (or absence) of phosphatidylcholine (PC) were examined. In general, incorporation of PC into the H_II interface (without TLL) increased insulin release, as a more cooperative system was formed. Addition of TLL to the systems' environments resulted in lipolysis of the H_II structure. In the absence of PC, the lipolysis was more dominant and led to a significant increase in insulin release (50% after 8h). However, the presence of PC stabilized the interface, hindering the lipolysis, and therefore no impact on the release profile was detected during the first 8h. Entrapment of TLL within the H_II cylinders (with and without PC) drastically increased insulin release in both systems up to 100%. In the presence of PC insulin released faster and the structure was more stable. Consequently, the presence of lipases (inner or outer) both enhanced the destruction of the carrier, and provided sustained release of the entrapped insulin.

Enteric-coated insulin microparticles delivered by lipopeptides of iturin and surfactin

Surfactin, a lipopeptide produced by Bacillus species, has been used for the oral delivery of insulin. In this study, another lipopeptide of iturin was tested for its ability to orally delivery insulin alone or plus surfactin. Iturin could form co-precipitate with insulin at acidic pH values. After treatment by ultrasonification, the structure of coprecipitate was destroyed that led to a significant decrease in hypoglycemic effect after oral administration. Iturin weakly binds to (Kd = 257 μM) and induce insulin structure more compact that is favorable for insulin uptake by the intestine. After being coated with Acryl-Eze by lyophilization, the coprecipitate formed the spherical enteric-coated insulin microparticles delivered by iturin with a relative oral bioavailability of 6.84% in diabetic mice. For further improving oral hypoglycemic effect, surfactin was added to form the spherical enteric-coated insulin microparticles in a formulation containing insulin, Acryl-Eze, iturin and surfactin at a ratio of 1:1:0.5: 0.5 (w/w), with an insulin encapsulation efficiency of 66.22%. The enteric-coated insulin microparticles delivered by iturin plus surfactin showed a classical profile for controlled release in the intestine with a relative bioavailability of 7.67% after oral administration, which could effectively control the postprandial blood glucose at a level about 50% of the initial one just like the subcutaneous injection. Collectively, iturin plus surfactin is more efficient for oral delivering insulin than the sole one, and the resultant enteric-coated insulin microparticles are potential for the development of oral insulin to control postprandial blood glucose in diabetic patients.