Effect of oral anticoagulant therapy on mortality in end-stage renal disease patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective study

Treatment strategies of the thromboembolic risk in kidney failure patients with atrial fibrillation

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients affected by kidney failure, i.e. glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min/1.73 m2, is high and probably underestimated. Numerous uncertainties remain regarding how to prevent thromboembolic events in this population because both cardiology and nephrology guidelines do not provide clear recommendations. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in preventing thromboembolism in patients with kidney failure and AF has not been demonstrated for either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct anticoagulants (DOACs). Moreover, it remains unclear which is more effective and safer, because estimated creatinine clearance <25-30 ml/min was an exclusion criterion in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs comparing DOACs and VKAs in kidney failure failed to reach the primary endpoint, as they were underpowered. The left atrial appendage is the main source of thromboembolism in the presence of AF. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has recently been proposed as an alternative to OAC. RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of LAAC versus OAC in kidney failure were terminated prematurely due to recruitment failure. A recent prospective study showed a reduction in thromboembolic events in haemodialysis patients with AF and undergoing LAAC compared with patients taking or not taking OAC. We review current treatment standards and discuss recent developments in managing the thromboembolic risk in kidney failure patients with AF. The importance of shared decision-making with the multidisciplinary team and the patient to consider individual risks and benefits of each treatment option is underlined.

Anticoagulation for Patients With Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concomitant atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease is common and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although oral anticoagulants have been well established to prevent thromboembolism, the applicability in patients under long-term dialysis remains debatable. The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in the dialysis-dependent population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An updated network meta-analysis based on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban 2.5/5 mg twice daily), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and no anticoagulation were compared on safety and efficacy outcomes. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause death. A total of 42 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, with 185 864 subjects were pooled. VKAs were associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding than either no anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61) or DOACs (DOACs versus VKAs; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]). For the prevention of thromboembolism, the efficacies of VKAs, DOACs, and no anticoagulation were equivalent. Nevertheless, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with fewer embolic events. There were no differences in all-cause death with the administration of VKAs, DOACs, or no anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

For dialysis-dependent populations, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with better efficacy, while dabigatran and apixaban demonstrated better safety. No anticoagulation was a noninferior alterative, and VKAs were associated with the worst outcomes.

Long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a multi-center, prospective, open label, observational study

Background

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing dialysis is high, however, the high risk of bleeding often hampers with a correct anticoagulation in ESKD patients with AF, despite high thromboembolic risk. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is a anticoagulation (OAT) for thromboembolism prevention in AF populations with high hemorrhagic risk.

Methods and Results

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAA occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients undergoing the procedure (LAA occlusion cohort, n = 106), in comparison with two other ESKD cohorts, one taking warfarin (Warfarin cohort, n = 114) and the other without anticoagulation therapy (No-OAT cohort, n = 148). After a median follow-up of 4 years, a Cox regression model, adjusted for possible confounding factors, showed that the hazard ratios (HRs) of thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were 0.19 (95%CI 0.04-0.96; p = 0.045) and 0.16 (95%CI 0.04-0.66; p = 0.011) as compared with Warfarin and No-OAT cohorts, respectively. The HR of bleeding in the LAA occlusion cohort was 0.37 (95%CI 0.16-0.83; p = 0.017) compared to Warfarin cohort, while there were no significant differences between the LAA occlusion and the No-OAT cohort (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.23-1.12; p = 0.094). Adjusted Cox regression models showed lower mortality in patients undergoing LAA occlusion as compared with both the Warfarin cohort (HR 0.60; 95%CI 0.38-0.94; p = 0.027) and no-OAT cohort (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.34-0.78; p = 0.002). Thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were lower than expected according to the CHA2DS2VASc score (1.7 [95%CI 0.3-3.0] vs 6.7 events per 100 person/years, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In ESKD patients with AF, LAA occlusion is safe and effective and is associated with reduced mortality compared with OAT or no therapy.

Survival benefits of oral anticoagulation therapy in acute kidney injury patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database

OBJECTIVE

To find out the effect of different oral anticoagulation therapies (OAC) on mortality rate in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF).DesignA retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 19 672 patients diagnosed with AKI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were categorised into three groups: (1) AF; (2) AKI and AF, OAC-; (3) AKI and AF, OAC+. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards model adjusted confounding factors. Linear regression was applied to assess the associations between OAC treatment and LOS.

RESULTS

After PSM, 2042 pairs of AKI and AF patients were matched between the patients who received OAC and those without anticoagulant treatment. Cox regression analysis showed that, OAC significantly reduce 30-day mortality compared with non-OAC (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.35; p<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that OAC prolong LOS in hospital (11.3 days vs 10.0 days; p=0.013) and ICU (4.9 days vs 4.4 days; p<0.001). OAC did not improve survival in patients with haemorrhage (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.29; p=0.23). Novel OAC did not reduce mortality in acute-on-chronic renal injury (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.78; p=0.025) patients compared with warfarin.

CONCLUSION

OAC administration was associated with improved short-term survival in AKI patients concomitant with AF.

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in advanced chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulants have not been studied in randomised controlled trials with CrCl < 30 ml/min. The objective of this review was to identify the impact of different anticoagulant strategies in patients with advanced CKD including dialysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, searching electronic databases from 1946 to 2022. Studies that evaluated both thrombotic and bleeding outcomes with anticoagulant use in CrCl < 50 ml/min were included.

RESULTS

Our initial search yielded 14,503 papers with 53 suitable for inclusion. RCTs comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin for patients with VTE and CrCl 30-50 ml/min found no difference in recurrent VTE events (RR 0.68(95% CI 0.42-1.11)) with reduced bleeding (RR 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.94)). Observational data in haemodialysis suggest lower risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding with apixaban versus warfarin. Very few studies examining outcomes were available for therapeutic and prophylactic dose low molecular weight heparin for CrCl < 30 ml/min. Findings for patients with AF on dialysis were that warfarin or DOACs had a similar or higher risk of stroke compared to no anticoagulation. For patients with AF and CrCl < 30 ml/min not on dialysis, anticoagulation should be considered on an individual basis, with limited studies suggesting DOACs may have a preferable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are still required, some ongoing, in patients with advanced CKD (CrCl < 30 ml/min) to identify the safest and most effective treatment options for VTE and AF.

Outcomes on safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in end stage renal disease patients undergoing dialysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing chronic dialysis, direct oral agents are contraindicated and warfarin does not fully prevent embolic events while increasing the bleeding risk. The high hemorrhagic risk represents the main problem in this population. Aim of the study was to estimate the safety and efficacy for thromboembolic prevention of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients with AF and high hemorrhagic risk.

METHODS

Ninety-two dialysis patients with AF who underwent LAA occlusion were recruited. For comparative purposes, two cohorts of dialysis patients with AF, one taking warfarin (oral anticoagulant therapy, OAT cohort, n = 114) and the other not taking any OAT (no-therapy cohort, n = 148) were included in the study. Primary endpoints were (1) incidence of peri-procedural complications, (2) incidence of 2-year thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, (3) mortality at 2 years. In order to evaluate the effect of the LAA occlusion on the endpoints with respect to the OAT and No-therapy cohorts, a multivariable Cox regression model was applied adjusted for possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

The device was successfully implanted in 100% of cases. Two major peri-procedural complications were reported. No thromboembolic events occurred at 2-year follow-up. The adjusted multivariable Cox regression model showed no difference in bleeding risk in the OAT compared to the LAA occlusion cohort in the first 3 months of follow-up [HR 1.65 (95% CI 0.43-6.33)], when most of patients were taking two antiplatelet drugs. In the following 21 months the bleeding incidence became higher in OAT patients [HR 6.48 (95% CI 1.32-31.72)]. Overall mortality was greater in both the OAT [HR 2.76 (95% CI 1.31-5.86)] and No-Therapy [HR 3.09 (95% CI 1.59-5.98)] cohorts compared to LAA occlusion patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study could open the way to a non-pharmacological option for thromboembolic protection in dialysis patients with AF and high bleeding risk.

Pros and cons of antithrombotic therapy in end-stage kidney disease: a 2019 update

Dialysis patients manifest both an increased thrombotic risk and a haemorrhagic tendency. A great number of patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis have cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) and different indications for treatment with antithrombotics (primary or secondary prevention). Unfortunately, few randomized controlled trials deal with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy in dialysis. Therefore cardiology and nephrology guidelines offer ambiguous recommendations and often exclude or ignore these patients. In our opinion, there is a need for an expert consensus that provides physicians with useful information to make correct decisions in different situations requiring antithrombotics. Herein the European Dialysis Working Group presents up-to-date evidence about the topic and encourages practitioners to choose among alternatives in order to limit bleeding and minimize atherothrombotic and cardioembolic risks. In the absence of clear evidence, these clinical settings and consequent therapeutic strategies will be discussed by highlighting data from observational studies for and against the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs alone or in combination. Until new studies shed light on unclear clinical situations, one should keep in mind that the objective of treatment is to minimize thrombotic risk while reducing bleeding events.

Systematic DOACs oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: the nephrologist's perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and also associated with unfavorable outcome. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstep of management in such patients, aimed at reducing the high risk of systemic thromboembolism and especially of ischemic stroke, which is reportedly associated with increased mortality in CKD patients. Even though new direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) proved to be effective in patients with non valvular chronic AF, and are therefore recommended by recent guidelines for their treatment, warfarin is currently used in more than one-half of subjects needing oral anticoagulation, and only 30% of them are converted from a vitamin K antagonist- to a DOAC-based regimen. The main reason for not prescribing DOACs is often a reduction in renal function, even if mild. Aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the impact of DOAC therapy in the setting of CKD, from a nephrological perspective, by comparing available evidence on the role of DOACs in patients with CKD and AF with that emerging from traditional warfarin-based therapy. Both the pathogenesis of AF in CKD, and available findings of renal, cardiovascular and bone effects of DOACs in CKD are discussed, leading to the conclusion that DOAC therapy should be considered as the first line therapy for non valvular AF in patients with mild and moderate reduction of renal function, and could also be adopted for patients with severe CKD not on hemodialysis treatment, whereas there is insufficient evidence for ESRD patients on dialysis.

Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease

The role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. However, none of the randomized controlled trials included patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) leaving a lack of evidence in this large, challenging and unique patient group. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) with AF have additional risk factors for stroke due to vascular comorbidities, HD treatment, age, and diabetes. Conversely, they are also at increased risk of major bleeding due to uremic platelet impairment. Anticoagulants increase bleeding risk in patients with ESRD and HD up to 10-fold compared with non chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on warfarin. There are conflicting data and recommendations regarding use of OACs in ESRD which will be reviewed in this article. We conclude by proposing a modified strategy for OAC use in ESRD based on the latest evidence.

Warfarin use and the risk of stroke, bleeding, and mortality in older adults on dialysis with incident atrial fibrillation

AIM

There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment among older end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, and differences among subgroups are unclear.

METHODS

Older dialysis patients who were newly diagnosed with AF (7/2007-12/2011) were identified in the United States Renal Data System. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the outcomes (any stroke, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, severe gastrointestinal bleeding, and death) by time-varying warfarin use were estimated using Cox regression accounting for the inverse probability of treatment weight.

RESULTS

Among 5765 older dialysis patients with incident AF, warfarin was associated with significantly increased risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.33-1.68), but was not statistically associated with any stroke (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.12), ischaemic stroke (HR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.70-1.11) or gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.80-1.32). Warfarin use was associated with a reduced risk of mortality (HR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.80). The association between warfarin and major bleeding differed by sex (male: HR = 1.29; 95%CI 1.08-1.55; female: HR = 1.67; 95%CI 1.44-1.93; P-value for interaction = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Older ESRD patients with AF who were treated with warfarin had a no difference in stroke risk, lower mortality risk, but increased major bleeding risk. The bleeding risk associated with warfarin was greater among women than men. The risk/benefit ratio of warfarin may be less favourable among older women.

Safety and efficacy of heparin during dialysis in the context of systemic anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications

Heparin is widely used to prevent coagulation during hemodialysis. Although systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are commonly prescribed in the hemodialysis population, the safety and efficacy of heparin in the presence of these medications is unclear. This retrospective cohort study considered adult hemodialysis patients treated in the United States (August 2015-July 2017). For each month, patients were ascribed a three-part exposure status (heparin use, anticoagulant use, antiplatelet agent use) based on electronic health records. Outcomes included anemia measures, peri-treatment bleeding and clotting, and hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Within systemic medication exposure categories, associations of heparin use were examined using adjusted generalized linear, negative binomial, or Poisson models. Across all systemic medication exposures, heparin use was associated with lower erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) dose, higher hemoglobin levels, and lower monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose; lower rates of clotting during treatment and hospitalization for GI bleeding; and similar rates of peri-treatment bleeding. Associations with respect to ESA, IV iron, hemoglobin, and clotting were approximately twofold more potent in the absence of a systemic anticoagulant; the presence of an antiplatelet agent had little impact. Neither medication type influenced associations between heparin use and peri-treatment or GI bleeding. These results suggest that heparin use is safe and effective in the presence and absence of systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. Clinical judgment must be applied to assess bleeding risk in individual patients; however, the decision to withhold heparin should not solely be based upon the concurrent use of anticoagulant or antiplatet agents.

Cardiac valve calcification and use of anticoagulants: Preliminary observation of a potentially modifiable risk factor

AIMS

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has been recently introduced in the clinical practice. Rather than interfering with vitamin K-dependent posttranscriptional modification of various proteins, DOACs selectively inhibit factors involved in the coagulation cascade. In particular, in contrast with Warfarin, Rivaroxabn does not interfere with activation of matrix Gla Protein (MGP), a potent vascular calcification Inhibitor. We herein sought to investigate the impact of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin on cardiac valve calcifications in a cohort of moderate-to advanced CKD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective, longitudinal study. Consecutive CKD stage 3b - 4 (according to KDIGO guidelines) patients from 8 cardiologic outpatient clinics were enrolled between May 2015 and October 2017. All patients received anticoagulation (100 Warfarin vs 247 Rivaroxaban) as part of their non-valvular atrial fibrillation management. Cardiac valve calcification was evaluated via standard trans-thoracic echocardiogram. 347 patients (mean age: 66 years; mean eGFR: 37 ml/min/1.73 m²) were studied. Over a mean follow-up period of 16 months, Rivaroxaban compared to Warfarin reduced both mitral and aortic valve calcifications (p < 0.001) independently of the degree of calcifications at baseline and potential confounders. Notably, Rivaroxaban use was also associated with a significant reduction in C reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study generates the hypothesis that the use of Rivaroxaban associates with a reduction of cardiac valve calcification deposition and progression as compared to Warfarin, in a cohort of CKD stage 3b-4 patients. Future endeavors are needed to confirm and to establish the mechanisms responsible for these findings.

Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score and cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is an important risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, current malnutrition biomarkers seem unable to accurately estimate the role of malnutrition in predicting cardiovascular risk. Our aim was to investigate the role of the Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score (SGA-DMS) compared to two well-recognized comorbidity scores-Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and modified CCI (excluding age-factor) (mCCI)-in predicting cardiovascular events in HD patients.

METHODS

In 86 maintenance HD patients followed from June 2015 to June 2017, we analyzed biohumoral data and clinical scores as risk factors for cardiovascular events (acute heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and stroke). Their impact on outcome was investigated by linear regression, Cox regression models and ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Cardiovascular events occurred in 26/86 (30%) patients during the 2-year follow-up. Linear regression showed only age and dialysis vintage to be positively related to SGA-DMS: B 0.21 (95% CI 0.01; 0.30) p 0.05, and B 0.24 (0.09; 0.34) p 0.02, respectively, while serum albumin, normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and dialysis dose (Kt/V) were negatively related to SGA-DMS: B - 1.29 (- 3.29; - 0.81) p 0.02; B - 0.08 (- 1.52; - 0.35) p 0.04 and B - 2.63 (- 5.25; - 0.22) p 0.03, respectively. At Cox regression analysis, SGA-DMS was not a risk predictor for cardiovascular events: HR 1.09 (0.9; 1.22), while both CCI and mCCI were significant predictors: HR 1.43 (1.13; 1.87) and HR 1.57 (1.20; 2.06) also in Cox adjusted models. ROC analysis reported similar AUCs for CCI and mCCI: 0.72 (0.60; 0.89) p 0.00 and 0.70 (0.58; 0.82) p 0.00, respectively, compared to SGA-DMS 0.56 (0.49; 0.72) p 0.14.

CONCLUSIONS

SGA-DMS is not a superior and significant prognostic tool compared to CCI and mCCI in assessing cardiovascular risk in HD patients, even it allows to appraise both malnutrition and comorbidity status.

Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin in moderate-to-advanced CKD: real world data

BACKGROUND

In recent years, novel anticoagulant drugs have been introduced in the clinical armamentarium and have progressively gained momentum. Although their use is increasing among CKD patients, some skepticism about their risk-benefit ratio still persists. We sought to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in a cohort of moderate-to-advanced CKD patients.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective, longitudinal study involved 347 consecutive CKD stage 3b-4 (according to NKF-KDOQI guidelines) patients enrolled from 8 cardiac outpatient clinics between March 2015 and October 2017. All patients received anticoagulation (100 warfarin vs. 247 rivaroxaban) as part of their non-valvular atrial fibrillation management at the attending physician's discretion. Clinical effectiveness (defined as the occurrence of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, or transient ischemic attack) and safety (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal or other bleeding) were assessed separately.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 16 ± 0.3 months, 25 stroke episodes (15 hemorrhagic, and 10 ischemic) occurred in 24 warfarin treated patients vs. none in the rivaroxaban arm. There were 5 vs. 0 episodes of deep venous thrombosis and 8 vs. 2 major episodes of bleeding in the warfarin and rivaroxaban groups, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of minor episodes of bleeding was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban seems a safe and effective therapeutic option in CKD stage 3b-4 patients. However, future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively establish the role of rivaroxaban in CKD patients.

[The Multimorbid Patient: Use of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease]

The Multimorbid Patient: Use of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Abstract. Increasing life expectancy in Western countries is associated with a high prevalence of multiple chronic diseases which is defined by the term "multimorbidity". Many of these patients suffer from chronic kidney disease (CKD) and thrombogenic comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation with the need for oral anticoagulation. For decades vitamin K antagonists have been exclusively prescribed for oral anticoagulation. However, due to altered pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of these drugs in CKD, a significant risk of bleeding exists. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants as a new and promising alternative to vitamin K antagonists was -especially for CKD patients - highly anticipated. However, data from randomized studies are missing for older patients with advanced CKD. Consequently, a careful evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio is recommended for this sensitive patient population.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation with warfarin among older adults with end stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence questioning the use of warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) among older adults with end stage renal disease (ESRD). We assessed the patterns and determinants of warfarin utilization among these patients in the US.

METHODS

We assembled a cohort of older adults (age ≥65) undergoing dialysis with incident AF from July 2007 to November 2011 from the US Renal Data System (USRDS). We used descriptive statistics to characterize warfarin utilization within 30 days of AF discharge, and logistic regression to quantify patient characteristics associated with warfarin initiation.

RESULTS

Among 5730 older adults undergoing dialysis with incident AF, 15.5% initiated warfarin. Among 2906 patients with high risk of bleeding, 12.7% initiated warfarin; whereas 14.9% initiated warfarin among 4824 patients with high risk of stroke. After adjustment for patient characteristics, warfarin initiation was lower among patients who were older [odds ratio (OR) = 0.74 per 10-year increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.83] and those with a history of diabetes (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.80), or bleeding (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.80). There was no association between sex, race, or dialysis modality and warfarin initiation. Among patients who initiated warfarin, 46.8% discontinued warfarin use after a median treatment length of 8.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite the unclear benefit and increased bleeding risk of warfarin treatment in patients with ESRD, 1 in 8 older adults undergoing dialysis with incident AF in the US who had high risk of bleeding used warfarin. Changes to warfarin therapy due to discontinuation were common after initiation.

Chronic kidney disease and anticoagulation: from vitamin K antagonists and heparins to direct oral anticoagulant agents

Anticoagulation in patients with impaired kidney function can be challenging since drugs' pharmacokinetics and bioavailability are altered in this setting. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with conventional anticoagulant agents [vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH)] are at high risk of bleeding events (both non-major and major clinically relevant bleeding). While anticoagulation reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, the co-existing bleeding risk and the fact that the most commonly used anticoagulation agents are eliminated via the kidneys pose additional challenges. More recently, two classes of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have been investigated for the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic events: the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In this review, we discuss the complex challenges and the practical considerations associated with the management of anticoagulation treatment in patients with CKD, with a special focus on DOACs.

Dabigatran etexilate: appropriate use in patients with chronic kidney disease and in the elderly patients

Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is a direct thrombin inhibitor, which has been approved for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite large randomized clinical trials and independent observational studies providing robust data concerning DE safety and efficacy, some physicians still perceive mild-to-moderate renal impairment and old age as a relative contraindication to its use. In this article, we review the available scientific evidence supporting the use of DE in these clinical situations. Patients with AF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are per se at high risk of stroke, bleeding and mortality. Although there is evidence of clinical benefit of anticoagulation in these patients, anticoagulant therapy requires caution and demands careful clinical monitoring, regardless of the drug used. In patients with no contraindication to its use, the clinical benefit of DE versus warfarin is independent of renal function. The elderly with AF are frequently undertreated because of the perception of high bleeding risk and limited clinical benefit. However, the clinical benefit of anticoagulation is independent of patient age, and age per se should not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation. DE has been extensively studied in the elderly, both in randomized clinical trials and in observational studies: DE 150 mg BID should not be used in patients 80 years of age or older, while DE 110 mg BID is as safe as warfarin. Intracranial haemorrhages reduction by DE compared with warfarin is preserved in the elderly. Therefore, mild and moderate CKD and being elderly should not deter physicians from prescribing DE. Furthermore, the availability of a specific antidote is expected to improve the safety of the use of DE in clinical practice.