Occupational allergy to β-lactam antibiotics

Evaluation of environmental antibiotic contamination by surface wipe sampling in a large care centre

OBJECTIVES

Exposure of healthcare workers to antibiotics may cause adverse health effects. Results of environmental contamination with antibiotics, obtained by taking surface wipe samples, can be used as an indicator for potential exposure to these sensitizing drugs. The objective was to describe the results of repeated measurements of contamination with antibiotics on multiple surfaces in hospital wards. Standardized needle and syringe preparation techniques and cleaning procedures were used.

METHODS

The preparation table and the floor around the waste bin in six wards were sampled and analysed for contamination with the antibiotics amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, flucloxacillin, meropenem, piperacillin and vancomycin. Sampling was performed in four trials during 8 months. Depending on the outcome of the trials, the cleaning procedure was adapted. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used for the analysis of the drugs.

RESULTS

During the four trials, contamination with all eight antibiotics was omnipresent on all preparation tables and floors in the six wards. The highest contamination was found for amoxicillin (1291 ng/cm2). Changing the cleaning procedure did not reduce the level of contamination.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface contamination with the antibiotics was widespread and most probably caused by spillage during the preparation in combination with an ineffective cleaning procedure. Strategies should be developed and implemented by institutions for safe handling of antibiotics to reduce environmental contamination and potential exposure of healthcare workers to these sensitizing drugs.

[Evaluation of the "Health management guideline on occupational allergy in nursing occupations and its primary prevention" by nursing managers]

OBJECTIVE

Individuals in nursing occupations are often exposed to various materials such as rubber products and drugs, and they comprise a population at high risk of developing occupational allergies. We therefore created a "Health management guideline on occupational allergy in nursing occupations and its primary prevention" (hereinafter referred to as "HMG") and conducted a questionnaire survey to elucidate its potential use and the challenges of implementing it in clinical practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The HMG includes the following content: A. Basic knowledge of occupational allergies; B. Common occupational allergies in nursing occupations; C. Occupational allergies triggered by specific antigens in nursing occupations; D. Eczema and skincare for hands; and E. Health management for occupational allergies. A questionnaire survey was conducted on one nursing manager each from 80 hospitals, with at least 400 beds. The survey included questions to gauge the level of understanding the content described in the HMG and opinions on incorporating the management method. The ethics committee of the researcher's institution approved the study.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 30 nursing managers. Over 70% responded that they understood the instructions for [occupational allergies], [common occupational allergies in nursing occupations], and [eczema and skincare for hands] presented in the HMG, and 100% said they either understood or mostly understood them. For [work management], 57% said they understood the content and 90% wanted to incorporate it. Furthermore, 10% responded that they wanted to incorporate the guidelines but did not believe it was feasible, given that "achieving general awareness and efforts involving other occupations are difficult." For [work environment management], 53% said they understood the content and 83% wanted to incorporate it. Additionally, 17% responded that they wanted to incorporate it but did not believe it was feasible, amid concerns that "allergen monitoring is difficult in reality" and "installation of local ventilation systems seems difficult."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The HMG was postulated to be useful in providing knowledge on occupational allergy and health management methods, and for employing in clinical practice. The study recommended that in order to specifically incorporate the management methods, it is imperative that the entire hospital, including staff from other occupations, understand the guidelines and make adjustments accordingly.

Pricktest als Provokation – schwere anaphylaktische Reaktion auf Hauttests mit Ceftriaxon bei beruflicher Exposition

Es werden zwei Patienten vorgestellt, die wegen eines Asthma bronchiale bei beruflichem Kontakt mit Ceftriaxon abgeklärt wurden. Bei beiden trat innerhalb von Minuten nach Anlegen eines Pricktests mit Ceftriaxon eine adrenalinpflichtige, anaphylaktische Reaktion auf. Systemische Reaktionen auf Hauttests mit Betalaktamantibiotika sind relativ selten, sie können auch bei Patienten mit vorausgegangenen milden Symptomen wie Urtikaria oder beruflichen Kontaktallergien auf Betalaktame auftreten. Als Risikofaktoren werden schwere Anaphylaxien in der Anamnese und ein kurzes Reaktionsintervall genannt. Eine korrekte Durchführung der Hauttests mit Titration und eine adäquate Überwachung sind zu beachten.

Occupational allergy to pharmaceutical products

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Occupational allergy in healthcare workers is common and can lead to significant costs from both loss of productivity within the workforce as well as those associated with diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to provide an update on drugs implicated in causing occupational allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drugs traditionally reported as causing occupational allergy, such as penicillin, remain problematic. However, as their use reduces and newer drugs, such as cephalosporins, are used more frequently there is a changing pattern to occupational sensitization. In some studies up to 17% of healthcare workers now appear sensitized to cephalosporins. Other drug classes also reported include proton pump inhibitors and benzodiazepines. Interestingly, drugs such as omeprazole and tetrazepam rarely cause allergy in patients but can be very sensitizing if applied topically or inhaled. Recent studies involving pharmaceutical company employees show that this problem can no longer be considered primarily related to healthcare workers.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of occupational allergy to drugs can be complicated and has been shown to take up to 5 years from the onset of symptoms. Ultimately, workplace avoidance remains key; however, an up to date awareness of culprit drugs and the patterns of allergy seen are key to a prompt resolution of symptoms.