Development of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (part 2): preventive aspects and innovations

The pharmacotherapeutic management of allergic rhinitis in people with asthma

INTRODUCTION

Up to 90% of asthmatic patients have comorbid allergic rhinitis (AR). Although appropriate therapy of AR can improve asthma symptoms and management, AR is often underdiagnosed and under-treated in asthmatics.A non-systematic literature research was conducted on AR as a comorbidity and risk factor of asthma. Latest international publications in medical databases, international guidelines, and the Internet were reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the conducted literature research there is proved evidence of the necessity of diagnosis and treatment of AR in patients with asthma because it affects health care utilization. Therefore, it is recommended in national and global guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

AR increases the risk of asthma development and contributes to the severity of an existing asthma. Early treatment of AR with drugs as intranasal steroids, antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and especially allergen-specific immunotherapy can reduce the risk of asthma development and the concomitant medication use in addition to severity of symptoms in AR and asthma.

[Neuroimmunology of allergic rhinitis : Part 1: Cellular and humoral basic principles]

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a very common disease with a high prevalence worldwide. It is an IgE-mediated type 2 inflammatory disease following exposure to inhalant allergens. A multitude of different neuropeptides including substance P, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), nerve growth factor (NGF), and neuromedin U (NMU) can be released via peripheral axon or central reflexes, interact with immune cells, and thus contribute to neurogenic inflammation which causes the nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) characteristic of AR. Independent production of neuroendocrine hormones and neuropeptides by immune cells has also been demonstrated. Neuro-immune cell units arise when immune and neuronal cells colocalize, for which typical anatomic regions are, e.g., the mast cell-nerve functional unit. The focus of this review is the elucidation of neuroimmune communication mechanisms in AR.

Care with allergen immunotherapy for allergic respiratory diseases in Germany-Predictors and deficits

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only possibility of causal therapy for allergic respiratory diseases. Although the prevailing high prevalence of allergic diseases and restrictions in the daily lives of patients, AIT is offered to a suboptimal number of patients in Germany.

METHODS

Insured patients with documented allergic respiratory disease of one of the largest statutory health insurances in Germany, 'DAK-Gesundheit', were contacted by postal mail and asked to participate in the study. In case of written consent, primary and secondary data of patients were collected and analysed. Patient characteristics, predictors of being offered AIT, predictors of performing AIT and guideline-compliant care were analysed.

RESULTS

2505 subjects were included in the VerSITA study. Allergy to tree pollen and native speaking were identified as predictors, which increase the probability of being offered AIT. The probability was significantly decreased by the characteristics allergic rhinitis only, allergic asthma only, age in years, non-German citizenship, no graduation and lower secondary qualification. Significant positive predictors for an AIT to be actually performed were: Allergy to tree pollen and male sex. Predictors that decrease the likelihood that AIT is performed were: only allergic asthma, current smoker, former smoker, age and non-German citizenship. Furthermore, it was possible to identify characteristics in which guideline-compliant patients differed significantly from the rest of the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on statutory health insurance data and patient survey data, the VerSITA study provides a broad and in-depth overview of the care situation with regard to AIT in Germany and identifies deficits.

Dokumentation von Biologika-Therapien bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP): Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab

Hintergrund: Die chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) ist eine multifaktorielle entzündliche Erkrankung der paranasalen Schleimhäute, der als Endotyp meistens eine Typ-2-Inflammation zugrunde liegt. Mittlerweile sind drei Antikörper (Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab) für die Therapie der schweren CRSwNP zugelassen. Eine Dokumentation der Erkrankungsschwere im Behandlungsverlauf ist unverzichtbar.

Methoden: In einer Literaturrecherche in Medline, Pubmed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinienregistern und der Cochrane Library wurde die Immunologie der CRSwNP analysiert und die Evidenz zur Wirkung von Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab bei dieser Erkrankung ermittelt. Hieraus wurden drei Positionspapiere durch unsere Autorengruppe erstellt, die Grundlage dieser zusammenfassenden Übersichtsarbeit sind.

Ergebnisse: Basierend auf den Angaben aus der internationalen Literatur werden von einem Expertengremium Empfehlungen für die Anwendung von Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab bei CRSwNP im deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben.

Schlussfolgerung: Dupilumab, Omalizumab und Mepolizumab sind zugelassen für Patienten ab 18 Jahren mit schwerer CRSwNP als Zusatztherapie zu intranasalen Glukokortikosteroiden (INCS), wenn, bei Dupilumab und Mepolizumab, durch eine Therapie mit systemischen Glukokortikosteroiden und/oder chirurgischem Eingriff keine ausreichende Krankheitskontrolle erzielt werden kann. Eine Therapie mit Omalizumab ist angezeigt, wenn eine Therapie mit INCS keine suffiziente Kontrolle der Erkrankung ergibt. Es werden dezidierte Empfehlungen zur Dokumentation der Anwendung im Deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben, die auf den hierzu bereits publizierten Positionspapieren unserer Autorengruppe basieren.

Zitierweise: Klimek L, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Beule AG, Chaker AM, Hagemann J, Klimek F, Casper I, Huppertz T, Hoffmann TK, Dazert S, Deitmer T, Olze H, Strieth S, Wrede H, Schlenter W, Welkoborsky H-J, Wollenberg B, Bergmann C, Cuevas M, Beutner C, Gröger M, Becker S. Indicating biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP): Recommendations by German Allergy and ORL-societies AeDA and DGHNO for Dupilumab, Omalizumab and Mepolizumab. Allergo J Int 2022;31:149-60

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-022-00220-x

Thermosensitive PLGA–PEG–PLGA Hydrogel as Depot Matrix for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only currently available curative treatment option for allergic diseases. AIT often includes depot-forming and immunostimulatory adjuvants, to prolong allergen presentation and to improve therapeutic efficacy. The use of aluminium salts in AIT, which are commonly used as depot-forming adjuvants, is controversially discussed, due to health concerns and Th2-promoting activity. Therefore, there is the need for novel delivery systems in AIT with similar therapeutic efficacy compared to classical AIT strategies. In this study, a triblock copolymer (hydrogel) was assessed as a delivery system for AIT in a murine model of allergic asthma. We show that the hydrogel combines the advantages of both depot function and biodegradability at the same time. We further demonstrate the suitability of hydrogel to release different bioactive compounds in vitro and in vivo. AIT delivered with hydrogel reduces key parameters of allergic inflammation, such as inflammatory cell infiltration, mucus hypersecretion, and allergen-specific IgE, in a comparable manner to standard AIT treatment. Additionally, hydrogel-based AIT is superior in inducing allergen-specific IgG antibodies with potentially protective functions. Taken together, hydrogel represents a promising delivery system for AIT that is able to combine therapeutic allergen administration with the prolonged release of immunomodulators at the same time.

New Therapeutic Approaches for Allergy: A Review of Cell Therapy and Bio- or Nano-Material-Based Strategies

Allergy constitutes a major health issue due to its large prevalence. The established therapeutic approaches (allergen avoidance, antihistamines, and corticosteroids) do not address the underlying causes of the pathology, highlighting the need for other long-term treatment options. Antigen-specific immunotherapy enables the long-term control of allergic diseases by promoting immunological tolerance to the allergen. However, efficacious immunotherapies are not available for all possible allergens, and the risk of undesired reactions during therapy remains a concern, especially in patients with severe allergic reactions. In this context, two types of therapeutic strategies appear especially promising for the future in the context of allergy: cell therapy and bio- or nano-material-based therapy. In this review, the main strategies developed this far in these two types of strategies are discussed, with several examples illustrating the different approaches.

Venom Immunotherapy: From Proteins to Product to Patient Protection

In this review, we outline and reflect on the important differences between allergen-specific immunotherapy for inhalant allergies (i.e., aeroallergens) and venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT), with a special focus on Venomil® Bee and Wasp. Venomil® is provided as a freeze-dried extract and a diluent to prepare a solution for injection for the treatment of patients with IgE-mediated allergies to bee and/or wasp venom and for evaluating the degree of sensitivity in a skin test. While the materials that make up the product have not changed, the suppliers of raw materials have changed over the years. Here, we consolidate relevant historical safety and efficacy studies that used products from shared manufacture supply profiles, i.e., products from Bayer or Hollister-Stier. We also consider the characterization and standardization of venom marker allergens, providing insights into manufacturing controls that have produced stable and consistent quality profiles over many years. Quality differences between products and their impacts on treatment outcomes have been a current topic of discussion and further research. Finally, we review the considerations surrounding the choice of depot adjuvant most suitable to augmenting VIT.

Antigen Uptake After Intradermal Microinjection Depends on Antigen Nature and Formulation, but Not on Injection Depth

The skin is an attractive alternative administration route for allergy vaccination, as the skin is rich in dendritic cells (DCs) and is easily accessible. In the skin multiple subsets of DCs with distinct roles reside at different depths. In this study antigen (=allergen for allergy) formulations were injected in ex vivo human skin in a depth-controlled manner by using a hollow microneedle injection system. Biopsies were harvested at the injection site, which were then cultured for 72 h. Subsequently, the crawled-out cells were collected from the medium and analyzed with flow cytometry. Intradermal administration of ovalbumin (OVA, model antigen) solution at various depths in the skin did not affect the migration and maturation of DCs. OVA was taken up efficiently by the DCs, and this was not affected by the injection depth. In contrast, Bet v 1, the major allergen in birch pollen allergy, was barely taken up by dermal DCs (dDCs). Antigens were more efficiently taken up by CD14⁺ dDCs than CD1a⁺ dDCs, which in turn were more efficient at taken up antigen than Langerhans cells. Subsequently, both OVA and Bet v 1 were formulated in cationic and anionic liposomes, which altered antigen uptake drastically following intradermal microinjection. While OVA uptake was reduced by formulation in liposomes, Bet v 1 uptake in dDCs was increased by encapsulation in both cationic and anionic liposomes. This highlights the potential use of liposomes as adjuvant in intradermal allergy vaccine delivery. In conclusion, we observed that antigen uptake after intradermal injection was not affected by injection depth, but varied between different antigens and formulation.