Challenges and Supports During the Transition from High School to College for Students with Traumatic Brain Injuries

Developing a model of return to school: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems study

OBJECTIVE

A common goal for those recovering from moderate to severe brain injury is to reengage in education or employment. There is significant overlap between the skills relevant for successful job and academic performance in high school and college, and many deficits reported after brain injury are consistent across young adults and adults. This study utilized a return to work (RTW) model framework to develop a model of return to school (RTS).

METHOD

Days of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), length of stay (LOS), rehabilitation discharge Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores, presence of pre-injury learning limitation, and educational level were used to predict RTS one-year post-injury in a student sample (N = 158, 58.8% white, 69.6% male) within the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database.

RESULTS

The overall RTS rate for this sample was 62%. Logistic regression indicated that lower DRS discharge scores and being in high school pre-injury resulted in the best outcome.

CONCLUSION

Results showed partial support for the translation of RTW factors to a student sample; however, results may also favor the conceptual distinction in RTS versus RTW, which are elaborated. More outreach for college students may improve awareness of disability services, thereby heightening the future return rate.

The student journey: Living and learning following traumatic brain injury

Primary objective: In this research we set out to gain further understanding of the experiences of students participating in secondary and tertiary education following TBI: exploring academic and non-academic factors, as well as changes in experiences over time.Methods and procedures: A longitudinal, qualitative investigation was completed. 12 students (17-32 years) completed up to three in-depth interviews over a period of 4-15 months, capturing atotal of 30 time points. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods.Main outcomes and results: Students' participation experiences were unique and varied with different timelines and outcomes, however they shared many similar critical points. We interpreted their experiences as a student journey traveling through four significant landscapes, "Choosing to study", "Studying", "Deciding what to do", "Making the next step." Journeys involved complex processes of living and learning. Moving along the pathway was not always smooth or straightforward.Conclusions: Students' experiences of returning to study following TBI can be interpreted as a complex journey of living and learning. Four important stages of the journey provide clinicians and educators with landscape features that can provide a structure for exploring supports to address both academic and non-academic factors to assist students in their study journey.