Five Critical Areas that Combat High Costs and Prolonged Development Times for Regenerative Medicine Manufacturing

Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications

Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) culture in spinner flask: improving the parameters of culture in a microcarrier-based system

Prior to clinical use, extensive in vitro proliferation of human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) is required. Among the current options, spinner-type stirred flasks, which use microcarriers to increase the yield of adherent cells, are recommended. Here, we propose a methodology for ASCs proliferation through cell suspension culture using Cultispher-S^® microcarriers (MC) under agitation in a spinner flask, with the aim of establishing a system that reconciles the efficiency of cell yield with high viability of the culture during two distinct phases: seeding and proliferation. The results showed that cell adhesion was potentiated under intermittent stirring at 70 rpm in the presence of 10% FBS for an initial cell concentration of 2.4 × 10⁴ cells/mL in the initial 24 h of cultivation. In the proliferation phase, kinetic analysis showed that cell growth was higher under continuous agitation at 50 rpm with a culture medium renewal regime of 50% every 72 h, which was sufficient to maintain the culture at optimal levels of nutrients and metabolites for up to nine days of cultivation, representing an 11.1-fold increase and a maximum cell productivity of 422 cells/mL/h (1.0 × 10⁵ viable cells/mL). ASCs maintained the immunophenotypic characteristics and mesodermal differentiation potential of both cell lines from different donors. The established protocol represents a more efficient and cost-effective method to obtain a high proliferation rate of ASCs in a microcarrier-based system, which is necessary for large-scale use in cell therapy, highlighting that the manipulation of critical parameters optimizes the ASCs production process.

Long-term and short-term preservation strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products: state of the art and emerging trends

There is an ever-growing need of human tissues and organs for transplantation. However, the availability of such tissues and organs is insufficient by a large margin, which is a huge medical and societal problem. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) represent potential solutions to this issue and have therefore been attracting increased interest from researchers and clinicians alike. But the successful large-scale clinical deployment of TERM products critically depends on the development of efficient preservation methodologies. The existing preservation approaches such as slow freezing, vitrification, dry state preservation, and hypothermic and normothermic storage all have issues that somehow limit the biomedical applications of TERM products. In this review, the principles and application of these approaches will be summarized, highlighting their advantages and limitations in the context of TERM products preservation.

Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast

Cell-based scaffold-free therapies seek to develop in vitro organotypic three-dimensional (3D) tissue-like surrogates, capitalising upon the inherent capacity of cells to create tissues with efficiency and sophistication that is still unparalleled by human-made devices. Although automation systems have been realised and (some) success stories have been witnessed over the years in clinical and commercial arenas, in vitro organogenesis is far from becoming a standard way of care. This limited technology transfer is largely attributed to scalability-associated costs, considering that the development of a borderline 3D implantable device requires very high number of functional cells and prolonged ex vivo culture periods. Herein, we critically discuss advancements and shortfalls of scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering strategies, along with pioneering concepts that have the potential to transform regenerative and reparative medicine.

Solid Organ Bioprinting: Strategies to Achieve Organ Function

The field of tissue engineering has advanced over the past decade, but the largest impact on human health should be achieved with the transition of engineered solid organs to the clinic. The number of patients suffering from solid organ disease continues to increase, with over 100 000 patients on the U.S. national waitlist and approximately 730 000 deaths in the United States resulting from end-stage organ disease annually. While flat, tubular, and hollow nontubular engineered organs have already been implanted in patients, in vitro formation of a fully functional solid organ at a translatable scale has not yet been achieved. Thus, one major goal is to bioengineer complex, solid organs for transplantation, composed of patient-specific cells. Among the myriad of approaches attempted to engineer solid organs, 3D bioprinting offers unmatched potential. This review highlights the structural complexity which must be engineered at nano-, micro-, and mesostructural scales to enable organ function. We showcase key advances in bioprinting solid organs with complex vascular networks and functioning microstructures, advances in biomaterials science that have enabled this progress, the regulatory hurdles the field has yet to overcome, and cutting edge technologies that bring us closer to the promise of engineered solid organs.

Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting

3D-printed orthopaedic devices and surgical tools, printed maxillofacial implants and other printed acellular devices have been used in patients. By contrast, bioprinted living cellular constructs face considerable translational challenges. In this Perspective, we first summarize the most recent developments in 3D bioprinting for clinical applications, with a focus on how 3D-printed cartilage, bone and skin can be designed for individual patients and fabricated using the patient's own cells. We then discuss key translational considerations, such as the need to ensure close integration of the living device with the patient's vascular network, the development of biocompatible bioinks and the challenges in deriving a physiologically relevant number of cells. Lastly, we outline untested regulatory pathways, as well as logistical challenges in material sourcing, manufacturing, standardization and transportation.