Spontaneous Reporting on Adverse Events by Consumers in the United States: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database

CDK4/6 inhibitors in drug-induced liver injury: a pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database and analysis of the drug-gene interaction network

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib by comprehensively analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Moreover, potential toxicological mechanisms of CDK4/6is-related liver injury were explored via drug-gene network analysis.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, we collected reports of DILI associated with CDK4/6i use from the FAERS dated January 2014 to March 2023. We conducted disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Pathway enrichment analysis and drug-gene network analyses were subsequently performed to determine the potential mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i-induced liver injury.

Results

We found positive signals for DILI with ribociclib (ROR = 2.60) and abemaciclib (ROR = 2.37). DILIs associated with liver-related investigations, signs, and symptoms were confirmed in all three reports of CDK4/6is. Moreover, ascites was identified as an unlisted hepatic adverse effect of palbociclib. We isolated 189 interactive target genes linking CDK4/6 inhibitors to hepatic injury. Several key genes, such as STAT3, HSP90AA1, and EP300, were revealed via protein-protein analysis, emphasizing their central roles within the network. KEGG pathway enrichment of these genes highlighted multiple pathways.

Conclusion

Our study revealed variations in hepatobiliary toxicity among the different CDK4/6 inhibitors, with ribociclib showing the highest risk of liver injury, followed by abemaciclib, while palbociclib appeared relatively safe. Our findings emphasize the need for cautious use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and regular liver function monitoring is recommended for long-term CDK4/6 inhibitor use.

Identifying Medications Underlying Communication Atypicalities in Psychotic and Affective Disorders: A Pharmacovigilance Study Within the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

PURPOSE

Communication atypicalities are considered promising markers of a broad range of clinical conditions. However, little is known about the mechanisms and confounders underlying them. Medications might have a crucial, relatively unknown role both as potential confounders and offering an insight on the mechanisms at work. The integration of regulatory documents with disproportionality analyses provides a more comprehensive picture to account for in future investigations of communication-related markers. The aim of this study was to identify a list of drugs potentially associated with communicative atypicalities within psychotic and affective disorders.

METHOD

We developed a query using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities to search for communicative atypicalities within the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (updated June 2021). A Bonferroni-corrected disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio) was separately performed on spontaneous reports involving psychotic, affective, and non-neuropsychiatric disorders, to account for the confounding role of different underlying conditions. Drug-adverse event associations not already reported in the Side Effect Resource database of labeled adverse drug reactions (unexpected) were subjected to further robustness analyses to account for expected biases.

RESULTS

A list of 291 expected and 91 unexpected potential confounding medications was identified, including drugs that may irritate (inhalants) or desiccate (anticholinergics) the larynx, impair speech motor control (antipsychotics), or induce nodules (acitretin) or necrosis (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors) on vocal cords; sedatives and stimulants; neurotoxic agents (anti-infectives); and agents acting on neurotransmitter pathways (dopamine agonists).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a list of medications to account for in future studies of communication-related markers in affective and psychotic disorders. The current test case illustrates rigorous procedures for digital phenotyping, and the methodological tools implemented for large-scale disproportionality analyses can be considered a road map for investigations of communication-related markers in other clinical populations.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23721345.

Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms

OBJECTIVE

Most systematic reviews of interventions focus on potential benefits. Common methods and assumptions that are appropriate for assessing benefits can be inappropriate for harms. This paper provides a primer on researching harms, particularly in systematic reviews.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Commentary describing challenges with assessing harm.

RESULTS

Investigators should be familiar with various terminologies used to describe, classify, and group harms. Published reports of clinical trials include limited information about harms, so systematic reviewers should not depend on these studies and journal articles to reach conclusions about harms. Visualizations might improve communication of multiple dimensions of harms such as severity, relatedness, and timing.

CONCLUSION

The terminology, classification, detection, collection, and reporting of harms create unique challenges that take time, expertise, and resources to navigate in both primary studies and evidence syntheses. Systematic reviewers might reach incorrect conclusions if they focus on evidence about harms found in published reports of randomized trials of a particular health problem. Systematic reviews could be improved through better identification and reporting of harms in primary studies and through better training and uptake of appropriate methods for synthesizing evidence about harms.

The Importance of Direct Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Safety Monitoring Process

All medicinal products authorized in the European Union are subjects of constant drug-safety monitoring processes. It is organized in a pharmacovigilance system that is designed to protect human health and life by the detection, analysis and prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and other drug-related problems. The main role of the aforementioned system is to collect and analyze adverse drug reaction reports. Legislation introduced several years ago allowed patients, their legal representatives and caregivers to report adverse drug reactions, which caused them to be an additional source of safety data. This paper presents the analysis of EudraVigilance data related to adverse drug reactions provided by patients, their representatives, as well as those obtained from healthcare professionals related to medicines which belong to M01A anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, a non-steroid group. The objective of the study was to identify the changes in the number and structure of adverse reaction reporting after the introduction of pharmacovigilance (PV) obligations in EU. A review of scientific literature was also conducted to assess the differences in adverse reactions reported by patients or their representatives and by healthcare professionals. We also identified other factors which, according to literature review, influenced the number of adverse reaction reports provided by patients. Analysis of data collected from the EudraVigilance showed that from 2011 to 2013 the number of reports made by patients and their caregivers increased by approx. 24 percentage points, and then, from 2014, it constituted around 30% of the total of reported reactions every year, so patient reporting is an important part of pharmacovigilance system and a source of drugs’ safety information throughout their use in healthcare practice. Additionally, there was no interrelationship between the seriousness of reported adverse reactions and the overall number of patient reports when compared to reports form healthcare professionals.

Does Social Media Accelerate Product Recalls? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry

Social media has become a vital platform for voicing product-related experiences that may not only reveal product defects, but also impose pressure on firms to act more promptly than before. This study scrutinizes the rarely studied relationship between these voices and the speed of product recalls in the context of the pharmaceutical industry in which social media pharmacovigilance is becoming increasingly important for the detection of drug safety signals. Using Federal Drug Administration drug enforcement reports and social media data crawled from online forums and Twitter, we investigate whether social media can accelerate the product recall process in the context of drug recalls. Results based on discrete-time survival analyses suggest that more adverse drug reaction discussions on social media lead to a higher hazard rate of the drug being recalled and, thus, a shorter time to recall. To better understand the underlying mechanism, we propose the information effect, which captures how extracting information from social media helps detect more signals and mine signals faster to accelerate product recalls, and the publicity effect, which captures how firms and government agencies are pressured by public concerns to initiate speedy recalls. Estimation results from two mechanism tests support the existence of these conceptualized channels underlying the acceleration hypothesis of social media. This study offers new insights for firms and policymakers concerning the power of social media and its influence on product recalls.

Adverse events related to unapproved stem cell products and other regenerative interventions: recommendations for more robust regulation of the direct-to-consumer marketplace

Tweetable abstract Adverse events continue to occur in the direct-to-consumer market for unapproved regenerative interventions and US FDA alone cannot adequately address the problem. Other public health strategies are needed to provide better patient protection.

Deep learning models in detection of dietary supplement adverse event signals from Twitter

Objective

The objective of this study is to develop a deep learning pipeline to detect signals on dietary supplement-related adverse events (DS AEs) from Twitter.

Materials and Methods

We obtained 247 807 tweets ranging from 2012 to 2018 that mentioned both DS and AE. We designed a tailor-made annotation guideline for DS AEs and annotated biomedical entities and relations on 2000 tweets. For the concept extraction task, we fine-tuned and compared the performance of BioClinical-BERT, PubMedBERT, ELECTRA, RoBERTa, and DeBERTa models with a CRF classifier. For the relation extraction task, we fine-tuned and compared BERT models to BioClinical-BERT, PubMedBERT, RoBERTa, and DeBERTa models. We chose the best-performing models in each task to assemble an end-to-end deep learning pipeline to detect DS AE signals and compared the results to the known DS AEs from a DS knowledge base (ie, iDISK).

Results

DeBERTa-CRF model outperformed other models in the concept extraction task, scoring a lenient microaveraged F1 score of 0.866. RoBERTa model outperformed other models in the relation extraction task, scoring a lenient microaveraged F1 score of 0.788. The end-to-end pipeline built on these 2 models was able to extract DS indication and DS AEs with a lenient microaveraged F1 score of 0.666.

Conclusion

We have developed a deep learning pipeline that can detect DS AE signals from Twitter. We have found DS AEs that were not recorded in an existing knowledge base (iDISK) and our proposed pipeline can as sist DS AE pharmacovigilance.

A VigiBase descriptive study of fluoroquinolone induced disabling and potentially permanent musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Recent drug safety concerns described fluoroquinolone (FQ)-induced serious musculoskeletal reactions. The objective of this study was to characterize reports with FQ-associated disabling musculoskeletal disorders, from VigiBase. The analysis included all FQ-induced musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports (up to July-2019), (disabling/incapacitating, or recovered/resolved with sequelae or fatal). We described aspects like reporter, suspected FQs, ADRs, associated corticosteroid therapy. We also looked into the disproportionality data in terms of proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and information component (IC) values. A total of 5355 reports with 13,563 ADRs and 5558 FQs were reported. The majority of reports were for patients aged 18-64 (62.67%), and the female gender prevailed (61.76%). Consumers reported almost half (45.99%), with a peak in reporting rates in 2017. Top reported ADRs were arthralgia (16.34%), tendonitis (11.04%), pain in extremity (9.98%), tendon pain (7.63%), and myalgia (7.17%). Top suspected FQs were levofloxacin (50.04%), ciprofloxacin (38.41%), moxifloxacin (5.16%), ofloxacin (3.17%) and norfloxacin (1.01%). For these, FQs-ADR association was supported by the disproportionality analysis. Corticosteroids were associated with about 7% of tendon related reports. The results augment the existing data on FQs safety concerns, specifically their potential effect on the musculoskeletal system.

Drug-induced liver injury associated with antiseizure medications from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

PURPOSE

Treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) confers a risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), especially for older ASMs. We sought to quantify recent reports of DILI attributed to both older and newer generation ASMs and survey newly marketed ASMs for hepatotoxicity in a large post-marketing database.

METHODS

We queried over 2.6 million adverse event reports made to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between July 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020 for DILI due to ASMs commonly used in clinical practice. Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed. We calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of DILI for each individual ASM versus all non-ASM reports.

RESULTS

A total of 2175 DILI cases were attributed to an ASM during the study period. 97.2% of these were designated as serious reactions, which include death, hospitalization, disability, and other life-threatening outcomes. A number of older and newer generation ASMs were associated with DILI, specifically: carbamazepine (ROR 2.92), phenobarbital (ROR 2.91), oxcarbazepine (ROR 2.58), phenytoin (ROR 2.40), valproate (ROR 2.22), lamotrigine (ROR 2.06), clobazam (ROR 1.67), levetiracetam (ROR 1.56), and diazepam (ROR 1.53). However, increased odds of DILI were not seen with zonisamide, perampanel, stiripentol, lacosamide, clonazepam, pregabalin, felbamate, eslicarbazepine, cannabidiol, topiramate, gabapentin, ethosuximide, brivaracetam, or primidone. Vigabatrin, tiagabine, and rufinamide all had zero reports of DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of newer generation ASMs were not significantly associated with DILI. Future studies utilizing FAERS in conjunction with other data sources will be critical for the ongoing surveillance of DILI, particularly as newly marketed ASMs continue to enter into widespread clinical use.

Global COVID-19 pandemic and reporting behavior - An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics of adverse event reporting in the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We included all FAERS reports from the US and Canada from November 7, 2019 to July 15, 2020 and divided the study period into three equal time intervals (pre-pandemic, first pandemic, second pandemic). We focused on methotrexate, a broadly used drug unrelated to COVID-19, and (hydroxy)chloroquine, another broadly used drug implicated in COVID-19 treatment. Using descriptive statistics, we compared reporting characteristics before and after the COVID-19 outbreak.

RESULTS

During the study period, 366 998 cases (60% female, median age: 59 years) were submitted to FAERS. The daily median number of reports (1796 in the pre-pandemic, 1810 in the second pandemic time interval) and other characteristics remained stable. The daily median number of reports for methotrexate decreased from 28 in the pre-pandemic to 15 in the second pandemic time interval, with no considerable differences in other characteristics. The daily median number of reports for (hydroxy)chloroquine increased slightly from 1 in the pre-pandemic to 3 in the second pandemic time interval, while there were also changes in the demographics of cases and an increase in the proportion of cases reported by health professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall reporting to FAERS did not change after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, some stimulated reporting was observed for (hydroxy)chloroquine, highlighting the need for caution when conducting pharmacovigilance analyses with substances related to COVID-19.

A Comparative View of Reported Adverse Effects of Statins in Social Media, Regulatory Data, Drug Information Databases and Systematic Reviews

INTRODUCTION

There are few studies assessing how data on adverse drug events from consumers on social media compare with other sources.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the consistency of adverse event data of statin medications from social media as compared with other sources.

METHODS

We collected data on the adverse events of statins from Twitter, the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), drug information databases (DIDs) and systematic reviews. We manually annotated 12,649 tweets collected between June 2013 and August 2018. We collected 45,447 reports from FAERS, 10,415 from MHRA, identified 17 systematic reviews with relevant data and extracted data from Facts and Comparisons^® and Clinical Pharmacology^®. We compared the proportion, relative frequencies and rank of each category of adverse event from each source using MedDRA^® primary System Organ Class codes.

RESULTS

Compared with other sources, patients on social media are proportionally far more likely to complain about musculoskeletal symptoms than other adverse events. Most adverse events showed a high level of agreement between Twitter and regulatory data. DIDs tend to demonstrate similar patterns but not as strongly. Systematic reviews tend to examine pre-specified adverse events or those reported by trial investigators.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the data from multiple sources, albeit challenging, may provide a broader safety profile of any medication. Systematically collected social media reports may be able to contribute information on the most pertinent adverse effects to patients.

Safety concerns reported by consumers, manufacturers and healthcare professionals: A detailed evaluation of opioid-related adverse drug reactions in the FDA database over 15 years

To perform an in-depth analysis of opioid-related ADRs reported by consumers, manufacturers and healthcare professionals. Delving into the depth and breadth of reported opioid-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) provides an opportunity to strategize better clinical management and alleviate safety concerns. Retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis for opioid-related ADRs in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was performed. Detailed analysis of patient (sex, age) and report (year of report; reporter: healthcare worker vs consumer) characteristics were conducted using reports from 2004 quarter 1 to 2018 quarter 4. Reporting odds ratios and confidence intervals (RORs,CI) were calculated. Of the 1 916 674 ADR reports, 300 985 indicated opioids as the primary medication. There was a surge in opioid-related ADRs reported in 2018 with six times more reports compared to 2004 and twice the number of reports compared to 2017. The largest ROR among the 20 common ADRs was depression and suicide-self-injury (ROR 3.12, 95% CI 3.01-3.22) for reports in age group ≥65 compared to age group 18 to 64, and lack of efficacy (ROR 6.80, 95% CI 6.61-7.00) for males compared to females. ADRs with the largest RORs for consumers included lack of efficacy/effect (ROR 3.37, 95% CI 3.28-3.46), administration site reactions (ROR 3.21, 95% CI 3.11-3.32), depression and suicide self-injury (ROR 2.26, 95% CI 2.14-2.38) compared to healthcare professionals. Important aspects of opioid ADR voluntary reporting included suicidal ideation in elderly patients and lack of efficacy, especially in male patients. This examination provides insight to better manage safety concerns of opioids.

Impact of adverse event reports from marketing authorization holder-sponsored patient support programs on the performance of signal detection in pharmacovigilance

OBJECTIVES

Marketing authorization holder (MAH)-sponsored patient support programs (PSPs) are a major source of adverse event (AE) reports. The impact of reports from PSPs on the ability to detect AE signals is unclear. We compared signal detection performance using data from PSPs vs. non-PSP sources, and between PSPs providing clinical services vs. PSPs not providing clinical services.

METHODS

Data were obtained from an internal safety database for a global pharmaceutical company 2015-2017. We assessed whether signals were detected for the reference drug-AE pairs using data from PSPs vs. non-PSP sources, and among different PSP services. The performance was evaluated by four measures including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and time-to-signal detection.

RESULTS

While the majority of reports were from PSPs, non-PSP sources were better and faster at detecting signals (AUC 0.63 vs. 0.41, p = 0.035; HR 3.52, p = 0.014) compared to PSPs. Within PSPs, PSPs providing clinical services were marginally better at detecting signals (AUC 0.60 vs. 0.41, p = 0.053) but not faster compared to PSPs not providing clinical services.

CONCLUSION

Reports of AEs from PSPs had worse signal detection performance compared to non-PSP sources. Pharmacovigilance experts should be mindful when using databases that contain reports from PSPs for signal detection.

Fournier Gangrene Associated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study with Data from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a safety warning of Fournier gangrene (FG), a rare but serious adverse effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in August 2018. However, existing studies have focused mainly on individual FG case reports. Although several previous studies conducted reviews of cases, objective scientific analysis was not applied, and the prognosis data were inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at presenting data supplementary to existing studies by analysing postmarketing adverse event reports in the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Multiple statistical analysis methods were applied to evaluate the potential association between SGLT2 inhibitors and FG, thus providing reliable and professionalized medication usage recommendations for SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice.

METHODS

Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were applied for data mining among the suspected adverse event reports of FG associated with SGLT2 inhibitors recorded in the FAERS database during the period from January 2004 to September 2019.

RESULTS

There were 542 FG cases identified in the FAERS database in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. Among all SGLT2 inhibitor therapies, empagliflozin was associated with the highest number of FG reports (232 in total), while empagliflozin plus metformin had the strongest association with FG occurrence with the reporting odds ratio (ROR 54.79, 95% two-sided CI 31.56 to 95.12) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR 53.36, χ 2 666.70). There were 391 patients who underwent initial or prolonged hospitalization (72.14%), and 26 patients died (4.81%). Three new FG cases caused by ertugliflozin were found in 2019.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of SGLT2 inhibitor-associated FG reports in the FAERS database identified signals between the drug and adverse events of interest. It also provides comprehensive information on the characteristics of FG onset and prognosis. Clinicians should pay more attention to this rare but severe adverse event when prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice.

Adverse Drug Reaction Case Safety Practices in Large Biopharmaceutical Organizations from 2007 to 2017: An Industry Survey

INTRODUCTION

Drug safety remains a top global public health concern. An increase in the number of data sources available has increased the complexity of pharmacovigilance operations, so the US FDA has created draft guidance focusing on optimizing drug safety data for well-characterized medicines. However, to date, no data demonstrating changes in reports have been presented.

OBJECTIVES

This study provided data assessing changes in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) and aggregate reports (ARs) for large biopharmaceutical companies from 2007 to 2017. This study also evaluated current trends on the use of advanced machine and deep learning in order to process all data captured for ICSRs as well as opinions from industry thought leaders on creating a sustainable case-processing operation.

METHODOLOGY

Using data captured from Navitas Life Science's annual pvnet^® benchmark, we calculated workload indicators characterizing pharmacovigilance operations for large biopharmaceutical organizations. Workload indicators included the number of ICSRs by organization, the number of ARs, and the number and types of data sources used. We also conducted structured in-depth interviews with seven biopharmaceutical executives to discover the reasons for changes in workload indicators across time as well as current strategies for increasing efficiencies in drug safety reporting.

RESULTS

The median number of ICSRs increased from 84,960 cases in 2007 to over 200,000 cases in 2017; this increase was largely attributable to an increase in both nonserious cases and follow-up cases. Member companies reported using 12 ± 3 data sources for case identification. The number of ARs also increased from a median of 70 reports in 2007 to 258 reports in 2017. To address these increases, 61% of the biopharmaceutical organizations we surveyed planned to adopt machine learning for full ICSR processing; however, as of 2018, none of the organizations surveyed had mechanisms in place.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that pharmacovigilance departments are currently burdened by ever-increasing case volumes. With increased guidance from regulatory agencies, as well as improvements in artificial intelligence and natural language processing, biopharmaceutical organizations must determine the most resource-efficient and sustainable methods to process the growing volume of cases.

Are Dental Patients Concerned About Safety? An Exploratory Study

OBJECTIVES

This study addresses a gap in the literature regarding dental patients' perceptions about safety at the dental office and their attitudes toward reporting safety concerns and experiences.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study with adult dental patients at an academic dental institution over a 6-week study period. A 16-item questionnaire was distributed to the patients to assess (1) past safety concerns and experiences during dental visits; (2) factors affecting the future reporting of safety concerns and experiences; (3) overall concern about safety at the dental office; (4) overall perceptions that patients should report of safety concerns or experiences to dental providers and staff.

RESULTS

A majority (63.5%) of dental patients were concerned about safety at the dental office, although only one-third of them shared their past safety concerns or experiences with their dental providers or clinic staff. Irrespective of their past experiences, most patients (96.9%) believed that patients should report any safety concerns or experiences to the clinic. Being female, highly educated, and having poor oral health were associated with a decreased overall perception that patients should report safety concerns and experiences to dental care providers and staff.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that dental patients are concerned about safety and can be valuable sources of data, when adequately engaged. The current level of patient reporting of safety concerns and/or experiences to clinic staff or care providers is not optimal for learning and improvement.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Better patient engagement in safety activities will potentially increase our collective understanding of threats to safety. Therefore, dental clinics need to encourage patients to speak up about their safety concerns or experiences.

Assessment of factors associated with completeness of spontaneous adverse event reporting in the United States: A comparison between consumer reports and healthcare professional reports

What is known and objective

The objectives of this study were to explore completeness of direct adverse event (AE) reports from consumers and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to discuss the reasons completeness varied among reporters with different occupations.

Methods

We used a total of 5475 direct AE reports to the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from the first and second quarters of 2016 and assessed completeness of basic information (eg, patient sex, age, weight) and information relevant to AEs (eg, suspect and concomitant drugs). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between report completeness and reporting backgrounds.

Results and discussion

The completeness of AE reports from consumers was generally greater than that of reports from HCPs. Completeness of specific items varied among different occupations, which may reflect accessibility to, and/or availability of, relevant information for each type of reporter. There was a clear association between the proportion of ‘known’ ADRs in a report and completeness, suggesting that consumers and HCPs are likely to consult labelling information when reporting AEs.

What is new and conclusion

The quality of AE reports seemed to depend on information costs accrued to potential reporters. Researchers should consider the impact of database heterogeneity and possible sample selection bias when using spontaneous AE reports as a sample of events in the United States.

Postmarketing Safety of Biosimilars: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities in the Spontaneous Reporting System

Recombinant drug products successfully treat many life-threatening and chronic diseases. The high cost of these drugs makes them inaccessible to the patients particularly in developing countries. Patent expiration of innovator recombinant drug products has led to the development of biosimilars or similar biologics by several manufacturers. Unlike generics, these are not identical to their innovator products because of the differences in the manufacturing process; however, they are similar in quality characteristics, biological activity, safety, and efficacy. The regulatory procedures used for generic drugs cannot be applied for biosimilars as they are large complex structures produced from living cells and can produce potential risk of immune-based adverse reactions. Out of several safety issues related to biosimilars, two main safety concerns are variable potency and immunogenicity, for which a robust long-term pharmacovigilance system is needed. Various guidelines have been issued for the regulatory approval and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars by USFDA, EU, and pharma-emerging countries like China and India. The article includes the pharmacovigilance plan of biosimilars in these countries, discusses the challenges and opportunities in pharmacovigilance through spontaneous reporting systems, and suggests amendments in the existing suspected adverse event reporting form of the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India.

Hypersensitivity Reactions in Serious Adverse Events Reported for Paracetamol in the EudraVigilance Database, 2007⁻2018

Paracetamol is a popular and easily available drug which is used world-wide as analgesic, antipyretic agent. Hypersensitivity reactions to this drug involve a wide range of symptoms of various importance for patient management. The EudraVigilance (EV) database serves as a system for monitoring adverse events (AE) due to drug intake. We retrospectively recorded AE reports for "paracetamol" reported from 1 January 2007 to 1 October 2018 which fulfilled the category of "serious" in EV. For further analysis the retrieved AE reports were selected according to the keywords corresponding to hypersensitivity symptoms. We included in the study 4589 AE reports with 9489 particular AEs. 24.2% of all the AE reports concerned children. The most often reported symptoms were "angioedema," "rash" and "urticaria" (each of them with a frequency of >10% in the AE reports). An important group of AEs were oedema reported as being located in the head, neck or respiratory tract. We recorded 58 AE reports with fatal outcomes, including 9 Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis cases (SJS/TEN), 10 anaphylactic reactions, 21 cases of hepatic failure and a further 18 cases which occurred for other reasons. SJS/TEN, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms were reported 129, 42 and 25 times, respectively. Prodromes and symptoms of potentially life-threating SJS/TEN appeared in 286 of the AE reports. 380 AE reports pointed to a diagnosis of anaphylaxis. To improve patient safety, healthcare professionals, including pharmacists, can identify warning signs of severe hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol.