Comparison of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Relapse Rates from US Insurance Claims Data

Patterns of disease-modifying therapy utilization before, during, and after pregnancy and postpartum relapses in women with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is a common consideration for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS); MS onset is typically between 20 and 45 years of age, during potential child-bearing years. Pregnancy and postpartum care are a significant factor influencing disease-modifying therapy (DMT) selection for many pwMS. To date, few DMTs are considered safe to continue during pregnancy and real-world treatment patterns before, during, and after pregnancy remain uncharacterized. Evolving guidance is needed regarding how to optimize management of the pregnancy and postpartum periods considering the changing DMT landscape. This analysis in two large claims databases describes DMT utilization for the treatment of MS before, during, and after pregnancy and relapse patterns during pregnancy and postpartum.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid claims database was assessed for female patients aged 18-55 years with ≥1 insurance claim submitted under the diagnosis code of MS from 01 January 2016-30 April 2021 and continuous enrollment eligibility from ≥6 months prior to pregnancy date (preconception) through 6 months of follow-up following delivery (postpartum period). Comorbid conditions were examined preconception and postpartum, including anxiety and depression. Moderate/severe relapse was defined as MS-related hospitalization, or an outpatient visit and one claim within 7 days of the visit with steroids or total plasma exchange.

RESULTS

A total of 944 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 32.4 [5.0] years) were eligible; 688 (73%) were commercially insured and 256 (27%) received Medicaid. Compared with commercially-insured patients, use of DMTs was lower among Medicaid patients at 6 months preconception (25.4% vs 40.4%; p < 0.001), with similar patterns observed both during pregnancy and postpartum. Overall, prevalence of DMT use declined sharply during pregnancy, from 36.3% of patients in the 6 months preconception to 17.9%, 5.3%, and 5.8% in trimesters 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Postpartum DMT utilization increased to 20.9% at 0-3 months and 24.4% at 4-6 months. Of all patients in the preconception period, the most frequently used DMTs were glatiramer acetate (14.3%), dimethyl fumarate (6.0%), interferon (5.2%), and natalizumab (4.9%). Due to small sample size, information was limited for anti-CD20s and alemtuzumab. The proportion of patients with any moderate/severe relapse declined over pregnancy (preconception, n = 82 [8.7%]; pregnancy, n = 25 [2.6%]), but increased postpartum (n = 94 [10.0%]). Of the 889 patients who stopped DMT during pregnancy, the risk of postpartum relapses was lower in the patients who resumed DMT postpartum (10/192) than in patients who did not (76/697) (5.2% vs 10.9%; odds ratio, 0.455 [95% confidence interval 0.216-0.860], p = 0.018). Cases of postpartum depression and anxiety were significantly lower in commercially-insured patients vs Medicaid patients (postpartum depression, 13.7% vs 27.0%, p < 0.01; postpartum anxiety, 16.3% vs 30.5%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DMT utilization declined sharply during pregnancy; it gradually increased postpartum but remained below pre-pregnancy use. The proportion of pwMS experiencing a moderate/severe relapse and number of relapses declined over pregnancy but increased postpartum. Reinitiation of DMT during the postpartum period was associated with lower risk of relapses, supporting a role for early reinitiation of DMT postpartum.

STUDY SUPPORTED BY

Biogen.

A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects nearly 1 million people in the United States and causes significant disability and economic loss. Among the first available oral MS treatment options, clinical outcome comparisons and associated health care resource utilization are not clearly defined.

OBJECTIVE

To compare MS outcomes, health care resource utilization, and relative costs across treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF), fingolimod (FG), or teriflunomide (TERI) among Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan and commercially insured beneficiaries.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Humana Research Database. Eligible study patients had their first MS medication claim for oral DMG, FG, or TERI between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months (mean follow-up = 3.8 years), until the earliest of the following occurred: health plan disenrollment, the end of the study period, or death. Study cohorts were balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and MS-related health care resource utilization, time on therapy, and time after therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-adjusted multivariate generalized linear models across treatment groups. Relative costs were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link.

RESULTS

We identified 1,442 patients in 3 medication groups: DMF (n = 843), FG (n = 213), and TERI (n = 386). After weighting, there were no significant differences between the medication groups on demographic and clinical characteristics. Time on therapy (days) was significantly different across medication groups (P < 0.001). Time on therapy was longest for FG compared with the DM and TERI groups (644 vs 462 vs 521). The number discontinuing the index medication was significantly different for FG vs DMF vs TERI (74.7% vs 85.3% vs 80.7%; P < 0.001). FG had the lowest discontinuation rate. The mean (SD) annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were 0.47 (0.80), 0.42 (1.3), and 0.53 (1.3) (P = 0.037) for DMF, FG, and TERI, respectively. The percentage of those experiencing inpatient stays and the number of stays (mean [SD]) were significantly different among the FG group vs DMF vs TERI (29.9% vs 34.1% vs 40.9%; P < 0.001) and (0.57 [2.9] vs 0.74 [1.9] vs 0.91 [3.5]; P = 0.007), respectively. All-cause emergency department visits and the number of visits (mean [SD]) were significantly different for the FG cohort vs DMF vs TERI (46% vs 54.3% vs 61%; P < 0.001) and (1.84 [7.7] vs 2.38 [5.9] vs 2.87 [8.8]; P = 0.002), respectively. FG had the lowest impatient stays and emergency department visits of the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MS initiated on FG used fewer health care resources and experienced lower ARR compared with patients on DMF and TERI.

Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is chronic progressive disease that poses a significant economic burden to patients and health care systems in the United States. We conducted a systematic literature review to provide up-to-date insights on the economic burden of MS in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively review and summarize the latest published evidence on the economic burden of MS with a focus on cost, resource use, and work productivity.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the Embase and Medline databases to identify studies, published between January 2011 and July 2022, reporting cost, resource use, or work productivity outcomes among people with MS in the United States. Clinical trials, economic modeling studies, and review articles were excluded. Details of eligible studies, including study design, patient population, and study outcomes for the overall population, as well as subgroups of interest, were extracted and summarized qualitatively.

RESULTS

Overall, 65 studies reporting cost, resource use, or work productivity data were included with majority of studies using claims data. The direct costs associated with MS ranged from $16,614 (2006) to $72,744 (2017) per patient per year with diseasemodifying therapies (DMTs) being the major cost contributors accounting for 43%-78%. The indirect costs reported ranged from $9,122 (2017) to $30,601 (2011) per patient per year with absenteeism, early retirement, and informal care being the key drivers for indirect costs. Costs, resource use, and work impairment were significantly higher for patients with severe disability compared with those with mild disability. Pharmacy costs were the major cost drivers in patients with mild, moderate, and severe disability. Similarly, patients with relapses incurred significantly higher costs, resource use, and work impairment compared with those without relapses. Additional hospitalization charges were the major driver of higher costs in patients who experienced relapses compared with those without relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct costs, particularly DMTs, appear to be the major cost drivers for people with MS in the United States. Availability of lower-cost therapies may considerably decrease the economic burden on these patients and the health care systems. Future research focusing on indirect costs, intangible costs, and their contributors would contribute to further understanding of economic burden to avoid underestimation of the financial burden experienced by the patients.

Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence on the use of cladribine tablets (CladT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States is emerging. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of CladT in RMS.

METHODS

Adults with RMS initiating CladT were selected from the Symphony Integrated Dataverse. Baseline and follow-up periods were the 12 months before and 24 months after CladT initiation (index date). Switching to another disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and number of CladT courses were described during follow-up. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), MS disease severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale-Derived Disability Indicators (EDSS-DDI), corticosteroid use, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) were described during Years 1 and 2 of follow-up and compared with baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 539 CladT-treated patients were included (mean age: 49.9 years; 77.6 % female). Over the 2-year follow-up, 91 % and 59 % of patients had one and two CladT courses, respectively, and 7 % of patients had evidence of switching to another DMT. ARR, MS disease severity score, and corticosteroid use decreased significantly during follow-up compared with baseline, while EDSS-DDI remained stable. All-cause and MS-related HRU decreased during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CladT-treated patients with RMS had low switch rates, reduced ARR, disease severity, corticosteroid use, and HRU.

Assessing the Health Economic Outcomes from Commercially Insured Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Switched from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies to Teriflunomide, in the United States

Objective

Assess patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who switched to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

Methods

Retrospective study of US Merative™ MarketScan^® claims database (Jan 1, 2012-July 31, 2020,) including HIPAA-compliant, deidentified data. Patients ≥18 years with MS diagnosis (based on ICD-9/ICD-10 codes), receiving ≥1 DMT prior to teriflunomide and ≥12 months continuous enrollment pre and post index (date of teriflunomide initiation). Outcomes included inpatient and emergency room claims coinciding with MS diagnosis, MS-related healthcare costs, and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (indirectly assessed using hospitalization/outpatient claims and steroid use coinciding with MS diagnosis).

Results

The analyzed cohort (N=2016) was primarily female (79%); age (mean ± standard deviation) 51.4 ± 9.3 years; MS duration 4.7±2.8 years (at index). The majority (89.2%) were treated with one DMT before switching to teriflunomide. Use of outpatient services (event rate/100 person-years) increased post vs pre index; however, MRI visits significantly reduced over the same period (both P<0.0001). Costs for MS-specific outpatient visits decreased by $371 per patient per year (PPPY) after switching to teriflunomide. Despite an increase in use post index (0.024 to 0.033 rate/100 person-years; P<0.0001), costs for MS-specific laboratory services reduced (pre-index: $271 vs $248 PPPY post-index; P=0.02). Fewer patients had relapses after switching (pre-index: n=417 [20.7%]; post-index: n=333 [16.5%]). ARR was significantly lower after switching (pre-index: 0.269 vs post-index: 0.205; P=0.000).

Conclusion

Switching to teriflunomide from existing DMTs in patients with relapsing MS resulted in a reduction in outpatient HCRU in this analysis of US claims data. The real-world effectiveness of teriflunomide was generally consistent with efficacy reported in clinical trials, showing a reduction in relapse following a switch to teriflunomide.

Health economic outcomes of switching to alemtuzumab from other disease-modifying therapies in people with multiple sclerosis in the USA

Aim: Describe demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) switching to alemtuzumab from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Patients & methods: Retrospective, observational study of IBM®MarketScan® claims database. PwMS previously treated with DMTs and initiating alemtuzumab (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019) were identified. "Index" was date of alemtuzumab initiation (prescription filled). Results: The study cohort (n = 341) was primarily female (72%) with (mean ± standard deviation) age 45.1 ± 9.5 years. At index, duration of MS was 5.3 ± 2.8 years. HCRU (inpatient/outpatient services), outpatient costs (including MS-specific MRI and emergency room visits) and annualized relapse rate significantly reduced over the 2 years following initiation of alemtuzumab. DMT costs reduced over the same period. Conclusion: Health economic and clinical benefits were seen following switching to alemtuzumab from other DMTs for treatment of MS, in this cohort from the USA.

Disease-Modifying Drug Uptake and Health Service Use in the Ageing MS Population

Background

Evidence regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of the disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in the older multiple sclerosis (MS) population is scarce. This has contributed to a lack of evidence-based treatment recommendations for the ageing MS population in practice guidelines. We examined the relationship between age (<55 and ≥55 years), DMD exposure and health service use in the MS population.

Methods

We conducted a population-based observational study using linked administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada. We selected all persons with MS and followed from the most recent of their first MS or demyelinating event, 18^th birthday or 01-January-1996 (index date) until the earliest of emigration, death or 31-December-2017 (study end). We assessed DMD exposure status over time, initially as any versus no DMD, then by generation (first or second) and finally by each individual DMD. Age-specific analyses were conducted with all-cause hospitalizations and number of physician visits assessed using proportional means model and negative binomial regression with generalized estimating equations.

Results

We included 19,360 persons with MS (72% were women); 10,741/19,360 (56%) had ever reached their 55th birthday. Person-years of follow-up whilst aged <55 was 132,283, and 93,594 whilst aged ≥55. Any DMD, versus no DMD in the <55-year-olds was associated with a 23% lower hazard of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR0.77; 95%CI 0.72-0.82), but not in the ≥55-year-olds (aHR0.95; 95%CI 0.87-1.04). Similar patterns were observed for the first and second generation DMDs. Exposure to any (versus no) DMD was not associated with rates of physician visits in either age group (<55 years: adjusted rate ratio, aRR1.02; 95%CI 1.00-1.04 and ≥55 years: aRR1.00; 95%CI 0.96-1.03), but variation in aRR was observed across the individual DMDs.

Conclusion

Our study showed beneficial effects of the DMDs used to treat MS on hospitalizations for those aged <55 at the time of exposure. In contrast, for individuals ≥55 years of age exposed to a DMD, the hazard of hospitalization was not significantly lowered. Our study contributes to the broader understanding of the potential benefits and risks of DMD use in the ageing MS population.

Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis and subsequent health service use

Objective:

We assessed the relationship between the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and healthcare use.

Methods:

Persons with MS (aged ⩾18 years) were identified using linked population-based health administrative data in four Canadian provinces and were followed from the most recent of their first MS/demyelinating event or 1 January 1996 until the earliest of death, emigration, or study end (31 December 2017 or 31 March 2018). Prescription records captured DMD exposure, examined as any DMD, then by generation (first-generation (the injectables) or second-generation (orals/infusions)) and individual DMD. The associations with subsequent all-cause hospitalizations and physician visits were examined using proportional means model and negative binomial regression.

Results:

Of 35,894 MS cases (72% female), mean follow-up was 12.0 years, with person-years of DMD exposure for any, or any first- or second-generation DMD being 63,290, 54,605 and 8685, respectively. Any DMD or any first-generation DMD exposure (versus non-exposure) was associated with a 24% lower hazard of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR: 0.76; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.71–0.82), rising to 29% for the second-generation DMDs (aHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58–0.88). This ranged from 18% for teriflunomide (aHR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67–1.00) to 44% for fingolimod (aHR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36–0.87). In contrast, DMD exposure was generally not associated with substantial differences in physician visits.

Conclusion:

Findings provide real-world evidence of a beneficial relationship between DMD exposure and hospitalizations.

Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns and costs in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate or teriflunomide in Germany

Aim: To evaluate adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs for glatiramer acetate (GA; injectable), dimethyl fumarate (oral) and teriflunomide (oral) in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Patients & methods: Retrospective analyses of a claims database. Results: Teriflunomide patients were older with more co-morbidities and fewer relapses versus GA and dimethyl fumarate. GA patients were mostly disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)-treatment naive. Treatment adherence was 61-70%. All DMTs reduced HRU versus pre-index. Costs were comparable across cohorts. High adherence reduced hospitalizations and several costs versus low adherers. Conclusion: Adherence rates were high and comparable with all DMTs. Similar (and high) reductions in HRU and costs occurred with all DMTs. High adherence improved economic outcomes versus low adherence. Thus, investing in adherence improvement is beneficial to improve outcomes in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

System-Level Variation in Multiple Sclerosis Care Outcomes: Initial Findings from the Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement Research Collaborative

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a "3C" (complex, chronic, costly) condition that is a common and disabling neurological illness affecting approximately 1 million adults in the United States. MS has been studied at the basic science, individual, and population levels, but not at the system level to assess small-area variation effects on MS population health outcomes. System-level effects have been observed in other 3C conditions including cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. The authors report here on system-level variation findings from the baseline period during the first year of the Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement (MS-CQI) study. Stepwise binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate system-level (small-area variation) effects on MS relapses (exacerbations), disease-modifying therapy (DMT) utilization, and brain MRI utilization, controlling for demographics (age and sex) and other potential confounders. Significant differences were observed in people with MS (PwMS) between centers for a number of demographic and disease characteristics, including sex, age, and MS subtype. Controlling for these factors, significant system-level effects were observed on outcomes, including DMT utilization, MRI utilization, and relapses. Significant relationships also were observed between outcomes and urgent care utilization, including emergency department visits and hospitalizations. This initial study provides evidence establishing the presence of system-level variation effects on MS outcomes in a multicenter population study - where PwMS get their care can influence their outcomes. Results support continued systems-level research and improvement initiatives to optimize MS population health outcomes in this challenging and costly complex chronic condition.

Factors associated with oral fingolimod use over injectable disease- modifying agent use in multiple sclerosis

Background

Fingolimod is the first approved oral disease-modifying agent (DMA) in 2010 to treat Multiple Sclerosis (MS). There is limited real-world evidence regarding the determinants associated with fingolimod use in the early years.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine the factors associated with fingolimod prescribing in the initial years after the market approval.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted involving adults (≥18 years) with MS from the 2010–2012 IBM MarketScan. Individuals with MS were selected based on ICD-9-CM: 340 and a newly initiated DMA prescription. Based on the index/first DMA prescription, patients were classified as fingolimod or injectable users. All covariates were measured during the six months baseline period prior to the index date. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors, conceptualized as per the Andersen Behavioral Model (ABM), associated with prescribing of fingolimod versus injectable DMA for MS.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 3118 MS patients receiving DMA treatment. Of which, 14.4% of patients with MS initiated treatment with fingolimod within two years after the market entry, while the remaining 85.6% initiated with injectable DMAs. Multivariable regression revealed that the likelihood of prescribing oral DMA increased by 2–3 fold during 2011 and 2012 compared to 2010. Patients with ophthalmic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-2.60), heart (aOR-2.21) and urinary diseases (aOR-1.37) were more likely to receive fingolimod. Patients with other neurological disorders (aOR-0.50) were less likely to receive fingolimod than those without neurological disorders. Use of symptomatic medication (for impaired walking (aOR-2.60), bladder dysfunction (aOR-1.54), antispasmodics (aOR-1.48), and neurologist consultation (aOR-1.81) were associated with higher odds of receiving fingolimod. However, patients with non-MS associated emergency visits (aOR-0.64) had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without emergency visits.

Conclusions

During the initial years after market approval, patients with highly active MS were more likely to receive oral fingolimod than injectable DMAs. More research is needed to understand the determinants of newer oral DMAs.

•

During 2010–2012, nearly one in seven MS patients were prescribed oral fingolimod

•

Several patient and clinical factors were associated with fingolimod prescribing

•

Patients with heart, eye, and urinary disease were more likely to receive fingolimod than those without those disorders

•

Patients with other neurological disorders had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without neurological disorders

•

Patients using MS symptomatic medication were more likely to receive fingolimod than their counterparts

Comparative treatment effectiveness of oral fingolimod and conventional injectable disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral fingolimod and conventional injectable disease-modifying agents (DMAs) using the composite endpoint of relapse or DMA treatment switch in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2010-2012.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years) with MS diagnosis (ICD-9-CM:340) who newly initiated DMAs.

INTERVENTION

Oral fingolimod and conventional injectable DMAs (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate).

MEASUREMENTS

Composite endpoint of time to relapse or DMA treatment switch.

MAIN RESULTS

The incident study cohort consisted of 1997 MS patients who initiated oral fingolimod (15.6%) or injectable (84.4%) DMAs. The proportion of patients who had a composite endpoint (relapse/DMA treatment switch) in oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users was found to be 16.72% and 27.16%, respectively. The Cox PH regression model with stabilized IPTW revealed that fingolimod is equally effective as conventional injectable DMAs in reducing the risk of experiencing the composite endpoint of relapse or DMA switch (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.43-1.03). Additional analysis among patients who were adherent also found no significant difference in the composite endpoint (aHR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-1.15) between oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral fingolimod has similar effectiveness as conventional injectable DMAs in reducing the risk of experiencing the composite endpoint (relapse or DMA treatment switch). In addition, when assessed independently, oral fingolimod showed no difference in reducing the time to relapse or DMA treatment switch compared to injectable DMAs.

Comparative Adherence Trajectories of Oral Fingolimod and Injectable Disease Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Oral fingolimod is convenient to use than injectable disease modifying agents (DMAs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the existing literature regarding the comparative adherence trajectories between oral fingolimod and injectable DMAs is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adherence trajectories between oral DMA, fingolimod, and injectable DMAs in patients with MS.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using adults (≥18 years) with MS (ICD-9-CM: 340 and a DMA prescription) from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2010 and 2012. Patients were grouped into oral fingolimod or injectable DMA users based on the index DMA among patients with MS. The annual DMA adherence trajectories, based on the proportion of days covered (PDC), were examined using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) during the one-year follow-up period after treatment initiation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression using stabilized inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) was performed to assess the association between the DMA route of administration (Oral vs Injectable) and the adherence trajectory groups. The balance of covariates between oral and injectable DMAs before and after IPTW was checked against a standardized difference threshold of 0.25.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 1,700 MS patients who were initiated with oral (15.8%) or injectable (84.2%) DMAs between 2010 and 2012. The adherence rates (PDC≥0.8) in oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users were found to be 64.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The GBTM grouped individuals in the study cohort into three adherence trajectories - rapid discontinuers (23.5%), complete adherers (49.9%), and slow decliners (26.6%). The multinomial logistic regression model with stabilized IPTW revealed that oral fingolimod users had higher odds to be a complete adherer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.85-4.16) or a slow discontinuer (AOR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70-4.05) than injectable DMA users.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral DMA fingolimod was associated with better adherence than injectable DMAs across group-based trajectories. Further research is warranted to evaluate the adherence trajectories with newer oral DMAs introduced in the last decade for MS.

A real-world comparison of relapse rates, healthcare costs and resource use among patients with multiple sclerosis newly initiating subcutaneous interferon beta-1a versus oral disease-modifying drugs

Background

Administrative-claims data enable comparative effectiveness assessment using large numbers of patients treated in real-world settings.

Objective

To evaluate real-world relapses, healthcare costs and resource use in patients with MS newly initiating subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (sc IFNβ-1a) v. oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs: dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, teriflunomide).

Methods

Patients from an administrative claims database (1 Jan 2012–31 Dec 2015) were selected if they: were 18–63 years old; had an MS diagnosis; had newly initiated sc IFNβ-1a, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or teriflunomide (first claim = index); had no evidence of DMD 12-months pre-index; and had 12-month eligibility pre- and post-index. Relapse was defined as an MS-related inpatient stay, emergency room visit, or outpatient visit with a corticosteroid prescription ± 7 days. Outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression and generalized linear models.

Results

A total of 4475 patients met inclusion criteria: 21.9% sc IFNβ-1a, 51.0% dimethyl fumarate, 19.7% fingolimod, 7.4% teriflunomide. Teriflunomide patients had 1.357 (95% CI 1.000, 1.831; p = 0.0477) greater odds of 1-year relapse than sc IFNβ-1a patients. Estimated mean all-cause 1-year costs were higher after fingolimod (US$72,376) v. sc IFNβ-1a initiation (US$65,408; p < 0.0001). Non-DMD costs were not significantly different.

Conclusion

Patients initiating sc IFNβ-1a had better relapse outcomes v. teriflunomide, and lower all-cause costs v. fingolimod.

Real-world experience of fingolimod in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS Fine): An observational study in the UK

Background

Fingolimod is approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in Europe. There is limited information on its effectiveness and safety in clinical practice within the UK.

Objective

To evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis who were prescribed fingolimod by UK neurologists within the National Health Service.

Methods

This was a multicentre, observational study conducted in the UK. Patients were initiated on fingolimod 0.5 mg 12 months before inclusion in the study. Key efficacy outcomes included annualised relapse rate and the proportion of patients free from relapses, disability progression and clinical and radiological disease activity at 12 months following fingolimod initiation. Resource utilisation and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results

In 12 months of treatment with fingolimod, the mean annualised relapse rate was reduced by 79%, the majority of patients were free from relapses (83.7%). Based on limited data, most patients were free from disability progression and clinical and radiological disease activity. More than 90% of patients continued on fingolimod. Lymphocyte count reductions and liver enzyme increases were observed.

Conclusion

Fingolimod was effective in reducing the disease activity in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients requiring an escalation from first-line therapies who were prescribed fingolimod in clinical practice in the UK.

Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US

BACKGROUND

Previous real-world comparative research of MS disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in the overall population has suggested dimethyl fumarate (DMF) to be comparable to fingolimod (FTY) and more efficacious than teriflunomide (TERI) in reducing relapses. However, there is limited comparative evidence in patients switching from platform DMTs in the US. The objective of the study was to compare the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and risk of relapse in MS patients who have switched from a platform therapy to DMF, FTY, or TERI.

METHODS

MS patients (18-65 years old) initiating an oral DMT from June 2013 to March 2015 were identified from the Truven MarketScan^® Commercial Claims Database. The index date was the date of first oral DMT fill. Patients were required to have: continuous enrollment in the database for 12 months pre-index date and ≥3 months post-index date; ≥1 MS diagnosis over the pre-index period; discontinuation of a platform DMT with no evidence of oral or infusion DMTs over the pre-index period; and adherence to the index drug for ≥90 days. DMF patients were propensity-score matched (PSM) 3:1 to FTY and to TERI based on age, gender, region, a claims-based MS severity measure, ARR, and number of hospitalizations over the pre-index period. Patients were censored when they dropped out of the database or at the end of the study period (March 31, 2016). Post-index relapses were annualized.

RESULTS

The database included 20,311 oral DMT users. After applying the study criteria, the PSM yielded 1602:534 switch patients for the DMF-FTY matched cohort. DMF-FTY patients were well-matched on all covariates: age (mean = 44 for both), gender (28% vs. 26% male, respectively), MS severity measure (0.99 vs. 1.08), and baseline ARR (0.40 vs. 0.44). PSM yielded 833:279 switch patients for the DMF-TERI match. DMF-TERI patients were well-matched on all covariates: age (mean = 50), gender (24% vs. 25% male), MS severity measure (0.86 vs. 0.99), and baseline ARR (0.23 vs. 0.30). The standardized differences confirmed balance across all covariates for matched cohorts. The matched DMF-FTY cohorts had comparable post-index ARR (Rate Ratio [RR] = 1.07 [95% Cl: 0.861, 1.328]) and risk of relapse (Hazard Ratio [HR ]= 0.996 [95% CI: 0.803, 1.236]). Post-index ARR was significantly lower with DMF in comparison to TERI (RR = 0.667 [0.486, 0.914]). The risk of relapse was also significantly lower when switching to DMF than TERI (HR = 0.679 [0.503, 0.917]).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, the effectiveness profiles for those oral DMT users specifically switching from platform therapies are consistent with findings from previous research conducted among all oral DMT users, regardless of prior therapy.