Impact of Letermovir Use for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis on Re-Hospitalization Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Real-Life Data from a University Hospital in Argentina

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.

Objectives

The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET).

Methods

This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET.

Results

The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, P=0.012). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), P=<0.0001, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), P=0.18. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, P=<0.0001. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality.

Conclusions

LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.

Differential clinical impact of letermovir prophylaxis according to graft sources: a KSGCT multicenter retrospective analysis

ABSTRACT

Clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi) is frequently observed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and prophylaxis with letermovir is commonly adopted. However, the clinical benefit of letermovir prophylaxis according to graft sources has not been sufficiently elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed 2194 recipients of HSCT who were CMV-seropositive (236 with letermovir prophylaxis and 1958 without prophylaxis against CMV). csCMVi was significantly less frequent in patients with letermovir prophylaxis than in those without (23.7% vs 58.7% at 100 days after HSCT, P < .001) and the same trend was seen when recipients of bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC), or cord blood (CB) transplantation were separately analyzed. In recipients of BM, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower in the letermovir group at 6 months after HSCT (5.0% vs 14.9%, P = .018), and the same trend was observed in recipients of PBSCs (14.7% vs 24.8%, P = .062); however, there was no statistical significance at 1 year (BM, 21.1% vs 30.4%, P = .67; PBSCs, 21.2% vs 30.4%, P = .096). In contrast, NRM was comparable between recipients of CB with and without letermovir prophylaxis throughout the clinical course (6 months, 23.6% vs 24.3%, P =.92; 1 year, 29.3% vs 31.0%, P = .77), which was confirmed by multivariate analyses. In conclusion, the impact of letermovir prophylaxis on NRM and csCMVi should be separately considered according to graft sources.

Patterns of CMV infection after letermovir withdrawal in recipients of posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based transplant

Reactivation of latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) is increased in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with seropositive CMV using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Letermovir, a novel DNA terminase complex inhibitor, reduces the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in this population; however, parameters that predict csCMVi after letermovir withdrawal are not well described. Here, we examined clinical and immunological parameters in 294 recipients of PT-Cy-based allo-HCT, including 157 patients with CMV, of whom 80 completed letermovir prophylaxis without csCMVi and subsequently stopped letermovir. In this population, the median duration of letermovir exposure was 203 days (interquartile range [IQR], 160-250 days). After letermovir withdrawal, the 90-day cumulative incidence of csCMVi was 23.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.3-32.8). There were no episodes of CMV end-organ disease. Hypogammaglobulinemia before letermovir discontinuation was predictive of csCMVi (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.93; P = .03), whereas T-cell and B-cell reconstitution before letermovir withdrawal were not predictive of csCMVi. Higher numbers of natural killer cells were found before letermovir withdrawal in patients who experienced csCMVi (median, 202 vs 160; P = .03). In recipients with seropositive CMV, CD3+CD4-CD8+ T-cell reconstitution was faster in patients with CMV regardless of letermovir exposure. Taken together, these data suggest that csCMVi after letermovir withdrawal was frequent in patients treated with PT-Cy, despite prolonged exposure. Strategies to boost CMV-specific adaptive immunity in patients with persistent hypogammaglobulinemia is a logical pathway to reduce csCMVi after letermovir withdrawal.

Epidemiology of cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance testing for solid organ and bone marrow transplant patients from 2011 - 2019

BACKGROUND

CMV reactivation post-transplantation is common, with need for prompt identification of patients most at-risk for CMV antiviral drug resistance (AVDR).

OBJECTIVES

This study describes CMV AVDR frequencies, antiviral prescribing practices, and AVDR risk factors in patients from 2011 to 2019 in British Columbia, Canada.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of demographics, transplant type, viral loads, antiviral exposure duration, and 12-month mortality was conducted for all patients with samples submitted for CMV AVDR testing from 2011 to 2019. Genotyping of AVDR mutations occurred at the national reference laboratory. Mann-Whitney U, T-test or Fisher's exact tests examined differences between patients with and without AVDR.

RESULTS

Fifty-three plasma and three tissue/fluid specimens successfully underwent CMV AVDR testing; of these samples, 27/56 (48%) had AVDR mutations detected. The commonest AVDR mutations were at UL97 loci A594 (20%), H596 (12%) and L595 (12%). Mutations occurred more frequently in requests from solid organ than hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (58% vs. 27%, p = 0.05). Previous resistance testing was a significant risk factor for AVDR (p < 0.001). Patients with AVDR had approximately 51 more days of antiviral therapy (p = 0.007) and took 9 days longer to clear viremia (p = 0.23). The median turnaround time from sample send-out to reporting was nine days. However, empiric use of second-line antivirals occurred in most cases (39/53, 74%) before results were available.

DISCUSSION

Laboratories should strive to provide timely CMV AVDR testing for transplant patients, to minimize unnecessary exposure to second-line antiviral agents. The findings of this study may help guide clinicians when selecting empiric antiviral therapy.

Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.

Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium

BACKGROUND

The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field.

SOURCES

We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest.

CONTENT

We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients.

IMPLICATIONS

Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.

Clinical and healthcare burden of disease associated with cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - A retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

CMV infection is a common complication in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated the association of clinically significant CMV (CS-CMV) infection with clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in allogeneic HSCT patients in Finland.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients who received their first allogeneic HSCT between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, at the Turku University Hospital. Data were collected from the hospital data lake. Clinical and healthcare outcomes were investigated at one year and mortality up to three years.

RESULTS

The study included 251 patients. CMV seroprevalence was 69.7%. CS-CMV infection occurred in 59.0% of the patients, and of those, 14.2% had ≥2 infections. The median time to CS-CMV infection was 34.5 days (Q₁ -Q₃ , 27.0-45.0). Recipient and donor seropositivity, and lymphoproliferative diseases were associated with higher, and HLA identical sibling donors with lower CS-CMV infection risk. CS-CMV infection was not associated with mortality in three years of follow-up. One hundred thirty-three (89.8%) and 75 (72.8%) patients with and without CS-CMV infection, respectively, were readmitted to the hospital. Patients with CS-CMV infection had more hospital readmissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.73, p = .005) and patients with one CS-CMV infection (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.94, p = .005) or ≥2 infections had longer length of hospital stay (IRR 2.71, 95% CI 1.76-4.35, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

CMV seroprevalence is relatively high among Finnish allogeneic HSCT patients. CS-CMV infection was common and associated with a higher readmission rate and longer length of hospital stay.