The Cost Effectiveness of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalaemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease with and without Heart Failure in Ireland

Heart Failure and Edema Costs in Patiromer and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Users

Key Points

Background

Previous work suggested differences between patients taking patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in real-world risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and edema hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits (edema events). We further investigated these differences to assess economic importance. Retrospective study using published event rates and mean costs derived from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database.

Methods

We designed a model to estimate adjusted economic offsets that combined respective patiromer and SZC HF hospitalization (25.1 and 35.8; difference 10.7 [95% confidence interval (CI)2, 2.6 to 18.8]) and edema event (3.4 and 7.1; difference 3.6 [95% CI, 1.7 to 7.1]) rates/100 person-years from the original published work with costs from our parallel data extract spanning 2019–2021, adjusted to 2021 US dollars.

Results

In a base case of mean HF hospitalization, edema event, and 30-count potassium-binder prescription costs from our data extract, the estimated mean savings with patiromer was $1428 per person per year (95% CI, −$1508 to $4652). Respective costs per person per year for patiromer versus SZC were $8526 versus $12,622 (difference $4096 [95% CI, $116 to $7320]) for HF hospitalization and edema events, and $10,649 versus $7981 (difference −$2668) for potassium binders, totaling $19,175 for patiromer versus $20,603 for SZC.

Conclusions

With differing drug costs, hospitalization and ED costs offset this difference when event rates were numerically small. Model outcomes were driven by HF hospitalization cost and least influenced by edema ED visit cost. A limitation was that the Clinformatics Data Mart data extract may differ from the original work.

Hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure: an Italian economic modelling study

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia (HK) is frequently present in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Risk factors for HK among CKD patients include comorbidities and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) treatment. Current standard of care (SoC) often necessitates RAASi down-titration or discontinuation, resulting in poorer cardiorenal outcomes, hospitalization and mortality. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of patiromer for HK in CKD patients with and without heart failure (HF) in an Italian setting.

METHODS

A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed based on OPAL-HK to assess the health economic impact of patiromer therapy in comparison to SoC after accounting for the effects of HK and RAASi use on clinical events. Outcomes included accumulated clinical events, number needed to treat (NNT) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Subgroup analysis was conducted in CKD patients with and without HF.

RESULTS

Patiromer was associated with an incremental discounted cost of €4,660 and 0.194 quality adjusted life years (QALYs), yielding an ICER of €24,004. Per 1000 patients, patiromer treatment prevented 275 moderate/severe HK events, 54 major adverse cardiovascular event, 246 RAASi discontinuation and 213 RAASi up-titration/restart. Subgroup analysis showed patiromer was more effective in preventing clinical events in CKD patients with HF compared to those without; QALY gains were greater in CKD patients without HF versus those with HF (0.267 versus 0.092, respectively). Scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis results support base-case conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Patiromer is associated with QALY gains in CKD patients with and without HF compared to SoC in Italy. Patiromer prevented HK events, enabled RAASi therapy maintenance and reduced cardiovascular event risk.

Pharmacological strategies to manage hyperkalaemia: out with the old, in with the new? Not so fast…

Since the 1950s, sodium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS) has been the dominant cation exchange agent prescribed for hyperkalaemia. Clinicians have had plenty of time to learn of SPS's advantages and limitations. The demands of drug regulatory agencies regarding the incorporation of medications into the market were not so stringent then as they are today, and the efficacy and safety of SPS have been questioned. In recent years, two novel cation exchangers, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, have received (or are in the process of receiving) regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions globally, after scrutiny of carefully conducted trials regarding their short-term and mid-term efficacy. In this debate, we defend the view that all three agents are likely to have similar efficacy. Harms are much better understood for SPS than for newer agents, but currently there are no data to suggest that novel agents are safer than SPS. Drug choices need to consider costs, access and numbers-needed-to-treat to prevent clinically important events; for potassium exchangers, we need trials directly examining clinically important events.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer in the UK: evaluation of hyperkalaemia treatment and lifelong RAASi maintenance in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with and without heart failure (HF) often present with hyperkalaemia (HK) leading to increased risk of hospitalisations, cardiovascular related events and cardiovascular-related mortality. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, the mainstay treatment in CKD management, provides significant cardiovascular and renal protection. Nevertheless, its use in the clinic is often suboptimal and treatment is frequently discontinued due to its association with HK. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of patiromer, a treatment known to reduce potassium levels and increase cardiorenal protection in patients receiving RAASi, in the UK healthcare setting.

METHODS

A Markov cohort model was generated to assess the pharmacoeconomic impact of patiromer treatment in regulating HK in patients with advanced CKD with and without HF. The model was generated to predict the natural history of both CKD and HF and quantify the costs and clinical benefits associated with the use of patiromer for HK management from a healthcare payer's perspective in the UK.

RESULTS

Economic evaluation of patiromer use compared to standard of care (SoC) resulted in increased discounted life years (8.93 versus 8.67) and increased discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (6.36 versus 6.16). Furthermore, patiromer use resulted in incremental discounted cost of £2,973 per patient and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,816 per QALY gained. On average, patients remained on patiromer therapy for 7.7 months, and treatment associated with a decrease in overall clinical event incidence and delayed CKD progression. Compared to SoC, patiromer use resulted in 218 fewer HK events per 1,000 patients, when evaluating potassium levels at the 5.5-6 mmol/l; 165 fewer RAASi discontinuation episodes; and 64 fewer RAASi down-titration episodes. In the UK, patiromer treatment was predicted to have a 94.5% and 100% chance of cost-effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP) of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the value of both HK normalisation and RAASi maintenance in CKD patients with and without HF. Results support the guidelines which recommend HK treatment, e.g., patiromer, as a strategy to enable the continuation of RAASi therapy and improve clinical outcomes in CKD patients with and without HF.