Does Adding Fluoxetine to Combined Oral Contraceptives Containing Drospirenone Improve the Management of Severe Premenstrual Syndrome? A 6-Month Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Three-Arm Trial

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a combination of physical, psychological and social symptoms in women of reproductive age, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe type of the syndrome, previously known as late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD). Both syndromes cause symptoms during the two weeks leading up to menstruation (the luteal phase). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are increasingly used as a treatment for PMS and PMDD, either administered in the luteal phase or continuously. We undertook a systematic review to assess the evidence of the positive effects and the harms of SSRIs in the management of PMS and PMDD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of SSRIs in treating women diagnosed with PMS and PMDD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in November 2023. We checked reference lists of relevant studies, searched trial registers and contacted experts in the field for any additional trials. This is an update of a review last published in 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered studies in which women with a prospective diagnosis of PMS, PMDD or LLPDD were randomised to receive SSRIs or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. We pooled data using a random-effects model. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for premenstrual symptom scores, using 'post-treatment' scores for continuous data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes. We stratified analyses by type of administration (luteal phase or continuous). We calculated absolute risks and the number of women who would need to be taking SSRIs in order to cause one additional adverse event (i.e. the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH)). We rated the overall certainty of the evidence for the main findings using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 RCTs in the review. The studies compared SSRIs (i.e. fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram) to placebo. SSRIs probably reduce overall self-rated premenstrual symptoms in women with PMS and PMDD (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.42; I2 = 51%; 12 studies, 1742 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). SSRI treatment was probably more effective when administered continuously than when administered only in the luteal phase (P = 0.03 for subgroup difference; luteal phase group: SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.21; 6 studies, 687 participants; moderate-certainty evidence; continuous group: SMD -0.69, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.51; 7 studies, 1055 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The adverse effects associated with SSRIs were nausea (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.58 to 4.21; I2 = 0%; 18 studies, 3664 women), insomnia (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.63; I2 = 0%; 18 studies, 3722 women), sexual dysfunction or decreased libido (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.57 to 3.42; I2 = 0%; 14 studies, 2781 women), fatigue or sedation (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.20; I2 = 0%; 10 studies, 1230 women), dizziness or vertigo (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.83; I2 = 0%; 13 studies, 2633 women), tremor (OR 5.38, 95% CI 2.20 to 13.16; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 1352 women), somnolence and decreased concentration (OR 3.26, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.30; I2 = 0%; 8 studies, 2050 women), sweating (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.47; I2 = 0%; 10 studies, 2304 women), dry mouth (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.75 to 4.17; I2 = 0%; 11 studies, 1753 women), asthenia or decreased energy (OR 3.28, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.98; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 1704 women), diarrhoea (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.08; I2 = 0%; 12 studies, 2681 women), and constipation (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.26; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 1022 women). There was moderate-certainty evidence for all adverse effects other than somnolence/decreased concentration, which was low-certainty evidence. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was moderate. The main weakness was poor reporting of study methodology. Heterogeneity was low or absent for most outcomes, although there was moderate heterogeneity in the analysis of overall self-rated premenstrual symptoms. Based on the meta-analysis of response rate (the outcome with the most included studies), there was suspected publication bias. In total, 68% of the included studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies. This stresses the importance of interpreting the review findings with caution.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs probably reduce premenstrual symptoms in women with PMS and PMDD and are probably more effective when taken continuously compared to luteal phase administration. SSRI treatment probably increases the risk of adverse events, with the most common being nausea, asthenia and somnolence.

[Premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder-Overview on pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment]

Premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder become episodically manifest during the second half of the female menstrual cycle and are characterized by psychological and physical symptoms causing relevant functional and social impairments. Mood swings, depression and dysphoria are associated depressive symptoms. Therefore, affective disorders should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Of women in reproductive age 3-8% suffer from premenstrual syndrome and 2% of women are affected by premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Genetic and sociobiographical risk factors are discussed. Furthermore, genetic polymorphisms of specific hormone receptors are considered to be genetic risk factors. From a pathophysiological perspective premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder are caused by a complex interaction between cyclic changes of ovarian steroids and central neurotransmitters. An imbalance of estrogen and progesterone in the luteal phase is believed to cause the symptoms. Therefore, the first treatment approach consists of regulation of the menstrual cycle or luteal support with progesterone or synthetic progestins even if their effectiveness has not yet been proven in randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses. The administration of combined oral contraceptives is also an option. Especially treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) represent an evidence-based approach. In severe cases the administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with add back treatment can also be considered. In the field of affective disorders premenstrual syndromes represent clinically relevant differential diagnoses and comorbidities, which confront the treating physician with particular clinical challenges. Therefore, this literature review gives the readership a clinical orientation for dealing with these disorders.

Guidelines on the use of sex and gender in cardiovascular research

In cardiovascular research, sex and gender have not typically been considered in research design and reporting until recently. This has resulted in clinical research findings from which not only all women, but also gender-diverse individuals have been excluded. The resulting dearth of data has led to a lack of sex- and gender-specific clinical guidelines and raises serious questions about evidence-based care. Basic research has also excluded considerations of sex. Including sex and/or gender as research variables not only has the potential to improve the health of society overall now, but it also provides a foundation of knowledge on which to build future advances. The goal of this guidelines article is to provide advice on best practices to include sex and gender considerations in study design, as well as data collection, analysis, and interpretation to optimally establish rigor and reproducibility needed to inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes. In cardiovascular physiology, incorporating sex and gender is a necessary component when optimally designing and executing research plans. The guidelines serve as the first guidance on how to include sex and gender in cardiovascular research. We provide here a beginning path toward achieving this goal and improve the ability of the research community to interpret results through a sex and gender lens to enable comparison across studies and laboratories, resulting in better health for all.

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome

BACKGROUND

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of premenstrual syndrome. Combined oral contraceptives (COC), which provide both progestin and oestrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and a low oestrogen dose has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of COCs containing drospirenone in women with PMS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trial register, CENTRAL (now containing output from two trials registers and CINAHL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos on 29 June 2022. We checked included studies' reference lists and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared COCs containing drospirenone with placebo or with another COC for treatment of women with PMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were effects on premenstrual symptoms that were prospectively recorded, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included effects on mood, adverse events, and response rate to study medications.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (858 women analysed, most diagnosed with PMDD). The evidence was very low to moderate quality; the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious inconsistency and imprecision. COCs containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (EE) versus placebo COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve overall premenstrual symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.59 to -0.24; 2 RCTs, N = 514; I2 = 64%; low-quality evidence); and functional impairment due to premenstrual symptoms in terms of productivity (mean difference (MD) -0.31, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 47%; low-quality evidence), social activities (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.04; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 53%; low-quality evidence), and relationships (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.06; 2 RCTs, N = 432; I2 = 45%; low-quality evidence). The effects from COCs containing drospirenone may be small to moderate. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may increase withdrawal from trials due to adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 3.41, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.78; 4 RCT, N = 776; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of withdrawal due to adverse effects from placebo is 3%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 6% and 16%. We are uncertain of the effect of drospirenone plus EE on premenstrual mood symptoms, when measured by validated tools that were not developed to assess premenstrual symptoms. COCs containing drospirenone may lead to more adverse effects in total (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.11; 3 RCT, N = 739; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the risk of having adverse effects from placebo is 28%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 40% and 54%. It probably leads to more breast pain, and may lead to more nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and menstrual disorder. Its effect on nervousness, headache, asthenia, and pain is uncertain. There was no report of any rare but serious adverse effects, such as venous thromboembolism in any of the included studies. COCs containing drospirenone may improve response rate (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.40; 1 RCT, N = 449; I2 not applicable; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if you assume the response rate from placebo is 36%, the risk from drospirenone plus EE will be between 39% and 58%. We did not identify any studies that compared COCs containing drospirenone with other COCs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

COCs containing drospirenone and EE may improve premenstrual symptoms that result in functional impairments in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a significant effect. COCs containing drospirenone and EE may lead to more adverse effects compared to placebo. We do not know whether it works after three cycles, helps women with less severe symptoms, or is better than other combined oral contraceptives that contain a different progestogen.

Efficacy of combined oral contraceptives for depressive symptoms and overall symptomatology in premenstrual syndrome: pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

Combined oral contraceptives are often considered a treatment option for women with premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder also seeking contraception, but evidence for this treatment is scarce. We aimed to determine (1) the level of evidence for the efficacy of combined oral contraceptives in managing premenstrual depressive symptoms and overall premenstrual symptomatology and (2) the comparative efficacy of combined oral contraceptives (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number CRD42020205510).

DATA SOURCES

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, EMCare, and Embase from inception to June 3, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of combined oral contraceptives in women with premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder were considered eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

A random effect Bayesian pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted with change in premenstrual depressive symptoms and overall premenstrual symptomatology between baseline and 3 cycles as outcome. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Of 3664 records, 9 eligible trials were included that studied 1205 women with premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (mean age per study range, 24.6-36.5 years). The pairwise meta-analysis revealed that combined oral contraceptives were more efficacious than placebo in treating overall premenstrual symptomatology (standardized mean difference, 0.41; 95% credible interval, 0.17-0.67), but not premenstrual depressive symptoms specifically (standardized mean difference, 0.22; 95% credible interval, -0.06 to 0.47). However, none of the combined oral contraceptives were more effective than each other in reducing premenstrual depressive symptoms and overall premenstrual symptomatology.

CONCLUSION

Combined oral contraceptives may improve overall premenstrual symptomatology in women with premenstrual syndrome or premenstrual dysphoric disorder, but not premenstrual depressive symptoms. There is no evidence for one combined oral contraceptive being more efficacious than any other.