Vesico-Vaginal Fistula in Females in 2010-2020: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Female non-obstetric urogenital fistula repair: long-term patient-reported outcomes and a scoping literature review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term and patient-reported outcomes, including sexual function, in women undergoing urogenital fistula (UGF) repair, addressing the lack of such data in Western countries, where fistulas often result from iatrogenic causes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis at a tertiary referral centre (2010-2023), classifying fistulas based on World Health Organisation criteria and evaluating surgical approaches, aetiology, and characteristics. Both objective (fistula closure, reintervention rates) and subjective outcomes (validated questionnaires) were assessed. A scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures in UGF repair was also performed.

RESULTS

The study included 50 patients: 17 (34%) underwent transvaginal and 33 (66%) transabdominal surgery. History of hysterectomy was present in 36 patients (72%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) operating time was 130 (88-148) min. Fistula closure was achieved in 94% of cases at a median (IQR) follow-up of 50 (16-91) months and reached 100% after three redo fistula repairs. Seven patients (14%) underwent reinterventions for stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal repair (autologous fascial slings). Patient-reported outcomes showed median (IQR) scores on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Modules (ICIQ-FLUTS) of 5 (3-7) for filling symptoms, 1 (0-2) for voiding symptoms and 4.5 (1-9) for incontinence symptoms. The median (IQR) score on the ICIQ Female Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex) was 3 (1-5). The median (IQR) ICIQ Satisfaction (ICIQ-S) outcome score and overall satisfaction with surgery item score was 22 (18.5-23.5) and 10 (8.5-10), respectively. Higher scores indicate higher symptom burden and treatment satisfaction, respectively. Our scoping review included 1784 women, revealing mixed aetiology and methodological and aetiological heterogeneity, thus complicating cross-study comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Urogenital fistula repair at a specialised centre leads to excellent outcomes and high satisfaction. Patients with urethrovaginal fistulas are at increased risk of stress urinary incontinence, possibly due to the original trauma site of the fistula.

Genitourinary Fistula: 5 Years' Experience of Five Referral Centers in Iran

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Genitourinary fistula is a devastating ailment that has an impact on women's physical health, mental health, emotional health, and financial security. The management of genitourinary fistula depends on the type, size, and duration of fistula formation. The purpose of this study is to report the features of genitourinary fistula in Iranian women and our experience in the management of fistula.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews of 283 patients were performed to determine the cause of the fistula, prior repairs, tissue interposition, and the success rate. The operation was considered successful if the patient did not have any urine leakage during the observation time.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age of women was 49.51 (19.39; range: 21-70) years, Of these, 137 (52.9%) had a history of previous genitourinary fistula surgery. The average fistula was 1.53 (0.041) cm in size. The median (interquartile range) operation lasted 70 (15) min. The success rate after fistula repair was 91.5%. The typical follow-up period lasted 13.26 (range: 1-88) months. Forty-three (15.2%) patients had a big fistula (>2.5 cm) and 4 patients (1.4%) had a history of pelvic radiation therapy, among other reasons for failure. After a second repair, all patients' initial failures were resolved. There were no significant complications, as classified by Clavien-Dindo class 2 or greater. Additionally, there were no bowel, ureteral, or nerve injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patients with genitourinary fistula had a successful outcome following repair techniques, without any significant morbidity or mortality.

Epidemiological, anatomoclinical, and therapeutic profile of obstetric fistula in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: About 1267 patients

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to describe the epidemiological, anatomoclinical and therapeutic profile of obstetric fistula (OF) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

METHODOLOGY

This was a descriptive retrospective study that collected 1416 obstetric fistulas in 1267 patients in seven provinces of the DRC, treated between January 2017 and December 2022. The variables studied were epidemiological, anatomoclinical and therapeutic.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at the time of surgical repair was 33.2 years (range: 15 and 77 years) and 32.8% of patients were aged between 20 and 29 years. The mean age of the fistula at repair was 10 years (range: 3.5 months and 56 years). At the time of fistula, 61.7% of patients had delivered vaginally and 28.7% by caesarean section and 8.2% of patients had a haemostasis hysterectomy. Labour lasted at least 3 days in 47.3% of these patients for the fistula birth. Deliveries took place either at home (27.4%) or in a health facility (72.6%); 83.6% of newborns resulting from these births had died. Taken as a whole, urogenital fistulas are more common than genito-digestive fistulas. Urethro-vaginal (26.2%) and vesico-uterine (24.7%) anatomoclinical entities were predominant among urogenital fistulas. A total of 1416 fistulas were surgically repaired in 1267 patients. These repairs were successful for 1226 (86.6%) fistulas. The main surgical route used was transvaginal (68.8%).

CONCLUSION

In the DRC, obstetric fistula is common in young adult women. It often results from vaginal delivery, after prolonged labour. Fistula births often result in the death of newborns. Uro-genital obstetric fistulas are the most frequent with predominance of urethro-vaginal and vesico-uterine anatomoclinical entities. Fistulas remain untreated for a long time. Mostly done transvaginally, surgical repair gives a good result.

Perioperative Outcomes of Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair by Surgical Approach

IMPORTANCE

Data comparing perioperative outcomes between transvaginal, transabdominal, and laparoscopic/robotic vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair are limited but are important for surgical planning and patient counseling.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess perioperative morbidity of VVF repair performed via various approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent transvaginal, transabdominal, or laparoscopic/robotic VVF repair from 2009 to 2020. Associations of surgical approach with baseline characteristics, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization (>4 days), and 30-day outcomes (any major or minor complication or return to the operating room) were evaluated with χ 2 , Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the adjusted association of approach with 30-day complications and prolonged hospitalization.

RESULTS

Overall, 449 women underwent VVF repair, including 252 transvaginal (56.1%), 148 transabdominal (33.0%), and 49 laparoscopic/robotic procedures (10.9%). Abdominal repair was associated with a longer length of hospitalization (median, 3 days vs 1 day transvaginal and laparoscopic/robotic; P < 0.001), higher risk of prolonged length of stay (abdominal, 21.1%; transvaginal, 4.0%; laparoscopic/robotic, 2.0%; P < 0.001), major complications (abdominal, 4.7%; transvaginal, 0.8%; laparoscopic/robotic, 0.0%; P = 0.03), and perioperative transfusion (abdominal, 5.0%; transvaginal, 0.0%; laparoscopic/robotic, 2.1%; P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the abdominal approach was independently associated with an increased risk of prolonged hospitalization compared with laparoscopic/robotic (odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-93.21; P = 0.02) and transvaginal (odds ratio, 6.09; 95% confidence interval, 2.87-12.92; P < 0.001) but not with major/minor complications ( P = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal and laparoscopic/robotic approaches to VVF repair are associated with lower rates of prolonged hospitalization, major complications, and readmission compared with a transabdominal approach.

Vesicovaginal Fistulas: Prevalence, Impact, and Management Challenges

Background and Objectives: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) are an abnormal communication between the vagina and bladder and the most common type of acquired genital fistulas. This review will address the prevalence, impact, and management challenges of VVFs. Materials and Methods: Epidemiologic studies examining VVFs are considered. In addition, publications addressing the treatment of VVFs are reviewed. Results: VVFs in developing countries are often caused by obstructed labor, while most VVFs in developed countries have iatrogenic causes, such as hysterectomy, radiation therapy, and infection. The reported prevalence of VVFs is approximately 1 in 1000 post-hysterectomy patients and 1 in 1000 deliveries. VVFs affect every aspect of quality of life, including physical, mental, social, and sexual aspects. Prevention of VVFs is essential. Early diagnosis is necessary to reduce morbidity. Nutrition, infection control, and malignancy detection are important considerations during evaluation and treatment. Conservative and surgical treatment options are available; however, these approaches should be customized to the individual patient. The success rate of combined conservative and surgical treatments exceeds 90%. Conclusions: VVFs are considered debilitating and devastating. However, they are preventable and treatable; key factors include the avoidance of prolonged labor, careful performance of gynecologic surgery, and early detection.

Vaginal-Laparoscopic Repair (VLR) of Primary and Persistent Vesico-Vaginal Fistula: Description of a New Technique and Surgical Outcomes

The main aim of our study was to describe the surgical technique and evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a vaginal-laparoscopic repair (VLR) of iatrogenic vesico-vaginal fistulae (VVF). Between April-2009 and November-2017, we retrospectively reviewed all clinical, radiological and surgical details of surgery for benign or malignant disease and ended up with VVF. All patients were diagnosed by CT urogram, cystogram and clinical test. The surgical technique was standardised and is described here. Eighteen patients developed VVF after hysterectomy, three after caesarean section and three after hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Twenty-two patients had an average 3 (range 1-5) attempts at fistula repair in other hospitals. In one patient, five attempts were made. The mean size of the fistula was 2.4 cm (range 0.7-3.1 cm). A median 8 weeks (6-16) conservative management with Foley catheter failed in all patients. No conversion to laparotomy and no complication occurred at VLR. Median hospitalisation was 1.4 days (range 1-3). The latter confirmed all patients were dry and tested negative at a repeated filling test. At 36 months follow-up, all patients remained dry. In conclusion, VLR successfully repaired VVF in all patients with primary and persistent VVF. The technique was safe and effective.

Platelet rich plasma for the management of urogynecological disorders: the current evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our objective is to review the currently available literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with pelvic floor disorders and to critically appraise the latest evidence on the safety and efficacy of the PRP application.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evidence on the use of PRP for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) appears promising, although limited to case series, case reports and animal studies. PRP has also been proposed to enhance the surgical outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by native tissue repair with promising success rates. The application of PRP in other PFDs including vaginal fistulas, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), mesh exposure and lichen sclerosus has been also associated with beneficial outcomes and a favorable safety profile.

SUMMARY

The currently available literature indicates that PRP could have a beneficial effect as a single or adjuvant treatment in patients with SUI, POP, GSM, vaginal fistula and genital lichen sclerosus with minimal adverse events. However, valid evidence is still lacking and further well-designed studies are warranted in the field to confirm the validity of the so far reported outcomes.