Levomepromazine and clozapine induce the main human cytochrome P450 drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4

The effect of new atypical antipsychotic drugs on the expression of transcription factors regulating cytochrome P450 enzymes in rat liver

BACKGROUND

Our recent studies showed that prolonged administration of novel atypical antipsychotics affected the expression and activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP), as demonstrated in vitro on human hepatocytes and in vivo on the rat liver. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of repeated treatment with asenapine, iloperidone, and lurasidone on the expression of transcription factors regulating CYP drug-metabolizing enzymes in rat liver.

METHODS

The hepatic mRNA (qRT-PCR) and protein levels (Western blotting) of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) were measured in male Wistar rats after 2 week-treatment with asenapine, iloperidone or lurasidone.

RESULTS

The 2-week treatment with asenapine significantly diminished the AhR and PXR expression (mRNA, protein level), and CAR mRNA level in rat liver. Iloperidone lowered the AhR and CAR expression and PXR protein level. Lurasidone did not affect the expression of AhR and CAR, but increased PXR expression. The antipsychotics did not affect PPARγ.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged treatment with asenapine, iloperidone, or lurasidone affects the expression of transcription factors regulating the CYP drug-metabolizing enzymes. The changes in the expression of AhR, CAR, and PXR mostly correlate with alterations in the expression and activity of respective CYP enzymes found in our previous studies. Since these transcription factors are also engaged in the expression of phase II drug metabolism and drug transporters, changes in their expression may affect the metabolism of endogenous substrates and pharmacokinetics of concomitantly used drugs.

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialized tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalize drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 50 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimize treatment effects, minimize side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalized drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

CYP-catalysed cycling of clozapine and clozapine-N-oxide promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species in vitro

Clozapine is an effective atypical antipsychotic indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but is under-prescribed due to the risk of severe adverse drug reactions such as myocarditis.A mechanistic understanding of clozapine cardiotoxicity remains elusive.This study aimed to investigate the contribution of selected CYP isoforms to cycling between clozapine and its major circulating metabolites, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine-N-oxide, with the potential for reactive species production.CYP supersome™-based in vitro techniques were utilised to quantify specific enzyme activity associated with clozapine, clozapine-N-oxide and N-desmethylclozapine metabolism.The formation of reactive species within each incubation were quantified, and known intermediates detected.CYP3A4 predominately catalysed clozapine-N-oxide formation from clozapine and was associated with concentration-dependent reactive species production, whereas isoforms favouring the N-desmethylclozapine pathway (CYP2C19 and CYP1A2) did not produce reactive species.Extrahepatic isoforms CYP2J2 and CYP1B1 were also associated with the formation of clozapine-N-oxide and N-desmethylclozapine but did not favour one metabolic pathway over another.Unique to this investigation is that various CYP isoforms catalyse clozapine-N-oxide reduction to clozapine.This process was associated with the concentration-dependent formation of reactive species with CYP3A4, CYP1B1 and CYP1A1 that did not correlate with known reactive intermediates, implicating metabolite cycling and reactive oxygen species in the mechanism of clozapine-induced toxicity.

Lower sertraline plasma concentration in patients co-medicated with clozapine-Implications for pharmacological augmentation strategies in schizophrenia

Augmentation of antipsychotic treatment with antidepressants represents a common and beneficial treatment strategy in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Combining clozapine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline represents a clinically important strategy in patients with therapy-resistant schizophrenia, but there is limited knowledge about mutual pharmacokinetic interactions. In the present study, we assessed the impact of clozapine on sertraline plasma concentrations. Based on a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database, sertraline plasma concentrations were compared between two groups: patients receiving a combined treatment with sertraline and clozapine (N = 15) and a matched control group receiving sertraline but no clozapine (N = 17). Group differences with respect to raw and dose-adjusted concentrations were assessed using nonparametric tests. Comedication with clozapine was associated with 67% lower median sertraline plasma concentrations (16 vs. 48 ng/mL; p = .022) and 28% lower median dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D; 0.21 vs. 0.29 (ng/mL)/(mg/day); p = .049) as compared to the control group. Scatter plots revealed a complex relationship between the dosage of clozapine and dose-adjusted sertraline concentrations composed of an initial decrease at clozapine doses below 300 mg, an increase between 300 and 600 mg and a final decrease at 800 mg which was best modeled by a third order polynomial term. Cotreatment with clozapine may lead to reduced sertraline plasma concentrations which may be explained by clozapine-induced gastrointestinal hypo-mobility already present at low doses and cytochrome P450 3A4 inducing properties at high clozapine doses. For this drug combination, clinicians should consider TDM to confirm therapeutically effective plasma concentrations of sertraline.

Comorbid epilepsy and depression—pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions

Background: Major depressive disorder may be encountered in 17% of patients with epilepsy and in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy its prevalence may reach 30%. This indicates that patients with epilepsy may require antidepressant treatment.

Purpose: Both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic (antiseizure) and antidepressant drugs have been reviewed. Also, data on the adverse effects of co-administration of antiepileptic with antidepressant drugs have been added. This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology.

Methods: The review of relevant literature was confined to English-language publications in PUBMED databases. Table data show effects of antidepressants on the seizure susceptibility in experimental animals, results of pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic and antidepressant drugs mainly derived from electroconvulsions in mice, as well as results concerning pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs in clinical conditions.

Conclusion: Antidepressant drugs may exert differentiated effects upon the convulsive threshold which may differ in their acute and chronic administration. Animal data indicate that chronic administration of antidepressants could reduce (mianserin, trazodone) or potentiate the anticonvulsant activity of some antiepileptics (fluoxetine, reboxetine, venlafaxine). There are also examples of neutral interactions (milnacipran).

The mechanisms of interactions of psychotropic drugs with liver and brain cytochrome P450 and their significance for drug effect and drug-drug interactions

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) plays an important role in psychopharmacology. While liver CYP enzymes are responsible for the biotransformation of psychotropic drugs, brain CYP enzymes are involved in the local metabolism of these drugs and endogenous neuroactive substances, such as neurosteroids, and in alternative pathways of neurotransmitter biosynthesis including dopamine and serotonin. Recent studies have revealed a relation between the brain nervous system and cytochrome P450, indicating that CYP enzymes metabolize endogenous neuroactive substances in the brain, while the brain nervous system is engaged in the central neuroendocrine and neuroimmune regulation of cytochrome P450 in the liver. Therefore, the effect of neuroactive drugs on cytochrome P450 should be investigated not only in vitro, but also at in vivo conditions, since only in vivo all mechanisms of drug-enzyme interaction can be observed, including neuroendocrine and neuroimmune modulation. Psychotropic drugs can potentially affect cytochrome P450 via a number of mechanisms operating at the level of the nervous, hormonal and immune systems, and the liver. Their effect on cytochrome P450 in the brain is often different than in the liver and region-dependent. Since psychotropic drugs can affect cytochrome P450 both in the liver and brain, they can modify their own pharmacological effect at both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic level. The article describes the mechanisms by which psychotropic drugs can change the expression/activity of cytochrome P450 in the liver and brain, and discusses the significance of those mechanisms for drug action and drug-drug interactions. Moreover, the brain CYP2D6 is considered as a potential target for psychotropics.

Nuclear Receptor PXR in Drug-Induced Hypercholesterolemia

Atherosclerosis is a major global health concern. The central modifiable risk factors and causative agents of the disease are high total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. To reduce morbidity and mortality, a thorough understanding of the factors that influence an individual’s cholesterol status during the decades when the arteria-narrowing arteriosclerotic plaques are forming is critical. Several drugs are known to increase cholesterol levels; however, the mechanisms are poorly understood. Activation of pregnane X receptor (PXR), the major regulator of drug metabolism and molecular mediator of clinically significant drug–drug interactions, has been shown to induce hypercholesterolemia. As a major sensor of the chemical environment, PXR may in part mediate hypercholesterolemic effects of drug treatment. This review compiles the current knowledge of PXR in cholesterol homeostasis and discusses the role of PXR in drug-induced hypercholesterolemia.

Caffeine consumption and schizophrenia: A highlight on adenosine receptor-independent mechanisms

Schizophrenia is a common psychiatric disorder which affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide. However, the complexity of etiology, treatment resistance and side effects induced by current antipsychotics, relapse prevention, and psychosocial rehabilitation are still to be uncovered. Caffeine, as the world's most widely consumed psychoactive drug, plays a crucial role in daily life. Plenty of preclinical and clinical evidence has illustrated that caffeine consumption could have a beneficial effect on schizophrenia. In this review, we firstly summarize the factors associated with the caffeine-induced beneficial effect. Then, a variety of mechanism of actions independent of adenosine receptor signaling will be discussed with an emphasis on the potential contribution of the microbiome-gut-brain axis to provide more possibilities for future therapeutic, prognosis, and social rehabilitation strategy.