1
|
Casetta C, Santosh P, Bayley R, Bisson J, Byford S, Dixon C, Drake RJ, Elvins R, Emsley R, Fung N, Hayes D, Howes O, James A, James K, Jones R, Killaspy H, Lennox B, Marchant L, McGuire P, Oloyede E, Rogdaki M, Upthegrove R, Walters J, Egerton A, MacCabe JH. CLEAR - clozapine in early psychosis: study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of clozapine vs other antipsychotics for young people with treatment resistant schizophrenia in real world settings. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:122. [PMID: 38355533 PMCID: PMC10865566 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05397-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug with unique efficacy, and it is the only recommended treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS: failure to respond to at least two different antipsychotics). However, clozapine is also associated with a range of adverse effects which restrict its use, including blood dyscrasias, for which haematological monitoring is required. As treatment resistance is recognised earlier in the illness, the question of whether clozapine should be prescribed in children and young people is increasingly important. However, most research to date has been in older, chronic patients, and evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of clozapine in people under age 25 is lacking. The CLEAR (CLozapine in EARly psychosis) trial will assess whether clozapine is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU), at the level of clinical symptoms, patient rated outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in people below 25 years of age. Additionally, a nested biomarker study will investigate the mechanisms of action of clozapine compared to TAU. METHODS AND DESIGN This is the protocol of a multi-centre, open label, blind-rated, randomised controlled effectiveness trial of clozapine vs TAU (any other oral antipsychotic monotherapy licenced in the British National Formulary) for 12 weeks in 260 children and young people with TRS (12-24 years old). AIM AND OBJECTIVES The primary outcome is the change in blind-rated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores at 12 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include blind-rated Clinical Global Impression, patient-rated outcomes, quality of life, adverse effects, and treatment adherence. Patients will be followed up for 12 months and will be invited to give consent for longer term follow-up using clinical records and potential re-contact for further research. For mechanism of action, change in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers and peripheral inflammatory markers will be measured over 12 weeks. DISCUSSION The CLEAR trial will contribute knowledge on clozapine effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness compared to standard antipsychotics in young people with TRS, and the results may guide future clinical treatment recommendation for early psychosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Number: 37176025, IRAS Number: 1004947. TRIAL STATUS In set-up. Protocol version 4.0 01/08/23. Current up to date protocol available here: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR131175# /.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Casetta
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - P Santosh
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Bayley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Bisson
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Byford
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Dixon
- Wonford House Hospital, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - R J Drake
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Elvins
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Emsley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Fung
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Hayes
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A James
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K James
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - R Jones
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - B Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L Marchant
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P McGuire
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Oloyede
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Rogdaki
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Upthegrove
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Womens and Childrens NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Walters
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Egerton
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J H MacCabe
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osimo E, Perry B, Mallikarjun P, Murray G, Howes O, Jones P, Upthegrove R, Khandaker G. Predicting treatment resistance in people with a first-episode of psychosis using commonly recorded clinical information. Eur Psychiatry 2022. [PMCID: PMC9567459 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction 23% of people experiencing a first episode of psychosis (FEP) develop treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). At present, there are no established methods to accurately identify who will develop TRS from baseline. Objectives In this study we used patient data from three UK early intervention services (EIS) to investigate the predictive potential of routinely recorded sociodemographic, lifestyle and biological data at FEP baseline for the risk of TRS up to six years later. Methods We developed two risk prediction algorithms to predict the risk of TRS at 2-8 years from FEP onset using commonly recorded information at baseline. Using the forced-entry method, we created a model including age, sex, ethnicity, triglycerides, alkaline phosphatase levels and lymphocyte counts. We also produced a machine-learning-based model, including an additional four variables. The models were developed using data from two and externally validated in another UK psychosis EIS. Results The development samples included 785 patients, and 1,110 were included in the validation sample. The models discriminated TRS well at internal validation (forced-entry: C 0.70, 95%CI 0.63-0.76; LASSO: C 0.69, 95%CI 0.63-0.77). At external validation, discrimination performance attenuated (forced-entry: C 0.63, 0.58-0.69; LASSO: C 0.64, 0.58-0.69) but recovered for the forced entry model after recalibration and revision of the lymphocyte predictor (C: 0.67, 0.62-0.73). Conclusions The use of commonly recorded clinical information including biomarkers taken at FEP onset could help to predict TRS. These measures should be considered in future studies modelling psychiatric outcomes. Disclosure No significant relationships.
Collapse
|
3
|
Beck K, Arumuham A, Brugger S, Mccutcheon R, Veronese M, Kaar S, Pillinger T, Stone J, Howes O. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor availability in First-Episode Psychosis: a multi-modal PET-MR brain imaging study. Eur Psychiatry 2022. [PMCID: PMC9565749 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction is hypothesised to underlie psychosis but this has not been tested early in illness. Objectives
Our aim was to determine if NMDAR availability was lower in patients with first episode psychosis compared to healthy controls. Methods To address this, we studied 40 volunteers (21 patients with first episode psychosis and 19 matched healthy controls) using PET imaging with an NMDAR selective ligand, [18F]GE179, that binds to the ketamine binding site to index its distribution volume ratio (DVR) and volume of distribution (VT). Striatal glutamatergic indices (glutamate and Glx) were measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (1H-MRS). Results
Hippocampal DVR, but not VT, was significantly lower in patients relative to controls (p=0.02, Cohen’s d=0.81; p=0.15, Cohen’s d=0.49), and negatively associated with total (rho=-0.47, p= 0.04), depressive (rho=-0.67, p=0.002), and general symptom severity (rho=-0.74, p<0.001). Exploratory analyses found no significant differences in other brain regions (anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, striatum and temporal cortex). We found an inverse relationship between hippocampal NMDAR availability and striatal glutamate levels in people with first-episode psychosis (rho = -0.74, p <0.001) but not in healthy controls (rho = -0.22, p = 0.44). Conclusions These findings are consistent with the NMDAR hypofunction hypothesis and identify the hippocampus as a key locus for relative NMDAR hypofunction, although further studies should test specificity and causality. Disclosure No significant relationships.
Collapse
|
4
|
Eap CB, Gründer G, Baumann P, Ansermot N, Conca A, Corruble E, Crettol S, Dahl ML, de Leon J, Greiner C, Howes O, Kim E, Lanzenberger R, Meyer JH, Moessner R, Mulder H, Müller DJ, Reis M, Riederer P, Ruhe HG, Spigset O, Spina E, Stegman B, Steimer W, Stingl J, Suzen S, Uchida H, Unterecker S, Vandenberghe F, Hiemke C. Tools for optimising pharmacotherapy in psychiatry (therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests): focus on antidepressants. World J Biol Psychiatry 2021; 22:561-628. [PMID: 33977870 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2021.1878427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: More than 40 drugs are available to treat affective disorders. Individual selection of the optimal drug and dose is required to attain the highest possible efficacy and acceptable tolerability for every patient.Methods: This review, which includes more than 500 articles selected by 30 experts, combines relevant knowledge on studies investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of 33 antidepressant drugs and of 4 drugs approved for augmentation in cases of insufficient response to antidepressant monotherapy. Such studies typically measure drug concentrations in blood (i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring) and genotype relevant genetic polymorphisms of enzymes, transporters or receptors involved in drug metabolism or mechanism of action. Imaging studies, primarily positron emission tomography that relates drug concentrations in blood and radioligand binding, are considered to quantify target structure occupancy by the antidepressant drugs in vivo. Results: Evidence is given that in vivo imaging, therapeutic drug monitoring and genotyping and/or phenotyping of drug metabolising enzymes should be an integral part in the development of any new antidepressant drug.Conclusions: To guide antidepressant drug therapy in everyday practice, there are multiple indications such as uncertain adherence, polypharmacy, nonresponse and/or adverse reactions under therapeutically recommended doses, where therapeutic drug monitoring and cytochrome P450 genotyping and/or phenotyping should be applied as valid tools of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B Eap
- Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G Gründer
- Department of Molecular Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Baumann
- Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Ansermot
- Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Conca
- Department of Psychiatry, Health Service District Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, South Tyrolean Regional Health Service, Bolzano, Italy
| | - E Corruble
- INSERM CESP, Team ≪MOODS≫, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Universite Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France.,Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - S Crettol
- Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M L Dahl
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J de Leon
- Eastern State Hospital, University of Kentucky Mental Health Research Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - C Greiner
- Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Germany
| | - O Howes
- King's College London and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS)-Imperial College, London, UK
| | - E Kim
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - R Lanzenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J H Meyer
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Moessner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H Mulder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, The Netherlands.,GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Services Drenthe, Assen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Centre for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - D J Müller
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Reis
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Riederer
- Center of Mental Health, Clinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Southern Denmark Odense, Odense, Denmark
| | - H G Ruhe
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - O Spigset
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - E Spina
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - B Stegman
- Institut für Pharmazie der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - W Steimer
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Stingl
- Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - S Suzen
- Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - H Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Unterecker
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - F Vandenberghe
- Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Center for Psychiatric Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Hiemke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mackewn JE, Stirling J, Jeljeli S, Gould SM, Johnstone RI, Merida I, Pike LC, McGinnity CJ, Beck K, Howes O, Hammers A, Marsden PK. Correction to: Practical issues and limitations of brain attenuation correction on a simultaneous PET-MR scanner. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:47. [PMID: 32666231 PMCID: PMC7359986 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00312-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J E Mackewn
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - J Stirling
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Jeljeli
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S-M Gould
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - R I Johnstone
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Merida
- ERMEP-Imagerie du vivant, Lyon, France
| | - L C Pike
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C J McGinnity
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K Beck
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.,South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - A Hammers
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P K Marsden
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mackewn JE, Stirling J, Jeljeli S, Gould SM, Johnstone RI, Merida I, Pike LC, McGinnity CJ, Beck K, Howes O, Hammers A, Marsden PK. Practical issues and limitations of brain attenuation correction on a simultaneous PET-MR scanner. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:24. [PMID: 32372135 PMCID: PMC7200964 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00295-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the advent of clinical PET-MR imaging for routine use in 2011 and the development of several methods to address the problem of attenuation correction, some challenges remain. We have identified and investigated several issues that might affect the reliability and accuracy of current attenuation correction methods when these are implemented for clinical and research studies of the brain. These are (1) the accuracy of converting CT Hounsfield units, obtained from an independently acquired CT scan, to 511 keV linear attenuation coefficients; (2) the effect of padding used in the MR head coil; (3) the presence of close-packed hair; (4) the effect of headphones. For each of these, we have examined the effect on reconstructed PET images and evaluated practical mitigating measures. RESULTS Our major findings were (1) for both Siemens and GE PET-MR systems, CT data from either a Siemens or a GE PET-CT scanner may be used, provided the conversion to 511 keV μ-map is performed by the PET-MR vendor's own method, as implemented on their PET-CT scanner; (2) the effect of the head coil pads is minimal; (3) the effect of dense hair in the field of view is marked (> 10% error in reconstructed PET images); and (4) using headphones and not including them in the attenuation map causes significant errors in reconstructed PET images, but the risk of scanning without them may be acceptable following sound level measurements. CONCLUSIONS It is important that the limitations of attenuation correction in PET-MR are considered when designing research and clinical PET-MR protocols in order to enable accurate quantification of brain PET scans. Whilst the effect of pads is not significant, dense hair, the use of headphones and the use of an independently acquired CT-scan can all lead to non-negligible effects on PET quantification. Although seemingly trivial, these effects add complications to setting up protocols for clinical and research PET-MR studies that do not occur with PET-CT. In the absence of more sophisticated PET-MR brain attenuation correction, the effect of all of the issues above can be minimised if the pragmatic approaches presented in this work are followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. E. Mackewn
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - J. Stirling
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - S. Jeljeli
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - S-M. Gould
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - R. I. Johnstone
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I. Merida
- CERMEP-Imagerie du vivant, Lyon, France
| | - L. C. Pike
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C. J. McGinnity
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - K. Beck
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O. Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK
- South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - A. Hammers
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - P. K. Marsden
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arnone D, Wise T, Walker C, Cowen PJ, Howes O, Selvaraj S. The effects of serotonin modulation on medial prefrontal connectivity strength and stability: A pharmacological fMRI study with citalopram. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 84:152-159. [PMID: 29409920 PMCID: PMC5886357 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2017] [Revised: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Static and dynamic functional connectivity are being increasingly used to measure the effects of disease and a range of different interventions on brain networks. While preliminary evidence suggests that static connectivity can be modulated by chronic antidepressants administration in healthy individuals and in major depression, much less is known about the acute effects of antidepressants especially on dynamic functional connectivity changes. Here we examine acute effects of antidepressants on dynamic functional connectivity within the default mode network. The default mode network is a well described network with many functions in which the role of serotonin is not clear. METHODS In this work we measured acute pharmacological effects of an infusion of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg) in a sample of thirteen healthy volunteers randomised to receive on two occasions the active compound or placebo in a cross over dosing. RESULTS Acute citalopram administration relative to placebo increased static connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex. The SSRI also induced a reduction in variability of connectivity with the medial prefrontal cortex in the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex. DISCUSSION The measured changes are compatible with modified serotonin cortical availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Arnone
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - T Wise
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Walker
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - P J Cowen
- Neurosciences Building, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - O Howes
- Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre (CSC), Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Imperial College London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - S Selvaraj
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmidt A, Antoniades M, Allen P, Egerton A, Chaddock CA, Borgwardt S, Fusar-Poli P, Roiser JP, Howes O, McGuire P. Longitudinal alterations in motivational salience processing in ultra-high-risk subjects for psychosis. Psychol Med 2017; 47:243-254. [PMID: 27697078 PMCID: PMC5216461 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291716002439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impairments in the attribution of salience are thought to be fundamental to the development of psychotic symptoms and the onset of psychotic disorders. The aim of the present study was to explore longitudinal alterations in salience processing in ultra-high-risk subjects for psychosis. METHOD A total of 23 ultra-high-risk subjects and 13 healthy controls underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging at two time points (mean interval of 17 months) while performing the Salience Attribution Test to assess neural responses to task-relevant (adaptive salience) and task-irrelevant (aberrant salience) stimulus features. RESULTS At presentation, high-risk subjects were less likely than controls to attribute salience to relevant features, and more likely to attribute salience to irrelevant stimulus features. These behavioural differences were no longer evident at follow-up. When attributing salience to relevant cue features, ultra-high-risk subjects showed less activation than controls in the ventral striatum at both baseline and follow-up. Within the high-risk sample, amelioration of abnormal beliefs over the follow-up period was correlated with an increase in right ventral striatum activation during the attribution of salience to relevant cue features. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirm that salience processing is perturbed in ultra-high-risk subjects for psychosis, that this is linked to alterations in ventral striatum function, and that clinical outcomes are related to longitudinal changes in ventral striatum function during salience processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Schmidt
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - M. Antoniades
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - P. Allen
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
- Department of Psychology,
University of Roehampton, London,
UK
| | - A. Egerton
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - C. A. Chaddock
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - S. Borgwardt
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry (UPK),
University of Basel, Basel,
Switzerland
| | - P. Fusar-Poli
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
- OASIS Clinic, SLaM NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| | - J. P. Roiser
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University
College London, London, UK
| | - O. Howes
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
- Psychiatric Imaging, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre,
Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - P. McGuire
- Department of Psychosis Studies,
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and
Neuroscience, London, UK
- OASIS Clinic, SLaM NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goodwin GM, Haddad PM, Ferrier IN, Aronson JK, Barnes T, Cipriani A, Coghill DR, Fazel S, Geddes JR, Grunze H, Holmes EA, Howes O, Hudson S, Hunt N, Jones I, Macmillan IC, McAllister-Williams H, Miklowitz DR, Morriss R, Munafò M, Paton C, Saharkian BJ, Saunders K, Sinclair J, Taylor D, Vieta E, Young AH. Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 2016; 30:495-553. [PMID: 26979387 PMCID: PMC4922419 DOI: 10.1177/0269881116636545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 443] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines specify the scope and targets of treatment for bipolar disorder. The third version is based explicitly on the available evidence and presented, like previous Clinical Practice Guidelines, as recommendations to aid clinical decision making for practitioners: it may also serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and assist audit. The recommendations are presented together with a more detailed review of the corresponding evidence. A consensus meeting, involving experts in bipolar disorder and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from these participants. The best evidence from randomized controlled trials and, where available, observational studies employing quasi-experimental designs was used to evaluate treatment options. The strength of recommendations has been described using the GRADE approach. The guidelines cover the diagnosis of bipolar disorder, clinical management, and strategies for the use of medicines in short-term treatment of episodes, relapse prevention and stopping treatment. The use of medication is integrated with a coherent approach to psychoeducation and behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Goodwin
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - P M Haddad
- Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Eccles, Manchester, UK
| | - I N Ferrier
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK and Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - J K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Trh Barnes
- The Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, UK
| | - A Cipriani
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - D R Coghill
- MACHS 2, Ninewells' Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK; now Departments of Paediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Fazel
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J R Geddes
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - H Grunze
- Univ. Klinik f. Psychiatrie u. Psychotherapie, Christian Doppler Klinik, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (PMU), Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik Salzburg, Austria
| | - E A Holmes
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - O Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry (Box 67), London, UK
| | | | - N Hunt
- Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Jones
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff, UK
| | - I C Macmillan
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - H McAllister-Williams
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK and Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - D R Miklowitz
- UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - R Morriss
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Munafò
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - C Paton
- Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - B J Saharkian
- Department of Psychiatry (Box 189), University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kea Saunders
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jma Sinclair
- University Department of Psychiatry, Southampton, UK
| | - D Taylor
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Pharmacy Department, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Vieta
- Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A H Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lally J, Gardner-Sood P, Firdosi M, Iyegbe C, Stubbs B, Greenwood K, Murray R, Smith S, Howes O, Gaughran F. Clinical correlates of vitamin D deficiency in established psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:76. [PMID: 27000113 PMCID: PMC4802895 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0780-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal vitamin D levels have been identified in populations with psychotic disorders. We sought to explore the relationship between vitamin D deficiency, clinical characteristics and cardiovascular disease risk factors among people with established psychosis. METHODS Vitamin D levels were measured in 324 community dwelling individuals in England with established psychotic disorders, along with measures of mental health, cardiovascular risk and lifestyle choices. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels below 10 ng/ml (equivalent to <25 nmol/L) and "sufficient" Vitamin D as above 30 ng/ml (>50 nmol/L). RESULTS The mean 25-OHD serum level was 12.4 (SD 7.3) ng/ml, (range 4.0-51.7 ng/ml). Forty nine percent (n = 158) were vitamin D deficient, with only 14 % (n = 45) meeting criteria for sufficiency. Accounting for age, gender, ethnicity and season of sampling, serum 25-OHD levels were negatively correlated with waist circumference (r = -0.220, p < 0.002), triglycerides (r = -0.160, p = 0.024), total cholesterol (r = -0.144, p = 0.043), fasting glucose (r = -0.191, p = 0.007), HbA1c (r = -0.183, p = 0.01), and serum CRP levels (r = -0.211, p = 0.003) and were linked to the presence of metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest cross sectional study of serum 25-OHD levels in community dwelling individuals with established psychosis, indicating a high level of vitamin D deficiency. Lower vitamin D levels are associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk factors and in particular metabolic syndrome. Further research is needed to define appropriate protocols for vitamin D testing and supplementation in practice to see if this can improve cardiovascular disease risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN number is ISRCTN58667926 Date of registration: 23/04/2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Lally
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
- />National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P. Gardner-Sood
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - M. Firdosi
- />South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C. Iyegbe
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - B. Stubbs
- />Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- />Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K. Greenwood
- />Honorary Senior Research Fellow, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton and Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, West Sussex, UK
| | - R. Murray
- />Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London and Honorary Consultant, National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Smith
- />Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London and Honorary Consultant, National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O. Howes
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College- Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK, London, UK
| | - F. Gaughran
- />Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
- />National Psychosis Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bonoldi I, Allen P, Tognin S, Madeira L, Azis M, Samson C, Quinn B, Modinos G, Bossong M, Stone J, Perez J, Howes O, Fusar-Poli P, McGuire P. Gray Matter Reductions in Cortical Midline Structures Related to Basic Self Disturbances in People at “ultra High Risk” for Psychosis. Eur Psychiatry 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0924-9338(15)30239-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
12
|
Valmaggia LR, Day FL, Jones C, Bissoli S, Pugh C, Hall D, Bhattacharyya S, Howes O, Stone J, Fusar-Poli P, Byrne M, McGuire PK. Cannabis use and transition to psychosis in people at ultra-high risk. Psychol Med 2014; 44:2503-2512. [PMID: 25055169 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291714000117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use is associated with an increased risk of developing a psychotic disorder but the temporal relationship between cannabis use and onset of illness is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess prospectively the influence of cannabis use on transition to psychosis in people at ultra-high risk (UHR) for the disorder. METHOD Lifetime and continued cannabis use was assessed in a consecutively ascertained sample of 182 people (104 male, 78 female) at UHR for psychosis. Individuals were then followed clinically for 2 years to determine their clinical outcomes. RESULTS Lifetime cannabis use was reported by 134 individuals (73.6%). However, most of these individuals had stopped using cannabis before clinical presentation (n=98, 73.1%), usually because of adverse effects. Among lifetime users, frequent use, early-onset use and continued use after presentation were all associated with an increase in transition to psychosis. Transition to psychosis was highest among those who started using cannabis before the age of 15 years and went on to use frequently (frequent early-onset use: 25%; infrequent or late-onset use: 5%; χ(2)1=10.971, p=0.001). However, within the whole sample, cannabis users were no more likely to develop psychosis than those who had never used cannabis (cannabis use: 12.7%; no use: 18.8%; χ(2)1=1.061, p=0.303). CONCLUSIONS In people at UHR for psychosis, lifetime cannabis use was common but not related to outcome. Among cannabis users, frequent use, early-onset use and continued use after clinical presentation were associated with transition to psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Valmaggia
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - F L Day
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - C Jones
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - S Bissoli
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - C Pugh
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - D Hall
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | | | - O Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - J Stone
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - P Fusar-Poli
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - M Byrne
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| | - P K McGuire
- Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is recommended as third-line treatment for schizophrenia in national and local guidelines. Despite this, it is underutilised. This survey aimed to clarify barriers to prescribing and elucidate factors that may improve patient access to clozapine. METHOD A questionnaire was made available to all staff members at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. RESULTS In total, 144 clinical staff completed the questionnaire. The majority (81%) of respondents were 'fairly' or 'very' familiar with clozapine prescribing guidelines. Barriers to prescribing most commonly stated as being 'very frequently' a problem were patient concerns about tolerability of clozapine or patient refusal to adhere to blood test monitoring. Staff members also felt medical complications frequently prevented clozapine prescription. Dedicated staff or day hospital placements devoted to clozapine initiation were identified as factors most likely to increase prescribing of clozapine. CONCLUSION Professionals identified the dominant barriers to prescribing as being patient focussed - refusal of blood test monitoring or concerns about tolerability. Clinician fears about compliance or medical complications were also important. The development of out-patient services specifically tasked with initiating clozapine may help to increase the frequency of prescribing of clozapine earlier in treatment than is currently seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gee
- Pharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kambeitz J, Howes O, Kim E, Stahl D, Silfstein M, Abi-Dargham A, Kapur S. The nature of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and what this means for treatment. Pharmacopsychiatry 2013. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
15
|
Kambeitz J, Abi-Dargham A, Kapur S, Howes O. Alterations in cortical and extra-striatal sub-cortical dopamine function in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging studies. Pharmacopsychiatry 2013. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
16
|
Masillo A, Day F, Laing J, Howes O, Fusar-Poli P, Byrne M, Bhattacharyya S, Fiori Nastro P, Girardi P, McGuire PK, Valmaggia LR. Interpersonal sensitivity in the at-risk mental state for psychosis. Psychol Med 2012; 42:1835-1845. [PMID: 22225783 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291711002996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interpersonal sensitivity is a personality trait described as excessive awareness of both the behaviour and feelings of others. Although interpersonal sensitivity has been found to be one of the vulnerability factors to depression, there has been little interest in its relationship with the prodromal phase of psychosis. The aims of this study were to examine the level of interpersonal sensitivity in a sample of individuals with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis and its relationship with other psychopathological features. METHOD Sixty-two individuals with an ARMS for psychosis and 39 control participants completed a series of self-report questionnaires, including the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM), the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ), the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) and the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). RESULTS Individuals with an ARMS reported higher interpersonal sensitivity compared to controls. Associations between interpersonal sensitivity, positive psychotic symptoms (i.e. paranoid ideation), avoidant coping and symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress were also found. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that being 'hypersensitive' to interpersonal interactions is a psychological feature of the putatively prodromal phase of psychosis. The relationship between interpersonal sensitivity, attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, avoidant coping and negative emotional states may contribute to long-term deficits in social functioning. We illustrate the importance, when assessing a young client with a possible ARMS, of examining more subtle and subjective symptoms in addition to attenuated positive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Masillo
- Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, King's Health Partners, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Selvaraj S, Faulkner P, Mouchlianitis E, Turkheimer F, Rosso L, Roiser J, Cowen P, Howes O. P-800 - How do antidepressants work? A Positron Emission Tomography (PET) study of brain serotonin levels and affect regulation. Eur Psychiatry 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0924-9338(12)74967-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
18
|
Howes O, Bose S, Turkheimer F, Valli I, Egerton A, Stahl D, Valmaggia L, Allen P, Murray R, McGuire P. Progressive increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity as patients develop psychosis: a PET study. Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16:885-6. [PMID: 21358709 PMCID: PMC3662873 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
19
|
Selvaraj S, Godlewska BR, Norbury R, Bose S, Turkheimer F, Stokes P, Rhodes R, Howes O, Cowen PJ. Decreased regional gray matter volume in S' allele carriers of the 5-HTTLPR triallelic polymorphism. Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16:471, 472-3. [PMID: 21042318 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2010.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
20
|
Johns LC, Allen P, Valli I, Winton-Brown T, Broome M, Woolley J, Tabraham P, Day F, Howes O, Wykes T, McGuire P. Impaired verbal self-monitoring in individuals at high risk of psychosis. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1433-1442. [PMID: 19951449 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291709991991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive models suggest that auditory verbal hallucinations arise through defective self-monitoring and the external attribution of inner speech. We used a paradigm that engages verbal self-monitoring (VSM) to examine whether this process is impaired in people experiencing prodromal symptoms, who have a very high risk of developing psychosis. METHOD We tested 31 individuals with an At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) and 31 healthy volunteers. Participants read single adjectives aloud while the source and pitch of the online auditory verbal feedback was manipulated, then immediately identified the source of the speech they heard (Self/Other/Unsure). Response choice and reaction time were recorded. RESULTS When reading aloud with distorted feedback of their own voice, ARMS participants made more errors than controls (misidentifications and unsure responses). ARMS participants misidentified the source of their speech as 'Other' when the level of acoustic distortion was severe, and misidentification errors were inversely related to reaction times. CONCLUSIONS Impaired VSM is evident in people with an ARMS, although the deficit seems to be less marked than in patients with schizophrenia. Follow-up of these participants may clarify the extent to which the severity of this impairment predicts the subsequent onset of psychosis and development of positive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Johns
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- P Fusar-Poli
- Neuroimaging Section, Institute of Psychiatry, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
|
25
|
|