High-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection for mycophenolic acid determination in saliva samples

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide determination in saliva samples from children with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Saliva sampling is one of the methods of therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). The study describes the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method developed for saliva MPA and MPAG determination in children with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

The mobile phase consisted of methanol and water at gradient flow, both with 0.1% formic acid. Firstly, 100 µL of saliva was evaporated at 45 °C for 2 h to dryness, secondly, it was reconstituted in the mobile phase, and finally 10 µL was injected into the LC-MS/MS system. Saliva from ten children with nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil was collected with Salivette®.

RESULTS

For MPA and MPAG, within the 2-500 ng/mL range, the method was selective, specific, accurate and precise within-run and between-run. No carry-over and matrix effects were observed. Stability tests showed that MPA and MPAG were stable in saliva samples if stored for 2 h at room temperature, 18 h at 4 °C, and at least 5 months at - 80 °C as well as after three freeze-thaw cycles, in a dry extract for 16 h at 4 °C, and for 8 h at 15 °C in the autosampler. The analytes were not adsorbed onto Salivette® cotton swabs. For concentrations above 500 ng/mL, the samples may be diluted twofold. In children, saliva MPA and MPAG were within the ranges of 4.6-531.8 ng/mL and 10.7-183.7 ng/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated LC-MS/MS method has met the validation requirements for saliva MPA and MPAG determination in children with nephrotic syndrome. Further studies are needed to explore plasma-saliva correlations and assess their potential contribution to MPA monitoring.

Extensive comparison of salivary collection, transportation, preparation, and storage methods: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Human saliva as a bodily fluid-similar to blood-is utilized for diagnostic purposes. Unlike blood sampling, collecting saliva is non-invasive, inexpensive, and readily accessible. There are no previously published systematic reviews regarding different collection, transportation, preparation, and storage methods for human saliva.

DESIGN

This study has been prepared and organized according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. This systematic review has been registered at PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42023415384). The study question according to the PICO format was as followed: Comparison of the performance (C) of different saliva sampling, handling, transportation, and storage techniques and methods (I) assessed for analyzing stimulated or unstimulated human saliva (P and O). An electronic search was executed in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three descriptive human clinical studies published between 1995 and 2022 were included. Eight categories of salivary features and biomarkers were investigated (i.e., salivary flow rate, total saliva quantity, total protein, cortisol, testosterone, DNA quality and quantity, pH and buffering pH). Twenty-two saliva sampling methods/devices were utilized. Passive drooling, Salivette®, and spitting were the most utilized methods. Sampling times with optimum capabilities for cortisol, iodine, and oral cancer metabolites are suggested to be 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM, 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM, and 14:00 PM to 20:00 PM, respectively. There were 6 storage methods. Centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C was the most utilized storage method. For DNA quantity and quality, analyzing samples immediately after collection without centrifuging or storage, outperformed centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C. Non-coated Salivette® was the most successful method/device for analyzing salivary flow rate.

CONCLUSION

It is highly suggested that scientists take aid from the reported categorized outcomes, and design their study questions based on the current voids for each method/device.