Optimal Flexion for the Femoral Component in TKR: A Study of Angle Between Mechanical Axis and Distal Anatomic Intramedullary Axis Using 3D Reconstructed CT Scans in 407 Osteoarthritic Knees Studied in India

Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal sagittal alignment of the femoral prosthesis is critical to the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy, the efficacy of default femoral alignment versus individualized alignment remains under scrutiny. This study aimed to compare the differences in prosthetic alignment, anatomical restoration, and clinical outcomes between individualized femoral sagittal alignment and default sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted TKA.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised controlled trial, 113 patients (120 knees) underwent robotic-assisted TKA were divided into two groups: 61 with individualized femoral flexion (individualized alignment group) and 59 with default 3-5° flexion (default alignment group). The individualized alignment was based on the distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA), defined as the angle between the mechanical and distal anatomical axes of the femur. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Despite similar postoperative femoral flexion angles between groups (P = 0.748), the individualized alignment group exhibited significantly lower incidences of femoral prosthesis extension and higher rates of optimal 0-3° prosthesis flexion (9.8% vs. 27.1%, P = 0.014,78.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.008, respectively). The individualized alignment group also demonstrated more favourable changes in sagittal anatomy, with higher maintenance of postoperative anterior femoral offset within 1 mm (54.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.026) and posterior condylar offset within 1 mm and 2 mm (44.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.031,73.8% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.010, respectively). Although slight improvement in the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) at three months was observed (P = 0.045), it did not reach a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

Individualized tailoring of femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances prosthetic alignment and anatomical restoration, suggesting potential improvements in postoperative outcomes.

Mid-flexion laxity could be identified with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment in patients with a large preoperative convergence angle

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence of intraoperative mid-flexion laxity using continuous flexion-arc gap assessment, risk factors for mid-flexion laxity, and clinical results in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Ninety posterior-stabilized TKAs were performed under navigation guidance for patients with degenerative arthritis and varus deformity. Intraoperatively, the gap between the trial femoral component and insert was evaluated in the navigation system with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment. Each medial and lateral gap at flexion (90°) and extension (0°) were made to be less than 3 mm. Mid-flexion laxity was determined when the gap in the flexion range between 15° and 60° was 3 mm or more. The proportion of knees with mid-flexion laxity was investigated. The factors affecting mid-flexion laxity were identified in terms of demographics, preoperative convergence angle, and change in joint line height and posterior femoral offset. The Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 31 cases (34.4%) of lateral mid-flexion laxity (average peak mid-flexion gap = 3.7 mm). The other 59 cases did not show mid-flexion laxity. The preoperative convergence angle was the only significant factor affecting lateral mid-flexion laxity (odds ratio = 1.466, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the clinical results between the groups with and without mid-flexion laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous flexion-arc gap assessment was useful in evaluating mid-flexion laxity using navigation-assisted TKA. The preoperative convergence angle, reflecting soft-tissue laxity, can be a practical and simple radiographic finding for predicting lateral mid-flexion laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Notching is less, if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis, in navigated TKA

Purpose

In navigated TKA, the risk of notching is high if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to the sagittal mechanical axis of femur (SMX). We intended to determine if, by opting to place the femoral component perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis (DCX), notching can be reduced in navigated TKA.

Methods

We studied 171 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral computer-assisted TKA. Femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to SMX in one knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Disabled, i.e. FBRD group) and perpendicular to DCX in the opposite knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Enabled, i.e. FBRE group). Incidence and depth of notching were recorded in both groups. For FBRE knees, distal anterior cortex angle (DCA), which is the angle between SMX and DCX, was calculated by the computer.

Results

Incidence and mean depth of notching was less (p = 0.0007 and 0.009) in FBRE versus FBRD group, i.e. 7% versus 19.9% and 0.98 mm versus 1.53 mm, respectively. Notching was very high (61.8%) in FBRD limbs when the anterior bowing was severe (DCA > 3°) in the contralateral (FBRE) limbs.

Conclusion

Notching was less when femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to DCX, in navigated TKA.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level II.