Acute and chronic effects of pirbuterol on left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical status in severe congestive heart failure

Impact of combined clenbuterol and metoprolol therapy on reverse remodelling during mechanical unloading

Background

Clenbuterol (Cl), a β₂ agonist, is associated with enhanced myocardial recovery during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, and exerts beneficial remodelling effects during mechanical unloading (MU) in rodent heart failure (HF). However, the specific effects of combined Cl+β₁ blockade during MU are unknown.

Methods and Results

We studied the chronic effects (4 weeks) of β₂-adrenoceptor (AR) stimulation via Cl (2 mg/kg/day) alone, and in combination with β₁-AR blockade using metoprolol ((Met), 250 mg/kg/day), on whole heart/cell structure, function and excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in failing (induced by left coronary artery (LCA) ligation), and unloaded (induced by heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation (HATx)) failing rat hearts. Combined Cl+Met therapy displayed favourable effects in HF: Met enhanced Cl's improvement in ejection fraction (EF) whilst preventing Cl-induced hypertrophy and tachycardia. During MU combined therapy was less beneficial than either mono-therapy. Met, not Cl, prevented MU-induced myocardial atrophy, with increased atrophy occurring during combined therapy. MU-induced recovery of Ca²⁺ transient amplitude, speed of Ca²⁺ release and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ content was enhanced equally by Cl or Met mono-therapy, but these benefits, together with Cl's enhancement of sarcomeric contraction speed, and MU-induced recovery of Ca²⁺ spark frequency, disappeared during combined therapy.

Conclusions

Combined Cl+Met therapy shows superior functional effects to mono-therapy in rodent HF, but appears inferior to either mono-therapy in enhancing MU-induced recovery of EC coupling. These results suggest that combined β₂-AR simulation +β₁-AR blockade therapy is likely to be a safe and beneficial therapeutic HF strategy, but is not as effective as mono-therapy in enhancing myocardial recovery during LVAD support.

Should acute treatment with inhaled beta agonists be withheld from patients with dyspnea who may have heart failure?

In patients with dyspnea, prehospital and emergency providers make therapeutic decisions before a diagnosis is established. Inhaled beta-2 agonists are frontline treatment for patients with dyspnea due to asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. However, these agents have been associated with increased adverse events when administered chronically to heart failure patients. Our goal was to determine the safety and efficacy of acute administration of inhaled beta-2 agonists to patients with heart failure. MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were performed using the terms "beta agonists," "albuterol," "congestive heart failure," and "pulmonary edema." Bibliographies of relevant articles were searched. Only studies addressing acute effects of beta-2 agonists were included for analysis. Twenty-four studies comprising 434 patients were identified that addressed the acute delivery of beta-2 agonists in subjects with heart failure--five studies with inhaled administration and 19 with systemic administration. No study directly evaluated the effects of inhaled beta-2 agonists to patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Treatment of heart failure patients with beta-2 agonists resulted in transient improvements in pulmonary function and cardiovascular hemodynamics. Only one investigation reported an association between beta-2 agonist use and an increase in malignant dysrhythmias. Investigations in animal models of heart failure and acute lung injury demonstrated resolution of pulmonary edema with beta agonist administration. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that acute treatment with inhaled beta-2 agonists should be avoided in patients with dyspnea who may have heart failure. Based on small studies and indirect evidence, administration of beta-2 agonists to patients with heart failure seems to improve pulmonary function, cardiovascular hemodynamics, and resorption of pulmonary edema. Although an increase in adverse effects with the use of beta-2 agonists cannot be ruled out based on these data, there was no evidence of an increase in clinically significant dysrhythmias, especially when administered by inhalation. Based on these findings, further study should focus on the clinical outcomes of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure who are treated with inhaled beta-2 agonist therapy.

Hemodynamic response to oral prenalterol in dilated decompensated cardiomyopathy as a result of cardiac and vascular effects

The initial antifailure efficacy of beta-adrenergic agonists is generally lost during prolonged treatment. The reasons are not fully understood. In 11 patients with advanced cardiac decompensation due to dilated cardiomyopathy, prenalterol, a selective beta 1 adrenergic agonist, improved the left ventricular contractility after acute intravenous and during prolonged oral administration. However, after periods of treatment ranging from 2 to 18 weeks, blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance were raised in each patient. These changes resulted in an increase of the left ventricular afterload which was such as to overwhelm the effects of the enhanced contractility, and to extinguish the initial improvement of the cardiac function and of the clinical condition. Stimulation of the presynaptical beta-receptors facilitating norepinephrine release or of the renin secretion by this beta 1 agonist, may be the causes of the systemic vasoconstriction and of the loss of effectiveness in the long run.

Pirbuterol. A preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in reversible bronchospastic disease

Pirbuterol is a beta-adrenoceptor agonist which differs structurally from salbutamol in the substitution of a pyridine ring for the benzene ring. In common with salbutamol, pirbuterol demonstrates both bronchodilatory and cardiovascular effects. Generally, improvements of up to 25% are noted in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) [versus baseline or placebo] in asthmatic patients treated with pirbuterol for several months. In individual 12-week double-blind comparative studies, pirbuterol aerosol appeared similar to orciprenaline (metaproterenol) aerosol, and orally administered pirbuterol appeared similar to orally administered salbutamol in bronchodilator efficacy. However, well-designed long term comparative studies are needed to more clearly define the comparative efficacy of pirbuterol and alternative beta-adrenoceptor agonists.

Methodologic problems in clinical trials in heart failure

Trials designed to establish the effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy in chronic heart failure illustrate methodologic problems associated with intervention trials in chronic disease. Early improvement in hemodynamic status or exercise capacity does not predict long-term changes, and hemodynamic variables do not correlate with exercise capacity. Mortality may not be a feasible outcome, suggesting that an adequate measure of quality of life is necessary to establish patient benefit. Care must be taken to ensure that subjects recruited are representative of the underlying population with respect to drug response. Need for cointervention can be dealt with by comparing only periods of comparable treatment, treating need for cointervention as a treatment failure, or using changes in non-study drugs as a measure of outcome. While cross-over designs can improve feasibility, the investigator runs the risk of inadequate followup and a time-treatment interaction. These issues must be considered in planning intervention trials in chronic disease.

Hemodynamic and clinical limitations of long-term inotropic therapy with amrinone in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To determine the hemodynamic and clinical effects of long-term positive inotropic stimulation on the myocardium, we treated 31 patients with severe chronic heart failure with oral amrinone (600 mg daily) and performed invasive hemodynamic studies during short- and long-term treatment with the drug. Stroke volume and stroke work indexes increased markedly during the first 48 hr of therapy (p less than .01) but returned to pretreatment values after 2 to 10 weeks; upon drug withdrawal, both variables deteriorated rapidly to values significantly lower than those observed before treatment with amrinone (p less than .01), despite similar values for left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. This pattern of response indicated that progression of the underlying heart disease had occurred during treatment with amrinone and contributed importantly to its failure to produce long-term benefits. Progression of left ventricular dysfunction was associated with a progressive increase in heart rate and plasma renin activity and a decline in serum sodium concentration. Clinically, amrinone therapy was complicated by sustained symptomatic ventricular tachycardia in four patients, worsening myocardial ischemia in four patients, and worsening congestive heart failure in eight patients, all of whom had been stable before entry into the study; only three of the 31 patients improved clinically. Ten patients died during the first 2 weeks of treatment, and 16 (52%) were dead within 3 months, a mortality rate twice as great as that seen during comparable trials with vasodilating drugs. Although noncardiac adverse effects were frequent, they were not the primary reason for drug failure. In conclusion, long-term therapy with amrinone may accelerate progression of left ventricular dysfunction, exacerbate myocardial ischemia, and provoke life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, thereby shortening survival in patients with severe chronic heart failure. Prolonged administration of inotropic drugs may achieve short-term gains at the expense of long-term detrimental effects on the myocardium.

Old and new inotropic drugs

An ideal cardiotonic agent should improve cardiac contractility and increase the oxygen supply to various tissues without inducing tachycardia, arrhythmias, decrease in coronary blood flow or increment in oxygen requirements of the myocardium. It should also be safe and orally active and have a persistent action. The aim of this paper is to describe various positive inotropic drugs at our disposal. The hemodynamic effects and the indications of adrenaline, noradrenaline, isoprenaline, dopamine, dobutamine and cardiac glycosides are presented first. Then several new promising orally active compounds are discussed.

Pirbuterol hydrochloride: evaluation of beta adrenergic agonist activity in reversible obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure

Pirbuterol hydrochloride is a beta 2 adrenergic agonist with a structure similar to that of albuterol, except for the substitution of a pyridine ring for the benzene ring. It is comparable in duration of action to albuterol when given by inhalation, but it is threefold less potent by weight. In man, pirbuterol and albuterol have similar beta 2 selectivity. In the acute therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pirbuterol is most effective in oral doses of 15-20 mg, and by aerosol in doses of 400 micrograms or greater. Long-term studies of oral pirbuterol in doses between 30-60 mg/day are promising, but further research is warranted. The combination of pirbuterol's beta 2 and lesser beta1 activity has proven helpful in the therapy of refractory congestive heart failure. Improvement of function of both right and left ventricles and systemic and pulmonic circulations has been demonstrated acutely. Drug effect wanes, as with other beta adrenergic agonists, due to the development of tolerance; however, long-term benefit appears to persist in both pulmonary and cardiac patients. Pirbuterol will be marketed in the United States as 10 and 15 mg tablets and as a 200 micrograms per actuation metered dose aerosol for use in pulmonary patients only; it will not be approved for use in congestive heart failure. In terms of beta 2 selectivity, duration of action, potency and frequency of side effects, pirbuterol is comparable to the two beta 2 agonists already available in the United States, albuterol and terbutaline.

Vasodilator and inotropic therapy for severe chronic heart failure: passion and skepticism

Although substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years in the development of vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the management of patients with severe chronic heart failure, much of the enthusiasm that surrounded the introduction of many of these agents has subsequently been tempered by reports of drug failure or adverse reactions. In this review and analysis, currently available vasodilator and inotropic agents are critically and comparatively evaluated to assess their respective advantages and limitations. It is apparent that the ability of most of these drugs to produce substantial clinical benefits in patients with severe heart failure has probably been overstated. Therapy fails to achieve the desired clinical results all too frequently, possibly as the result of: the choice of an ineffective drug; the administration of an effective drug in subtherapeutic doses; the administration of an effective drug to improperly selected patients; the failure of initial hemodynamic benefits to be sustained; the occurrence of severe or serious adverse reactions; and the failure to alter concomitant therapy appropriately. The present analysis indicates that there is no uniformly effective or safe vasodilator or inotropic drug for patients with severe heart failure; all agents have important limitations. Of the available therapeutic choices, however, long-term converting enzyme inhibition appears to produce more consistent hemodynamic and clinical benefits with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions than other pharmacologic approaches for the management of these severely ill patients.

Effects of pirbuterol and sodium nitroprusside on pulmonary haemodynamics in hypoxic cor pulmonale

The acute haemodynamic effects of oral pirbuterol (a beta-agonist) were contrasted with those of sodium nitroprusside, a vasodilator, in six patients with hypoxic chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Sodium nitroprusside (1-5 mg/kg intravenously) reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure and total pulmonary vascular resistance significantly (p less than 0.01) without change in cardiac output or right ventricular ejection fraction, measured by radionuclide ventriculography. Oral pirbuterol (22.5 mg) produced a greater reduction in total pulmonary vascular resistance than sodium nitroprusside, largely as a result of increasing cardiac output. Right ventricular ejection fraction also increased significantly after pirbuterol (p less than 0.01). Pirbuterol in a lower dosage (15 mg by mouth) in six further patients with hypoxic chronic bronchitis and emphysema produced similar changes in total pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular ejection fraction. Nine of the patients who were studied acutely thereafter received pirbuterol 15 mg thrice daily for six weeks, which produced a significant fall in systolic pulmonary arterial pressure and a rise in right ventricular ejection fraction (p less than 0.01), without a significant fall in arterial oxygen tension. Pirbuterol acts as a vasodilator on the pulmonary circulation in these patients and may in addition improve right ventricular performance by an inotropic action.

Response of pulmonary circulation to oral pirbuterol in chronic airflow obstruction

The effects of the oral beta agonist pirbuterol on pulmonary haemodynamics and gas exchange were studied in nine patients with severe irreversible airflow obstruction and moderate arterial hypoxaemia. After administration of 15 mg pirbuterol pulmonary vascular resistance fell by 19% but cardiac output rose by 24%, so that pulmonary arterial pressure showed no significant change. Systemic arterial oxygen pressure fell by 7%, limiting the rise in oxygen delivery to 21%. All changes were significant at the 2% level. These results show that pirbuterol dilates the pulmonary bed at the cost of a slight worsening of gas exchange, which is compensated by an independent rise in blood flow.

Comparative pharmacology and clinical efficacy of newer agents in treatment of heart failure

The animal and human pharmacology of several new drugs (prazosin, trimazosin, pirbuterol, and carbazeran) useful in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) is delineated in relation to the pharmacology of other agents employed for CHF management. Prazosin and trimazosin are selective alpha 1-blockers that cause a balanced increase in cardiac output (CO) and reduction in left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP); the reduction in diastolic blood pressure with these drugs is significantly related to increase in treadmill exercise, fall in LVFP, and increase in CO. Pirbuterol is a relatively selective beta 2-agonist with somewhat greater effects on CO than on LVFP. Early promise in CHF therapy is being shown by a novel series of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) phosphodiesterase inhibitors with combined direct inotropic and vasodilator effects. Double-blind long-term studies demonstrate persistent efficacy of prazosin and trimazosin in CHF as measured by improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, treadmill exercise performance, and noninvasive measures of cardiac function; these data are supported by studies in which repeat cardiac catheterization has been performed after several months of therapy. Double-blind studies of other CHF drugs are in progress.

Mechanisms and implications of vasodilator tolerance in the treatment of congestive heart failure

Vasodilators play an important role in the treatment of the patient with severe heart failure and increased systemic vascular resistance. However, there are both clinical data and theoretic reasons to anticipate that some degree of tolerance may develop during the long-term use of most agents. The cause of the increased vascular resistance of heart failure is not completely understood, but it appears to be related to a number of neuroendocrine, molecular and physical mechanisms including increased activity of the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems, and increased vascular stiffness due to intra- and extracellular sodium and fluid accumulation. Not surprisingly, a lowering of systemic vascular resistance either by direct smooth muscle relaxers or by blockade of specific neuroendocrine systems may result in a number of compensatory responses at the neuroendocrine and/or molecular level. The over-all effectiveness of a particular vasodilator is the net sum of its direct pharmacologic action, and the neuroendocrine and molecular responses to the drug. The specific compensatory mechanisms activated depend on several factors including the type of vasodilator used, the dose employed, the baseline neuroendocrine status of the patient, the severity of heart failure and the functional integrity of various reflex systems. Although not directly applicable to patients with heart failure, much information derived from the use of these agents to treat patients with hypertension and angina pectoris suggests several potential mechanisms by which tolerance may develop to virtually all classes of vasodilators. The major types of vasodilators are discussed with regard to their potential mechanisms of tolerance. Finally, the evidence currently available from long-term studies is reviewed in order to assess the potential relevance of vasodilator tolerance to the clinical management of the patient with heart failure.