Evolving concepts of management of stable and potentially lethal arrhythmias

A matrical approach to the basic and clinical pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

In summary, the lethal cardiac arrhythmias remain a major public health problem and their treatment is a major challenge to the clinician. We possess rapidly increasing knowledge of the electrophysiologic events which underly arrhythmogenesis and the antiarrhythmic as well as the proarrhythmic actions of drugs. Much of this electrophysiologic knowledge is irrelevant to the practicing physician. While complex, we believe that the matrical approach provides the clinician with a useful intellectual framework within which to consider the actions of arrhythmogenic influences and antiarrhythmic drugs. The matrical approach is scientifically sound, reflects clinical realities, and serves as a rational guide to the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. The traditional classifications of antiarrhythmic drugs have served a useful purpose, but they are clearly outmoded.

Comparison of propafenone and disopyramide for treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias: placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover study

In a double blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of propafenone, a new antiarrhythmic drug was compared to that of disopyramide. Sixteen patients with frequent and complex premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were studied by serial 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, while they were receiving propafenone, 300 mg, and disopyramide, 200 mg, both every 8 hours. A reduction in the mean frequency of PVCs per hour, in comparison to the placebo period, from 574 +/- 535 to 100 +/- 130, was observed after propafenone (p less than 0.005) and from 629 +/- 455 to 231 +/- 280 after disopyramide (p less than 0.008). A greater than 70% reduction in PVCs in comparison to placebo was observed in 11 of 14 after propafenone and 9 of 15 after disopyramide (NS). A greater than or equal to 90% reduction in PVCs was observed in 9 of 16 with propafenone and in 4 of 15 with disopyramide (p less than 0.05). The suppression of complex PVCs (repetitive, polymorphic, or more than 5/min with bigeminism) was observed in 11 of 14 after propafenone and in 9 of 14 after disopyramide. The abolition of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was observed in 6 of 6 and 3 of 5, respectively, after propafenone and disopyramide (p less than 0.05). A lower incidence of side effects, 4 of 16 vs 8 of 16, was observed during propafenone than during disopyramide treatment. We conclude that propafenone, in a dose of 900 mg daily, is more effective than disopyramide, in a dose of 600 mg daily, in the treatment of frequent and complex PVCs and nonsustained ventricular tachycardias. Propafenone also showed a lower incidence of side effects.

Propafenone for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: correlation with drug plasma levels during long-term treatment

The efficacy of propafenone, a new antiarrhythmic drug, was studied in 21 patients with ventricular arrhythmias refractory to previous antiarrhythmic medications. Group A included 10 patients with chronic ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), 6 of whom had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 of whom had recurrent, sustained VT; all received propafenone, 900 mg/day. Group B included 11 patients, all with chronic VPCs, 9 of whom had nonsustained VT and 5 of whom had sustained VT; all received propafenone, 450 mg/day. Drug efficacy was evaluated as a 70% or greater reduction in VPC frequency with complex VPC abolition in ambulatory monitoring and suppression of nonsustained VT and sustained VT during a follow-up period up to 154 +/- 58 days in group A and 96 +/- 42 days in group B. Drug plasma levels were measured during chronic therapy in pharmacologic steady state. In group A, propafenone reduced the frequency of chronic VPCs in 9 patients and abolished nonsustained VT in 4 of 6 and sustained VT in 3 of 4; in group B, propafenone reduced the frequency of chronic VPCs in 6 patients and abolished nonsustained VT in 6 of 9 and sustained VT in 3 of 5. Two patients with recurrences of sustained VT in this group were later successfully treated with propafenone, 900 mg/day; overall, 8 of 9 patients with recurrences of sustained VT were successfully treated with 900 mg/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Asymptomatic ventricular ectopy. To treat or not to treat?

Ventricular ectopy that is bothersome to the patient warrants treatment, but the asymptomatic cases present the physician with a dilemma of whether or not treatment is justified. In patients free of organic heart disease, antiarrhythmic therapy does not appear to be necessary. Post myocardial infarction (MI) patients should be considered for beta-blocker therapy regardless of the presence of ventricular ectopy. In the post-MI patient with risk factors for sudden death, treatment of complex dysrhythmia may be warranted, despite the lack of documented benefit.