Insights into intrarenal sites and mechanisms of action of diuretic agents

Combined eutexia and amorphization for simultaneous enhancement of dissolution rate of triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide: preparation of orodispersible tablets

BACKGROUND

Triamterene is an oral antihypertensive drug with dissolution-limited poor bioavailability. It can be used as monotherapy or in fixed dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide which also suffers from poor dissolution. Moreover, co-processing of drugs in fixed dose combination can alter their properties. Accordingly, pre-formulation studies should investigate the effect of co-processing and optimize the dissolution of drugs before and after fixed dose combination. This is expected to avoid deleterious interaction (if any) and to hasten the biopharmaceutical properties.

OBJECTIVE

Accordingly, the aim of this work was to optimize the dissolution rate of triamterene alone and after fixed dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide.

METHODOLOGY

Triamterene was subjected to dry co-grinding with xylitol, HPMC-E5 or their combination. The effect of co-grinding with hydrochlorothiazide was also tested in absence and presence of xylitol and HPMC-E5. The products were assessed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), in addition to dissolution studies. Optimum formulations were fabricated as oral disintegrating tablets (ODT).Results: Co-processing of triamterene with xylitol formed eutectic system which hastened dissolution rate. HPMC-E5 resulted in partial amorphization and improved triamterene dissolution. Co-grinding with both materials combined their effects. Co-processing of triamterene with hydrochlorothiazide resulted in eutexia but the product was slowly dissolving due to aggregation. This problem was vanished in presence of HPMC-E5 and xylitol. Compression of the optimum formulation into ODT underwent fast disintegration and liberated acceptable amounts of both drugs.

CONCLUSION

The study introduced simple co-processing with traditional excipients for development of ODT of triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide.

Confocal Raman micro-spectral evidence and physicochemical evaluation of triamterene salts

Discrimination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) existing as neutral molecules or salts is essential and complicated. However, the discrimination of pharmaceutical salts by confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy remains relatively poorly understood. In this paper, four new salts of triamterene (Tri) cocrystallized with nicotinic acid (NA), benzoic acid (BA), p-toluenesulfonic acid (TA), or isonicotinic acid (INA) were prepared and characterized comprehensively by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), polarized light microscopy (PLM), and dynamic vapor sorption (DVS). Ionized pteridine is identified by marker peaks in the confocal Raman micro-spectra that are characteristic of C[double bond, length as m-dash]N. The single crystal structures of Tri-NA·H2O and Tri-TA further demonstrate that a proton transfers from the carboxylic group of NA or TA to the pyrimidine N1 atom of Tri and their salts formation take place. The intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) and apparent equilibrium solubility of these four salts are improved compared to the pure Tri component, especially for Tri-BA. This study provides a valuable insight into pharmaceutical salt discrimination by vibrational spectroscopy and presents that the combination of Tri with an acid can be a possible and promising alternative formulation of Tri.

Risk Stratification for Acute Kidney Injury: Are Biomarkers Enough?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious complication that is associated with several adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients. AKI significantly increases the risk of mortality, need for renal replacement therapy, and intensive care admission, and it also has serious economic ramifications. Effective risk stratification to identify patients at risk for severe AKI is essential for targeting our health care and research resources to tackle this important public health issue. The overwhelming majority of research in earlier diagnosis and risk stratification of AKI over the past 10 years has focused on novel biomarker development. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on other novel risk stratification tools than can be used in the prognostication of AKI. We discuss the utility of the furosemide stress test in predicting the severity of AKI and the renal angina index in predicting the occurrence of AKI. We also discuss NephroCheck, a prognostic test that measures tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 for the early detection of severe AKI.

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Antihypertensive drugs from the thiazide diuretic drug class have been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Loop diuretics are indicated and used to treat hypertension, but a systematic review of their blood pressure-lowering efficacy or effectiveness in terms of reducing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity from randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence has not been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose-related decrease in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, or both, as well as adverse events leading to participant withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects (serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids profile) due to loop diuretics versus placebo control in the treatment of people with primary hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2014, Issue 9), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 27 October 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials of at least three weeks duration comparing loop diuretic with a placebo in people with primary hypertension defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg at baseline.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We used weighted mean difference and a fixed effects model to combine continuous outcome data. We analysed the drop outs due to adverse effects using relative risk ratio.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials evaluated the dose-related blood pressure-lowering efficacy of five drugs within the loop diuretics class (furosemide 40 mg to 60 mg, cicletanine 100 mg to 150 mg, piretanide 3 mg to 6 mg, indacrinone enantiomer -2.5 mg to -10.0/+80 mg, and etozolin 200 mg) in 460 people with baseline blood pressure of 162/103 mmHg for a mean duration of 8.8 weeks. The best estimate of systolic/diastolic blood pressure-lowering efficacy of loop diuretics was -7.9 (-10.4 to -5.4) mmHg/ -4.4 (-5.9 to -2.8) mmHg. Withdrawals due to adverse effects and serum biochemical changes did not show a significant difference.We performed additional searches in 2012 and 2014, which found no additional trials meeting the minimum inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited number of published RCTs, the systolic/diastolic blood pressure-lowering effect of loop diuretics is -8/-4 mmHg, which is likely an overestimate. We graded the quality of evidence for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure estimates as "low" due to the high risk of bias of included studies and the high likelihood of publication bias. We found no clinically meaningful blood pressure-lowering differences between different drugs within the loop diuretic class. The dose-ranging effects of loop diuretics could not be evaluated. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with loop diuretics because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Personalizing the diuretic treatment of hypertension: the need for more clinical and research attention

Neither randomized controlled trials nor efforts to identify genetic markers have been helpful with regard to the goal of individualizing diuretic therapy in the treatment of hypertension, a goal that receives little clinical or research attention. This review will examine, and bring attention to, the considerable yet overlooked information relevant to individualizing diuretic therapy. It will bring attention to clinical, biochemical, and pharmacological clues that can be helpful in identifying who is likely to respond to a diuretic, who needs a stronger diuretic regimen, which diuretic to prescribe, and how to minimize adverse effects. New directions for clinical research aimed at individualizing use in hypertension will be explored. Research and clinical attention to the goal of individualizing diuretic treatment in hypertension need to be renewed, to help us achieve greater hypertension control with fewer adverse effects and lower costs.

Investigation of the inclusion interaction of p-sulfonatocalix[6]arene with triamterene

The inclusion complexation behavior of p-sulfonatocalix[6]arene (SCX6) with triamterene (TA) was investigated by fluorescence spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, (1)H and 2D NMR, FT-IR, SEM and DSC. The results indicate that TA is able to form an inclusion complex with SCX6. The inclusion complex has a stoichiometry of 1:1 at pH 6.50. In addition, the water solubility of TA was obviously increased in the inclusion complex with SCX6.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Antihypertensive drugs from the thiazide diuretic drug class have been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Loop diuretics are indicated and used as antihypertensive drugs but a systematic review of their blood pressure lowering efficacy or effectiveness in terms of reducing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity from randomized controlled trial evidence has not been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose related decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure as well as adverse events leading to patient withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects (serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids profile) due to loop diuretics versus placebo control in the treatment of patients with primary hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

Medline (1946-February 2012), EMBASE (1974-February 2012), CENTRAL (issue 2, 2012) and bibliographic citations were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double blind randomized placebo controlled trials of at least 3 weeks duration comparing loop diuretic with a placebo in patients with primary hypertension defined as BP >140/90 mmHg at baseline were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Weighted mean difference and a fixed effects model were used to combine continuous outcome data. The drop outs due to adverse effects was analysed using relative risk ratio.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials evaluated the dose-related blood pressure lowering efficacy of five drugs within the loop diuretics class (furosemide 40 to 60mg, cicletanine 100 to 150 mg, piretanide 3 to 6 mg, indacrinone enantiomer -2.5 to -10.0/+80 mg and etozolin 200 mg) in 460 patients with baseline blood pressure of 162/103 mmHg for a mean duration of 8.8 weeks. The best estimate of systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics was -7.9 (-10.5, -5.4) mmHg/ -4.4 (-5.6, -2.8) mmHg . Withdrawals due to adverse effects and serum biochemical changes did not show a significant difference.The 2012 updated search resulted in no additional new trials meeting the minimum inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited number of published RCTs, the systolic/diastolic blood pressure lowering effect of loop diuretics is modest (-8/-4 mmHg) and is likely an overestimate due to the high risk of bias in the included studies. There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different drugs within the loop diuretic class. The dose ranging effects of loop diuretics could not be evaluated. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with loop diuretics because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Spectrophotometric and spectrodensitometric determination of triamterene and xipamide in pure form and in pharmaceutical formulation

Sensitive and validated UV-spectrophotometric, chemometric and TLC-densitometric methods were developed for determination of triamterene (TRM) and xipamide (XIP) in their binary mixture, formulated for use as a diuretic, without previous separation. Method A is the isoabsorptive point spectrophotometry, in which TRM concentration alone can be determined at its λ(max) while XIP concentration can be determined by measuring total concentration of TRM and XIP at their isoabsorptive point followed by subtraction. Method B is the ratio subtraction spectrophotometry, where XIP can be determined by dividing the spectrum of the mixture by the spectrum of TRM (as a divisor) followed by subtracting the constant absorbance value of the plateau region, then finally multiplying the produced spectrum by the spectrum of the divisor, while TRM concentration can be determined at its λ(max). Method C is a chemometric-assisted spectrophotometry where classical least squares, principal component regression, and partial least squares were applied. Method D is a TLC-densitometry; this method depends on quantitative densitometric separation of thin layer chromatogram of TRM and XIP using silica gel plates at 254 nm. The proposed methods were successfully applied for the analysis of TRM and XIP in their pharmaceutical formulation and the results were statistically compared with the established HPLC method.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Antihypertensive drugs from the thiazide diuretic drug class have been shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Loop diuretics are indicated and used as antihypertensive drugs but a systematic review of their blood pressure lowering efficacy or effectiveness in terms of reducing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity from randomized controlled trial evidence has not been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose related decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure as well as adverse events leading to patient withdrawal and adverse biochemical effects (serum potassium, uric acid, creatinine, glucose and lipids profile) due to loop diuretics versus placebo control in the treatment of patients with primary hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline (Jan.1966-March-2009), EMBASE (Jan.1988-March-2009), CENTRAL (issue 1, 2009) and bibliographic citations were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double blind randomized placebo controlled trials of at least 3 weeks duration comparing loop diuretic with a placebo or no treatment in patients with primary hypertension defined as BP >140/90 mmHg at baseline were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Weighted mean difference and a fixed effects model were used to combine continuous outcome data. The drop outs due to adverse effects was analysed using relative risk ratio.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials evaluated the dose-related blood pressure lowering efficacy of five drugs within the loop diuretics class (furosemide 40 to 60mg, cicletanine 100 to 150 mg, piretanide 3 to 6 mg, indacrinone enantiomer -2.5 to -10.0/+80 mg and etozolin 200 mg) in 460 patients with baseline blood pressure of 162/103 mmHg for a mean duration of 8.8 weeks. The best estimate of SBP/DBP lowering efficacy of loop diuretics was -7.9 (-10.5, -5.4) mmHg/ -4.4 (-5.6, -2.8) mmHg . Withdrawals due to adverse effects and serum biochemical changes did not show a significant difference.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited number of published RCTs, the SBP/DBP lowering effect of loop diuretics is modest -8/-4 mmHg and is likely an overestimate due to the high risk of bias in the included studies. There is no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different drugs within the loop diuretic class. The dose ranging effects of loop diuretics could not be evaluated.The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Angiotensin II-dependent hypertension increases Na transport-related oxygen consumption by the thick ascending limb

Renal medullary superoxide (O(2)(-)) increases in angiotensin (Ang) II-dependent hypertension. O(2)(-) increases thick ascending limb Na transport, but the effect of Ang II-dependent hypertension on the thick ascending limb is unknown. We hypothesized that Ang II-dependent hypertension increases thick ascending limb NaCl transport because of enhanced O(2)(-) production and increased protein kinase C (PKC) alpha activity. We measured the effect of Ang II-dependent hypertension on furosemide-sensitive oxygen consumption (a measure of Na transport), O(2)(-) production, and PKCalpha translocation (a measure of PKCalpha activity) in thick ascending limb suspensions. Ang II-dependent hypertension increased furosemide-sensitive oxygen consumption (26.2+/-1.0% versus 36.6+/-1.2% of total oxygen consumption; P<0.01). O(2)(-) was also increased (1.1+/-0.2 versus 3.2+/-0.5 nmol of O(2)(-)/min per milligram of protein; P<0.03) in thick ascending limbs. Unilateral renal infusion of Tempol decreased O(2)(-) (2.4+/-0.4 versus 1.2+/-0.2 nmol of O(2)(-)/min per milligram of protein; P<0.04) and furosemide-sensitive oxygen consumption (32.8+/-1.3% versus 24.0+/-2.1% of total oxygen consumption; P<0.01) in hypertensive rats. Tempol did not affect O(2)(-) or furosemide-sensitive oxygen consumption in normotensive controls and did not alter systolic blood pressure. Ang II-dependent hypertension increased PKCalpha translocation (5.7+/-0.3 versus 13.8+/-1.4 AU per milligram of protein; P<0.01). Unilateral renal infusion of Tempol reduced PKCalpha translocation (5.0+/-0.9 versus 10.4+/-2.6 AU per milligram of protein; P<0.04) in hypertensive rats. Unilateral renal infusion of the PKCalpha inhibitor Gö6976 reduced furosemide-sensitive oxygen consumption (37.4+/-1.5% versus 25.1+/-1.0% of total oxygen consumption; P<0.01) in hypertensive rats. We conclude that Ang II-dependent hypertension enhances thick ascending limb Na transport-related oxygen consumption by increasing O(2)(-) and PKCalpha activity.

Herbal medicines as diuretics: a review of the scientific evidence

There is increasing interest in the health and wellness benefits of herbs and botanicals. This is with good reason as they might offer a natural safeguard against the development of certain conditions and be a putative treatment for some diseases. One such area may be the lowering of blood pressure in those where it is elevated (i.e., hypertension). One class of clinical medicines used to lower blood pressure are known as diuretics and work by increasing the excretion of urine from the body as well as the amount of sodium in urine. There are a growing number of studies purporting diuretic effects with traditional medicines. The aim of this article was to review these studies and identify which extracts promote diuresis (which we assessed on terms of urine excreted and urinary sodium excretion) and also to identify the research needs in this area. We identified a number of species and genuses reporting diuretic effects. Of these, the most promising, at the present time, are the species Foeniculum vulgare, Fraxinus excelsior, Hibiscus sabdariffa, Petroselinum sativum and Spergularia purpurea, and species from the genuses Cucumis (Cucumis melo and Cucumis trigonus), Equisetum (Equisetum bogotense, Equisetum fluviatile, Equisetum giganteum, Equisetum hiemale var. affine and Equisetum myriochaetum), Lepidium (Lepidium latifolium and Lepidium sativum), Phyllanthus (Phyllanthus amarus, Phyllanthus corcovadensis and Phyllanthus sellowianus) and Sambucus (Sambucus mexicana and Sambucus nigra). However, there the number of studies is limited and we recommend that further studies be conducted to confirm reported effects. Such evidence is needed to provide scientific credence to the folklore use of traditional medicines and even be helpful in the development of future medicines, treatments and treatment guidelines.

The evaluation of the diuretic action of parenteral formulations of metolazone

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study was design to compare the diuretic and natriuretic effects of the 2 parenteral formulations of metolazone and the combination of these 2 formulations of metolazone with the parenteral administration of furosemide. Metolazone is an anthracrene acid derivate and manifests a dual diuretic effect on the proximal and distal tubule with a minimal kaluretic effect. It is currently only marketed in an orally administrable formulation, and this has limited its utility in critically ill patients. Metolazone given orally and furosemide given orally or parenterally are frequently administrated together when furosemide alone is clinically inadequate at producing a desired diuresis.

METHODS

Sprague Dawley male rats (400 to 450 g) were divided into groups to receive a parenteral formulation of metolazone or furosemide administrated separately intraperitoneally (IP) or administrated IP in combination with one another. Tris buffer-administered IP was used as a control vehicle comparator. The urine volume voided over the following 24 hours was collected, measured and analyzed for sodium content.

RESULTS

Vehicle (Tris buffer) caused 9 +/- 1 mL/d output of urine with a sodium [Na+] concentration of 194 +/- 41 micromol/L (n=6 per group). Metolazone 2 mg/kg resulted in 16 +/- 3 mL/d urine output and sodium [Na+] of 278 +/- 76 micromol/L (n=6 per group). Furosemide 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg resulted in a volume of urine 9 +/- 1, 14 +/- 2 and 17 +/- 2 mL/d and [Na+] micromol/L of 194 +/- 41, 206 +/- 108, and 229 +/- 91, respectively. Metolazone 4 mg/kg combined with furosemide 4 mg/kg resulted in a urine volume of 21 +/- 1 mL/d and [Na+] of 326 +/- 108 micromol/L.

CONCLUSION

Combining metolazone and furosemide can cause an increase in urine volume and sodium excretion. Metolazone administrated parenterally in combination with the parenteral administration of furosemide appears to have an important clinical potential.

Indapamide: a diuretic of choice for the treatment of hypertension?

In recent years, the therapeutic approach to mild hypertension has evolved from a stepped care approach to one including varied, initial monotherapies, with the selection of drug based on factors present in an individual patient, followed by combination therapy. The greatest cumulative experience of the value of antihypertensive therapy has been obtained with diuretics. The reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease with successful antihypertensive therapy using conventional agents, including diuretics, is not as great as might have been anticipated by the magnitude of change in blood pressure. This could be due to antecedent cardiovascular injury prior to therapy or to risk factors induced by therapy. The recent introduction of a new generation of drugs with combined diuretic and hypotensive effects that reduce blood pressure without inducing the biochemical changes associated with thiazides, offers an opportunity to evaluate this question. Indapamide is the first of this new generation to be released. Its pharmacologic characteristics show that it has the prerequisites to be considered a first-line drug for use in hypertension. It meets the requirements of a Phase II or second generation drug in that it has similar efficacy, but less short term toxicity than first generation drugs. It has been introduced at a cost that is competitive with thiazides and potassium-sparing combination drugs and is cheaper than many other classes of antihypertensive drugs. The major caution in promoting its use is that its long term effect on morbidity and mortality in hypertensive disease has not yet been evaluated. In summary, this is a promising new drug that has the potential to replace first generation thiazides in the routine management of hypertension.

Ultrastructure of three-dimensionally localized distal nephron segments in superficial cortex of the rat kidney

The ultrastructure of superficial distal nephron segments was analyzed after precise localization of tubule cross sections using computer-assisted three-dimensional reconstructions. Five systems of tubules, each with three interconnected distal tubules, were reconstructed and the lengths of the post macula densa segment of the distal straight tubule (DST), the distal convoluted tubule (DCT), the connecting tubule (CNT), and the initial collecting tubule (ICT) were determined. Each cortical collecting duct (CCD) was in continuity with only one tubule in contact with the renal capsule. In three of the five reconstructions, the two nonsubcapsular tubules fused and had a common connection to the subcapsular tubule. The length, between the macula densa (MD) and the confluence, of subcapsular tubules (2.68 +/- 0.15 mm) significantly exceeded the length of tubules not in contact with the renal capsule (2.05 +/- 0.10 mm). This difference was mainly due to a longer ICT in subcapsular tubules. Subcapsular tubules always contacted the renal capsule in the early DCT and often again in the ICT. Cells in the early DCT showed more microvilli on the luminal surface and more infoldings of basolateral membranes than cells in the late DCT. The ultrastructure of intercalated cells (I cells) varied within a range of different manifestations and the ultrastructural variation of I cells was similar in all the analyzed tubule segments. Connecting tubule cells and principal cells were similar in ultrastructure in all tubule segments and cortical levels analyzed.

A review of 10 years of experience with indapamide as an antihypertensive agent

Indapamide is an effective antihypertensive agent for which a dual mechanism of action has been put forward: a limited diuretic activity combined with antivasoconstrictive effects, resulting in decreased peripheral vascular resistance. Results from clinical trials show that 2.5 mg indapamide once daily effectively reduces arterial blood pressure in about two-thirds of patients with mild to moderate hypertension and that this reduction is related to the severity of the hypertension. As a rule, indapamide's blood pressure-reducing effect is rapid in onset (within 1 or 2 weeks) and by 1 month reaches 65% of its maximum, which occurs after 3 to 4 months of treatment. No tachyphylaxis has been observed during long-term treatment, nor has withdrawal syndrome at discontinuation of therapy. Indapamide has been successfully combined with beta blockers, methyldopa, and other antihypertensive agents, adding considerable effectiveness without noticeable increase in adverse reactions. In general, the drug is well tolerated and side effects are mild and rare. Possibly in relation to its limited diuretic activity at 2.5 mg daily, long-term treatment seldom elicits significant changes in electrolyte balance. In addition, indapamide does not induce deleterious effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Indapamide is an effective, well-tolerated, first-line antihypertensive agent. The fact that long-term administration does not induce biochemical abnormalities that constitute cardiovascular risk factors indicates another advantage of the drug.

Indapamide: a unique diuretic?

Indapamide (Lozol) is a new diuretic and antihypertensive agent. The drug appears to have a unique mechanism of action, combining diuretic effects with a direct vascular action, presumably secondary to calcium channel blockade. Available studies indicate that indapamide is comparable to hydrochlorothiazide, chlorothiazide, furosemide, and other diuretic agents in the management of hypertension and edema. The drug produces toxicity similar to that of the thiazide and loop diuretics; however, it does not appear to increase cholesterol levels. Although it is claimed that indapamide produces no effect on glucose levels, hyperglycemia has been reported. Indapamide is safe and effective for treatment of hypertension in mild to severe renal impairment, but advantages over furosemide are questionable. Indapamide is a unique diuretic, but does not appear to offer advantages over other available agents.