Bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction

Prognostic significance of bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction: the importance of location and time of appearance

BACKGROUND

The presence of bundle-branch block (BBB) is associated with high mortality rates and is considered an important predictor of poor outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of BBB in patients with AMI depending on its form of presentation.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective 1-year follow-up study involving 1,239 consecutive patients diagnosed with AMI was performed.

RESULTS

Bundle-branch block was present in 177 cases (14.2%), associated with worse clinical characteristics, lower rate of thrombolytic therapy, and higher mortality: in-hospital (23.8 vs. 9.7%, p < .01) and 1-year (40.9 vs. 16.9%, p < 0.01). Compared with right BBB (n = 135), left BBB (n = 42) was more often associated with female gender and higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, but had a similar 1-year mortality. In the absence of heart failure or complete atrioventricular (AV) block, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality of patients with BBB (n = 76) and without BBB (n = 786) (2.6 vs. 3.9%). Compared with existing BBB (n = 113), BBB of new appearance (n = 64) was more often accompanied by complete AV block and heart failure and higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Only BBB of new appearance was an independent predictor of mortality: in-hospital (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.7) and 1-year mortality (OR 3.2, 95% CI, 1.7-9.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AMI, the classification of BBB according not only to location but also to time of appearance is of practical interest. New BBB is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality.

Influence of conduction disturbances on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis (results from the ARGAMI-2 study)

Right bundle branch block and complete atrioventricular (AV) block are conduction disorders (CDs) that have been observed in 14% of patients admitted with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. CDs carry a poor prognosis, with a threefold increase in the mortality rate, mainly due to cardiogenic shock and recurrent fatal myocardial infarction at 1-year follow-up. According to multivariable analysis, CD was the second strongest predictor of death, after high Killip class. Compared with patients without CD, the 1-year outcome of patients with CD was identically worse, irrespective of whether CD appeared during admission, disappeared, or remained constant. Similar adverse outcomes were seen in patients with complete AV block and right bundle branch block.

New-onset conduction defects and their relationship with in-hospital major cardiac events in unstable angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective cohort study was to describe the incidence and the risk factors for the development of intraventricular conduction defects and the relationship of these defects with in-hospital major cardiac events (MACE) in unstable angina pectoris.

METHODS

Two-hundred-and-seventy consecutive patients presenting with Braunwald class IIIB angina without a conduction defect at admission were included in the study and followed up during the in-hospital period.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients who developed non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the first day were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 219 patients, 40 (18%) had a new permanent conduction defect (group 1) and 179 (82%) did not have a conduction defect (group 2) during the in-hospital period. The patients in group 1 were significantly older (mean age of 63.5 +/- 11 years compared with 59 +/- 10 years, P = 0.01) and a history of previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was more frequent in this group (12.5% compared with 1.6%, P = 0.004). By logistic regression analysis, age (P = 0.01, odds ratio (OR) = 1.473, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.108-2.612) and previous CABG (P = 0.005, OR = 3.995, 95% CI = 1.811-7.383) were also found to be risk factors for the development of a conduction defect. In-hospital total MACE, death and heart failure were more frequently observed in group 1 (P = 0.005, P = 0.02, P = 0.001, respectively). The incidences of recurrent refractory angina, acute myocardial infarction and urgent revascularization were not different between the groups. ST-segment depression at admission (P = 0.009, OR = 1.654, 95% CI = 1.228-2.675) and a new-onset conduction defect (P = 0.02, OR = 1.625, 95% CI = 1.244-2.754) were found to be predictors of the development of in-hospital MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In unstable angina pectoris, patients with a new-onset conduction defect are relatively older and have more frequently undergone previous CABG. Because in-hospital MACE, death and heart failure are more common in patients with a new conduction defect, they should be considered as high risk and treated more aggressively.

[Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction]

OBJECTIVE

Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19).

CONCLUSION

The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality.

Bundle branch block as a predictor of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction

Using a community-based population of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we sought to: (1) determine the prevalence of bundle branch block (BBB) on the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG), (2) compare the clinical characteristics and the treatment administered to patients with and without BBB, and (3) determine the association of BBB with mortality. We analyzed the admission ECGs of 894 consecutive patients with AMI from Olmsted County, Minnesota, seen at our institution from January 1988 to March 1998. Of these, 53 had left BBB (LBBB) (5.9%) and 60 had right BBB (RBBB) (6.7%). Patients with BBB were more likely to be older, have a history of AMI or hypertension, and to be in Killip class >I at presentation. They were less likely to receive primary reperfusion therapy, beta blockers, or heparin, but more likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. They had lower mean predischarge ejection fractions (38 +/- 16% vs 50 +/- 15%, p <0.0001). In-hospital mortality was 13.3%, 17.0%, and 9.1% for patients with RBBB, LBBB, and no BBB, respectively (p = 0.11). Respective postdischarge survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 80%, 60%, and 50% in the RBBB group, 78%, 56%, and 51% in the LBBB group, and 92%, 85%, and 76% in the group without BBB (p <0.0001). Although BBB was not an independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis, the presence of transient or persistent BBB with AMI is an easily recognized clinical marker of increased mortality. Our conclusion from this study is that in a community-based population, patients who had LBBB or RBBB at the time of AMI had lower predischarge ejection fractions and higher in-hospital and long-term unadjusted mortality.

The prognostic significance of intermediate QRS prolongation in acute myocardial infarction

Complete right and left bundle branch block and advanced atrioventricular block present on admission electrocardiograms of patients with acute myocardial infarction, are associated with poor short and long-term outcome. Little is known about the impact of intermediate QRS prolongation (0.09-0.11 s) on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. In this study, among 1100 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis, the QRS duration on admission electrocardiogram was <0.09 s in 536 (48%) patients, between 0.09 and 0.11 s in 496 (45%) patients and >0.11 s in 78 (7%) patients. QRS duration was strongly associated with 7-day (0.6%, 6%,18%, P<0.001), 30-day (1%, 8%, 22%, P<0.001) and 1-year (3%, 11%, 26%, P<0.001) all-cause mortality. After adjustment for significant variables associated with 1-year mortality, including age, female gender, diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, anterior myocardial infarction and Killip class> or =2 on admission, both levels of QRS prolongation remained significant independent predictors of short and long-term all-cause mortality.

Predictors of in-hospital bundle branch block reversion after presenting with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block have a higher mortality rate and more in-hospital complications than patients with normal intraventricular conduction. Patients whose conduction defects revert have an improved prognosis (with outcomes similar to patients who never develop bundle branch block); thus, we analyzed potential predictors of bundle branch block reversion.

Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block in the thrombolytic era.

BACKGROUND

Studies of patients with acute MI and bundle branch block have reported high mortality rates and poor overall prognosis.

METHODS

The North American population with acute MI and bundle branch block enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial was matched by age and Killip class with an equal number of GUSTO-I patients without conduction defects.

RESULTS

Of all 26,003 North American patients in GUSTO-I, 420 (1.6%) had left (n = 131) or right (n = 289) bundle branch block. These patients had higher 30-day mortality rates than matched control subjects (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] 1.8) and were more likely to experience cardiogenic shock (19% vs. 11%, p = 0.008, OR 1.78) or atrioventricular block/asystole (30% vs. 19%, p < 0.012, OR 1.57) and to require ventricular pacing (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.006, OR 1.73). Bundle branch block also carried an independent 53% higher risk for 30-day mortality. Thirty-day mortality rates for patients with complete, partial and no reversion of the bundle branch block were 8%, 12% and 20%, respectively (two-tailed chi-square test for trend 5.61, p = 0.02, OR 0.34 for complete reversion, OR 0.55 for partial reversion).

CONCLUSIONS

Bundle branch block at hospital admission in patients with acute MI predicts in-hospital complications and poor short-term survival.

Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy

BACKGROUND

Whether thrombolytic therapy alters the incidence and clinical outcome of bundle-branch block is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the occurrence of new-onset bundle-branch block, both transient and persistent, in 681 patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction 9 and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Arteries 1 protocols. Each patient underwent continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring for 36 to 72 hours with the Mortara ST monitoring system. Bundle-branch block was characterized as right, left, alternating, transient, or persistent. The overall incidence of bundle-branch block was 23.6% (n = 161), with transient block in 18.4% (n = 125) and persistent block in 5.3% (n = 36). Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n = 89) of the population; left bundle-branch block was found in 7% (n = 48). Alternating bundle-branch block was seen in 3.5% (n = 24) of patients. Left anterior descending artery infarcts accounted for most bundles (54%, n = 79). Patients with bundle-branch block had lower ejection fractions, higher peak creatine phosphokinase levels (P < .0001), and more diseased vessels (P < .019). Mortality rates in patients with and without bundle-branch block were 8.7% and 3.5%, respectively (P < .007). A higher mortality rate was observed in the presence of persistent (19.4%) versus transient (5.6%) or no (3.5%) bundle-branch block (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolytic therapy reduces the overall mortality rate associated with persistent bundle-branch block. However, persistent bundle-branch block remains predictive of a higher mortality rate than either transient or no bundle-branch block. Continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring provides an accurate characterization of the incidence and type of conduction disturbances after acute myocardial infarction.

Right bundle branch block of unknown age in the setting of acute anterior myocardial infarction: an attempt to define who should be paced prophylactically

It is widely accepted that patients presenting with acute anterior myocardial infarction and acute onset of right bundle branch block should be prophylactically paced in contrast with those who have a chronic bundle branch block. The admitting physician is faced with the dilemma of how to act if the age of this conduction disturbance is unknown. This problem has further intensified in recent years, with the introduction of thrombolytic treatment, where insertion of a central vascular line is associated with increased morbidity. The objectives of this study were to define clinical or electrocardiographic parameters that may help the admitting physician to decide whether patients presenting with an anterior wall myocardial infarction and a right bundle branch block of unknown age should be prophylactically paced. We examined prospectively the in-hospital clinical course of 39 consecutive patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction in whom the age of a right bundle branch block upon admission was unknown (group C, n = 39) and compared with two similar groups of patients who presented with an acute right bundle branch block (group A, n = 38) and with a known chronic right bundle branch block (group B, n = 22). Thirty-three patients (33%) died, with cardiogenic shock being the leading cause of death in the entire population. Prophylactic pacing, which was carried out in 66% and 54% of patients in groups A and C, respectively, did not reduce mortality rates. No clinical or electrocardiographic variables on admission were predictive to support prophylactic pacing in group C. In 10 of 46 (22%) patients who were prophylactically paced with a transvenous electrode, the following complications attributed to the procedure were detected: (1) either rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia (during implantation) that was unresponsive to overdrive pacing, or ventricular fibrillation necessitating electrical defibrillation (4 patients); (2) recurrent episodes of rapid nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, which stopped only after the pacemaker was turned off (1 patient); (3) complete AV block (1 patient); (4) fever appearing on the third or fourth day after implantation (3 patients); and (4) a large hematoma in the groin in 1 patient who was treated with thrombolysis shortly before pacemaker electrode insertion. Thus, the complications of transvenous temporary pacing in the era of thrombolysis may outweight any theoretical advantage.

A simplified method to predict occurrence of complete heart block during acute myocardial infarction

Data were analyzed from 698 patients with proved acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to develop a method to predict the occurrence of complete heart block (CHB). The presence of electrocardiographic abnormalities of atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction during hospitalization was determined for each patient. The electrocardiographic risk factors considered were: first-degree atrioventricular block, Mobitz type I atrioventricular block, Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, left anterior hemiblock, left posterior hemiblock, right bundle branch block and left bundle branch block. A CHB risk score was developed that consisted of the sum of each patient's individual risk factors. CHB risk scores of 0, 1, 2 or 3 or more were associated with incidences of CHB of 1.2, 7.8, 25.0 and 36.4%, respectively. When applied to an independent AMI data base, as well as to the summed results of 6 previously reported series that identified predictors of CHB during AMI, a similar incremental risk of CHB as predicted by the risk score method was demonstrated.

Cardiac pacing in intensive care

Cardiac pacing techniques and equipment have developed dramatically in recent years. Bradycardias and tachycardias may be effectively treated by pacing. Bradyarrhythmias: It is generally accepted that pacing is indicated for a sustained symptomatic bradycardia. Prophylactic pacing for 'high-risk' bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction is more controversial. A new era in cardiology has been introduced with the advent of 'physiological pacing', i.e. pacing of the heart with the maintenance of atrioventricular synchrony and varying the heart rate according to the body's metabolic leads. Modern pacing systems, which allow the atria and ventricles to contract in sequence, improve cardiac haemodynamics, result in subjective improvement and increase exercise tolerance. There are, however, pacemaker-associated and pacemaker-mediated tachyarrhythmias. Further advances in technology should overcome these problems. Tachyarrhythmias: Intracardiac electrocardiograms are often useful in the diagnosis of tachyarrhythmias, especially wide complex tachycardias. Rapid pacing of the atria in certain supraventricular tachycardias or of the ventricle in ventricular tachycardia is an alternative to cardioversion in many instances. This form of treatment is usually utilised in conjunction with drug therapy.

Effects of reperfusion on complete heart block complicating anterior myocardial infarction

Two patients with complete heart block complicating extensive anterior myocardial infarction underwent late (greater than 40 hours) coronary reperfusion with angioplasty. One to one atrioventricular conduction was restored within minutes of reperfusion despite a lack of measurable ventricular muscle salvage as demonstrated by ventriculography 1 week later. The evidence favors reversible ischemia rather than extensive necrosis of the proximal conduction system as the mechanism of heart block in this subgroup of patients.

Pacemaker dependence in patients with bifascicular block during acute anterior myocardial infarction

Eleven patients with bifascicular block complicating anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction were studied to determine the effect of prophylactic permanent pacing; eight of them also had transient high grade atrioventricular block during the acute phase of the infarction. One month after the infarction an electrophysiological study was performed and a bradycardia indicating pacemaker implanted. All the patients were followed for two years. Six had bradycardia detected, two of whom did not have high grade atrioventricular block during the index infarction. Seven patients died, four of them suddenly. There was no correlation between the electrophysiological findings and subsequent development of bradycardia. Thus pacemaker dependence seems to be common in patients with bifascicular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Mortality is, however, also high in patients treated with pacemakers. Prospective studies to determine the predictive factors in those patients with an anterior acute myocardial infarction and who benefit from a combination of permanent pacemaker treatment and antiarrhythmic treatment are needed.