Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol)

Coronary angiography-related myocardial injury as detected by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay

AIMS

We sought to evaluate rates and mechanisms of myocardial injury and type 4a myocardial infarction (MI) after an elective diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) as detected by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) assay.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac troponin concentrations were measured in consecutive patients before and after undergoing an elective CAG -with or without coronary intervention (PCI)- using an hsTnT assay. The study population consisted of 545 patients: 320 (58.7%) patients received only an elective CAG and another 225 patients (41.3%) received an additional PCI. Significant hsTnT increases occurred in 97 (30.3%) cases within the CAG group and in 152 (67.6%) cases within the PCI group. Rates of normal baseline hsTnT values (<99th percentile upper reference limit) were 75.9% in the CAG group and 71.6% in the PCI group. In cases with normal baseline hsTnT values, peak levels meeting criteria of MI type 4a according to the second or third version of the universal MI definition were observed in five (1.6%) and one (0.3%) cases within the CAG group, as well as in 32 (14.2%) and 22 (9.8%) cases within the PCI group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the hsTnT assay may allow identification of myocardial injury during an uneventful diagnostic coronary angiography in the absence of any coronary or non-coronary interventions.

Effect of transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation on cardiac troponin I release

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation increases cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels which indicates myocardial injury. During implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, balloon inflation for coronary sinus (CS) venogram, cannulation of CS side branch, and electrode advancement may interfere with CS drainage and, hence, may decrease the washout of toxic metabolites from the heart. Thus, CRT implantation may further increase cTnI levels. In this study, we investigated the effects of CRT implantation on cTnI release.

METHODS

We included 10 patients (mean age = 57 +/- 15 years) in whom a successful transvenous CRT system was implanted (CRT group). Twenty patients (mean age = 65 +/- 10 years) who underwent a transvenous pacemaker or ICD implantation were included as the control group. Blood samples for cTnI were drawn at baseline and at six, 12, 18, and 24 hours thereafter.

RESULTS

Baseline median cTnI levels were similar in CRT and control groups (0.03 ng/mL vs 0.02 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). Postoperative cTnI levels during 24 hours were significantly higher in the CRT group (P < 0.05) by two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance. Post hoc analysis revealed that cTnI levels were higher at the 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th hours compared to baseline levels (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). There was a significant difference in the area under the curves (AUCs) of cTnI measurements (1.79 hr.ng/mL in the CRT group and 0.78 hr.ng/mL in the control group, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative cTnI levels were higher after CRT implantation than simple pacemaker/ICD implantation. This may be due to CS manipulation during CRT implantation.

Safety and Hemodynamic Effects of Pulmonary Angiography in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: 10-Year Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the incidence of complications and change in pulmonary artery pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension who were undergoing pulmonary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent pulmonary angiography over a 10-year period at a single institution. Patients with moderate pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure, 30-59 mm Hg) and severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure, >/= 60 mm Hg) served as the study population. Demographic data, clinical indication, pre- and postcontrast pulmonary artery pressure measurements, type of pulmonary hypertension, contrast agent volume, complications, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were recorded for all patients and compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred two of 612 patients who underwent pulmonary angiography had pulmonary hypertension. Moderate pulmonary hypertension was present in 155 patients (77%) and severe pulmonary hypertension, in 47 patients (23%). Three (2.0%) of four complications were fatal. The complication rate was higher in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension compared with patients with moderate pulmonary hypertension but not statistically significant (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.63). Patients with complications had a higher mean ASA score than those without complications (4.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.03). Patients with lung transplants had the greatest increase in pulmonary artery pressure after pulmonary angiography compared with all other clinical indications (16.75 +/- 12.97 mm Hg vs 5.46 +/- 6.86 mm Hg, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The complication rate of pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension is low. However, in severely ill patients with acute pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary angiography should be undertaken with extreme caution.

Comparison of Iotrolan 320 and Iohexol 350 in cardiac angiography: a randomised double-blind clinical study

OBJECTIVE

A double-blind randomised study was conducted in two British centres, to evaluate the safety, tolerance and efficacy of the new dimeric non-ionic contrast medium Iotrolan 320 in comparison with the monomeric non-ionic compound Iohexol 350 in coronary angiography.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

120 patients were randomised to receive either Iotrolan at a concentration of 320 mgI/ml or Iohexol at a concentration of 350 mgI/ml, during selective coronary angiography and left ventriculography. The variables measured were: maximum increase of the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure up to 6 min after ventriculography, haemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables, arrhythmogenicity, clinical laboratory parameters, tolerance, adverse events and efficacy.

RESULTS

Iotrolan resulted in a smaller change of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure compared to Iohexol, but the difference was not statistically significant. Transient changes in left ventricular systolic pressure, intra-arterial systolic pressure, intra-arterial diastolic pressure, and in electrocardiographic parameters, occurred after the injections, but they were not clinically significant. Changes in the clinical laboratory markers from baseline values were comparable between the two groups and confirmed good renal and hepatic tolerance. During the left ventriculogram, Iotrolan resulted in less symptoms compared to Iohexol (P = 0.002). Adverse events, which were mild or moderate in most cases, were observed with no statistical difference between the two agents. The contrast quality of both agents was good with no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

This study did not show a significant difference between Iotrolan 320 and Iohexol 350 with regard to cardiovascular safety or patient tolerance, except for a minor difference in the intensity of heat/warmth sensation.

Energetically optimal left ventricular pressure for the failing human heart

BACKGROUND

An energy-starved failing heart would benefit from more effective transfer of the mechanical energy of ventricular contraction to blood propulsion. However, the energetically optimal loading conditions for the failing heart are difficult to establish. In the present study, we analyzed the optimal left ventricular pressure to achieve maximal mechanical efficiency of the failing heart in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined the relation between left ventricular pressure-volume area and myocardial oxygen consumption per beat (VO2), stoke work, and mechanical efficiency (stroke work/VO2) in 13 patients with different contractile states. We also calculated the optimal end-systolic pressure that would theoretically maximize mechanical efficiency for a given end-diastolic volume and contractility. Left ventricular pressure-volume loops were constructed by plotting the instantaneous left ventricular pressure against the left ventricular volume at baseline and during pressure loading. The contractile properties of the ventricle were defined by the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation. In patients with less compromised ventricular function, the operating end-systolic pressure was close to the optimal pressure, achieving nearly maximal mechanical efficiency. As the heart deteriorated, however, the optimal end-systolic pressure became significantly lower than normal, whereas the actual pressure remained within the normal range. This discrepancy resulted in worsening of ventriculoarterial coupling and decreased mechanical efficiency compared with theoretically maximal efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Homeostatic mechanisms to maintain arterial blood pressure within the normal range cause the failing heart to deviate from energetically optimal conditions.

Contractile, metabolic and arrhythmogenic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the isolated rat heart

Intracoronary administration of contrast agents may be associated with contractile dysfunction and arrhythmias. To further establish the mechanisms of these alterations, we studied high-energy phosphate metabolism, developed pressure, the occurrence of arrhythmias, and the effects of verapamil during infusion of ionic and nonionic agents in isovolumic, retrogradely perfused rat hearts using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMR). Diatrizoate meglumine (Renografin) infusion reduced developed pressure (DP) to 17.1 +/- 3.4% (p less than 0.001) of the control level, and immediately following termination of the infusion, sudden ventricular tachycardia (VT) was observed in four of six hearts. In the presence of verapamil, meglumine reduced DP to 13 +/- 1.9% of control values and none of these six hearts developed VT. Iopamidol infusion in the presence of verapamil (n = 6) and alone (n = 6) resulted in a decrease in DP to 87% of control value, and no arrhythmias, significant change in high-energy phosphate levels, or changes in pH were observed. These results suggest that contrast-induced contractile depression is not mediated by changes in high-energy phosphate metabolism or pH. Arrhythmias associated with meglumine administration alone and suppressed by verapamil are probably related to calcium loading.

Comparative trial of Omnipaque 350 (iohexol) and Telebrix 350 (sodium-meglumine-ioxithalamate) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography

In a double-blind randomized trial, the hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of the low-osmolar nonionic contrast medium iohexol (Omnipaque) and the standard high-osmolar ionic monomer sodium-meglumine-ioxithalamate (Telebrix) at left ventricular angiography and selective coronary arteriography were evaluated. Sixty patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients; one group received Omnipaque in a dosage of 350 mgI/ml and the other group received Telebrix in a dosage of 350 mgI/ml. The Omnipaque showed significantly less effects on heart rate and myocardial contractility, and induced less electrophysiological changes than did Telebrix. However, there was a significant increase of 10% in the diameter of the left coronary artery following selective coronary injection with Telebrix, while Omnipaque induced practically no change in vessel diameter. All hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects proved to be short-lasting. We conclude that ionic and nonionic agents are similarly efficacious in providing adequate images with minimal risk to the patient. However, the nonionic agents exert slightly more alterations in cardiac hemodynamics and in electrocardiographic intervals. The vasodilatory effect on coronary artery diameter by Telebrix may entail a more rapid clearance of contrast medium from the coronary circulation, which might be of some advantage over nonionic contrast media.

Energy conversion efficiency in human left ventricle

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular mechanical efficiency is one of the most important measures of left ventricular pump performance. Several clinical studies, however, have shown that mechanical efficiency does not fall substantially as the heart fails. To clarify the insensitivity of mechanical efficiency to the change in pump performance, we analyzed human left ventricular mechanical efficiency, applying the concept of left ventricular systolic pressure-volume area (PVA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

PVA correlates linearly with myocardial oxygen consumption per beat (MVO2): MVO2 = a.PVA+b, and represents the total mechanical energy of contraction. We determined MVO2-PVA relation and external work in 11 patients with different contractile states. We also calculated the energy transfer from MVO2 to PVA (PVA/MVO2 efficiency), that from PVA to external work (work efficiency), and mechanical efficiency (external work/MVO2). Left ventricular pressure-volume loops were constructed by plotting the instantaneous left ventricular pressure against the left ventricular volume at baseline and during pressure loading. The contractile properties of the ventricle were defined by the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (Ees). Pressure elevation raised external work by 41.4%, PVA by 71.2%, and MVO2 by 54.5%. These changes were associated with a decrease in work efficiency and an increase in PVA/MVO2 efficiency. The opposite directional changes in these two efficiencies rendered the mechanical efficiency constant. The slope, a, of the relation between MVO2 and PVA was relatively constant (2.46 +/- 0.33) over the range of 0.8-8.8 mm Hg/ml of Ees, but the oxygen axis intercept, b, tended to decrease with the reduction in Ees. PVA/MVO2 efficiency correlated inversely (r = -0.66, p less than 0.05) with Ees, whereas work efficiency correlated linearly with Ees (r = 0.91, p less than 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical efficiency is not appreciably affected by changes in loading and inotropic conditions as long as the left ventricular contractility is not severely depressed.

Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: conceptions and misconceptions

Ionic and nonionic contrast materials are similarly efficacious in providing excellent images with minimal risk to the patient. In comparison with ionic media, the nonionic agents produce minor alterations in intracardiac and peripheral pressures as well as in electrocardiographic intervals and morphology. In addition, nonionic media are less often associated with undesirable symptoms, such as flushing and vomiting. At the same time, ionic and nonionic media are accompanied by a similar incidence of nephrotoxicity, serious arrhythmias, and death. Finally, nonionic contrast material is substantially more expensive than ionic media. In light of this marked difference in cost, one could argue that nonionic media should be reserved for "high-risk" patients, that is, those with a history of a serious adverse reaction to ionic contrast media and those in whom contrast-induced hypotension would be particularly deleterious.

Ionic versus nonionic contrast use

It has taken many years of research, development and intense scientific investigation to produce intravascular contrast media. Research on relations between chemical structure, animal toxicity, and water-solubility has produced a number of highly water-soluble, iodinated compounds for use in diagnostic radiology as intravascular contrast agents. The currently used intravascular agents may be classified into four groups according to their chemical structure: 1. Ionic monomers 2. Ionic monoacid dimers 3. Nonionic monomers 4. Nonionic dimers It is the objective of this publication to review the history and development of intravascular contrast media as well as their properties, general effects and clinical use. The four types of contrast media differ significantly in their chemical structure and physico-chemical properties, and these differences determine their osmotoxicity, chemotoxicity, and ion toxicity. We analyze the organ specific toxic effects of intravascular contrast media upon the central nervous system, the cardiovascular system, and the renal system. We also review the secondary effects, clinical manifestations, and the incidence of adverse events associated with different types of contrast. The choice of contrast media has become critical since the introduction of nonionic agents because their toxicological and pharmacological properties differ from those of the ionic agents. The application of basic concepts involved in the use of contrast media in excretory urography, computed tomography, angiography, and angiocardiography is discussed, and the advantages of the use of nonionic contrast agents are outlined. Economic and ethical issues are presented with emphasis upon strategies to reduce the risk associated with the injection of intravascular contrast and to curtail consumption according to rational principles of use.

Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agents

The ideal intravascular contrast agent would be biologically inert and have no pharmacologic actions. Pharmacologic actions of currently used radiographic contrast agents are determined principally by 3 physicochemical properties of the iodine-bearing molecule and its formulation: osmolality, sodium concentration and calcium-binding properties. Within this framework, the calcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents have the most marked effects, and the 3.0 ratio nonionic agents the least, with the noncalcium-binding formulations of 1.5 ratio agents and ioxaglate (the only 3.0 ratio ionic agent) in between. Differences in hemodynamic effects are predominantly related to osmolality with the 3.0 agents causing less hemodynamic disturbance. The magnitude of difference is small enough that the 3.0 ratio agents have no important clinical advantage when used in patients with good or moderately impaired left ventricular function. However, the difference may be important in patients with severely impaired circulatory performance. The principal electrophysiologic differences are between the calcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents (which are associated with a clear-cut greater frequency of ventricular fibrillation during coronary injection than the noncalcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents) and the 3.0 ratio agents. There is no justification for the use of calcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents, since noncalcium-binding formulations of the same molecule are available at the same price. The circulatory reserve of most patients makes the differences between 3.0 ratio agents and noncalcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents clinically unimportant. In view of the substantial price disparity between 1.5 ratio and 3.0 ratio agents, noncalcium-binding 1.5 ratio agents are appropriate for patients with good circulatory performance and 3.0 ratio agents are best reserved for patients with impaired circulatory performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Selection of a contrast agent in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

The evolution of contrast material for intravascular use has been directed toward the development of better-tolerated agents. Currently, a variety of such "dyes" are available for coronary angiography and left ventriculography. Considerable animal and human investigation suggests that significant differences exist between the families of contrast agents that relate to patient tolerance. The newer low osmolality agents (especially the nonionic agents) produce less perturbation of the homeostatic state, which is clinically manifested by a lessened incidence of side effects, including those of a hemodynamic and electrophysiologic nature. While controversy continues over the cost/benefit ratio of the low osmolality contrast agents compared to traditional high osmolality agents, the former are rapidly becoming the community standard for diagnostic and especially therapeutic cardiologic procedures. Accepting the advantages of the low osmolality contrast agents, differences between the ionic dimers and the nonionic agents have been examined. Both experimental and clinical data suggest superiority of the nonionic agents. Although controversy still surrounds the issue of thromboembolism with the nonionic agents, accumulating evidence fails to support a clinically significant relation. The choice of contrast material is the responsibility of the invasive cardiologist. While the benefits of low osmolality agents are most obvious in high-risk patients, experience with large-scale intravenous studies suggests that the choice of contrast agent is a better discriminator of adverse reaction than is preprocedural risk stratification.

Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiography

To evaluate the effectiveness and cost of low osmolarity, nonionic contrast agents for cardiac angiography, 443 patients were randomized to receive either iopamidol or diatrizoate. All adverse events that occurred within 24 h of the procedure were recorded prospectively by study personnel and classified according to previously determined criteria. Major events were defined as life threatening or requiring a procedure to treat, or both. Costs of the catheterization procedure, pharmacy, hospital laboratory and treatment of adverse events were determined on the basis of actual resource use. A total of 20 patients (8.5%) had major and 143 (61%) had minor adverse events with diatrizoate use; 10 patients (4.8%) had major and 53 (25%) had minor adverse events with iopamidol (p = 0.12 for major events; p less than 0.001 for total events). Most adverse events were treated fairly easily and inexpensively. The median overall cost was $186 higher for patients after iopamidol use compared with diatrizoate (p less than 0.0001), but all costs except the cost of the contrast agent were not significantly different between the two groups. Thus, patients who received iopamidol for cardiac angiography had a significantly lower rate of adverse events than those who received diatrizoate, but this difference was achieved at a considerably high overall cost.

Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective

Intravascular radiographic contrast media play a major role in diagnostic imaging. Recently, low-osmolality contrast media (LOCM) have become available in the United States. Because of their lower osmolality, these new agents cause fewer undesirable physiologic effects and fewer adverse reactions than do conventional agents after intravascular administration. Unfortunately, the cost of LOCM is substantially higher than the cost of conventional contrast media. Appropriate use of these newer, more expensive contrast agents must be based on a thorough knowledge and understanding of their chemistry, physiologic features, and relative safety. Some questions remain about these new agents. Further studies are needed to determine the nephrotoxicity of LOCM relative to that of conventional agents. In addition, LOCM have less anticoagulant capacity than do the conventional media; therefore, clotting may occur when the LOCM and blood mix in syringes and small catheters. This potential decrease in anticoagulation and its clinical implications should be further investigated. Finally, the mortality rate associated with use of LOCM needs to be determined in future studies in large numbers of patients.

Newer emergency reperfusion techniques in acute myocardial infarction

We have given an overview of the management of the acute myocardial infarction patient utilizing the aggressive reperfusion techniques available today. Anatomic reperfusion rates have been over 95% with the combined methods described. The remaining problems technically are those of earlier reperfusion, methods to enhance myocardial recovery after ischemia, and prevention of restenosis or reocclusion. The use of laser methodology, coronary sinus retroperfusion, partial left heart bypass, and other innovative strategies may improve these results. The introduction of tissue plasminogen activator will affect our approach and will profoundly alter society's expectations of therapeutic success. Still, patients will die from acute myocardial infarction and its complications. The search for a prevention must, therefore, not be overshadowed by our current enthusiasm for reperfusion techniques. Hopefully, our current approach will become a historical footnote as breakthroughs in preventive strategies occur.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans: I. Safety--a comparison with routine coronary arteriography

Myocardial contrast echocardiography is a new diagnostic cardiovascular imaging technique capable of defining perfusion zones of coronary vessels in vivo; ultimately, it may be used to measure absolute regional myocardial blood flow. However, before it can be used in humans, its safety must be clearly established. Accordingly, the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic effects of intracoronary injections of 2 cc of sonicated Renografin-76 were compared with 5 to 10 cc of non-sonicated Renografin-76 in 10 subjects with normal coronary arteries. Two cubic centimeters of sonicated Renografin provides optimal myocardial opacification during echocardiography, while 5 to 10 cc of Renografin is required for an adequate coronary arteriogram. During coronary arteriography, heart rate decreased while PR and QT intervals and QRS duration increased as compared with baseline and myocardial contrast echocardiography (p less than 0.01). Similarly, the decrease in aortic pressure and first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) was significantly (p less than 0.01) greater during routine coronary arteriography than during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar during myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary angiography. There were no significant differences in the duration of electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes between myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary arteriography. It is concluded that intracoronary injection of 2 cc of sonicated Renografin-76 provides optimal myocardial opacification. It is safe in humans, producing transient electrocardiographic and hemodynamic alterations that are less pronounced than those seen during routine coronary angiography.