The effect of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol after single administration of a 14/190 metoprolol OROS system

Influence of Chronic Renal Failure on Stereoselective Metoprolol Metabolism in Hypertensive Patients

The influence of chronic renal failure on the stereoselective metabolism of rac-metoprolol was investigated in 15 hypertensive patients, 7 of them with chronic renal failure and 8 with normal renal function. They were treated with rac-metoprolol (200 mg) for 7 days. The patients of both groups presented stereoselectivity in metoprolol metabolism, favoring the formation of 1'R-alpha-hydroxymetoprolol (AUC(1(')R/1(')S)(0-24) approximately 2.5) and (R)-metoprolol acidic metabolite (AUC((S)/(R))(0-24) = 0.8), the latter resulting in the plasma accumulation of (S)-metoprolol (AUC((S)/(R))(0-24) = 1.2). Patients with chronic renal failure presented plasma accumulation of the 4 alpha-hydroxymetoprolol isomers and of both metoprolol acidic metabolite enantiomers. A 50% reduction in Cl(R) does not explain the 3- to 4-fold plasma accumulation of metoprolol acidic metabolite in this group, suggesting that other pathways of metoprolol elimination are affected in chronic renal failure in addition to renal excretion. Chronic renal failure does not change the stereoselective kinetic disposition of metoprolol but modifies its stereoselective metabolism, inducing some of the CYP enzymes involved in the formation of the metoprolol acid metabolite.

Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions. Drug dosing in these patients often proves to be a difficult task. Renal dysfunction-induced changes in human pathophysiology regularly results may alter medication pharmacodynamics and handling. Several pharmacokinetic parameters are adversely affected by CKD, secondary to a reduced oral absorption and glomerular filtration; altered tubular secretion; and reabsorption and changes in intestinal, hepatic, and renal metabolism. In general, drug dosing can be accomplished by multiple methods; however, the most common recommendations are often to reduce the dose or expand the dosing interval, or use both methods simultaneously. Some medications need to be avoided all together in CKD either because of lack of efficacy or increased risk of toxicity. Nevertheless, specific recommendations are available for dosing of certain medications and are an important resource, because most are based on clinical or pharmacokinetic trials.

Effects of renal diseases on the regulation and expression of renal and hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes: a review

1. The activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in extrahepatic organs is highest in the kidneys. Generally, the kidneys contain most, if not all, of the DMEs found in the liver. Surprisingly, some of these DMEs show higher activity in the kidneys than in the liver. 2. Most of the renal DMEs are localized in the cortex of the kidneys, especially in the proximal tubules. DMEs are also found in the distal tubules and collecting ducts. 3. Renal diseases such as acute and chronic renal failure and renal cell carcinoma alter the regulation of both hepatic and extrahepatic phase I and II DMEs. Changes in the expression of these DMEs seem to be tissue and species specific. 4. Generally, there is significant down-regulation of most of the phase I and a few of phase II DMEs at the protein, mRNA and activity levels. Unfortunately, the mechanisms leading to the alteration in DMEs in renal diseases remain unclear, although many theories have been made. 5. The presence of some circulating factors such as cytokines, nitric oxide, parathyroid hormones and increased intracellular calcium play a role in the regulation of DMEs in renal diseases.

Human variability in polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism: is the kinetic default uncertainty factor adequate?

Human variability in the kinetics of CYP2D6 substrates has been quantified using a database of compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by this polymorphic enzyme. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in non-phenotyped healthy adults, and phenotyped extensive (EMs), intermediate or slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed with the available data for subgroups of the population (age, ethnicity and disease). Interindividual differences in kinetics for markers of oral exposure were large for non-phenotyped individuals and for EMs (coefficients of variation were 67-71% for clearances and 54-63% for C(max)), whereas the intravenous data indicated a lower variability (34-38%). Comparisons between EMs, SEMs and PMs revealed an increase in oral internal dose for SEMs and PMs (ratio compared to EMs=3 and 9-12, respectively) associated with lower variability than that for non-phenotyped individuals (coefficients of variation were 32-38% and 30% for SEMs and PMs, respectively). In relation to the uncertainty factors used for risk assessment, most subgroups would not be covered by the kinetic default of 3.16. CYP2D6-related factors necessary to cover 95-99% of each subpopulation ranged from 2.7 to 4.1 in non-phenotyped healthy adults and EMs to 15-18 in PMs and 22-45 in children. An exponential relationship (R(2)=0.8) was found between the extent of CYP2D6 metabolism and the uncertainty factors. The extent of CYP2D6 involvement in the metabolism of a substrate is critical in the estimation of the CYP2D6-related factor. The 3.16 kinetic default factor would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2D6 was responsible for up to 25% of the metabolism in EMs.

Controlled release metoprolol formulations. A review of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease

Conventional formulations of metoprolol have become well established in cardiovascular medicine and are particularly useful in the management of hypertension and ischaemic heart disease. Recently developed controlled release metoprolol delivery systems (metoprolol CR/ZOK and metoprolol OROS) were designed to overcome the drug delivery problems of matrix-based sustained release forms by releasing the drug at a relatively constant rate over a 24-hour period, and thus producing sustained and consistent metoprolol plasma concentrations and beta 1-blockade while retaining the convenience of once daily administration. Clinically and statistically significant reductions in blood pressure have been observed with metoprolol CR/ZOK and metoprolol OROS 24 hours after administration in mildly or moderately hypertensive patients. Studies in patients with mild to moderate hypertension have demonstrated that a similar or higher percentage of patients achieved a goal response with metoprolol CR/ZOK compared with matrix-based sustained release formulations of metoprolol, or conventional atenolol or bisoprolol, while metoprolol OROS achieved an equal or greater response rate compared with conventional or matrix-based sustained release metoprolol preparations. In patients with stable effort angina pectoris, once daily administration of metoprolol CR/ZOK provided at least equal antianginal efficacy as conventional metoprolol in divided doses, while metoprolol OROS reduced the mean number of anginal attacks by the same margin as atenolol. Controlled release metoprolol formulations have been well tolerated in clinical trials. Metoprolol CR/ZOK was associated with a similar or lesser degree of adverse effects related to the central nervous system compared with atenolol or long acting propranolol. Metoprolol CR/ZOK also demonstrated less pronounced beta 2-mediated bronchoconstrictor effects than atenolol in asthmatics, and less general fatigue and leg fatigue in healthy subjects. Metoprolol OROS produced less pronounced bronchoconstrictor effects than atenolol, matrix-based sustained release metoprolol or long acting propranolol in patients with asthma or obstructive airways disease, and healthy volunteers. These results are presumably due to the beta 1-selectivity of metoprolol in addition to the relatively low plasma concentrations maintained by metoprolol CR/ZOK and metoprolol OROS, and the avoidance of high peak plasma concentrations with these agents. Despite the relative safety of the controlled release forms of metoprolol, the use of all beta-adrenoceptor antagonists should be avoided in patients with a history of bronchospasm. Thus, controlled release metoprolol formulations offer the potential to maximise the confirmed benefits of this agent in the management of hypertension and angina, by maintaining clinically effective plasma concentrations within a narrow therapeutic range over a 24-hour dose interval.