Incidence of implantable defibrillator discharges after coronary revascularization in survivors of ischemic sudden cardiac death

The effect of revascularization on mortality and risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Background

There is clear evidence that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a reduced ejection fraction benefit from implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear whether this benefit is altered by whether or not revascularization is performed prior to ICD implantation.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study following patients who underwent ICD implantation from 2002 to 2014. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and either primary or secondary prevention ICDs were selected for inclusion. Using the electronic medical record, cardiac catheterization data, revascularization status (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery) were recorded. The outcomes were mortality and ventricular arrhythmia.

Results

There were 606 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.1 years, 11.9% were women, and the mean LVEF was 30.5 ± 12.0, 58.9% had a primary indication for ICD, 82.0% of the cohort had undergone coronary catheterization prior to ICD implantation. In the overall cohort, there were fewer mortality and ventricular arrhythmia events in patients who had undergone prior revascularization. In patients who had an ICD for secondary prevention, revascularization was associated with a decrease in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85) p = 0.015), and a trend towards fewer ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.38, 1.00) p = 0.051). There was no association between death or ventricular arrhythmia with revascularization in patients with primary prevention ICDs.

Conclusion

Revascularization may be beneficial in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and should be considered as adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Effect of coronary revascularization on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) postmyocardial infarction (MI) are a higher risk group with significant morbidity and mortality. We examined the impact of prior coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT.

METHODS

The VANISH trial randomized 259 patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug-refractory VT to receive escalated medical therapy or catheter ablation. Clinical outcomes were compared according to whether patients have undergone prior revascularization procedures. The primary outcome was a composite of death, appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) shock, or VT storm. The secondary outcomes included elements of the primary outcome, hospitalization, and any ventricular arrhythmia.

RESULTS

190 patients (73%) had prior coronary revascularization. Revascularization group had more men (97% vs 83%; P  =  0.0003) and patients in that group were older (mean age 69.3 ± 7.6 vs 66.7 ± 9.2; P  =  0.04), had more renal insufficiency (22.6% vs 8.7%; P  =  0.01), and were more likely to have an implanted cardiac resynchronization device (23% vs 10%, P  =  0.03) as compared with the nonrevascularized patients. There were no significant differences in baseline medication use. There was a trend toward fewer hospitalizations in the revascularization group (64% vs 77%; P  =  0.07); there were no differences in the individual outcomes of mortality, VT storm, ICD shocks, recurrent MI, or cardiac failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with an ischemic cause for VT, a history of prior coronary revascularization was not associated with a reduction in ventricular arrhythmia or mortality.

Clinical review: beyond immediate survival from resuscitation-long-term outcome considerations after cardiac arrest

A substantial body of literature concerning resuscitation from cardiac arrest now exists. However, not surprisingly, the greater part concerns the cardiac arrest event itself and optimising survival and outcome at relatively proximal time points. The aim of this review is to present the evidence base for interventions and therapeutic strategies that might be offered to patients surviving the immediate aftermath of a cardiac arrest, excluding components of resuscitation itself that may lead to benefits in long-term survival. In addition, this paper reviews the data on long-term impact, physical and neuropsychological, on patients and their families, revealing a burden that is often underestimated and underappreciated. As greater numbers of patients survive cardiac arrest, outcome measures more sophisticated than simple survival are required.

Prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease: do lipid-lowering drugs play a role?

Ventricular arrhythmias are the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease. Since treatment of hypercholesterolemia in patients with coronary artery disease reduces the risk of major coronary events by about 30%, one could speculate that this treatment could also result in a reduction of arrhythmic episodes in high-risk patients. In this review, the importance of myocardial ischemia as a trigger for ventricular arrhythmias, as well as the available data that suggest a possible effect of anti-ischemic treatments, including lipid-lowering drugs, on these arrhythmias are presented. Also, possible mechanisms and future research to test the hypothesis that lipid-lowering drugs can reduce life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias are discussed.

Application of a cardiac arrest score in patients with sudden death and ST segment elevation for triage to angiography and intervention

The aim of this study was to test a previously validated, prognostic, cardiac arrest score in patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who suffered a witnessed cardiac arrest and survived to emergency department admission. A consecutive series constructed retrospectively from a sudden death database (n = 22) of patients with ST segment elevation AMI resuscitated from cardiac arrest underwent angiography and angioplasty of the culprit vessel within 24 hours of presentation. A cardiac arrest score was assigned to each case by explicit criteria present on evaluation. Primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and the degree of neurological recovery during the hospitalization. All patients underwent successful coronary angioplasty and 77% received adjunctive intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. The overall rate of survival to discharge was 41%. For cardiac arrest scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, the rates of neurologic recovery were 0 (0%) of 4 (95% CI 0-53%), 3 (50%) of 6 (95% CI 15-85%), 2 (67%) of 3 (95% CI 13-98%), and 9 (100%) of 9 (95% CI 72-100%), and the rates of survival to discharge were 0 (0%) of 4, (95% CI 0-53%), 2 (33%) of 6 (95% CI 6-74%), 2 (67%) of 3 (95% CI 13-98%), and 9 (100%) of 9 (95% CI 72-100%), P < 0.01 for both outcomes over ascending scores. These results suggest appropriate patients for primary angioplasty after cardiac arrest are those with ST segment elevation AMI and an emergency department cardiac arrest score of > or = 2, thus predicting a 11 (92%) of 12 (95% CI 65-100%) chance of survival to discharge.

Effect of surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo resuscitation from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias often have significant coronary artery disease, and revascularization has been shown to reduce myocardial ischemia and cardiac arrest episodes in this patient population. The magnitude of benefit attributed to revascularization has varied by study, and the use of adjunct implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has not been well-characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) registry included 3117 patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, of whom 2321 (77%) had documented coronary artery disease and 281 (17%) underwent a coronary artery bypass grafting revascularization procedure after the index event. Patients who underwent a revascularization procedure were younger, had a lower incidence rate of prior myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmia, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction, had less congestive heart failure, and were more likely to have had ventricular fibrillation as the presenting arrhythmia. Patients who underwent revascularization had a better survival rate than did those who did not undergo such a procedure after the index event, and adjustment for differing baseline patient covariates did not alter the relative survival rate benefit. Further, ICD implantation offered a similar survival rate advantage to those patients in the AVID registry with coronary artery disease independent of revascularization.

CONCLUSION

Coronary revascularization in the AVID registry patients with coronary artery disease effected a survival rate benefit that was not attributable to differences in baseline patient characteristics. The benefit of ICD on patient survival rate was not attenuated by a revascularization procedure.

Permanent explantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Although ICD therapy is seen as an irrevocable mode of therapy in most patients, a small number of patients do have their devices permanently explanted. The long-term outcome in these patients has not been described. The purpose of this single center study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients whose ICD was explanted and not replaced and to propose clinical variables that can be considered when making the decision to discontinue therapy. Ten of 323 (3.1%) patients in our ICD registry had their devices permanently explanted or turned off between 1986 and December 1998. The devices had been in place for 39 +/- 31 months preexplant. No patient had received appropriate therapy prior to surgery, which was indicated for infection or lead fracture. All patients are alive and well 75 +/- 30 months postexplant with 1 (10%) patient requiring late reimplantation. We reviewed the English language literature describing ICD explanation without replacement. A total of 151 patients were reported in eight studies and were followed for up to 30 months postexplant. Excluding patients with terminal illness or heart transplantation 57.6% survived without reimplantation. In selected patients, after not using an ICD for a long period and when clinical circumstances justify, device therapy may be discontinued with some degree of safety.

Factors determining long-term outcomes and survival in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a single center experience

A Single-Center Experience. The influence, after ICD implantation, of concomitant CABG, angioplasty, and other antiischemic therapeutic interventions, like treatment with beta-blockers, on outcome and mortality of patients with VT or VF due to CAD remains uncertain. The univariate and multivariate risks of recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD interventions or death associated with baseline clinical and functional variables were studied in 160 consecutive patients with CAD of whom 30 underwent CABG or angioplasty at < or = 2 weeks before ICD implantation. ICD interventions occurred in 98 (61%) patients over a mean follow-up of 1,065 days. In univariate and multivariate analysis, VT as the presenting arrhythmia was the only clinical factor predictive of recurrences. Treatment with beta-blockers at hospital discharge reduced the probability of recurrences. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the effect of beta-blockers (P < 0.005) and of VT as the presenting arrhythmia (P < 0.01). Overall mortality was 61% (29/160). In multivariate analysis a low ejection fraction (< or = 0.20) and omission of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge were associated with excess mortality. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, a low ejection fraction (borderline between 0.30 and 0.21, significant < 0.21) was the single predictor of mortality. Revascularization by CABG or angioplasty had no influence on ventricular arrhythmia recurrences or survival. During long-term follow-up, VT as the presenting arrhythmia and the omission of beta-blocker therapy were associated with excess recurrences of ventricular arrhythmias after ICD implantation. In contrast, survival depended primarily on left ventricular function at discharge. Revascularization did not prevent recurrences of arrhythmias and had no significant effect on survival in the small group of patients who underwent CABG or angioplasty.

Prediction of outcome of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias treated with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using SPECT perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

In the present study, we examined the predictors of outcome of 103 patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who had life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and were treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with the use of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 29 months, there were 29 cardiac deaths. In comparison with patients who died, survivors had less diabetes mellitus (45% versus 19%, P < .007), higher left ventricular ejection fraction (23 +/- 9% versus 27 +/- 11%, P = .04), and fewer perfusion defects as determined with stress SPECT (15 +/- 5 versus 12 +/- 5, P < .004). Most of the perfusion defects were fixed, indicative of scarring; the extent of reversible defects did not differ (2 +/- 3 in survivors and 3 +/- 4 in nonsurvivors). Multivariate Cox survival analysis identified the number of fixed defects as the only independent predictor of death (chi 2 = 10, P = .002). There were six deaths among 42 patients (14%) with < 8 fixed defects compared with 23 deaths among 61 patients (38%) with > or = 8 defects (P = .005). The 4-year survival was better in patients with < 8 segmental fixed defects than in those with > or = 8 fixed defects (80% versus 36%) (chi 2 = 8, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The myocardial perfusion pattern is an important determinant of outcome in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who are treated with a implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The extent of scarring separates patients into high- and low-risk groups with a 2.7-fold difference in death rate.