Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads. Comparison of recently proposed ECG and VCG criteria for distinguishing posterolateral myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads may be present in patients with posterior myocardial infarction, right ventricular hypertrophy, various conduction disturbances, and some forms of cardiomyopathy and in clinically otherwise normal subjects with prominent anterior electromotive forces. Clinical uncertainty most often arises in distinguishing possible prior posterolateral myocardial infarction (PMI) from the unusual normal variant (PAF). The ECGs and VCGs of 15 subjects with posterolateral infarction were compared with tracings from 12 subjects with no evidence of cardiac disease, all individuals demonstrating tall R waves (R/S greater than 1.0 in V1 and/or V2) in the right precordial leads on surface ECG. By standard ECG, the infarction group was characterized by taller T waves in leads V1 and V2, shorter T waves in V6, greater T2-T6 index, and a more negative two variable function as described by Nestico. By VCG, the infarction group was characterized by a more anteriorly oriented T loop, more leftward maximal frontal plane QRS vector and a lower calculated -45 degrees/ab, as described by Suzuki. An algorithm was proposed that permitted proper classification (PAF vs. PMI) based on ECG criteria in 75% of subjects with 90% accuracy. This compared favorably with performance of the Frank vectorcardiogram, including using more recently proposed criteria. Routine use of the VCG, therefore, in this clinical setting may no longer be justified.

Comparative accuracy of the vectorcardiogram and electrocardiogram in the localization of the accessory pathway in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: validation of a new vectorcardiographic algorithm by intraoperative epicardial mapping and electrophysiologic studies

The scalar electrocardiograms (ECGs) and vectorcardiograms (VCGs) of 41 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome were used to compare the accuracy of these techniques in the identification of the site of preexcitation. The location of the accessory pathway (AP) was determined by endocavitary electrophysiologic studies in all patients and the location was confirmed during intraoperative epicardial mapping in 28 of them. The ECGs were classified according to Gallagher's criteria and with Milstein's algorithm, whereas the VCGs were classified according to a new two-step algorithm. The presence of multiple accessory pathways and coexisting myocardial infarctions were major limitations in both the VCG and ECG classification procedures. In patients with a single accessory pathway, three AP localizations (right free ventricular wall, posterior, or left free ventricular wall) were identified with the first step of the VCG algorithm, with an overall sensitivity (96.5%), specificity (90.7%), and positive predictive values (80%) that were greater than those obtained with the ECG Milstein algorithm (77.1%, 91.5%, and 75%, respectively). The second step of the VCG algorithm made it possible to identify an AP location in one of the following sites: anterior right, lateral right, posterior right, posterior left, lateral left, or anterior left ventricle. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were greater for the second step of the VCG algorithm than for the ECG criteria proposed by Gallagher (43.6% versus 39.3%, 92.1% versus 87.4%, and 51.5% versus 33.3%, respectively). It was concluded that the VCG seems to be more specific and sensitive than the ECG in the identification of the preexcitation site and should be given preference in the initial evaluation of the WPW syndrome.

Value of the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram for locating the accessory pathway in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The resting 12 lead electrocardiogram and vectocardiogram were reviewed in 47 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (a) who had pre-excitation on the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram, (b) who had a single anterograde conducting accessory pathway assessed and located during preoperative electrophysiological study and during epicardial mapping at operation, and (c) in whom surgical division of the accessory pathway resulted in loss of pre-excitation. The site of the accessory pathway established during operation was compared with that established by evaluating the polarity of the delta wave and QRS complex on the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram. The electrocardiogram was assessed by the Rosenbaum criteria (Wolff-Parkinson-White type A, left-sided pathway; or type B, right-sided pathway), the Gallagher criteria (atrial pacing resulting in maximal pre-excitation), and the World Health Organisation criteria (a composite of previous studies). The Gallagher and World Health Organisation criteria were derived from patients demonstrating maximal pre-excitation that often required atrial pacing. The present study was designed to determine whether these criteria could be accurately applied to the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram on which the degree of pre-excitation was variable. The Rosenbaum criteria correctly identified a left sided accessory pathway in 26 of 34 patients and a right-sided accessory pathway in nine of 13 patients. The Gallagher and World Health Organisation criteria correctly identified the location in only 15 (32%) of the 47 patients. The resting vectorcardiogram was inaccurate for locating the accessory pathway. Although published criteria are useful for identifying the site of the accessory pathway from an electrocardiogram obtained when rapid atrial pacing is being used to achieve maximal pre-excitation, they are not suitable for identifying the exact site of an accessory pathway from the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram.

When is the vectorcardiogram superior to the scalar electrocardiogram?

The clinical usefulness of the vectorcardiogram is well documented by the numerous reports published in the last 3 decades. It has been found more reliable than the electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of atrial enlargement and right ventricular hypertrophy. It is more sensitive than the electrocardiogram in the recognition of myocardial infarction, especially if the infarction is inferior or if it occurs in the presence of left bundle branch block or left anterior hemiblock. It is helpful in the diagnosis of ventricular pre-excitation and in the localization of the bypass tract. Some repolarization abnormalities are more clearly demonstrated by the vector display. However, some information, such as that on cardiac chamber size and myocardial damage, can also be obtained by other noninvasive tests that are often performed on the same patients. With the increasing awareness of cost-effectiveness of various laboratory procedures in medicine, the vectorcardiogram should no longer be considered a routine cardiac test and should be requested only for a specific clinical purpose. When properly utilized, vectorcardiography should remain a valuable diagnostic as well as teaching tool.

Spatial vectorcardiography in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: correlation with epicardial mapping findings

The spatial vectorcardiograms (VCG) of 13 patients with WPW syndrome due to single accessory pathways were analyzed and correlated with the excitation analysis obtained on epicardial mapping. The azimuth angle of the initial 10 ms cardiac vector was greater than + 90 degrees (directed right and anteriorly) in patients with a left ventricular free wall; it ranged between 0 degree to 90 degrees (left and anteriorly) in those with a left or right paraseptal free wall and was -30 degrees (left and posteriorly) in one patient with a right ventricular free wall location. The elevation angle of the initial 10 and 20 ms cardiac vector was either zero or positive (inferiorly directed) in those with right and left ventricular free wall pathway. Among six patients with a paraseptal location, the elevation angle was negative (superiorly directed) in four and positive in two. Both the patients with a clockwise inscription of a QRS loop in the horizontal plane (HP) had pathways located to the left ventricle. Among the paraseptal group, at surgery, the accessory pathway could not be excised in two in spite of dissection very close to the IV (interventricular) septum. The elevation angle in both these patients was markedly negative (-45 degrees and -62 degrees) in contrast to the other in whom surgical excision was successful.+

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads: vectorcardiographic and electrocardiographic distinction of posterior myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects

Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads may be present in patients with posterior wall myocardial infarction, right ventricular hypertrophy, various conduction disturbances, some forms of cardiomyopathy, and in clinically otherwise normal subjects with prominent anterior forces. Since clinical uncertainty most often arises in distinguishing possible prior posterior myocardial infarction from the unusual normal variant, we compared VCGs and ECGs in 19 subjects with posterior infarction with tracings from 11 subjects with no evidence of cardiac disease who had prominent anterior forces on routine examination. By VCG, the infarction group was characterized by smaller maximum posterior voltage in the horizontal plane, more anteriorly oriented T loop direction, more prolonged anterior QRS forces, more leftward frontal plane QRS maximum vector, and associated evidence of diaphragmatic infarction. By standard ECG, the infarction group was characterized by isoelectric or upright T waves in precordial lead V1, a more leftward frontal plane axis, and associated diaphragmatic infarction. Criteria for distinguishing between posterior wall myocardial infarction and prominent anterior forces in otherwise clinically normal subjects are suggested. These require prospective validation in an independent test population.

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous lidocaine in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Twelve patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome underwent electrophysiologic study, before and after the bolus intravenous administration of lidocaine, 1 mg./kg. There was no significant increase in the effective refractory period of the anterograde AV node pathway, the anterograde or retrograde accessory pathway, or the atrial or ventricular muscle; intravenous bolus administration of lidocaine is unlikely to terminate the re-entry tachycardias, or decrease the rate of the ventricular response in atrial fibrillation, in the WPW syndrome. There was no significant increase in the anterograde or retrograde AV conduction times; bolus administration of lidocaine is unlikely to decrease the rates of the re-entry tachycardias. In addition, lidocaine failed to alter significantly features related to tachycardia initiation. Except in isolated, unpredictable cases, intravenous bolus administration of lidocaine is not likely to be of benefit in the supraventricular tachyarrhythmias of the WPW syndrome.

Pseudo-infarct patterns in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: importance of Q wave-T wave vector discordance

Inferior lead pseudo-infarct Q waves are a common finding in the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. In a retrospective study of previously published cases of WPW, pseudo-infarct Q waves in the inferior leads were associated with positive or isoelectric T waves in 47 of 50 examples (94%). This characteristic Q wave-T wave vector discordance results from secondary repolarization changes due to altered ventricular activation. As a corollary, the presence of T wave inversion with inferior lead Q waves and a short PR interval is strongly suggestive, but not pathognomonic of inferior ischemia.

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Conversion of type A to type B electrocardiographic changes

This paper reports a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who presented with a tachycardia showing an unusual QRS morphology closely resembling that of a ventricular tachycardia. On reversal to a normal rhythm the electrocardiogram showed changes of a type A preexcitation, with subsequent conversion to a type B pattern. This phenomenon was observed on two separate occasions. Such conversion would suggest the presence of two distinct sites for bypass location resulting in preexcitation, thus lending support to the theory of aberrant atrioventricular conduction via a bundle of Kent or neuromuscular tissue connecting atrium to ventricle. The configuration of the QRS complexes during the tachycardia would appear to be due to a circus movement with antegrade anomalous atrioventricular conduction and retrograde atrial stimulation via the bundle of His, although in this case, due to the presence of two distinct anomalous atrioventricular conduction pathways, both antegrade and retrograde conduction via these two pathways alone cannot be excluded.