Oral vasodilator therapy for chronic heart failure: a plea for caution

The First Dedicated Comprehensive Heart Failure Program in the United States: The Division of Circulatory Physiology at Columbia Presbyterian (1992-2004)

The first dedicated multidisciplinary heart failure program in the United States was founded as the Division of Circulatory Physiology at the Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons in 1992. The Division was administratively and financially independent of the Division of Cardiology and grew to 24 faculty members at its peak. Its administrative innovations included (1) a comprehensive full-integrated service line, with 2 differentiated clinical teams, one devoted to drug therapy and the other to heart transplantation and ventricular assist devices; (2) a nurse specialist/physician assistant-led clinical service; and (3) a financial structure independent of (and not supported by) other cardiovascular medical or surgical services. The division had 3 overarching missions: (1) to promote a unique career development path for each faculty member to be linked to recognition in a specific area of heart failure expertise; (2) to change the trajectory and enhance the richness of intellectual discourse in the discipline of heart failure, so as to foster an understanding of fundamental mechanisms and to develop new therapeutics; and (3) to provide optimal medical care to patients and to promote the ability of other physicians to provide optimal care. The major research achievements of the division included (1) the development of beta-blockers for heart failure, from initial hemodynamic assessments to proof-of-concept studies to large-scale international trials; (2) the development and definitive assessment of flosequinan, amlodipine, and endothelin antagonists; (3) initial clinical trials and concerns with nesiritide; (4) large-scale trials evaluating dosing of angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors and the efficacy and safety of neprilysin inhibition; (5) identification of key mechanisms in heart failure, including neurohormonal activation, microcirculatory endothelial dysfunction, deficiencies in peripheral vasodilator pathways, noncardiac factors in driving dyspnea, and the first identification of subphenotypes of heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction; (6) the development of a volumetric approach to the assessment of myocardial shortening; (7) conceptualization and early studies of cardiac contractility modulation as a treatment for heart failure; (8) novel approaches to the identification of cardiac allograft rejection and new therapeutics to prevent allograft vasculopathy; and (9) demonstration of the effect of left ventricular assist devices to induce reverse remodeling, and the first randomized trial showing a survival benefit with ventricular assist devices. Above all, the division served as an exceptional incubator for a generation of leaders in the field of heart failure.

Reflecting on the advancements of HFrEF therapies over the last two decades and predicting what is yet to come

What was once considered a topic best avoided, managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has become the focus of many drug and device therapies. While the four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapies have successfully reduced heart failure hospitalizations, and some have even impacted cardiovascular mortality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), patient-reported outcomes have emerged as important endpoints that merit greater emphasis in future studies. The prospect of an oral inotrope seems more probable now as targets for drug therapies have moved from neurohormonal modulation to intracellular mechanisms and direct cardiac myosin stimulation. While we have come a long way in safely providing durable mechanical circulatory support to patients with advanced HFrEF, several percutaneous device therapies have emerged, and many are under investigation. Biomarkers have shown promise in not only improving our ability to diagnose incident heart failure but also our potential to implicate specific pathophysiological pathways. The once-forgotten concept of discordance between pressure and volume, the forgotten splanchnic venous and lymphatic compartments, have all emerged as promising targets for diagnosing and treating heart failure in the not-so-distant future. The increase in heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (CS) has revived interest in defining optimal perfusion targets and designing RCTs in CS. Rapid developments in remote monitoring, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence promise to change the face of heart failure care. In this state-of-the-art review, we reminisce about the past, highlight the present, and predict what might be the future of HFrEF therapies.

Nitrate therapy today

A review of nitrate therapy including a short summary of their physiological effects is presented. Both cardiac and non-cardiac indications are reviewed including esophageal spasm, spasm of bile ducts and urinary tract, Raynaud's disease, pulmonary hypertensive disorders, portal hypertension, bronchial asthma, and effect on arrhythmias.

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.

The role of vasodilator therapy in the treatment of severe chronic heart failure

The rationale for the use of vasodilating agents in the treatment of congestive heart failure is to reverse the systemic vasoconstriction that characterises patients with this disorder, and which may further limit cardiac performance. Nitrates were the first vasodilators used, followed by arterial vasodilators (hydralazine, minoxidil), alpha-adrenergic blockers (prazosin, trimazosin) and, more recently, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, beta-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The choice of vasodilator should be based on consideration of overall benefit-risk profiles. Consideration of pharmacological action together with classification of patients into haemodynamic subsets has been used as a basis from which to initiate vasodilator therapy. However, such a classification may not lead to a logical choice of drug and there is no evidence to suggest that patients so selected do better when given long term treatment with peripherally specific drugs than with agents that are not tailored to pretreatment haemodynamic variables. Moreover, changes in central haemodynamics after administration of specific vasodilator drugs may differ from those expected on the basis of their presumed actions on the peripheral vasculature. Dosage requirements are difficult to predict with many vasodilator drugs. Traditionally, such requirements have been established by titrating vasodilating drugs to achieve an arbitrarily defined haemodynamic response. However, there is little correlation between haemodynamic end-points and clinical efficacy in patients with heart failure, and short and long term haemodynamic responses to vasodilator drugs are not necessarily related. Drug-specific haemodynamic and clinical tolerance occurs during the course of treatment with all vasodilator drugs; the extent and frequency with which it develops differs between agents. Tolerance is thought to arise from a reduction in drug receptor affinity and/or density or activation of counter-regulatory forces (mainly neurohormonal) that limit the magnitude of vasodilatation that can be achieved. Development of tolerance to a single agent does not usually preclude efficacy of other agents. ACE inhibitors have been associated with a relatively low incidence of tolerance. This may relate to their natriuretic effect and ability to decrease the degree of neurohormonal activation, actions not shared by other vasodilators. Tolerance is the principal reason for failure of prazosin and nitrates as therapeutic agents in severe chronic heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Conceptual dilemmas in the classification of vasodilator drugs for severe chronic heart failure. Advocacy of a pragmatic approach to the selection of a therapeutic agent

Two distinct systems of classifying vasodilator drugs have been developed over the past decade in an attempt to guide the choice of a therapeutic agent for the patient with severe heart failure, but the merits and utility of these systems have not been critically evaluated. Vasodilator drugs may be categorized according to their peripheral site of action: an agent may exert its effects preferentially on systemic arteries, systemic veins, or on both circulations. However, changes in the peripheral circulation cannot be directly translated into an improvement in central hemodynamic variables; furthermore, immediate hemodynamic responses may not be predictive of long-term clinical efficacy. Hence, there is no evidence that characterization of patients into hemodynamic subsets determined by the findings of right heart catheterization improves the clinical outcome of vasodilator therapy in chronic heart failure. An alternative classification system groups vasodilator drugs according to their mechanism of action: an agent may possess direct vasodilating effects or may exert its actions via selective neurohumoral inhibition. However, attempts to identify patients who might be most responsive to neurohumoral antagonism by measuring plasma renin activity or circulating levels of catecholamines before treatment have not been successful in predicting the clinical responses to therapy. Because neither system of drug classification provides the clinician with useful therapeutic guidelines, patients with severe heart failure appear to be best managed using a pragmatic approach in which specific drugs that produce predictable therapeutic benefits with a low frequency of side effects are utilized preferentially. Among presently available vasodilator agents, only captopril and oral isosorbide dinitrate have been shown to produce consistent hemodynamic and clinical improvement with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions.

Vasodilator and inotropic therapy for severe chronic heart failure: passion and skepticism

Although substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years in the development of vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the management of patients with severe chronic heart failure, much of the enthusiasm that surrounded the introduction of many of these agents has subsequently been tempered by reports of drug failure or adverse reactions. In this review and analysis, currently available vasodilator and inotropic agents are critically and comparatively evaluated to assess their respective advantages and limitations. It is apparent that the ability of most of these drugs to produce substantial clinical benefits in patients with severe heart failure has probably been overstated. Therapy fails to achieve the desired clinical results all too frequently, possibly as the result of: the choice of an ineffective drug; the administration of an effective drug in subtherapeutic doses; the administration of an effective drug to improperly selected patients; the failure of initial hemodynamic benefits to be sustained; the occurrence of severe or serious adverse reactions; and the failure to alter concomitant therapy appropriately. The present analysis indicates that there is no uniformly effective or safe vasodilator or inotropic drug for patients with severe heart failure; all agents have important limitations. Of the available therapeutic choices, however, long-term converting enzyme inhibition appears to produce more consistent hemodynamic and clinical benefits with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions than other pharmacologic approaches for the management of these severely ill patients.

Acute hemodynamic effects of endralazine: a new vasodilator for chronic refractory congestive heart failure

Invasive hemodynamic measurements were made in 10 supine patients with chronic refractory congestive heart failure (CHF) due to ischemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy before and after oral administration of a new arteriolar vasodilator, endralazine. In 9 patients, a 10 mg dose of endralazine produced maximal increases in cardiac and stroke volume indexes of 56 and 41%, respectively, with a 45% reduction in total systemic resistance. After a 5 mg dose of endralazine, cardiac index increased maximally by 38% and stroke volume index by 34%, with a 31% decrease in total systemic resistance. Mean arterial pressure decreased 11 +/- 4 mm Hg (mean +/- standard error of mean) with the 5 mg dose and 17 +/- 5 mm Hg after the 10 mg dose. There were no significant changes in the right atrial, pulmonary arterial, or pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. After administration of a single dose of endralazine, statistically significant hemodynamic changes were observed from 1 to 8 hours with peak responses at 3 to 4 hours. These observations suggest that endralazine has hemodynamic properties similar to those of its structural analog, hydralazine. However, endralazine metabolism is largely independent of the patients' acetylator status, and no cases of systemic lupus erythematosus have been reported after long-term oral administration. These findings suggest that endralazine may be an efficacious drug that is potentially safer than hydralazine in the treatment of chronic CHF.

The use of Doppler flow velocity measurement to assess the hemodynamic response to vasodilators in patients with heart failure

To determine if the hemodynamic response to vasodilator therapy can be assessed noninvasively by pulsed Doppler velocimetry, we compared the hemodynamic changes after treatment to changes in Doppler aortic blood flow measurements. The relationship between the absolute values and percent changes of invasively measured systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and stroke volume (SV) and Doppler-measured peak flow velocity (PFV), left ventricular ejection time (ET) and flow velocity integral (FVI) were evaluated. Measurements were made during 18 drug interventions in 13 patients treated with vasodilator agents for congestive heart failure (CHF). A poor correlation was found between the absolute values of either SVR or SV and the absolute values of each of the three Doppler aortic blood flow indexes studied. In contrast, a good correlation was found between percent changes in aortic PFV and in SVR (r = -0.89), and between percent changes in Doppler aortic FVI and in SV (r = 0.88). The correlation between percent changes in SVR and FVI revealed an r value of -0.65, while the correlation between percent changes in SVR and in ET showed an r value of -0.15. Percent changes in SV and either PFV or ET correlated with r values of 0.75 and 0.70, respectively. We conclude that Doppler aortic blood flow measurement can be used to assess quantitative changes in SVR and SV after vasodilator therapy. These findings suggest that it may be useful for evaluating vasodilator drug therapy in patients with CHF.

Effects of captopril in acute and chronic heart failure. Correlations with plasma levels of noradrenaline, renin, and aldosterone

The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, was given to 19 patients with severe heart failure. Seven patients had acute myocardial infarction and the remainder had chronic myocardial damage caused by ischaemia or valvular disease. Cardiac filling pressures were raised in all, the pulmonary capillary "wedge" pressure being 17 mmHg or more. Captopril, 50 mg orally, raised stroke volume and cardiac output, and reduced heart rate, cardiac filling pressures, systemic arterial pressure, and the plasma concentrations of aldosterone and noradrenaline. These changes were attended by clinical improvement. Decrements in cardiac filling pressures, systemic arterial pressure, and total peripheral resistance were positively correlated with pretreatment plasma renin. Long-term treatment with captopril was offered to 14 patients. Four patients with severe coronary disease died suddenly after initial clinical improvement. In nine patients haemodynamic measurements were repeated after three months. The results showed sustained effects on cardiac output and filling pressures but there was no loss of body weight. The haemodynamic effects were at least as good as with previous vasodilators. The fall in systemic arterial pressure, however, was greater with captopril. Captopril may become a valuable adjunct to the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, but more information about its effect on coronary blood flow is required.

Intravenous isosorbide dinitrate in patients with refractory pump failure and acute myocardial infarction

We studied the hemodynamic effects of isosorbide dinitrate administered by continuous i.v. infusion to 22 patients with chronic refractory pump failure and 18 with pump failure due to acute myocardial infarction. In patients with severe pump failure, i.v. ISDN markedly decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p less than 0.001), moderately increased cardiac output (p less than 0.01), and decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p less than 0.001). There were no deleterious effects on arterial pressure and heart rate. The effects obtained in acute and chronic left ventricular failure were similar. Patients with initial SVR levels lower than 1500 dyn-sec-cm-5 did not significantly increase their cardiac output (p less than 0.005). Cardiac output increased more than 25% only in patients with initial high SVR levels (greater than 2000 dyn-sec-cm(-)5). Positive correlations were found between high SVR and elevated plasma catecholamines (r = 0.53, p less than 0.05) and between the initial SVR and initial heart rate (r = 0.70, p less than 0.01). The i.v. administration of isosorbide dinitrate appears to be an efficient therapy, particularly in selected patients with ischemic pump failure.

Vasodilator therapy in refractory congestive heart failure: a comparative analysis of hemodynamic and noninvasive studies

The response to vasodilator therapy was assessed in 12 patients with chronic severe congestive heart failure refractory to conventional treatment. Cardiac output and intraarterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were recorded continuously to assess the hemodynamic response to the vasodilators used. Control and post-treatment M mode echocardiograms and radionuclide angiograms were obtained to assess the change in left ventricular size and ejection fraction concurrent with the hemodynamic improvement. Despite a 33 percent decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p less than 0.001) and a 35 percent increase in cardiac index (p less than 0.001), no significant change occurred in left ventricular end-diastolic or end-systolic chamber size on echocardiography or in ejection fraction measured with radionuclide angiography. In this study M mode echocardiography and radionuclide angiography were of no value in monitoring the actual hemodynamic response to vasodilator therapy in this group of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30 percent.

Physiologic and pharmacologic determinants of vasodilator response: a conceptual framework for rational drug therapy for chronic heart failure

This article has attempted to summarize the increasing number of pharmacologic and physiologic variables that are being recognized as important determinants in the response to vasodilator therapy in patients with severe chronic heart failure. It is apparent that a careful consideration of many factors is necessary before proper selection of a specific drug can be made for a specific patient, since not all patients with refractory heart failure demonstrate beneficial hemodynamic and clinical responses to all agents. Each patient presents us with a unique set of physiologic variables; each drug has its own advantages and limitations. Identification of those subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from a specific agent or combination of agents is a major goal for future research. Although a number of hemodynamic variables can be made to improve acutely with a wide variety of vasodilator drugs, well tolerated sustained meaningful clinical benefits are probably observed in relatively few patients. Rational and successful vasodilator therapy is possible only through a highly individualized approach.

Hemodynamic assessment of prenalterol: a cardioselective beta agonist in patients with imparied left ventricular function

The hemodynamic effects of a new cardioselective beta agonist, prenalterol, were evaluated in 12 patients with moderate or severe impairment of left ventricular function due to coronary heart disease or primary cardiomyopathy. In doses up to 7 mg the drug led to a substantial increase of left ventricular pressure rise (+55%) and mean circumferential fiber shortening (+59%) and a decrease of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (-52%), mean pulmonary artery pressure (-24%) and pulmonary vascular resistance (-37%) indicating augmented myocardial contractility and reduced left ventricular preload. Cardiac output was increased only in 4 of 12 patients, heart rate, left ventricular systolic and mean right atrial pressures and the pressure-rate product as an index for myocardial oxygen demand remained essentially unchanged. The same is true for stroke index, stroke work index, total peripheral resistance, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume and ejection fraction. The positive inotropic effect was achieved with good tolerance and without arrhythmogenic or other side effects. Prenalterol may be especially useful in patients with low sympathetic activity and hypotension. In patients with diffuse congestive cardiomyopathy, high sympathetic activity, pronounced peripheral vasoconstriction and normal blood pressure, vasodilator therapy alone or in combination with prenalterol should be considered.

Provocation of myocardial ischemic events during initiation of vasodilator therapy for severe chronic heart failure. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of 52 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

Although hydralazine provokes myocardial ischemic events in hypertensive patients not in heart failure by producing reflex tachycardia, the frequency of and mechanisms underlying ischemic events when this drug is administered as a vasodilator agent to patients with heart failure is unknown. The responses to hydralazine in 52 consecutive patients with severe chronic heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease were reviewed. Twelve patients (23 percent) had 16 ischemic events during the initial administration of hydralazine (angina at rest in 12 and myocardial infarction in 4); these generally occurred in the absence of significant tachycardia and hypotension. Thirty-five of the 52 patients received nitroprusside (8 of whom had ischemic events with hydralazine), but this drug provoked ischemia in only 1 of the 35 although it resulted in greater decreases in systemic arterial pressure than occurred with hydralazine. In patients with ischemic event only with hydralazine, left ventricular filling pressure decreased 14.6 mm Hg with nitroprusside but only 3.9 mm Hg with hydralazine (probability [p] less than 0.01). Provocation of ischemia with hydralazine may therefore be due to the relative preservation of elevated left ventricular preload with this drug, since ischemic events are not in common with nitroprusside despite greater decreases in systemic pressures.

Determinants of drug response in severe chronic heart failure. 1. Activation of vasoconstrictor forces during vasodilator therapy

Vasodilator drugs activate neurohumoral forces that produce peripheral vasoconstriction and tachycardia and probably cause the rebound events observed upon abrupt withdrawal of therapy. To determine their role in limiting therapeutic vasodilator responses, these reactive forces were measured in 40 patients with severe chronic heart failure by quantifying the magnitude of rebound change (MRC) after nitroprusside withdrawal. Group 1 patients (n = 22), who had minimal reactive vasoconstriction (MRC less than or equal to 27%), showed marked hemodynamic effects with nitroprusside (4.5 microgram/kg/min) and isosorbide dinitrate (40 mg orally), associated with significant decreases in heart rate with both drugs (p less than 0.001). Despite administration of the same doses of both drugs, group 2 patients (n = 18), who had marked rebound changes (MRC greater than 27%), showed significantly smaller changes in cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.001), associated with no change or increases in heart rate. Rebound events were attenuated and the responses to nitroprusside and nitrates were enhanced in four patients in whom these drugs were readministered after pretreatment with i.v. phentolamine (0.3mg/min). We conclude that activation of neurohumoral forces can limit the hemodynamic responses to vasodilator administration; this supports the use of combination therapy of direct-acting vasodilators and neurohumoral antagonists in selected patients with severe chronic heart failure.

Mechanisms and implications of vasodilator tolerance in the treatment of congestive heart failure

Vasodilators play an important role in the treatment of the patient with severe heart failure and increased systemic vascular resistance. However, there are both clinical data and theoretic reasons to anticipate that some degree of tolerance may develop during the long-term use of most agents. The cause of the increased vascular resistance of heart failure is not completely understood, but it appears to be related to a number of neuroendocrine, molecular and physical mechanisms including increased activity of the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems, and increased vascular stiffness due to intra- and extracellular sodium and fluid accumulation. Not surprisingly, a lowering of systemic vascular resistance either by direct smooth muscle relaxers or by blockade of specific neuroendocrine systems may result in a number of compensatory responses at the neuroendocrine and/or molecular level. The over-all effectiveness of a particular vasodilator is the net sum of its direct pharmacologic action, and the neuroendocrine and molecular responses to the drug. The specific compensatory mechanisms activated depend on several factors including the type of vasodilator used, the dose employed, the baseline neuroendocrine status of the patient, the severity of heart failure and the functional integrity of various reflex systems. Although not directly applicable to patients with heart failure, much information derived from the use of these agents to treat patients with hypertension and angina pectoris suggests several potential mechanisms by which tolerance may develop to virtually all classes of vasodilators. The major types of vasodilators are discussed with regard to their potential mechanisms of tolerance. Finally, the evidence currently available from long-term studies is reviewed in order to assess the potential relevance of vasodilator tolerance to the clinical management of the patient with heart failure.

Sustained effectiveness of chronic prazosin therapy in severe chronic congestive heart failure

Twelve patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) (NYHA class III and IV) resistant to digitalis and diuretics were treated with the postsynaptic alpha-blocking agent prazosin (PZ) (3 to 20 mg/day). In 11 patients oral PZ treatment was well tolerated; the agent was discontinued in the remaining patient because of orthostatic dizziness. After 4 weeks of PZ, total systemic vascular resistance decreased from 2245 +/- 792 to 1603 +/- 355 dyn sec cm-5, mean blood pressure declined from 100 +/- 15 to 90 +/- 14 mm Hg, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 29 +/- 8 to 25 +/- 9 mm Hg. Cardiac index increased from 1.92 +/- 0.63 to 2.30 +/- 0.41 l/min/m2. The increase of stroke volume index correlated with the fall in peripheral vascular resistance (r = --0.79, p less than 0.01) and the decline in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r = --0.75, p less than 0.05). In parallel, exercise tolerance increased significantly. Four patients improved from functional class IV to II, four from class IV to III, and one from class III to II, while two patients were unchanged. In the eight patients followed for 6 months, the beneficial effects of ambulatory PZ were maintained throughout the expansive observation period. Three patients died as their disease process progressed during the study (sudden death, pneumonia, and post-PZ withdrawal pump failure). Prazosin is a valuable vasodilator for long-term treatment of otherwise refractory congestive heart failure with the agent given in sufficient individualized dosage.

Long-term benefit of dobutamine in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy

Dobutamine was given intravenously for three days to 38 patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. The patients were followed by serial determinations of functional class and by non-invasive measurements of left ventricular function-systolic time intervals (PEP/LVET) and echocardiogram (% delta D). The average PEP/LVET declined significantly (p < 0.001) at three days, four and nine weeks, and at 10 months after the discontinuation of dobutamine infusion. Also, 67% (20 of 30) of patients had improvement of the PEP/LVET by greater than -0.04 at seven days. Even two and six months after dobutamine, 58% (15 of 26) and 39% (seven of 18) were improved. Similarly, the % delta D was improved by at least 2% in 60% (18 of 30) at seven days and 55% (16 of 29) at four weeks. At two and six months, 50% (14 of 28) and 42% (10 of 24) were improved. Those patients who did not improve their FC were more likely (five of nine) to have left ventricular free wall thickness (by echocardiogram) less than 0.5 cm./M2. Those who responded usually (22 of 29) had a ventricular wall thickness greater than 0.5 cm./M2. Although the mechanism of the prolonged improvement after a three day infusion of dobutamine is not understood, this study suggests that dobutamine has a role in the therapy of chronic congestive heart failure.

Importance of left ventricular chamber size in determining the response to hydralazine in severe chronic heart failure

To examine the importance of left ventricular chamber size in determing the response to vasodilator therapy, we performed echocardiography in 40 patients with chronic refractory heart failure before they were treated with oral hydralazine. The left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) correlated significantly with the per cent change in stroke volume (r = 0.77), left ventricular filling pressure (r = -0.68), and stroke work index (r = 0.87) during short-term drug administration. After 14 to 21 days of maintenance therapy, 15 of 24 patients with an LVEDD greater than or equal to 60 mm were improved, and one was worse; mean blood urea nitrogen decreased from 45.6 to 30.6 mg per deciliter in the 21 patients in this group who completed the study (16.3 to 10.9 mmol per liter) (P less than 0.001). In contrast, only two of 16 patients with an LVEDD less than 60 mm improved, whereas 10 showed clinical deterioration; blood urea nitrogen increased from 49.3 to 64.2 mg per deciliter in the 13 patients in this group who completed the study (17.6 to 22.9 mmol per liter) (P less than 0.01). These findings indicate that left ventricular chamber size is an important factor in the response to hydralazine in patients with severe chronic heart failure.