Prolongation of cardiac conduction times by intravenous aprindine in man

Prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year

To determine whether prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy influences mortality in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction, 143 such patients were randomized in a double-blind individually dose-adjusted, placebo-controlled trial an average of 14 +/- 7 days after myocardial infarction and followed for 1 year. Patients were judged to be at high risk on the basis of (1) ejection fraction less than 40% (n = 60), (2) arrhythmias of Lown class 3 or higher (n = 26), or (3) both (n = 57). Aprindine was chosen because of its long half-life, few side effects, and antiarrhythmic efficacy. Baseline characteristics in the treatment arms did not differ. Holter-detected arrhythmias were reduced in aprindine-treated patients at 3 months (p less than .001) and at 1 year (p less than .001). One patient was lost to follow-up; in the remaining patients 1 year mortality was 20% (28/142; 12 aprindine and 16 placebo). There was no significant difference between the two study arms in overall mortality and sudden death. However, among those who died, median duration of survival was longer in aprindine-treated patients (86 vs 21.5 days) (p = .04). Although antiarrhythmic treatment with aprindine of high-risk patients after myocardial infarction does not affect 1 year survival, mortality appears to be delayed; thus there may be a role for short-term treatment before more definitive therapy such as surgery.

The utility of aprindine blood levels in the management of ventricular arrhythmias

Sixty-four patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation refractory to conventional therapy received aprindine to abolish recurrent episodes of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Fifty-six patients became asymptomatic and were followed up for a mean period of 23 months. Aprindine dose was adjusted to minimize adverse reactions but still control arrhythmia. Survival analysis was performed for the group with aprindine levels greater than 1.5 micrograms/ml and the group with levels of 1.5 micrograms/ml or less. At the end of the study, 65% of the patients with a high level were alive and asymptomatic as compared with only 35% of the patients with a low level (p less than 0.036). In patients at risk of recurrent sudden cardiac death, high aprindine levels maintained after abolition of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia were associated with improved survival.

Ventricular ectopy: etiology, evaluation, and therapy

Ventricular ectopy occurs commonly. Its significance is related to the degree of complexity and the associated cardiac substrate. Coronary artery disease is the most frequent underlying cause, followed by cardiomyopathy and valvular disease. Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias require treatment, whereas benign simple ventricular ectopy does not; however, the treatment of asymptomatic high-grade ventricular ectopy remains controversial. Therapy first must be directed toward the cardiac disease. Evaluation of the patient includes Holter monitoring, echocardiography, radionuclide studies, exercise testing, cardiac catheterization, and electrophysiologic testing. Programmed stimulation is useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of ventricular tachycardia, as well as in the evaluation of drug regimen efficacy. After treatment of ischemia and/or failure, specific antiarrhythmic agents, conventional and investigational, alone or in combination, are systematically selected. Should medical therapy alone be insufficient, consideration is given to surgical procedures such as subendocardial resection or ventriculotomy, often in combination with bypass grafting, aneurysmectomy, or valvular replacement. Electronic devices, including pacemakers or automatic internal defibrillators, may also be useful in certain selected cases. Suggested guidelines are proposed for a standardized approach, although therapy for each patient must still be individualized.

Aprindine-induced polymorphous ventricular tachycardia

Five cases of aprindine-induced polymorphous ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes) are presented. In four cases, polymorphous ventricular tachycardia appeared after the oral administration of 400 mg of aprindine. One patient had mild hypokalemia at the time of polymorphous ventricular tachycardia so that a direct cause and effect relation between the drug and the tachycardia cannot be established. All five patients manifested Q-T prolongation and recurrent syncope due to polymorphous ventricular tachycardia. In all five, polymorphous ventricular tachycardia subsided once administration of aprindine was discontinued.

Ventricular tachycardia: prediction of response to oral aprindine with intravenous aprindine

Aprindine was administered both intravenously and orally to 25 patients with ventricular tachycardia refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic agents to test the hypothesis that the response to intravenous aprindine predicts the response to oral aprindine. Ten patients had incessant ventricular tachycardia and 15 had paroxysmal sustained inducible ventricular tachycardia. Eleven patients (43 percent) had conversion to sinus rhythm with intravenous aprindine (nine with incessant and two with paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachycardia). Thirteen patients (all with paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachycardia) manifested slowing of the tachycardia without conversion, whereas in one patient with incessant ventricular tachycardia, the tachycardia became less frequent and nonsustained after intravenous aprindine. All 11 patients who had conversion to sinus rhythm with intravenous aprindine remained free of ventricular tachycardia during oral treatment with aprindine (at 2 weeks) and for a follow-up period of 2 to 38 months (mean 16 +/- 13). Of the 14 patients who did not have conversion to sinus rhythm with intravenous aprindine, 12 had spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia, or both, at evaluation 1 to 2 weeks after initiation of oral aprindine. In conclusion, administration of intravenous aprindine to patients with ventricular tachycardia is helpful in predicting the subsequent response to oral aprindine. In addition, the pattern of ventricular tachycardia predicted the response to aprindine; patients with incessant ventricular tachycardia tended to respond, and those with paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachycardia tended not to respond.