Propranolol rebound--a retrospective study

Measurement and cardiovascular relevance of partial agonist activity (PAA) involving beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors

In the normal heart the ratio of beta 1/beta 2-receptors in both atria and ventricles is about 75:25; in the failing heart the ratio is about 60:40. Stimulation of either beta 1- or beta 2-receptors results in a positive chronotropic and inotropic response. In the periphery, with the exception of lipolysis, renin release, control of intraocular pressure and intestinal relaxation, beta 2-related activity predominates. The nature of the beta 2-receptor is being unravelled and it has now been cloned. The beta-receptor antagonist is 'anchored' via disulfide bonding. Subsequent events involve the regulatory protein guanine nucleotide which couples the receptor to adenylate cyclase. beta-receptor density may by up- or down-regulated. beta-stimulation down-regulates (uncouples and internalizes or sequestrates) and beta-antagonism up-regulates beta-receptor numbers, but the functional implications of such changes are not always clear. A partial agonist occupies a receptor site and competitively inhibits the full agonist (e.g. noradrenaline). A partial agonist differs from a full agonist in that maximal response of a tissue is less. When background sympathetic activity is absent or very low a partial agonist will act as an agonist, e.g. increase heart rate, but when background tone is high the partial agonist will behave functionally as an antagonist, e.g. decrease heart rate. In animals partial agonist activity (PAA) can be assessed in many ways. In the catecholamine-depleted (reserpine or syrosingopine), vagotomized or pithed, intact animal beta-activity can be assessed via changes in heart rate, cardiac contractility and atrioventricular conduction. Isolated organs can also be used such as atria, papillary muscle, tracheal, mesenteric artery and uterine preparations. The choice of animal is important as marked species differences in response can occur. In man assessing PAA is difficult due to the presence of an intact sympathetic system: the problem can be overcome by autonomic blockade of constrictor and vagal reflexes with prazosin, clonidine and atropine but leaving the beta-receptor mediated responses unimpaired. beta 1- and beta 2-selective PAA can also be gauged via an increased sleeping heart rate (basal sympathetic tone) in the presence and absence of a beta 1- and beta 2-selective antagonist. beta 1-selective PAA can also cause an increase in resting systolic blood pressure, beta 2-selective PAA may be further assessed by a fall in DBP, increased blood flow, fall in peripheral resistance or increased finger tremor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Transient myocardial ischemia after abrupt withdrawal of antianginal therapy in chronic stable angina

In 47 patients with chronic stable angina and proven coronary artery disease, abrupt withdrawal of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents either as monotherapy or in combination with calcium antagonists (group 1, n = 25) was compared with abrupt withdrawal of calcium antagonist monotherapy (group 2, n = 22) as regards the occurrence of cardiac events and total ischemic activity detected by ambulatory monitoring. Reinstitution of medical therapy was required in 6 patients (4 in group 1 and 2 in group 2). Ambulatory monitoring was initiated for 36 hours on 3 occasions: before withdrawal, and again 2 and 5 days after withdrawal. The first 2 monitorings were performed in the hospital and the last during daily activity. In group 1, the frequency of total ischemia increased by 64 and 148% from monitoring occasions 1 to 2 and 1 to 3, respectively (p less than 0.01), and silent ischemia increased by 100 and 129%, respectively (p less than 0.01). However, no significant change in transient myocardial ischemia was noted in group 2. Heart rate at onset of ischemia increased significantly in group 1 (p less than 0.01), in contrast to group 2 which had significant increases only in out-of-hospital values (p less than 0.05). These results indicate that a rebound increase in ischemic activity (mainly silent) occurs after abrupt withdrawal of beta-receptor blockade in patients with chronic stable angina. This increase in ischemic activity may be caused by increased myocardial oxygen demand.

Clinical consequences of abrupt drug withdrawal

Syndromes due to the abrupt withdrawal of drug treatment occur mainly with adrenal corticosteroids and agents with an action on either the cardiovascular system or central nervous system. The abrupt withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy typically results in symptoms of overactivity in the sympathetic nervous system. Clonidine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are clinically the most important of these agents, but numerous other drugs have been implicated. Overall, the problem is small when viewed in the context of the huge scale of prescribing of antihypertensive medicines. A more serious problem is the occurrence of crescendo angina following the abrupt withdrawal of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Although other factors may be involved, adaptive up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density is the most likely cause of crescendo angina, and renders the patient more susceptible to sympathetic nervous stimulation following withdrawal of treatment. Besides leading to a recrudescence of the disease being treated, the withdrawal of corticosteroids can cause a variety of syndromes. In particular, problems can arise as a result of treatment-induced suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Another steroid withdrawal syndrome of unknown aetiology, without significant abnormalities of the HPA axis occurring, has been described. Benign intracranial hypertension may rarely follow steroid withdrawal in children. The syndromes associated with withdrawal of drugs which have an action on the CNS are poorly understood. Withdrawal of neuroleptic drugs can be followed by symptoms that resemble those described following withdrawal of anticholinergic drugs, and those agents with the greatest muscarinic-receptor-blocking properties are those which are most frequently implicated. However, the less common withdrawal dyskinesias are thought to reflect up-regulation of dopaminergic receptors during long term treatment. Gastrointestinal symptoms predominate following the abrupt withdrawal of antidepressants but hypomania and an 'akathisia-like' syndrome have been reported. Barbiturates are no longer recommended as hypnotics because of severe effects of withdrawal and the existence of safer alternatives. Short acting barbiturates can be withdrawn by replacement with either phenobarbitone (phenobarbitol) or diazepam and subsequent gradual reduction in dose. The recognition of dependency on benzodiazepines has been slow because of the similarity of mild withdrawal symptoms to the original problem which led to treatment being offered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Beta-adrenergic blocker withdrawal

Abrupt withdrawal of long-term beta-blocker therapy in patients with angina may be associated with unstable angina and myocardial infarction. It appears that an "overshoot" in heart rate from pretreatment values occurs, which increases myocardial oxygen demand. This increase in heart rate may be secondary to increased beta receptor numbers or increased receptor sensitivity. Another possible mechanism for the increased risk of myocardial infarction after beta-blocker withdrawal is increased platelet aggregability. Withdrawal reactions may be less severe with beta blockers that have partial agonist activity. In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, beta-blocker withdrawal reactions have also been observed. Maintenance of beta-blocker therapy on the morning of surgery appears to reduce this risk. Gradual withdrawal regimens in outpatients with angina may be associated with lower risk for a beta-blocker withdrawal reaction. The gradual withdrawal of beta blockers in hypertensive patients requires further study.

Abrupt withdrawal of beta-blockade therapy in patients with myocardial infarction: effects on infarct size, left ventricular function, and hospital course

The effects of abrupt withdrawal or continuation of beta-blockade therapy during acute myocardial infarction were evaluated in 326 patients participating in the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). Thirty-nine patients previously receiving a beta-blocker and randomly selected for withdrawal of beta-blockers and placebo treatment during infarction (group 1) were compared with 272 patients previously untreated with beta-blockers who were also randomly assigned to placebo therapy (group 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups in MB creatine kinase isoenzyme (15.8 +/- 10.9 vs 18.2 +/- 14.4 g-eq/m2, respectively) estimates of infarct size, radionuclide-determined left ventricular ejection fractions within 18 hr of infarction (0.44 +/- 0.15 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16) or 10 days later (0.42 +/- 0.14 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16), creatine kinase-determined incidence of infarct extension (13% vs 6%), congestive heart failure (43% vs 37%), nonfatal ventricular fibrillation (5% vs 7%), or in-hospital mortality (13% vs 9%). Patients in group 1 had more recurrent ischemic chest pain (p = .002) within the first 24 hr after infarction, but not thereafter. However, this did not appear to be related to a rebound increase in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or double product. In a separate analysis, 20 propranolol-eligible group 1 patients randomly selected for withdrawal of beta-blockade (group 3) were compared with 15 patients randomly selected for continuation of prior beta-blockade therapy (group 4). This comparison yielded similar results. These data indicate that the beta-blockade withdrawal phenomenon is not a major clinical problem in patients with acute myocardial infarction. beta-Blockade therapy can be discontinued abruptly during acute myocardial infarction if clinically indicated.

Abrupt withdrawal of atenolol in patients with severe angina. Comparison with the effects of treatment

The effects of abrupt withdrawal of atenolol, a long acting cardioselective beta blocker, were studied in 20 patients with severe stable angina pectoris admitted to hospital for coronary arteriography. During the 144 hour postwithdrawal period no serious coronary events occurred. Mean and maximal daily heart rates rose steadily for at least 120 hours. No important arrhythmias were noted on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Treadmill exercise testing at 120 hours showed little reduction in the times to angina, ST depression, and maximal exercise when compared with those recorded at 24 hours. This deterioration was small when contrasted with the improvements in these indices produced by atenolol treatment in a similar group of patients not admitted to hospital. No change in catecholamine concentrations or acceleration of the heart rate response to exercise occurred after atenolol withdrawal, suggesting that rebound adrenergic stimulation or hypersensitivity was absent or insignificant. Catastrophic coronary events after beta blockade withdrawal (the beta blockade withdrawal syndrome) have occurred almost exclusively in patients taking propranolol, many of whom had unstable angina at the time of withdrawal. This study showed that in patients with stable angina, even when severe, the abrupt withdrawal of atenolol can be expected to result in only minor clinical consequences. The risk to any patient of so called rebound events after withdrawal of beta blockade seems to be related to both the clinical setting and the agent being used.

Central nervous system mechanisms in blood pressure control

Much of our knowledge about the CNS control of blood pressure is derived from animal studies using techniques such as intracerebroventricular administration of drugs, stereotactic ablation of specific brain nuclei, and biochemical analysis of these nuclei. These methods have identified numerous specific brain nuclei in the brain stem and a meshwork of interconnecting neurones involved in cardiovascular control. The main neurotransmitter involved is noradrenaline but recent interest has focused on several laterally situated nuclei which are capable of synthesizing adrenaline. Centrally acting antihypertensive drugs are thought to act by stimulating central alpha 2-adrenoceptors either by the parent drug itself (clonidine) or via the formation of an active metabolite (alpha-methyldopa). This leads to decreased peripheral sympathetic activity and a hypotensive response but the latter is often attained at the expense of central side-effects such as drowsiness or dry mouth. The mechanism of the antihypertensive effect of beta-blockers remains uncertain although the balance of evidence is against a central effect. The central administration of propranolol causes decreased peripheral sympathetic activity in animals, but plasma catecholamine levels are little altered by beta-blockers in man. In equipotent antihypertensive doses, central alpha-agonists cause a much greater reduction in plasma noradrenaline than beta-blockers.

The phenomenon of beta-adrenergic hypersensitivity following propranolol withdrawal studied in normal subjects

A study was carried out to determine whether beta-adrenergic hypersensitivity occurs in normal subjects following the abrupt withdrawal of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol. Sixteen normal subjects took propranolol, orally, 120 mg twice daily for one week. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured supine and standing as well as during exercise. Heart rate was measured during and following the Valsalva manoeuvre. Measurements were made on the last day of the treatment period and on two occasions during the six days following withdrawal. Three subjects were removed from the analysis because of failure to take medication and one more was excluded because of protocol variation. In the remaining twelve, propranolol treatment reduced all parameters measured. Following abrupt withdrawal of the drug, there was no measurable increase in any of the parameters above baseline or placebo values within six days of the withdrawal. These findings, from normal subjects, do not support the phenomenon of beta-adrenergic hypersensitivity following propranolol withdrawal.

Beta-receptor blocker withdrawal. A preoperative problem in general surgery?

A prospective randomized study was performed in 91 patients scheduled for general surgery on 99 occasions. The patients were chronically (greater than 3 months) treated with beta-receptor blockers because of ischaemic heart disease and/or hypertension and the beta-receptor blockade was either gradually withdrawn (n = 51) during 4 days preoperatively or continued until surgery (n = 48). The effects on arterial blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and rate-pressure product (RPP) at rest and the incidence of chest pain during daily activities were registered. A withdrawal of the beta-receptor blockade was associated with increases of HR (in eight patients greater than 30 beats min-1) and RPP and in patients treated for hypertension there were also increases of systolic and diastolic BP (in five patients greater than or equal to 30/15 mmHg). Patients who continued the beta-receptor blockade until surgery showed no changes. Nine out of 23 patients with a previous history of ischaemic heart disease had an increase of chest pain after withdrawal of the beta-receptor blockers, whereas none of the corresponding 25 patients who continued the therapy suffered from an increased chest pain. Due to the severity of symptoms after beta-receptor blocker withdrawal, surgery had to be postponed in 4 patients. The observations suggest that a 4-day preoperative withdrawal of long-term beta-receptor blockade is potentially hazardous in ischaemic and/or hypertensive patients.

Withdrawal of beta-blocking drugs

Our early observations indicated that when treatment was changed from propranolol to placebo, anginal patients experienced a higher incidence of chest pain during the first week of placebo treatment compared to the second week. Since then, there have been several reports of myocardial infarction and sudden death occurring when propranolol therapy has been stopped. However, more formal hospital studies have indicated that ischemia from propranolol withdrawal is relatively infrequent. Studies in normal subjects and hypertensive patients have shown an increase in beta-receptor sensitivity as suggested by increased responsiveness to isoprenaline after propranolol withdrawal. Some investigators have found an increase in free triiodothyronine levels. Catecholamine levels do not appear to be raised. Other relevant factors in ischemic patients might be a reversal of the favorable rightward shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve or a reversal of reduced platelet aggregation produced by propranolol. Last, propranolol withdrawal in patients who have received the drug for a considerable period might unmask a withdrawal in patients who have received the drug for a considerable period might unmask a progression of the disease process, so that in the absence of beta blockade oxygen supply is inadequate to meet the requirements of relatively ischemic areas even at rest. Whether all beta blockers are similar to propranolol in this regard is unknown. We are examining, in normal volunteers, the sensitivity of the beta receptor after the withdrawal of atenolol, pindolol, or propranolol, administered for at least 2 weeks after final dose adjustment to levels sufficient to produce maximum inhibition of exercise tachycardia. The sensitivity of the beta receptor is being assessed by the response of bolus injections of isoprenaline and the response to exercise tachycardia.

Pindolol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, and adverse effects

Pindolol is a new noncardioselective beta adrenergic blocking agent with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. In the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, pindolol provides effective control of blood pressure in a large majority of patients when administered alone or, more commonly, when combined with a thiazide diuretic. Pindolol is approximately as effective as propranolol in the therapy of hypertension, but in some crossover trials central nervous system side effects were more frequent with pindolol. A "ceiling effect" may be observed as dosages are titrated upward above approximately 20 to 30 mg per day, such that further blood pressure reductions may not be achievable. Some patients will exhibit a paradoxical increase in blood pressure with an increase in dosage. In patients who respond to modest doses of pindolol, twice or even once daily dosing is often adequate. This prolonged duration of hypotensive activity, while not suggested by the kinetics of this or similar drugs, is probably common to most beta blockers. Investigations in small numbers of patients with angina pectoris have reported variable but generally beneficial results with pindolol.

Intravenous beta-blockade in coronary heart disease: is cardioselectivity or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity hemodynamically useful?

Beta-blocking drugs are increasingly prescribed in coronary heart disease, but controversy surrounds the hemodynamic relevance of their ancillary pharmacologic properties--cardioselectivity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. We therefore compared the effects of four intravenous beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with different ancillary properties on left ventricular function in 24 patients with coronary heart disease. All four drugs depressed the relation between left ventricular filling pressure and cardiac output at rest and during exercise. However, practolol and oxprenolol, which have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, induced significantly less depression of left ventricular function than either propranolol or metoprolol, which do not have this activity. Cardioselectivity, a property of both practolol and metoprolol, had no discernible hemodynamic advantage. Beta-blocking drugs that have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity appear to be more effective in maintaining cardiac function than drugs without this property, when given intravenously to patients with coronary heart disease.

Lack of beta-adrenoreceptor hypersensitivity after abrupt withdrawal of long-term therapy with oxprenolol

The possibility of beta-adrenoreceptor hypersensitivity after abrupt withdrawal of long-term therapy (8-18 months) with the slow-release (SR) formulation of oxprenolol (160-320 mg/day) was assessed in six patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. The chronotropic dose 25 of isoproterenol (the dose that increases the resting heart rate by 25 beats/min), plasma concentration of catecholamines, triiodothyronin and thyroxin, plasma renin activity and aldosterone, hemoglobin, hematocrit and oxyhemoglobin dissociation were measured on the last day of oxprenolol SR intake and 1, 2, 3, 6 and 13 days after abrupt replacement by identical placebo tablets. The chronotropic dose 25 of isoproterenol (microgram/m2), which was greater than 25.6 in all patients on the last day of oxprenolol SR, fell to 4.83 +/- 2.03 on the second day and to 3.50 on the third day after its abrupt withdrawal and reached a minimal value on the thirteenth day (2.78 +/- 0.30). Throughout the study, plasma concentrations of catecholamines, triiodothyronin and thyroxin and oxyhemoglobin dissociation remained unchanged. Plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone, which were suppressed during oxprenolol administration, rose significantly during placebo, coinciding with a significant fall in hematocrit and hemoglobin. No major subjective symptoms were reported by the patients. Thus, hypersensitivity of beta-adrenoreceptor-mediated responses was not demonstrated after sudden withdrawal of oxprenolol SR.

Speed of onset of pharmacodynamic activity of propranolol, practolol, oxprenolol and metoprolol after intravenous infection in man

1 The speed of onset of the pharmacodynamic activity of intravenous propranolol, practolol, oxprenolol and metoprolol was determined, using attenuation of isoprenaline-induced tachycardia as the end-point, in 16 patients with clinically coronary heart disease. 2 Antagonism was evident within 15 s of injection into the central circulation of all four drugs. The time to maximum attenuation of isoprenaline tachycardia was significantly more rapid with propranolol and oxprenolol than with practolol and metoprolol.

Adrenergic responsiveness after abrupt propranolol withdrawal in normal subjects and in patients with angina pectoris

Adrenergic responsiveness after abrupt propranolol withdrawas during exogenous and esdogenous catecholamine stimulation was assessed in 10 normal subjects and 10 patients with angina pectoris. Propranolol, 160 mg/day, was administered for 2 weeks and then stopped. During an epinephrine infusion, period (p < 0.005). There were no differences from control 96 hours after the drug had been stopped in both groups or at 144 hours in the angina patients who were studied for a longer time. At 48 hours of heart rate and the pressure-rate product were significantly less than control level in the angina patient, but not in the normal subjects. Similar results were observed during exercise in both groups. The epinephrine-induced increase in free fatty acids was blocked by propranolol (p < 0.005), was still attenuated at 48 hours of withdrawals (p < 0.05), but returned to control levels thereafter in both groups. Resting serum triiodothyromine levels decreased with propranolol ( < 0.005) and remaind low throughout the withdrawal period. Measurements of dopamine beta-hydroxylase, plasma platelet factor 4, and platelet aggregation at rest and after exercise did not change significantly during or after propranolol administration. Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine values were not changed from control during the withdrawal period at rest or after exerise. We conclude that there is no evidence of hypersensitivity to beta-adrenergically mediated responses after abrupt propranolol withdrawal.

Ischemic cardiovascular complications concurrent with administration of captopril. A clinical note

Administration of potent vasodepressor agents such as the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, may precipitate myocardial ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, particularly if this treatment is preceded by a discontinuation of beta-blocking drugs such as propranolol. In one case studied, a patient experienced three episodes of angina pectoris under these conditions; in another, acute anterior myocardial infarction was suspect.

Acute central chest pain in the elderly. A review of 296 consecutive hospital admissions during 1976 with particular reference to the possible role of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in inducing substernal pain

Two hundred and ninety-six patients were admitted to geriatric medical beds in Cardiff in 1976 with acute central chest pain. One hundred and eighty-six (63 per cent) had a confirmed acute myocardial infarction. Of the 37 per cent without evidence of cardiac infarction, 32 per cent were on beta-blocking drugs. The possible role of adrenergic blocking agents in producing acute central chest pain is discussed.